Qwen Image 2512 Alibaba vs Recraft V4 Pro Recraft AI

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent depiction of the plant seen through the glass surfaces
• + Natural lighting and realistic reflections on the wood
• + Accurate cube geometry

• − The blue sphere looks like a matte rubber ball rather than glass, which clashes slightly with the luxury aesthetic

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Beautiful material rendering of the glass sphere and solid crystal cube
• + High level of detail in the book texture and wood grain
• + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions

• − The plant is more to the side than 'behind' the cube compared to Image A

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent skin texture and facial details
• + Accurate depiction of a Japanese man
• + Effective shallow depth of field with realistic bokeh

• − The man is posing/looking at the camera rather than 'repairing' the bike
• − Background cars lack the requested motion blur
• − The bike geometry has some AI merging artifacts at the seat and handlebars

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Successfully captures the requested 'candid' feel and the action of repairing
• + Superior atmosphere with visible rain and pavement reflections
• + Better composition with 'imperfect framing' requested

• − Anatomy of the bike is broken (front wheel and handlebars are disconnected/misaligned)
• − Shoes and hands have some structural issues
• − The yellow cab in the background feels less specifically Japanese than Model A's street scene

Qwen Image 2512

• + Stronger visual grid of photos
• + Vibrant color accents throughout the layout
• + Excellent professional vertical presentation

• − Text is nonsensical and contains numerous spelling errors
• − Section titles like 'Appetiizizers' and '/Means' are broken

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfect legibility with accurate spelling
• + Clean minimalist design with high-quality photography
• + Clear logical grouping of requested sections

• − Layout is slightly more basic/generic than Image A
• − The 'grid' format is separated by headers rather than a unified photo block

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent adherence to the 'elegant cursive' requirement for the title.
• + Highly realistic chalk texture with dusty smudges and varying stroke pressure.
• + Included all requested menu items with very high legibility.

• − Spelling error in 'Risotto' (spelled as 'Risitto').

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Perfect spelling across all menu items.
• + Consistent visual style throughout the entire board.
• + The background environment (café entrance) is coherent and adds good context.

• − Failed to provide 'elegant cursive' for the title, using a rounded print style instead.
• − Text appears more like a digital font overlay than natural chalk handwriting.
• − Text alignment is a bit rigid and lacks the requested natural variations in slant.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent character expressions, both for the capybara and the businesswoman.
• + High-quality texture on the capybara's fur and the leather steering wheel.
• + Clear, cinematic front-on composition that feels like a film still.

• − The capybara's paws look more like primate hands than rodent paws.
• − The character in the back seat appears more sad/pouty than 'bored'.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Stronger sense of atmosphere with the rain on the window and city lights.
• + The capybara's paws and silhouette are more anatomically grounded.
• + Good profile perspective showing the relationship between driver and passenger.

• − The passenger's phone is glowing but doesn't cast light on her face naturally.
• − The composition is a bit tight on the left side, cutting off the front of the car.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent typography with a cohesive 'cartoon' aesthetic that fits the prompt
• + Superior 3D diorama base that feels solid and well-modeled
• + Vibrant colors and high-quality textures on the food items

• − The flag icon is slightly merged with the text block

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Features realistic materials, especially in the rice and fish textures
• + Follows the layout and centering instructions perfectly
• + Clean, minimalist aesthetic that feels professional

• − The 'diorama base' looks like a fuzzy salt/ice block rather than a structured base
• − The text is a bit plain compared to the 'large bold' request
• − The circular plate is slightly skewed in perspective

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the animals.
• + Strong center-focused composition with high visual appeal.
• + Very vibrant colors and clear 'god rays' effects as requested.

• − The animals are static/posed rather than 'playfully chasing and tumbling'.
• − The kitten has an anatomical error with a third paw appearing between it and the bunny.

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Successfully captures the action of 'tumbling' and 'chasing' described in the prompt.
• + More realistic interaction with the environment and Meadow depth.
• + Better adherence to the dynamic 'playful' aspect of the scene.

• − The fox looks slightly disjointed from the grass.
• − The lighting is a bit more muted compared to the requested 'warm golden sunrise' in Model A.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Excellent typography rendering with consistent weight and style
• + Rich, warm tonal palette that perfectly matches the 'vintage' requirement
• + Detailed and balanced illustration style with high visual appeal

• − Illustration is quite ornate, leaning more toward a classic emblem than the requested 'minimalist' style

Recraft V4 Pro

• + Successfully captures a more minimalist and clean design aesthetic
• + Accurate text rendering and placement of elements
• + Closer to a modern vector logo style

• − The steam is very minimal and less impactful compared to Model A
• − The compositional gap between the cloche and the text is slightly awkward
• − Less visual depth and texture than requested