Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

23.7 arena score

#22 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.7 Pro

21.0 arena score

#37 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

Seedream 5.0 Lite

100.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.7 Pro

0.0%

win rate

100.0% 0.0% ties 0.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent surface reflections on the wooden table and sphere.
  • + Clean, minimalist aesthetic with very sharp focus on the central objects.
  • + Accurate and aesthetically pleasing lighting consistent with the window source.
  • The glass cube lacks a bottom panel, appearing to be an open-bottomed casing rather than a solid container.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Features a highly detailed Fern plant and weathered wooden texture for a more realistic environment.
  • + Shows better physical logic for the glass cube's construction including its base.
  • + Good material contrast between the marble-like blue sphere and the paper of the book.
  • The glass refractive logic is slightly messy, causing strange vertical distortions in the plant behind.
  • The lighting is a bit flatter compared to the soft glow in the other image.

Verdict: Both models followed the spatial requirements of the prompt perfectly. Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a more polished, 'pro-photography' look with beautiful lighting, while Wan 2.7 Pro offers a more believable, detailed environmental scene with varied textures. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the slight winner for its superior rendering of glass and light interaction, which was a core component of the prompt.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent preservation of the specific person's likeness and clothing.
  • + The car's details and reflections are well-maintained during the scene change.
  • + Captures a sense of motion with realistic road textures and blur.
  • The driver's right hand position on the steering wheel looks slightly distorted.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Beautiful landscape composition with golden hour lighting.
  • + Successfully changes the background to the requested coastline.
  • Completely fails to include the man from the source image, replacing him with a generic person.
  • The driver is positioned too high and small relative to the car seat.
  • Poor source preservation for the subject.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite successfully followed the multi-part edit instruction by placing the specific man and the specific car from the source images into the new environment. Wan 2.7 Pro provided a beautiful coastline image but failed the core task of preserving the subject's identity, replacing him with a different individual entirely.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field with realistic bokeh.
  • + Effective use of motion blur on the passing vehicle to create a sense of street life.
  • + Higher level of fine detail in the skin texture and wet surfaces.
  • The 'imperfect framing' request led to a slightly awkward cutoff of the bicycle gear system.
  • Minor anatomical oddity in the way the fingers interact with the bicycle chain.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Strong composition that captures the entire subject and bicycle.
  • + Clear reflections on the wet pavement that enhance the rainy atmosphere.
  • + Bicycle geometry is mostly realistic for a vintage model.
  • Lacks the requested motion blur on the passing cars, which appear frozen.
  • The skin texture and lighting look slightly flatter and less cinematic than Model A.
  • Bicycle wheel spokes are inconsistently rendered and messy.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite adhered better to the technical photography prompts, specifically the shallow depth of field and motion blur, resulting in a more cinematic and high-end look. While Wan 2.7 Pro captured a better full-body composition, it failed to incorporate the motion blur element and had significant technical artifacts in the bicycle spokes.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh implementation.
  • + Highly detailed knit texture on the cloth underlayer.
  • + Very sharp focus on the character's facial features and eyes.
  • The beads in the hair look a bit repetitive and artificial.
  • The armor engraving is slightly softer in detail compared to its opponent.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Superb texture on the metal armor, including realistic pitting and grime.
  • + More natural and varied distribution of beads within the braids.
  • + Great adherence to the 'battle-worn' descriptor with visible dirt and skin texture.
  • The background lighting feels a bit more generic or 'plugged in' compared to the atmospheric lighting in Model A.
  • The leather strap buckles have some minor geometry inconsistencies.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well. Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a more cinematic, polished 'hero' portrait with superior focus and lighting, while Wan 2.7 Pro offers more convincing gritty textures and complex hair detailing that feels more grounded. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the likely winner for its superior atmospheric composition and realistic depth of field.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent text legibility and spelling accuracy throughout the menu.
  • + Very high-quality, realistic food photography that aligns perfectly with the descriptions.
  • + Clean, professional layout that matches the 'modern minimalist' prompt.
  • Simple grid layout is slightly less creative than model b.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Great overall presentation with prop styling around the menu sheet.
  • + Comprehensive layout including a QR code, social media icons, and a footer.
  • Significant text rendering issues with many spelling errors in the menu items and descriptions.
  • Small body text is blurry and difficult to read.
  • Composition of food photos in the grid is somewhat inconsistent in scale.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a functional and highly professional menu with perfectly legible text and appetizing, realistic food images. In contrast, while Wan 2.7 Pro created a visually appealing scene with nice prop styling, the menu itself suffers from numerous typos and poor text rendering, making it less useful for a design task.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent typography with a glowing, fiery neon effect that matches the prompt perfectly.
  • + Includes all requested text elements, including the price starburst and secondary message.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the vegetables and bun with a believable 'exploded' vertical arrangement.
  • The cheese is fused to the patty rather than being a separate suspended component.
  • The bottom bun appears to be a bagel or has a hole in the center.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Dynamic, messy 'exploded' composition with ingredients spread across the canvas.
  • + Intense fire and spark effects create a strong sense of drama.
  • + Separates each component clearly, including sauces and individual cheese slices.
  • Failed to include 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' and the '€6.99' starburst.
  • Text rendering is flat and lack the requested 'fiery, glowing effect'.
  • The bun texture looks slightly artificial compared to Model A.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt much more accurately, successfully integrating all requested text elements and maintaining a cohesive glowing aesthetic. While Wan 2.7 Pro captured the 'exploded' motion well, it failed to include over half of the requested text requirements and used a flat font style.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent realistic chalk texture on both the green board and the text
  • + Authentic handwritten feel with natural slants and variations
  • + Good framing of the chalkboard surface
  • Several spelling errors including 'Heriss', 'Beliter', and 'frese op-toons'
  • Failed to follow the 'elegant cursive' instruction for the title

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfect spelling on all requested menu items
  • + Clean, aesthetically pleasing composition with café background
  • + Successfully interpreted the 'Brown But...' prompt truncation into 'Brown Butter'
  • Text looks like a digital font rather than authentic chalk handwriting
  • Repeated the 'Herbs' line twice by mistake
  • Lacks the requested natural variations and chalky grit in the lettering

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a much more realistic chalk appearance with genuine texture and handwriting style, though it struggles significantly with spelling and text accuracy. Wan 2.7 Pro provides perfect spelling and a beautiful environment, but the text appears to be a digital overlay rather than authentic chalk, and it suffers from a repetitive line error. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the likely winner for better adhering to the specific stylistic requirements of 'realistic chalk handwriting' despite the typos.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Expertly combines the character details from Image 2 (clothing, scarf, sunglasses, face) with the pose from Image 1.
  • + Successfully matches the lighting and vibrant yellow environment of the source pose image.
  • + Maintains excellent anatomy and facial recognition while translating the character into the new position.
  • The left hand (pointing up) shows some minor structural distortion in the palm/fingers.
  • The text on the shirt is slightly altered to be less legible than the source character image.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Preserves the source image 1 almost perfectly.
  • Completely failed the edit instruction to change the character to the person in Image 2.
  • Identical to source Image 1 with no character reference applied.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite successfully performed a complex character-to-pose transfer, maintaining the identity and clothing of the man from Image 2 while perfectly replicating the dynamic pose of the woman from Image 1. Wan 2.7 Pro failed to perform any edit at all, returning an image that is virtually indistinguishable from the first source image.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent vibrant colors and nebula effects
  • + High level of texture detail on both the space suit and the horse's coat
  • + Dynamic, cinematic composition with a sense of motion
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut
  • Anatomy of the rear legs is slightly messy where they meet the nebula

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Clean, clear render with a sharp focus
  • + Interesting inclusion of multiple planets and spherical elements
  • + Well-defined lighting on the astronaut's suit
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction to place the horse on top
  • Composition is a bit static and less surreal than the nebula approach
  • The floating rock/planet debris at the bottom feels a bit cluttered

Verdict: Both Seedream 5.0 Lite and Wan 2.7 Pro failed the negative/spatial constraint of the prompt, which specifically requested the horse be on top of the astronaut. However, Seedream 5.0 Lite is the better artistic output, offering a more cinematic and vibrant interpretation with superior texture work and lighting compared to the relatively flat composition of Wan 2.7 Pro.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully replicates the exact outfit from Image 2 including the coat, scarf, glasses, and watch.
  • + Perfectly preserves the face, unique skin markings, and sand details from Image 1.
  • + Seamlessly blends the new clothing with the lighting and background of the original scene.
  • The composition is a slightly closer crop than Image 1, though it maintains the original's essence.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Attempts a full-body reconstruction showing shoes and full legs.
  • Completely fails to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a random patterned robe.
  • The person's face and unique vitiligo patterns are significantly altered and lose the accuracy of Image 1.
  • Anatomical issues with the hands and feet.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it followed every instruction perfectly, accurately transferring the specific clothing from Image 2 onto the person in Image 1 while keeping their identity and the background intact. Wan 2.7 Pro failed on almost every metric, providing a completely different outfit and failing to preserve the specific features of the base person.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro
100% wins 0% ties 0% wins

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'human looking at her phone' requirement.
  • + Highly detailed fur texture and realistic passenger facial features.
  • + Captures the New York night atmosphere with vibrant street bokeh.
  • The capybara's anatomy is slightly more humanoid than requested, appearing like a person in a suit.
  • The steering wheel placement looks a bit cramped against the dashboard.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + The capybara looks very natural and animal-like in its proportions while driving.
  • + Good use of side-profile composition that shows both the driver and the city lights well.
  • + Strictly adheres to both paws on the steering wheel with realistic claws.
  • Completely missed the 'looking at her phone' requirement for the businesswoman.
  • The passenger is looking forward and lacks the specific 'bored' expression requested.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed all prompt instructions, specifically including the key detail of the passenger looking at her phone, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro missed the phone interaction entirely. Seedream 5.0 Lite also creates a more immersive 'inside the taxi' feeling, even though the capybara's posture is a bit more artificial.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent text legibility and accuracy
  • + Highly professional cinematic lighting and atmosphere
  • + Strong adherence to the vintage gothic aesthetic
  • The parchment texture is a bit repetitive in the background
  • The web graphics look slightly overlaid rather than integrated

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Beautifully illustrated ornate border with lots of thematic details
  • + Excellent integration of the scroll banner into the composition
  • + Includes all requested text with decorative flourishes
  • The art style is more of a clean digital illustration than a 'vintage parchment poster'
  • The lighting is less cinematic and more flatly colored

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a more atmospheric and realistic vintage poster that feels truly gothic and cinematic. While Wan 2.7 Pro features a more intricate and charming illustration style, Seedream 5.0 Lite captures the 'moody night sky' and 'dark parchment' texture requested in the prompt more effectively.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent source preservation of the face and beard
  • + Natural-looking hairline and hair texture
  • + Perfect lighting integration with the existing scene
  • None notable

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Natural wavy hair texture
  • + Good overall adherence to the prompt
  • Slghtly alters the facial structure, making the man look a bit different from the source image
  • The hair and forehead integration is slightly less seamless than the alternative

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite performed an exceptional edit, adding realistic hair while perfectly preserving the subject's identity and the original lighting. Wan 2.7 Pro also did a good job with the hair itself, but it subtly changed the man's facial features and forehead shape, losing more of the original source integrity.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Clean and minimalist layout that matches the prompt's request for simplicity.
  • + Excellent text rendering with clear, bold, and well-spaced letters.
  • + Very accurate soft 'cartoon' 3D aesthetic with a smooth, professional feel.
  • The 3D models of the sushi pieces are somewhat generic and lack fine texture detail.
  • The flag icon is slightly misaligned with the text line.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Higher level of detail in the PBR materials, particularly the rice grains and fish textures.
  • + More complex and visually interesting composition with additional garnishes and accessories.
  • + Sophisticated graphic design elements including a stylized flag icon and secondary text.
  • Included extra elements like chopsticks and a soy sauce bowl not requested in the prompt.
  • The text 'JAPAN SUSHI' has slightly inconsistent kerning compared to Model A.
  • Minor geometric artifacts on the floating elements at the top corners.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt's request for 'minimal' garnish and a 'solid light blue background' more literally, resulting in a cleaner, more focused image. However, Wan 2.7 Pro produced a superior visual result in terms of material rendering and lighting, even though it added extraneous elements. Overall, Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner due to the higher quality of its 3D assets and more professional graphic design layout.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's features in a cartoon style
  • + Higher visual quality with clean line work and rendering
  • + Includes all requested elements: anchor desk, dog, and hockey equipment (stick and puck)
  • The caricature style is a bit safe/generic rather than highly exaggerated

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully more 'exaggerated' and humorous expression
  • + Creative integration of hockey jerseys on the dogs
  • Lower visual quality with messy artifacts on the hands and speech bubbles
  • Loses the specific likeness of the source person
  • The hockey stick/microphone hybrid is visually confusing and poorly drawn

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 Lite is the clear winner as it successfully maintains the subject's identity while transforming her into a clean, professional-looking caricature that incorporates all requested elements clearly. While Wan 2.7 Pro attempts a more exaggerated and humorous approach, the technical execution is poor, resulting in distorted hands, generic facial features, and nonsensical objects.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'joyful' and 'wholesome' vibe with expressive, cute features.
  • + Strong implementation of god rays and dew sparkles in the foreground.
  • + Effective use of vibrant colors for the butterflies and flowers.
  • Lean more toward a stylized or 3D render look rather than true photorealism.
  • The cat's paw interaction with the air looks slightly unnatural.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + High degree of photorealism in fur textures and animal anatomy.
  • + Dynamic composition that accurately captures 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling'.
  • + Consistent lighting and realistic integration of butterflies into the scene.
  • The fox's front right leg has anatomical structural issues where it meets the ground/body.
  • The butterfly wings look somewhat thick and lack the delicate translucency seen in Model A.

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro is the preferred choice for its superior photorealism and dynamic action, capturing the playful movement requested in the prompt. While Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a very charming and clean image, it feels more like a 3D animated movie still than the 'hyper-photorealistic' masterpiece requested.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent capture of the specific Studio Ghibli cel-animation style.
  • + Maintains very high structural fidelity to the source image composition and clothing.
  • + Successfully recreates the iconic facial expressions of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme in anime form.
  • Lighting is a bit flat compared to the requested 'gentle, dreamy' atmosphere.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Strong application of 'hand-painted' watercolor textures as requested.
  • + Creates a very soft, nostalgic, and warm color palette.
  • + Good preservation of the original subjects' facial likenesses within the artistic medium.
  • The style leans more toward general watercolor illustration than specifically Studio Ghibli.
  • The girl in the foreground has lost some of the 'motion blur' focus effect that made the original composition dynamic.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite perfectly captures the specific Studio Ghibli animation aesthetic, including character design and line art, while maintaining the exact composition of the meme. Wan 2.7 Pro produces a beautiful watercolor illustration with great texture and mood, but it feels less like a Ghibli film and more like a storybook. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner for its superior adherence to the requested iconic style.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face and original details
  • + Successfully added wind-blown hair effect
  • + Maintains the background integrity of the source image perfectly
  • The added leaves are very large and look like digital stickers
  • The color of the added leaves is a vibrant green that doesn't match the lighting or the scene

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + The added leaves have a natural autumnal color and motion blur that fits the 'energetic' prompt
  • + The hair edit feels very dynamic and realistic
  • + The overall lighting and atmosphere feel more cohesive with the added elements
  • There is slight distortion along the subject's jawline and teeth
  • Minor loss of detail realism in the face compared to the original

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro creates a much more convincing sense of motion by adding autumn leaves with motion blur and varied colors, which integrate better into the scene than the bright green leaves in the other image. While Seedream 5.0 Lite preserves the subject's face more accurately, its added elements feel like an artificial overlay, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro successfully creates a lively, energetic feel.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect text accuracy including the circumflex accent
  • + Clean vector minimalism suitable for a modern logo
  • + Excellent adherence to the requested warm brown and cream color palette
  • The Cloche design is a bit generic and lacking in detail
  • The composition feels slightly disjointed with the text positioned far above the emblem

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Sophisticated vintage engraving style with beautiful line work
  • + Excellent emblem composition with a cohesive circular layout
  • + Added creative details like the laurel wreath and geographic location
  • Spelling error in the main name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian')
  • Visible artifacts/stray elements in the corners of the frame
  • Incorrect accent mark usage on the 'è'

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the text prompt perfectly and achieved a true minimalist vector style, but felt a bit plain. Wan 2.7 Pro produced a much more visually impressive and professional-looking vintage emblem, but failed on the critical task of spelling the brand name correctly. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner for functional logo use as it correctly renders the specific requested text.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

Seedream 5.0 Lite
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent text legibility and correct spelling of all major labels.
  • + Clean, consistent icon sizes and a well-balanced grid layout.
  • + Strong execution of the lunar module descent and landing icons with clear visual distinction.
  • The 'Translumar' label is a misspelling of 'Translunar'.
  • The icons for Earth and Moon orbits are slightly inconsistent as the orbit lines overlap the planets in a messy way.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Comprehensive details including dates, times, and mission statistics.
  • + Beautiful vertical flow that mimics a trajectory path more effectively than a grid.
  • + Superior aesthetic with stars and a more sophisticated use of the requested color palette.
  • Several spelling errors including 'DESCRIPT' instead of 'Descent' and 'Tramquility' instead of 'Tranquility'.
  • The text is very small and loses clarity in several areas.
  • The NASA logo at the bottom is distorted and visually messy.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner because it provides a much more usable and polished infographic with legible text and high-quality iconography, despite a single misspelling. Wan 2.7 Pro covers more data and has a better layout for the subject matter, but it is plagued by numerous spelling errors and rendering artifacts that undermine the professional 'modern vector' requirement.

Next steps

Explore each model