Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs Nano Banana 2 Google

Settled by community votes across 12 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [pro]

26.3 arena score

#9 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Nano Banana 2

29.0 arena score

#1 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Best Text-to-Image right now Top 2 in Image Editing
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [pro]

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Nano Banana 2

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 12

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealism and clean lighting.
  • + Perfectly captures the 'blue sphere' instruction with a matte finish.
  • + Composition is balanced and mimics professional photography.
  • The plant is very blurred in the background, making its visibility through the glass less distinct.
  • The book has less detailed texture than Model B.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'visible through the glass' instruction for the plant.
  • + High level of detail on the book texture and text rendering.
  • + Good reflection of the sphere on the bottom of the cube.
  • The cube looks more like a small aquarium with thick glass seams rather than a solid glass cube.
  • Composition feels slightly more cluttered with the background shelves.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt perfectly. FLUX.2 [pro] produced a more aesthetically pleasing, professionally lit photograph with high clarity, while Nano Banana 2 did a better job of making the plant 'partially visible through the glass' as requested. FLUX.2 [pro] is generally preferred for its superior lighting and cleaner material renders.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the car's original design and proportions.
  • + Good facial likeness of the man from the source image.
  • + Realistic motion blur and high visual clarity in the landscape.
  • The man's scale relative to the car is slightly off, appearing a bit small in the driver's seat.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent composition with a winding coastal road that captures the 'California coastline' feel perfectly.
  • + The man's clothing from the source image (the plaid coat and scarf) is better preserved.
  • + Dynamic lighting and high aesthetic appeal.
  • The perspective of the car feels slightly elongated compared to the source image.
  • Minor artifacts in the distance where the road merges with the cliffside.

Verdict: Both models succeeded in combining the two source images into a cohesive scene. Nano Banana 2 provides a more dramatic and iconic California-style composition with the winding road and preserved the man's specific clothing better, while FLUX.2 [pro] maintains better structural accuracy of the car itself. Ultimately, Nano Banana 2 is preferred for its superior storytelling and faithfulness to the subjects' attire.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent anatomical detail in the man's hands and face
  • + Superior rendering of wet textures and realistic rain droplets on the bike
  • + High aesthetic quality with professional shallow depth of field
  • The bike's physical construction is slightly nonsensical around the rear wheel hub
  • Missing the requested motion blur for passing cars

Nano Banana 2

  • + Successfully captures the requested motion blur on passing vehicles
  • + Authentic environment with readable Japanese signage providing context
  • + Stronger overall adherence to the 'candid street photo' and 'imperfect framing' prompts
  • Noticeable anatomical distortion in the hands and facial features
  • The bicycle geometry is warped and incoherent
  • Lower resolution and more digital artifacts compared to Model A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] produces a much more visually pleasing and realistic-looking subject, with skin and rain textures that are highly impressive. However, Nano Banana 2 actually adhered better to the specific technical requests of the prompt, such as motion blur and the urban Japanese aesthetic, even though the physical details of the man and bike are significantly warped. FLUX.2 [pro] is the winner for its clarity and quality, despite missing the motion blur requirement.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Exquisite lighting with very realistic warm torchlight reflections on the metal surfaces.
  • + Exceptional skin texture including subtle scars and dirt that look integrated rather than painted on.
  • + High fidelity on the leather straps and worn fabric textures.
  • The beads in the hair are a bit colorful/plastic-looking compared to the gritty tone of the image.
  • The background fire is slightly clipped by the edge of the frame.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Excellent engraving details on the armor and hilt of the sword.
  • + Strong thematic consistency with the inclusion of the sword and runic symbols.
  • + Great hair braiding work that looks very natural and historically inspired.
  • The lighting feels a bit more flat and computer-generated compared to the realistic bounce light in the other model.
  • The skin texture is a bit muddy in certain areas of the face.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] wins on pure technical realism, specifically regarding how the torchlight interacts with the skin and metal surfaces. Nano Banana 2 provides a more 'heroic' and detailed composition with better armor engravings, but the skin and lighting appear slightly more artificial in comparison.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent photo quality and lighting for the food items.
  • + Strong use of bold colors for section headers.
  • + The grid layout is very professional and symmetrical.
  • Contains significant spelling errors and nonsensical text even for a mock-up.
  • Repeatedly lists 'Garlic Bread' and 'Margherita Pizza' in different sections incorrectly.
  • Mislabeling: The 'Mains' section is misspelled as 'MINS' and contains images of pizza.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly legible and mostly accurate text with coherent descriptions.
  • + Excellent adherence to the 'Appetizers/Pizza/Mains' section requirement.
  • + Sophisticated layout that balances images with descriptive text and pricing effectively.
  • Slightly less 'minimalist' than a standard grid due to the amount of text.
  • Small text imperfections in the descriptions (e.g., 'mate' instead of 'meat').

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it produces a functional, logical menu with accurate sectioning and highly legible text. While FLUX.2 [pro] has slightly more vibrant photography, the content is nonsensical and fails to correctly categorize the food items into their respective sections as requested.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent handling of the interior lighting from the smartphone and streetlights
  • + Accurately represents both primary subjects mentioned in the prompt
  • + High photographic realism in the textures of the capybara fur and leather jacket
  • The paws on the steering wheel look somewhat human-like/distorted in shape
  • The composition crops out much of the taxi dashboard which would add to the realism

Nano Banana 2

  • + Exceptional environment detail including a period-accurate taxi meter and dashboard
  • + Very clear and readable NYC landmarks like Radio City in the background
  • + Great capybara anatomy and pose on the steering wheel
  • Completely failed to include the human businesswoman in the back seat
  • The interior of the car looks slightly more like a generic older vehicle than a modern NYC taxi yellow cabin

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] followed the prompt more accurately by including both the capybara driver and the bored businesswoman in the back seat, creating a more narrative image. Nano Banana 2 features significantly better dashboard detail and environmental world-building, but it failed a major requirement of the prompt by omitting the passenger.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
FLUX.2 [pro]
Before After
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent preservation of the background and clothing.
  • + The hair has a realistic, wind-swept texture.
  • Failed to preserve facial features, significantly altering the subject's face.
  • The hairline integration looks like a digital overlay on the forehead.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly preserves the original facial features and identity.
  • + Creates a very realistic, natural-looking hairline and hair texture.
  • + Seamlessly maintains the lighting and background from the original.
  • The hair volume is slightly more conservative compared to the 'full, thick head' request, but still fits the prompt.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner because it successfully added hair while preserving the identity of the person in the source image. FLUX.2 [pro] failed the preservation part of the task by changing the man's facial structure and features entirely, essentially creating a different person.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent professional graphics with a clean, vector-style caricature.
  • + Coherently blends hockey and TV studio elements, including a desk shaped like a rink and hockey sticks.
  • + Maintains the subject's likeness well within the cartoon style.
  • The dogs look generic and repetitive.
  • The 'hockey gear' on the dogs (skates) is a bit messy and illogical in placement.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Perfectly captures the traditional hand-drawn 'caricature' aesthetic requested.
  • + Clever integration of text ('W-K9 News') and different breeds of dogs.
  • + Very expressive and humorous facial exaggeration that fits the prompt perfectly.
  • The hand holding the hockey stick has anatomical issues with finger count.
  • The microphones in the background on the left are a bit cluttered and floating.

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 wins this challenge as it better understands the 'caricature' art style, providing an exaggerated and humorous hand-drawn look that feels more authentic to the request than the sleek digital avatar style of FLUX.2 [pro]. Nano Banana 2 also showed more creativity with the 'W-K9 NEws' branding and varied dog breeds, whereas FLUX.2 [pro] felt a bit more like a generic clipart generator.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent character interaction with dynamic, playful posing
  • + Beautiful bokeh effects and realistic lighting on the fur
  • + Expressive facial features and high-quality textures
  • Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt
  • Anatomical oddity on the kitten's front right paw

Nano Banana 2

  • + Included all four requested animals correctly
  • + Strong adherence to the 'god rays' and sunrise lighting requirement
  • + Clear sense of movement and motion in the composition
  • The fox kit has a slightly distorted, elongated back leg
  • The kitten's tail and hind legs are somewhat blended and lack definition
  • Overall look is slightly more digital/artificial compared to Model A

Verdict: While FLUX.2 [pro] produced a more artistically pleasing image with superior fur textures and expressive interactions, it failed a key prompt requirement by omitting the bunny. Nano Banana 2 successfully included all four animals and captured the 'god rays' more effectively, making it the better choice for strict prompt adherence despite slightly lower anatomical precision.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent adherence to the Studio Ghibli art style with soft, watercolor-like textures.
  • + Preserves the exact facial expressions and poses from the source image remarkably well.
  • + Adds subtle, relevant background details like Japanese signage and a red bus that fit the requested aesthetic.
  • The color palette is slightly desaturated, bordering on a weathered look rather than 'warm' and 'nostalgic'.

Nano Banana 2

  • + Beautifully vibrant pastel color palette that feels very warm and inviting.
  • + Excellent use of hand-painted textures and dreamy background scenery with greenery.
  • + Maintains the 'distracted boyfriend' composition perfectly.
  • The facial expressions are slightly softened, losing a bit of the intense 'outraged' look of the girlfriend from the source.
  • The man's expression feels more surprised than flirtatious/distracted.

Verdict: Both models did an exceptional job of translating the 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme into the Studio Ghibli style. FLUX.2 [pro] captures the specific line work and character expressions of the source more accurately, while Nano Banana 2 better captures the vibrant, warm, and lush aesthetic typical of Ghibli backgrounds. FLUX.2 [pro] is the slight winner for maintaining the narrative tension of the original image through more faithful facial expressions.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography with clean, professional spacing
  • + Adheres well to the minimalist vector emblem style
  • + Perfectly renders all requested text including accents
  • The cloche is split down the middle with inconsistent shading styles
  • Steam is a bit simplified compared to the rest of the logo

Nano Banana 2

  • + Highly detailed hand-drawn vintage aesthetic
  • + Beautifully integrated banner and ornate border details
  • + Expressive steam and cloche illustration
  • Text is slightly warped and poorly spaced along the curve
  • Less 'minimalist' than requested, leaning more towards a complex badge

Verdict: FLUX.2 [pro] delivers a much cleaner, professional logo that captures the 'minimalist' and 'vector' aspects of the prompt with flawless typography. While Nano Banana 2 provides a more charming and ornate vintage feel, its execution of the curved text is technically weaker than the precise lettering in FLUX.2 [pro].

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [pro]
Nano Banana 2

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography style and legible main headers
  • + Consistent aesthetic and clever use of line weights
  • + Clean vertical layout that flows logically
  • The placeholder text under headers is gibberish
  • The rocket in the 'Launch' icon looks more like a space shuttle than a Saturn V
  • Missed 'Lunar Orbit' as a distinct, labeled step

Nano Banana 2

  • + Strictly followed the six requested steps with clear labels
  • + Excellent adherence to the NASA color palette and flat-vector style
  • + Iconography is very consistent and polished across all stages
  • Included a fourth, unidentified astronaut silhouette
  • The 'Translunar' icon is slightly abstract compared to the others

Verdict: Nano Banana 2 is the clear winner as it successfully included all six requested infographic steps with accurate labels and high-quality iconography. While FLUX.2 [pro] has a very professional layout, it failed to include several prompt-specified stages and the placeholder text is non-functional.

Next steps

Explore each model