Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

Seedream 4.0 ByteDance Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

Seedream 4.0

24.7 arena score

#15 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.7 Pro

21.0 arena score

#37 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

Seedream 4.0

0.0%

win rate

Ties

0.0%

Wan 2.7 Pro

100.0%

win rate

0.0% 0.0% ties 100.0%
Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent depiction of soft, golden hour window light.
  • + Clean and simple composition.
  • + Higher color saturation in the sphere and book provided a vibrant look.
  • The glass cube shape is slightly inconsistent with the tabletop's perspective.
  • The plant reflection is a bit muddy and lacks detail.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to all spatial instructions including the plant's position behind the cube.
  • + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and fern leaves.
  • + Excellent rendering of light through glass and refraction effects.
  • The sphere's texture is slightly marbled rather than a solid blue sphere.
  • The red book has a slightly worn look which may be less 'clean' than Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt perfectly, including the difficult instruction for a plant to be visible through a glass cube. Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner due to its superior realism in textures and more complex composition, whereas Seedream 4.0 was slightly simpler and more stylized.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Successfully merges features from both source images such as the man's hair, scarf, and coat pattern.
  • + Excellent preservation of the white Rolls Royce's design and features.
  • + Dynamic composition with motion blur and a beautiful coastal background.
  • The man's right hand position on the steering wheel looks slightly unnatural.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Accurately preserves the white car in a scenic coastal setting.
  • + Good lighting and environmental integration.
  • Completely fails to use the man from the second source image, replacing him with a generic figure.
  • The person in the car is poorly rendered and too small.

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 is the clear winner as it successfully integrated specific elements from both source images, carefully including the man's unique hairstyle and clothing while placing the car in the requested environment. Wan 2.7 Pro correctly identified the car but completely ignored the provided image of the man, rendering a generic person in the driver's seat instead.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent execution of motion blur from passing cars
  • + Natural and expressive skin texture on the man's face
  • + Beautifully rendered reflections on the wet pavement
  • Anatomical issues with the man's hands merging with the bike
  • Physical logic errors with the bike's chain and frame

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + High clarity and sharpness across the main subject
  • + Superior rendering of the bicycle's mechanical structure
  • + Very effective rain streaks and wet surface texture
  • Failed to include the requested motion blur for passing cars
  • Composition feels a bit more posed than 'candid'

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed the specific stylistic prompts for motion blur and imperfect framing much better, creating a more cinematic atmosphere. However, Wan 2.7 Pro produced a much more physically coherent image with better anatomical details and a more believable bicycle, though it missed the motion blur requirement.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent atmospheric lighting with dynamic torchlight and sparks.
  • + High-quality skin texture with realistic dirt and faint scarring.
  • + Detailed engraving on the pauldrons with varied metal finishes.
  • The leather straps across the chest appear somewhat flat and lack fine surface grain.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Superb leather strap detail with visible wear, stitching, and grain.
  • + Braided hair and beadwork are more intricate and prominent.
  • + Excellent engraving detail that covers more of the breastplate.
  • The character looks slightly older and less 'battle-worn' in terms of skin grit compared to Model A.
  • Lighting is a bit more clinical and less atmospheric than the warmth in Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Seedream 4.0 captures a superior cinematic atmosphere with its use of warm torchlight reflections and more realistic facial grit. Wan 2.7 Pro excels in technical texture rendering, specifically on the leather straps and the complexity of the braided hair, but Seedream 4.0 is preferred for its lifelike eye rendering and overall mood.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent typography rendering with zero spelling errors
  • + High-quality, appetizing food photography
  • + Clean minimalist layout with high contrast
  • Lack of actual menu content like item names or descriptions
  • The grid layout feels slightly disjointed with large whitespace gaps

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Complete menu design including item names, prices, and descriptions
  • + Professional use of iconography, QR codes, and social media logos
  • + Includes a lifestyle context with realistic tabletop props
  • Small body text contains significant hallucinations and spelling errors
  • The layout is quite dense and less 'minimalist' than requested

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 produces a very clean, bold visual that feels like a modern graphic design poster, but it fails to include the functional details of a menu. Wan 2.7 Pro creates a fully realized, professional menu layout with branding and pricing, although the small text is illegible upon closer inspection. Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner for better understanding the structural requirements of a 'menu design'.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent sense of motion with dynamic motion blur and swirling effects
  • + Photorealistic food textures, especially on the bun and patties
  • + Organic integration of the 'MAGIC BURGER' text within stylized flames
  • Incorrect price displayed as €5.99 instead of the requested €6.99
  • The burger anatomy is confusing, appearing as two separate partial burgers rather than one exploded one

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including the correct €6.99 price
  • + Clear 'exploded' view layout showing each individual component distinctly
  • + Strong, crisp graphics suitable for a digital advertisement
  • The lighting on the burger components feels flat compared to the fiery background
  • The starburst element looks a bit like a generic clip-art asset rather than being integrated into the scene

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence, accurately rendering the specific price and the 'exploded' layout requested. While Seedream 4.0 has more convincing photorealistic textures and motion effects, it failed the core instruction regarding the price and lacked the clarity needed for an exploded-view advertisement.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and dust
  • + Authentic handwritten variation in letter size and slant
  • + Perfect text accuracy including the complicated 'Brown Butter' completion
  • The perspective is slightly angled rather than a flat lay

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Clean, readable text layout
  • + Excellent composition with symmetrical framing in the café environment
  • + Accurate rendering of the requested text content
  • The text looks more like a digital font than natural chalk handwriting
  • Uniformity of the letters lacks the 'natural variations' requested in the prompt

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed the stylistic instructions much more closely, delivering a result that looks like actual chalk on a board with authentic textures and handwriting variations. While Wan 2.1 Pro has a better overall composition, its text looks like a digital font overlay, failing the 'no printed or digital fonts' requirement.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Successfully incorporates clothing elements like the checkered scarf and black sweatshirt from Image 2.
  • + Follows the instruction to combine the character features and pose.
  • + Adapts the character's clothing style to fit the action.
  • The face is severely distorted and look nothing like the character in Image 2 or Image 1.
  • The exact pose from Image 1 is completely lost and simplified into a generic squat.
  • The anatomy of the feet and legs is poor and unrealistic.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Perfectly maintains the environment and background from Image 1.
  • + Preserves the exact dynamic pose of Image 1 flawlessly.
  • Failed the editing instruction entirely by returning Image 1 with no changes.
  • Did not incorporate the character, clothing, or face from Image 2.

Verdict: Both models failed the task, but in opposite ways. Seedream 4.0 attempted to merge the images but produced a low-quality result with a distorted face and an incorrect pose, while Wan 2.7 Pro simply returned a slightly cropped version of the source Image 1 without applying any character edits. Seedream 4.0 is technically the 'winner' only because it attempted the requested fusion, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro ignored the character reference entirely.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and texture on the horse's coat.
  • + High-quality reflection in the astronaut's visor showing a nebula.
  • + Dynamic, dramatic composition with the horse rearing up.
  • Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top.
  • Severe anatomical artifacts with the front legs and hooves blending into the lower body.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Consistent anatomical rendering of the horse's body and gait.
  • + Clean, clear rendering of the astronaut suit and equipment.
  • + Nice placement of celestial bodies in the background.
  • Failed the core prompt instruction to have the 'horse on top'.
  • Lighting on the astronaut and horse is flat and doesn't match the background environment.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific spatial instruction to have the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, choosing instead to generate the conventional image of an astronaut riding a horse. Despite the failure in prompt adherence for both, Seedream 4.0 is significantly worse due to severe anatomical distortions in the horse's legs, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro provides a clean, anatomically correct image.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Successfully transferred the exact clothing items from Image 2, including the scarf pattern and coat style.
  • + Maintains the pose and most of the background layout from the source.
  • Violated the core constraint of keeping the person's face identical; it merged the facial features of the person in Image 2 onto the person in Image 1.
  • The skin texture on the face looks artificially applied and lacks the realism of the original vitiligo.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Maintained the original person's face and identity much more accurately than the other model.
  • + Preserved the background perfectly and integrated the character well into the environment.
  • Completely failed the instruction to use the clothing from Image 2, instead generating a generic gold-patterned blazer.
  • Missed the specific accessories like the sunglasses and plaid scarf.

Verdict: Both models struggled with the complex multi-image instruction. Seedream 4.0 successfully transferred the specific outfit but failed to preserve the subject's identity, merging the two faces together. Wan 2.7 Pro successfully preserved the identity and background of the source image but failed to use the correct clothing from the second reference image.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur.
  • + Accurately places the passenger in the back seat as requested.
  • + Captures a gritty, realistic New York taxi atmosphere with appropriate lighting.
  • The passenger's face is slightly blurry and lacks fine detail.
  • The capybara's paws look somewhat mangled and less defined.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + High clarity and sharp focus on the capybara's face.
  • + Good clothing detail on both the capybara and the passenger.
  • + The capybara's paws are clearly gripping the wheel.
  • Failed to place the passenger in the back seat, placing her in the front passenger seat instead.
  • The paws look somewhat more like human/primate hands than capybara feet.

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed the spatial layout of the prompt much better by placing the human passenger in the back seat, creating the intended narrative of a normal taxi ride. Wan 2.7 Pro produced a sharper image with better lighting, but failed the prompt instruction to have the passenger in the back seat, placing her right next to the driver instead.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro
0% wins 0% ties 100% wins

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Atmospheric, cinematic lighting with a realistic 3D feel.
  • + Rich, moody textures on the parchment and jack-o-lantern.
  • + Excellent integration of the thorny border with the background scenery.
  • Text on the small scroll banner is quite blurry and difficult to read.
  • Composition is a bit cluttered around the central text area.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Clear, legible text across all intended fields including the scroll.
  • + Clean, illustrative design with symmetrical composition.
  • + Rich in specific thematic details like the cauldron, gravestones, and roses.
  • The jack-o-lantern's green color and candle-nose are a slightly odd interpretation of a 'glowing jack-o-lantern'.
  • Lighting feels flatter and less 'cinematic' than Model A.

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 excels at creating a moody, atmospheric image with superior lighting and texture, making it feel like a high-end cinematic poster. However, Wan 2.7 Pro is much more effective at rendering the specific text details requested in the prompt, providing a cleaner and more professional layout for an actual invitation. While Seedream 4.0 is more visually striking, Wan 2.7 Pro is the more functional design.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
Seedream 4.0
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent preservation of the background and clothing
  • + Strong adherence to the 'thick' hair prompt requirement
  • The hairline is unnaturally square and high
  • The hair texture looks somewhat airbrushed and artificial compared to the beard

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Provides a highly realistic hair texture that matches the beard
  • + The hairline and style look natural and well-integrated
  • + Maintains facial features and lighting perfectly
  • The hair is slightly less 'full/thick' than model A, though more realistic

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job preserving the original image's lighting and detail. Seedream 4.0 provided a very dense, blocky hairstyle that feels slightly artificial, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro created a much more convincing, natural-looking head of hair that blends seamlessly with the subject's existing features.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent text rendering and alignment.
  • + High-clarity textures on the fish and rice that feel realistic yet stylized.
  • + Clean isometric 45-degree angle that matches the prompt perfectly.
  • The light blue background has a slight gradient rather than being a strictly solid color.
  • The wasabi shape is a bit blocky compared to the rest of the high-quality assets.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Beautifully soft, refined 3D cartoon aesthetic.
  • + High-quality PBR material representation on the plate and garnish.
  • + Very clean composition with a solid background.
  • The text layout is slightly off-center and includes unrequested extra text.
  • The flag icon is less integrated than in Model A.
  • Added extra elements like chopsticks and a soy sauce dish that weren't in the prompt.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Seedream 4.0 adhered more strictly to the requested text layout and centering. While Wan 2.7 Pro offers a more sophisticated 3D 'diorama' aesthetic for the base, Seedream 4.0 produced a cleaner result that better respected the 'minimal' and 'perfectly centered' instructions.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Expertly captures the subject's facial features in a classic bobblehead-style caricature.
  • + Seamlessly integrates the background of the source image with the new elements like the news desk and dog.
  • + Creative blends hockey jerseys into the subject's outfit and the desk decor.
  • The fingers on the hand holding the phone are poorly rendered and blurry.
  • The transition between the subject's neck and the new outfit is slightly awkward.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Strong prompt adherence for the 'humorous' and 'caricature' themes using a comic book art style.
  • + Excellent text rendering within the speech bubbles.
  • + Includes multiple dogs and a clever hockey stick-microphone hybrid.
  • Loses most of the subject's specific facial likeness, opting for a generic cartoon woman.
  • The source image preservation is low, completely changing the lighting and environment.

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 is much better at image editing, as it maintains the subject's actual likeness and incorporates the new elements into the physical space of the original room. Wan 2.7 Pro creates a fun, high-quality illustration that hits all the prompt points, but it fails as an edit because the person no longer looks like the source image and the background is entirely replaced by a stylized drawing.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent capture of dynamic, playful energy with the 'tumbling together' request
  • + Superior lighting effects including beautiful dew sparkles and warm bokeh
  • + Highly expressive eyes and fur texture that feels very fluffy and soft
  • The fox kit has slightly unnatural proportions and a very saturated red color
  • Minor artifacts in the bokeh highlights where they overlap the kitten

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Naturalistic and realistic rendering of the four distinct animals
  • + Clear and distinct god rays coming from the sunrise
  • + Stable anatomy for all animals involved in the scene
  • The composition feels more static and posed compared to the 'chasing and tumbling' request
  • The butterflies look a bit pasted on and lack the motion of the rest of the scene

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 better captures the joyful and energetic vibe of the prompt, with a more dynamic composition and magical lighting that includes the requested dew sparkles. While Wan 2.7 Pro offers more anatomically grounded animals, it feels more like a staged studio photo than a playful scene in nature.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli character design style with minimalist facial features and expressive eyes.
  • + Applies a convincing hand-painted watercolor texture with soft pastel color washes.
  • + Accurately replicates the character poses and clothing while fully stylizing the faces.
  • Loses the specific identity and background detail of the original photograph in favor of a dreamier abstraction.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Retains high facial similarity to the original subjects while applying a watercolor style.
  • + Preserves more of the background street detail from the source image.
  • The character design looks more like a standard portrait illustration than the specific Studio Ghibli style requested.
  • The facial features are too detailed and realistic for the iconic Ghibli aesthetic.

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed the prompt instruction much more effectively by transforming the subjects into authentic Studio Ghibli-style character designs. While Wan 2.7 Pro preserved the likeness of the original people better, it failed to capture the specific artistic essence of Ghibli, resulting in a more generic realistic watercolor illustration.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
Seedream 4.0
Before After
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'windy hair' instruction with a natural flow.
  • + Successfully added flying leaves with motion blur.
  • + Preserved the character's facial features and clothing accurately.
  • Resolution appears slightly lower/softer than the original.
  • The sun flare in the top right is a bit distracting and wasn't requested.

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Successfully added a large number of flying leaves throughout the scene.
  • + Maintains very high image clarity and sharpness consistent with the source.
  • + Effective hair motion that spreads out dynamically.
  • The hair has some minor artifacts where it meets the background.
  • Some leaves on the ground appear a bit static compared to the ones in the air.

Verdict: Both models handled the edit well, but Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner due to its superior image clarity and more abundant leaves which create a stronger sense of energy. Seedream 4.0 followed the hair instruction nicely but introduced a slightly soft focus and an unrequested lens flare that altered the original image's lighting too much.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Perfect text rendering for the brand name
  • + Strong vector emblem aesthetic with a clean background
  • + Excellent adherence to the color palette and textures requested
  • The steam is a bit literal and lacks the stylized elegance of a professional logo

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Elegant engraving-style illustration on the cloche dome
  • + Sophisticated composition with wreath and circular framing
  • + High-quality vintage aesthetic
  • Spelling error in the brand name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian')
  • Clutter at the edges of the frame distracts from the logo logo
  • Incorrect cloche placement on a pedestal rather than a plate

Verdict: Seedream 4.0 is the superior choice because it accurately spells the brand name 'Caffè Florian' and follows the minimalist vector prompt more closely. While Wan 2.7 Pro offers a more detailed and sophisticated illustration, its spelling error and distracting elements in the corners make it less usable as a logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

Seedream 4.0
Wan 2.7 Pro

AI Judge Analysis

Seedream 4.0

  • + Successfully captured all 6 required icons
  • + The large Landing Module illustration is well-detailed
  • + Clear, bold numbering for the steps
  • Numerous spelling errors including 'Translunar' (misplaced icon), 'Surfcce', and 'Tranquility'
  • The layout is cluttered and lacks the professional 'poster' feel requested
  • The sixth step is detached from the main timeline flow

Wan 2.7 Pro

  • + Superior typography and text rendering with minimal spelling errors
  • + Excellent vertical layout that feels like a professional NASA infographic
  • + Consistent flat-vector style with a sophisticated muted color palette
  • Misspelled 'Descent' as 'Descript'
  • Icons are somewhat small and blend into the dark background
  • Missing the specifically requested Saturn V icon (uses a generic rocket)

Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro produces a significantly more professional and polished infographic that accurately captures the 'NASA-inspired' modern vector aesthetic. While Seedream 4.0 followed the specific icons more literal-mindedly, it suffered from poor layout, significant spelling errors, and a less cohesive design language. Wan 2.7 Pro's composition and clean typography make it the clear winner for a poster-style request.

Next steps

Explore each model