Bria's 8B parameter model for controlled text-to-image generation with structured JSON prompts, trained exclusively on licensed data
Settled by community votes across 17 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
Bria FIBO
#55 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Wan 2.6
#28 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
Bria FIBO
0%
win rate
Ties
0%
Wan 2.6
0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent refraction and transparency effects in the glass cube.
- + Clean, modern aesthetic with high resolution.
- + Accurately represents the plant being partially visible through the glass.
- − The plant appears to be growing directly out of the table surface or through the cube base rather than being behind it.
- − The blue sphere is floating inexplicably rather than resting.
Wan 2.6
- + Highly realistic lighting and textures on the wooden table and weathered red book.
- + Logic of object placement is sound, with the plant in a pot behind the cube.
- + Accurate blue sphere reflection on the bottom surface of the glass.
- − The glass cube has some geometric distortion on its right edge.
- − The red book appears slightly flat in its perspective relative to the cube top.
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the superior image due to its logical composition and realistic physical rendering; it correctly places the plant in a pot behind the cube, whereas Bria FIBO has the plant clipping through the table or the cube itself. While Bria FIBO offers cleaner glass rendering, Wan 2.6's attention to detail in the textures of the old book and the caustic lighting on the table creates a more convincing scene.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Natural skin texture on the man's face
- + Good lighting and reflections on the pavement
- − Serious anatomical issues with the hands and fingers
- − The man is standing over the bike awkwardly rather than appearing to repair it
- − The bicycle geometry is broken (pedal and chainring alignment)
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent depiction of the 'repairing' action with a tool and natural crouching pose
- + Highly realistic rain detail with visible droplets on the jacket and bicycle
- + Superior composition that follows the 'imperfect framing' and '50mm' aesthetic
- − The motion blur on the car in the background is a bit static
- − Water droplets on garments are slightly uniform in size
Verdict: Wan 2.6 significantly outperforms Bria FIBO by accurately depicting the requested action of repairing the bike, whereas Bria FIBO features a man just standing near a structurally impossible bicycle. Wan 2.6 also captures the atmosphere of light rain and street photography much more convincingly with better details in the hands, tools, and environmental reflections.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent engraving details on the plate armor.
- + Clean composition with a very strong lighting focus on the eyes.
- + Accurate representation of small beads in the braids.
- − The facial scars look a bit like surface mud or stamps rather than being integrated skin depth.
- − The overall image has a slightly digital/smooth look favored by older AI models.
Wan 2.6
- + Superb cinematic lighting and atmosphere with very realistic skin texture.
- + Highly effective interpretation of 'battle-worn' showing grit, grime, and realistic scars.
- + Superior texture on the leather straps and frayed cloth underlayer as requested.
- − The beads in the hair are a bit large and bulky compared to the request for 'small beads'.
- − The focus is slightly soft on the lower armor pieces.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Wan 2.6 produced a much more realistic and cinematic image that fully captured the 'battle-worn' aesthetic and the complex textures of leather and cloth. While Bria FIBO has excellent armor engravings, the lighting and skin integration in Wan 2.6 feel more lifelike and professional.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent use of vibrant, colorful accents in the layout corners
- + Dynamic food photography with unique high-angle crops
- + Clean vertical tri-paneled composition
- − Text rendering is completely illegible gibberish
- − Food images contain significant AI artifacts and lack specific identifiable pizza or mains
- − The layout is repetitive, featuring the 'Pizza' heading twice in the right column
Wan 2.6
- + Much better text legibility and formatting for prices and headings
- + High-quality, realistic food photography that clearly depicts pizza and salads
- + Adheres strictly to the requested grid layout for photos
- − Layout is slightly more generic and less 'modernist' than model A
- − Minor spelling errors in 'RESTAUR MENU' and 'Mains' decoration
- − The food images are almost exclusively pizza, lacking variety for appetizers and mains
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it produces a functional menu design with realistic food photography and legible pricing, whereas Bria FIBO fails to render readable text or coherent food items. While Bria FIBO has a more creative modernist flair with its geometric accents, it functions poorly as an actual menu design.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent photorealistic texture on the burger bun and patty
- + Clean typography with a subtle glow effect
- + Vibrant and appetizing color saturation
- − Failed to include the currency symbol (€) as requested
- − The layout of ingredients feels more stacked than truly 'exploded'
Wan 2.6
- + Stronger sense of motion and chaotic 'exploded' effect
- + Accurately included all text elements including the currency symbol
- + Effective use of the starburst graphic for the price
- − Text rendering is a bit messy with fire artifacts overlapping letters
- − The sauce pour looks slightly unnatural and disconnected
Verdict: Bria FIBO offers superior texture and photorealism in the food itself, but Wan 2.6 follows the prompt's layout instructions much more closely. Wan 2.6 captures the 'exploded' motion better and successfully includes the currency symbol and starburst graphic, making it a more effective advertisement despite the slightly lower image clarity.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Natural chalk smudge and wipe marks on the board
- + Realistic variation in letter sizes
- + Good lighting and depth of field in the background
- − Significant spelling errors and gibberish text in the menu items
- − Failed to include the date correctly, omitting '30'
- − The bottom text becomes completely illegible
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent text rendering with near-perfect spelling for all menu items
- + Highly realistic chalk texture with dusty particles and grain
- + Composition feels like an authentic chalkboard within a cafe frame
- − Slightly less 'cursed' handwriting, leaning more toward high-quality signage than a messy hand
- − The line for April 30, 2026 is slightly inconsistent in spacing
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully rendered all requested text with high accuracy, including the specific date and complex menu items like 'Truffle Mushroom Risotto'. Bria FIBO struggled significantly with text legibility, producing mostly gibberish below the header and failing to include the correct date.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent use of glowing neon accents on the horse's hooves and bridle
- + Clean, digital art aesthetic that emphasizes the cinematic quality
- + Good anatomical coherence of both the horse and the astronaut
- − Composition feels slightly stiff despite the surreal elements
- − The horse and rider appear to be 'floating' in an empty void rather than interacting with a surface
Wan 2.6
- + Dynamic, energetic composition with the horse mid-gallop
- + Realistic lighting and atmospheric effects like cosmic dust kicked up by the horse
- + Highly detailed astronaut suit rendering
- − The horse's front left leg is anatomically distorted
- − The extra set of floating reins on the left side is a significant visual artifact
Verdict: While Wan 2.6 offers a more dynamic and realistically lit scene, it suffers from noticeable anatomical glitches in the horse's legs and strange floating reins. Bria FIBO produces a cleaner, more coherent image with creative glowing details that better fit the 'surreal' aspect of the prompt without breaking logic.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent interior detail and lighting
- + Creative interpretation of the capybara's professional expression
- + Correctly places the woman in the back seat
- − The capybara's hands/paws are small and primate-like rather than capybara paws
- − The woman's hand holding the phone looks slightly distorted
Wan 2.6
- + Very realistic texture on the capybara fur and clothing
- + Better captured the 'bored' expression of the passenger
- + Atmospheric rain and light reflections on the glass
- − The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat
- − The taxi light on the roof is weirdly positioned over the windshield
Verdict: Bria FIBO followed the spatial instructions more accurately by placing the passenger in the back seat, whereas Wan 2.6 placed her in the front. While Wan 2.6 had superior textures and a more convincing bored expression for the human, the architectural errors with the car and the incorrect seating arrangement make Bria FIBO the more successful interpretation of the prompt.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent typography style for the main title
- + Includes realistic spider web and thorn border details
- + Cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern
- − Significant text errors and gibberish in the event details section
- − Changed 'night of frights' to 'night of nights' in the banner
- − Date formatting is completely incorrect
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect text rendering for all requested details, including date and location
- + Rich, detailed composition with twisted trees and golden gothic text
- + Accurate adherence to the scroll banner content
- − The thorns are slightly less sharp in detail compared to Model A
- − Text is a bit tight against the top border
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner because it successfully rendered all requested text details, including specific dates and locations, which Bria FIBO failed to do with significant gibberish. Wan 2.6 also created a more vibrant and detailed gothic atmosphere that feels like a complete, usable invitation.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Successfully added a very thick head of hair with realistic texture
- + The style fits the rugged aesthetic of the image
- − Failed to preserve the person's facial features, making him look like a completely different, younger man
- − Changed the background and the material of the jacket
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the original face, glasses, clothes, and background
- + Applied a very natural-looking head of hair that integrates perfectly with the existing beard and lighting
- − The hair volume is slightly high at the top, though it fits the 'full, thick' prompt requirement
Verdict: Wan 2.6 followed the editing instructions perfectly by adding the requested hair while preserving every other detail of the source image. Bria FIBO failed as an editing model, essentially regenerating a whole new image that resembles the prompt but loses the identity of the person and the original environment.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent PBR textures and lighting depth
- + Accurate rendering of specific text requests
- + High level of detail in the food items
- − Includes undesirable watermarks/artifacts in the corners
- − Perspective is slightly lower than the requested 45-degree angle
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect adherence to the 45-degree isometric composition
- + Extremely clean, artifact-free image
- + Strong alignment of text and icon at the top center
- − Lighting is a bit flat compared to the other model
- − The flag icon is slightly oversized relative to the text
Verdict: Wan 2.6 followed the compositional instructions more accurately, providing a clean, professional isometric view without the watermark artifacts found in the other image. While Bria FIBO had superior material textures and realistic lighting, the inclusion of corner text/logos and a flatter perspective makes it less effective as a graphic design piece.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent caricature-style facial exaggeration that preserves identifying features
- + Detailed TV newsroom environment with many thematic elements
- + Densely packed composition with high energy
- − Failed to include any visible hockey-related elements
- − Significant anatomical issues with hands and finger counts
- − Studio background is cluttered to the point of being messy
Wan 2.6
- + Successfully incorporated all prompt elements including hockey stick and puck
- + Clean, professional-looking illustration style
- + Maintained the subject's hair and eye color consistently with the source image
- − The caricature style is very safe and 'cartoonish' rather than 'exaggerated and humorous'
- − Composition is somewhat static with a simple flat background
- − Subject looks more like a generic avatar than a caricature of the specific woman provided
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the slightly better overall choice as it successfully integrated the hockey theme which Bria FIBO completely ignored. While Bria FIBO did a much better job of capturing an actual caricature of the woman's face from the source image, its failure to follow the sport-related part of the prompt and the severe distortion in the hands makes it a less successful edit overall.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent adherence to the 'lush wildflower' request with vibrant, dense foliage
- + Characters are well-spaced and clearly identifiable
- + Vibrant colors create a cheerful atmosphere
- − Lighting feels more like a digital illustration than 'hyper-photorealistic'
- − The fox appears to be floating awkwardly in the air without clear momentum
- − Anatomical issues with the cat's legs and paws
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent interpretation of 'god rays' and 'dew sparkles' with realistic bokeh effects
- + Superior realism in fur textures and light interaction
- + Dynamic poses that accurately suggest tumbling and playing together
- − The bunny is plain white rather than a 'baby bunny' wilder look which would fit the scene better
- − The background flora is less diverse compared to Model A
Verdict: Wan 2.6 wins by delivering a much more believable and high-quality image that captures the specific lighting requirements like 'god rays' and 'dew sparkles' with photographic precision. Bria FIBO captures the colorful meadow well but falls into a more artificial, illustrative style that lacks the physical coherence and texture realism seen in Wan 2.6.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent Ghibli-inspired color palette and lighting.
- + High artistic quality with beautiful background flora.
- + Successfully captures a dreamy, nostalgic mood.
- − Significantly alters the poses and relative positions of the characters.
- − Fails to preserve the specific 'distracted boyfriend' glance, making the man look forward instead.
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent preservation of the original image's composition and character poses.
- + Effective hand-painted watercolor texture typical of Ghibli backgrounds.
- + Accurately translates facial expressions into an anime style.
- − Colors are slightly washed out compared to the vibrant Ghibli inspiration.
- − The bokeh effect is rendered as simple white dots rather than integrated lighting.
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully maintains the iconic composition and specific narrative of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme while applying the requested art style. Bria FIBO produces a beautiful illustration, but it fails as an edit because it completely changes the characters' poses and interactions, losing the essence of the source image.
Golden Hour Stroll
Image Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent adherence to the 'energetic and lively' instruction through pose changes
- + Successfully added a large volume of dynamic autumn leaves
- + Dramatically changed the hair to show strong wind motion
- − Poor source preservation as the woman's face, body pose, and background details are significantly altered
- − The lighting and color palette were changed from summer to autumn without being requested
Wan 2.6
- + Perfectly preserved the source image including the subject's face, clothing, and background
- + Subtle but effective wind effect added to the hair
- + Maintains the original lighting and resolution of the source
- − The added leaves look a bit like floating stickers rather than integrated elements
- − The sense of 'energetic motion' is much lower than Model A
Verdict: Bria FIBO captures the spirit of the prompt much better by creating a truly dynamic and energetic scene with flying leaves and hair, though it fails at source preservation by changing the woman's facial features and the season. Wan 2.6 is much more technically precise at preserving the original image, but its additions are minimal and less convincing as 'dynamic motion.' Bria FIBO is the preferred choice for a creative edit, while Wan 2.6 is better if strict identity preservation is required.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Clean vector illustration style
- + Good execution of the steam inside the dome
- + Balanced layout between the ribbon and text
- − Incorrect year (Est. 1320 instead of 1720)
- − Spelling error in the brand name ('Froaian' instead of 'Florian')
- − Cloche dome handle is slightly off-center
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect text accuracy for both brand name and date
- + Excellent vintage texture on the background
- + Stronger minimalist aesthetic that fits the logo prompt
- − The banner/ribbon is very small and tucked to the side
- − The steam is coming from the top of the dome rather than appearing inside it
Verdict: While Bria FIBO has a nice composition, it fails significantly on text-based prompt adherence with multiple spelling and date errors. Wan 2.6 rendered the text perfectly and captured the 'vintage' and 'minimalist' aesthetic much more effectively, although the placement of the banner is less traditional.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
Bria FIBO
- + Excellent vector iconography for Earth, Moon, and spacecraft.
- + Accurate NASA-inspired color palette with a clean layout.
- + High level of detail for a secondary mission infographic.
- − Nonsense Greek-style text character substitutions.
- − The flow of the infographic steps is visually disorganized and lacks a clear sequence.
Wan 2.6
- + Legible and accurate English text for the title and astronauts.
- + Clean, minimalist aesthetic.
- − Fails completely to include the requested 6 steps of the mission.
- − Lacks the Saturn V, Earth orbit, and lunar landing icons requested.
- − Texture looks more like a printed fabric/towel than a digital vector infographic.
Verdict: Bria FIBO followed the core prompt instructions for a detailed vector infographic, providing a complex layout with the requested iconography, even though the text is garbled. Wan 2.6 failed significantly on the prompt adherence, ignoring the six specific steps and the required icons, resulting in an empty composition that looks like a tea towel.
Explore each model
Alibaba's multimodal generation model from the Wan AI suite, supporting text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-to-video with audio, and text-to-image, in both Chinese and English