FLUX.2 [klein] 9B Black Forest Labs Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 4 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

21.3 arena score

#7 of 23 in Image Editing

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

Wan 2.7 Pro

21.4 arena score

#29 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

66.7%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.7 Pro

33.3%

win rate

66.7% 0.0% ties 33.3%

Shared challenges 4

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

Wan 2.7 Pro

0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

+ Excellent typography with glowing fire effects
+ High visual coherence and professional ad layout
+ Perfect adherence to all text requirements including price and secondary message

− The 'exploded' effect is less literal, with components still mostly stacked
− The background is more abstract sparks than a distinct fiery environment

Wan 2.7 Pro

+ Superb 'exploded' physics with clearly separated components
+ Dynamic liquid splashes and steam add excellent motion
+ High-quality texture on the tomato and sesame seed bun

− Missed significant portions of the prompt's text requirements (missing price and secondary message)
− Text effects are flat orange rather than the requested fiery/glowing effect
− Composition feels slightly empty in the center compared to the title

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the prompt instructions much more accurately, successfully integrating all three requested text elements with the specific glowing fire theme. While Wan 2.7 Pro provided a more impressive and literal 'exploded' view of the burger ingredients, its failure to include the secondary message and the price starburst makes it a less successful advertisement based on the user's requirements.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

+ Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and ghosting on the board.
+ Strong adherence to the requested font style for the majority of the text.
+ Captures a very realistic café background and natural lighting.

− Spelling error in 'Mushrroropom'.
− The text alignment is slightly cramped towards the edges.

Wan 2.7 Pro

+ Perfect spelling across all menu items including the long cookie description.
+ Very clean and balanced composition with decorative underlining.
+ Excellent legibility and font consistency.

− The text looks a bit too much like a digital font rather than authentic chalk-on-slate.
− Lacks the realistic chalk dust and smudging effects requested for a 'handwritten' style.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B provides a much more authentic 'chalkboard' feel with realistic smudges and texture, but it suffers from a significant spelling error in the first menu item. Wan 2.7 Pro produces perfectly spelled, legible text with great layout, but the text lacks the gritty chalk texture requested and looks somewhat like a digital overlay. Overall, Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner for following the complex text prompt perfectly without spelling mistakes.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing

Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

Wan 2.7 Pro

100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

+ Successfully replicates the complex pose and body position from Image 1.
+ Accurately transplants the character, face, sunglasses, scarf, and clothing from Image 2.
+ Matches the yellow background and lighting of the source pose image.

− The right hand is clenched into a fist instead of the open-fingered gesture from Image 1.
− Minor lighting inconsistencies on the character's feet compared to the stool.

Wan 2.7 Pro

+ Maintains the original Image 1 perfectly.

− Failed the editing task entirely by providing the original Image 1 without any changes.
− Did not incorporate the character reference from Image 2.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B successfully completed the image editing task by mapping the character from Image 2 onto the unique pose and environment of Image 1 while maintaining high visual quality. Wan 2.7 Pro failed completely, returning Image 1 without any of the requested modifications.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing

Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [klein] 9B

+ Excellent adherence to the specific outfit, including the pea coat, plaid scarf, and jeans.
+ Almost perfect preservation of the original face, hair, and sand textures on the face.
+ Successfully integrates the pose while maintaining the complex layers of clothing.

− Adds extra chunky jewelry that was not present in Image 2.
− Slightly changes the background details under the wooden structure.

Wan 2.7 Pro

+ Preserved the full-body pose and background structure well.
+ Maintains the skin vitiligo patterns on the hands and chest.

− Failed completely to use the outfit from Image 2, providing a gold patterned blazer instead.
− The facial features were slightly altered and lost some of the unique sand texture details.
− The proportions of the legs seem slightly elongated compared to the original person.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [klein] 9B followed the prompt much more accurately by transferring the specific navy pea coat, plaid scarf, and denim jeans from Image 2 onto the subject while keeping the face nearly identical to Image 1. Wan 2.7 Pro failed the primary instruction by generating an entirely different, unrelated outfit and losing facial likeness in the process.