Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash fal FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs

Settled by community votes across 6 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

26.8 arena score

#5 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature

Not enough comparable category data

The chart appears once both models have ratings across at least three shared arena categories.

FLUX.2 [max]

25.9 arena score

#11 of 44 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

50.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

FLUX.2 [max]

50.0%

win rate

50.0% 0.0% ties 50.0%
Shared challenges 6

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [max]
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent realism in the glass textures and refractions
  • + Accurate lighting consistency with shadows and reflections
  • + Very high detail on the wooden table surface
  • The plant is slightly more to the side than directly behind

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Clean, minimalist composition
  • + Perfect placement of the plant behind the glass
  • + Realistic leather texture on the book cover
  • Lighting feels slightly more CG/rendered than photographic
  • The glass cube looks open or missing sides due to the thinness of the edges

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash produces a more convincing photographic image with superior handling of glass physics and table textures. FLUX.2 [max] follows the spatial prompt perfectly (placing the plant directly behind the cube), but the glass cube lacks the depth and material weight seen in the Flash version.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [max]
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent depiction of motion blur on passing vehicles.
  • + The man's skin texture and facial features are highly realistic and detailed.
  • + Captures the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' requested by cutting off part of the bike and sidewalk.
  • The man's hands have structural inconsistencies and look somewhat fused with the bike parts.
  • The bicycle's anatomy is slightly warped, specifically around the handlebars and kickstand area.

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Composition is more dynamic and follows the 'shallow depth of field' prompt well.
  • + The man's interaction with the bicycle wheel feels more grounded and intentional.
  • + Beautiful lighting and reflections on the wet pavement.
  • The motion blur on the background car is less convincing than Model A's.
  • Minor artifacts on the man's hands where he is touching the wheel spokes.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, capturing the rainy atmosphere and the specific subject. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash delivered a more realistic skin texture and better motion blur, while FLUX.2 [max] produced a more aesthetically pleasing composition and a more convincing physical interaction between the man and the bicycle.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [max]

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent front-facing composition that clearly shows both the capybara and the passenger
  • + Accurate depiction of the businesswoman's bored expression while on her phone
  • + High-quality fur texture and lighting on the capybara's face
  • The capybara's hands look slightly more like gloved human hands than natural paws
  • The passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Successfully places the passenger in the back seat as requested
  • + Detailed interior showing the dashboard and realistic taxi environment
  • + Side profile of the capybara is very natural and biologically accurate
  • The composition obscures the businesswoman, making her a secondary detail
  • The framing from outside the open door feels less like an 'inside the taxi' scene than Image A

Verdict: FLUX.2 [dev] Flash captures the prompt's tone perfectly with a clear, cinematic view of both characters, though it mistakenly puts the passenger in the front seat. FLUX.2 [max] follows the spatial instructions better by putting the woman in the back, but the side-view composition is less engaging and loses the 'professional expression' mentioned in the prompt. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash is preferred for its superior clarity and the way it emphasizes the humorous contrast between the driver and passenger.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [max]
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent texture rendering for the fish and rice grain details.
  • + Extremely clean and bold typography.
  • + Strong 3D isometric perspective with high focal clarity.
  • The sushi internal composition (the square segments) looks a bit artificial/unrealistic.
  • Includes fewer varieties of sushi compared to the other model.

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Superior interpretation of a 'diorama base' with the multi-tiered platform.
  • + Better variety of sushi including nigiri and maki rolls.
  • + Excellent clay-like '3D cartoon' aesthetic with smooth lighting.
  • Text is slightly less crisp than Model A.
  • The 'Japan' text is a bit crowded towards the top edge of the frame.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality isometric graphics with perfect text rendering. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has sharper textures and more professional-looking typography, whereas FLUX.2 [max] provides a better diorama composition and feels more like a complete miniature scene.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [max]
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent depiction of golden sunrise light and defined god rays
  • + Extremely detailed fur textures and expressive eye highlights
  • + Vibrant colors and beautiful bokeh effect on the wildflowers
  • Added an extra animal (two rabbits/hare-like creatures) not requested by the specific list in the prompt
  • The kitten has an anatomical error with a missing or awkwardly placed hind leg while standing

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Perfect adherence to the requested animal count (four specific animals)
  • + Very natural sense of movement and 'tumbling' as requested in the prompt
  • + Excellent lighting and background depth with realistic dew sparkles
  • A few butterflies are slightly indistinct or look like small sparks
  • The kitten's facial structure is slightly less 'cat-like' than Model A

Verdict: Both models produced high-quality, adorable images that captured the lighting and mood perfectly. FLUX.2 [dev] Flash had superior fur detail and more dramatic god rays, but it failed the prompt's count by adding a second rabbit. FLUX.2 [max] followed the prompt instructions exactly while maintaining better anatomical consistency and a more dynamic sense of motion among the animals.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash
FLUX.2 [max]
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX.2 [dev] Flash

  • + Excellent detailed illustrations of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
  • + Includes all six requested stages with descriptive labels.
  • + Strong NASA-inspired aesthetic with a realistic yet clean approach.
  • The layout is a bit cluttered with overlapping icons and text.
  • Contains garbled pseudo-text around the rocket icon and information fields.
  • The flow of the infographic is somewhat disjointed rather than a clear sequence.

FLUX.2 [max]

  • + Superior clean, flat-vector style that perfectly matches the 'modern infographic' prompt.
  • + Excellent consistent iconography with clear framed boxes.
  • + Perfectly legible text with very few spelling errors ('Tranquiity' being a minor one).
  • The 'Translunar' and 'Lunar Orbit' steps are swapped in the visual sequence.
  • The trajectory arc for 'Translunar' is a bit too thick and simplified compared to other elements.

Verdict: FLUX.2 [max] produced a much cleaner and more professional infographic that perfectly adheres to the requested flat-vector style and NASA palette. While FLUX.2 [dev] Flash has more detailed lunar module illustrations, its layout is messy and the text becomes garbled, making FLUX.2 [max] the more successful informational poster despite a small sequencing error in its icons.

Next steps

Explore each model