Improved version of Alibaba's Qwen image model with better text rendering, finer natural textures, and more realistic human generation.
Settled by community votes across 6 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
Qwen Image 2512
22.4
arena score
#26 of 44 in Text-to-Image
Skill signature
Not enough comparable category data
The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.
Seedream 4.0
24.6
arena score
#16 of 44 in Text-to-Image
Vote tally
Where the votes landed
Qwen Image 2512
40.0%
win rate
Ties
20.0%
Seedream 4.0
40.0%
win rate
40.0%
20.0% ties
40.0%
Shared challenges
6
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
Qwen Image 2512
Seedream 4.0
AI Judge Analysis
Qwen Image 2512
- + Excellent photographic realism and texture on the book and table.
- + Accurate soft lighting from the left following the prompt.
- + Superior glass rendering with convincing thickness and reflections.
- − The glass box appears more like a rectangular prism than a perfect cube.
Seedream 4.0
- + Perfect geometric cube shape.
- + Good representation of the blue sphere's translucency.
- + Clever use of caustic light patterns on the table.
- − The plant appears to be growing inside the cube rather than behind it, violating the spatial logic of the prompt.
- − The book has a slight floating effect on the left edge.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt's instructions for the specific objects and colors. Qwen Image 2512 is the winner because it correctly placed the plant behind the cube, whereas Seedream 4.0 made the plant appear as if it were inside the glass. Qwen Image 2512 also provided a much more realistic texture for the wooden table and red book.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
Qwen Image 2512
Seedream 4.0
AI Judge Analysis
Qwen Image 2512
- + Excellent skin texture and elderly facial features
- + Strong cinematic lighting and wet pavement reflections
- + High resolution with great detail on the bicycle frame
- − The subject is posing/staring at the camera rather than repairing the bike
- − The background cars lack the motion blur requested
- − Bicycle anatomy is slightly warped toward the rear
Seedream 4.0
- + Captured the 'repairing' action perfectly
- + Excellent application of motion blur on the passing vehicle
- + Natural, 'candid' composition with tools on the ground
- − Physical artifacts on the bicycle (disconnected spokes and frame parts)
- − Character's face and hair are slightly blurry/low detail
- − Hands are poorly defined while interacting with the bike
Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed the prompt's narrative and technical requirements much more closely, successfully depicting the act of repairing, horizontal motion blur on cars, and an imperfect candid framing. Qwen Image 2512 has superior textures and facial detail, but it feels like a staged portrait rather than the candid action scene requested, failing the 'repairing' and 'motion blur' instructions. Seedream 4.0 is the winner for better prompt adherence and atmosphere, despite some structural issues with the bicycle's spokes.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
Qwen Image 2512
Seedream 4.0
0% wins
0% ties
100% wins
AI Judge Analysis
Qwen Image 2512
- + Excellent layout that actually looks like a professional restaurant menu
- + Good adherence to the 'grid' request for food photos
- + Includes placeholders for prices and descriptions, creating a realistic document
- − Text is mostly gibberish or illegible upon closer inspection
- − Food photos are somewhat repetitive in style
Seedream 4.0
- + Text rendering for section headers is clear and legible
- + High-quality, vibrant food photography
- − Fails the 'menu design' prompt by providing a collage rather than a functional document
- − Poor composition with awkward white spaces and overlapping crops
- − Does not include menu items or sections for appetizers/pizza/mains as requested beyond simple headers
Verdict: Qwen Image 2512 successfully interprets the prompt as a design task, creating a realistic and structured menu layout with defined sections and a grid of photos. Seedream 4.0 produces a disjointed collage of images that lacks the professional formatting of a menu. Despite the illegible small text, Qwen Image 2512 is the superior choice for its adherence to the composition and design requirements.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
Qwen Image 2512
Seedream 4.0
AI Judge Analysis
Qwen Image 2512
- + Excellent text rendering with a stylized 3D outline
- + Strong diorama aesthetic with a distinct raised base
- + High-quality textures on the sushi and garnish
- − The sushi and plate are slightly off-center compared to the text
Seedream 4.0
- + Precise 45° isometric angle
- + Clean and simple text layout
- + Vibrant colors and realistic lighting on the salmon and ikura
- − The diorama base is a simple footed tray rather than a raised platform piece
- − Text is a bit more generic in style compared to the 3D art style of the prompt
Verdict: Qwen Image 2512 better captures the 'miniature diorama' and '3D cartoon' feel requested, using stylized text that complements the scene perfectly. Seedream 4.0 provides a very clean, high-quality isometric render with excellent sushi textures, but falls slightly behind on the creative interpretation of a diorama base.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
Qwen Image 2512
Seedream 4.0
33% wins
33% ties
33% wins
AI Judge Analysis
Qwen Image 2512
- + Excellent fur texture and individual strand detail
- + Features all four requested animals clearly
- + Very clean, high-resolution rendering with no major anatomical errors
- − The animals are posing for a portrait rather than 'playfully chasing' or 'tumbling'
- − The lighting feels a bit more artificial/studio-like despite the god rays
Seedream 4.0
- + Stronger adherence to the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' part of the prompt
- + Beautiful atmospheric lighting with realistic dew sparkles and backlighting
- + Dynamic composition that conveys a 'joyful wholesome vibe' effectively
- − The kitten has some anatomical blurring/muddiness in its paws
- − The fox's face lacks the high-fidelity realism found in Model A
Verdict: Qwen Image 2512 produces a much higher quality '8K' image with incredible fur detail and perfect anatomy, but it treats the prompt as a static group portrait. Seedream 4.0 captures the spirit of the prompt much better, showing the animals in motion and interacting with the environment, though it suffers from slightly lower technical clarity and some minor artifacts in the animals' limbs.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
Qwen Image 2512
Seedream 4.0
100% wins
0% ties
0% wins
AI Judge Analysis
Qwen Image 2512
- + Excellent typography with professional swashes
- + Higher level of illustrative detail on the cloche and steam
- + Sophisticated use of texture and shading
- − The steam is a bit heavy, slightly clashing with the 'minimalist' prompt
Seedream 4.0
- + Follows the 'minimalist' aspect of the prompt more closely
- + Accurate typography and banner placement
- + Clean vector style
- − The steam effect is very basic and small
- − Cloche illustration lacks the depth and premium feel of the other model
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific name and founding date. Qwen Image 2512 is the winner because it provides a much more professional and aesthetically pleasing illustration with superior typography and shading, whereas Seedream 4.0 looks a bit like a generic clip-art style logo.
Next steps
Explore each model
ByteDance's image generation model with integrated text-to-image and image editing capabilities in a unified architecture, supporting up to 4K resolution