Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro Alibaba Wan 2.6 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 2 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

22.3 arena score

#27 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Wan 2.6

23.4 arena score

#23 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Best Image-to-Video right now
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.6

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 2

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

  • + Excellent text legibility and accuracy
  • + Completes the cutoff prompt intelligently
  • + Clean and professional-looking handwriting
  • The 'chalk' texture looks a bit too smooth, closer to a chalk-style marker than dry chalk
  • Composition is a bit plain with limited depth

Wan 2.6

  • + Superb chalk texture with realistic dust and smudging on the board
  • + Stronger sense of environmental depth and lighting
  • + Captures the 'elegant cursive' requirement for the header more effectively
  • Slightly less crisp text on the bottom-most lines
  • One of the price symbols is slightly messy

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this complex text rendering task, with Qwen Image 2.0 Pro delivering very clean, legible handwriting. However, Wan 2.1 is the winner due to its superior artistic realism, perfectly capturing the gritty texture of real chalk and the authentic look of a hand-smudged board in a café environment.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
Wan 2.6
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

  • + Excellent photorealism with shallow depth of field
  • + Accurately places the passenger in the back seat as requested
  • + Detailed capybara texture and realistic human expression

Wan 2.6

  • + Strong composition from an exterior-looking-in perspective
  • + Accurate costume details for both the capybara and passenger
  • + Vibrant colors and convincing rainy night atmosphere
  • Passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat
  • Anomalous 'TLC' sign on top of the car is facing the wrong way or distorted
  • Capybara's hands look slightly more human-like and uncanny

Verdict: Qwen Image 2.0 Pro followed the spatial instructions much better by placing the human passenger in the back seat, creating a more realistic taxi layout. While Wan 2.6 has a very cinematic rainy aesthetic, it failed the prompt by putting the passenger in the front seat and has slight anatomical inconsistencies in the paws.

Next steps

Explore each model