ByteDance's image generation model with integrated text-to-image and image editing capabilities in a unified architecture, supporting up to 4K resolution
Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
Seedream 4.0
#15 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Seedream 4.5
#9 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
Seedream 4.0
15.2%
win rate
Ties
6.1%
Seedream 4.5
78.8%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Perfect adherence to the glass cube geometry.
- + Realistic rendering of reflections and refractions through the glass surfaces.
- + Excellent lighting that clearly comes from the left as requested.
Seedream 4.5
- + High resolution and realistic book texture.
- + Good lighting and shadows on the wooden table surface.
- − The 'cube' has broken geometry with a missing front corner/edge.
- − The blue sphere is merged with the glass wall rather than sitting inside it.
- − The glass object lacks a clear top surface for the book to rest on.
Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed all spatial instructions perfectly, creating a coherent glass cube with the sphere centered inside and the plant visible behind. Seedream 4.5 failed significantly on the geometry of the cube, resulting in a distorted glass shape where the blue sphere appears to be fused with the outer glass edge.
Man and Car in California
Editing“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Excellent preservation of the source car's model and color
- + Successfully places the man inside the vehicle while maintaining his identity and clothing
- + Dynamic and picturesque composition of the California coastline
- − The man appears slightly small in scale relative to the car interior
Seedream 4.5
- + High level of detail in the subject's clothing and accessories
- + Good preservation of the subject's face and hairstyle
- − The car door is inexplicably open while the car is in motion
- − The car model is significantly altered and no longer resembles the Rolls-Royce in the source image
Verdict: Seedream 4.0 followed the instructions perfectly, placing the correct man in the correct car on a beautiful coastline while maintaining a realistic driving pose. While Seedream 4.5 captures the man's details well, it fails the edit by changing the car model and rendering the car door open while driving, which creates a nonsensical image.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Excellent adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' request with a natural-looking side-on perspective.
- + Highly realistic tools and bicycle mechanical details.
- + Subtle and believable motion blur on the passing vehicle.
- − The reflections on the pavement are slightly less pronounced than requested.
- − The man's face is looking down, losing some of the 'natural skin texture' detail.
Seedream 4.5
- + Superior rendering of rain streaks and wet pavement reflections.
- + Beautiful cinematic lighting and bokeh from the vehicle headlights.
- + Highly detailed facial texture and skin realism.
- − The bicycle chain and wrench interaction is physically impossible (wrench is floating/clipping through the chain).
- − The 'candid' feel is slightly lost as the subject appears to be posing for the camera.
Verdict: Seedream 4.0 captures a much more authentic 'candid street photo' feel with higher mechanical accuracy in the bicycle's design and tools. While Seedream 4.5 offers more striking cinematic lighting and impressive textures on the man's face, it fails on basic physics with the tool usage and feels more like a staged portrait than a candid shot.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Excellent character expression with intense, lifelike eyes.
- + Very clear and intricate engraving on the plate armor.
- + Dynamic lighting with a strong sense of mood from the torchlight.
- − The beads in the hair are a bit thick and less refined in placement.
- − Leather straps appear slightly flatter compared to the armor.
Seedream 4.5
- + Superb skin texture including detailed pores, faint scars, and dirt.
- + Extremely high fidelity on the leather straps and braided cordage.
- + Elegant beadwork and hair detail that feels more naturally integrated.
- − The background sparks are slightly less varied in shape.
- − The face-to-armor scale makes the shoulder piece feel slightly oversized.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Seedream 4.5 offers a higher level of textural detail, particularly in the leather straps, skin pores, and the fine metallic beads in the hair. While Seedream 4.0 has a more compelling direct gaze, Seedream 4.5 feels more technically impressive in its rendering of materials and lighting.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully renders large, bold headers with correct spelling.
- + High-quality, realistic food photography.
- + Follows the request for a grid-style layout for the photos.
- − Missing the actual menu items and prices, appearing more like a mood board than a menu design.
- − Layout is a bit disjointed with large white gaps and overlapping text elements.
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent structure that actually resembles a functional restaurant menu.
- + Includes price points and menu items alongside the category headers.
- + Uses vibrant colored borders to distinguish sections as requested.
- − Smaller secondary text contains several typos (e.g., 'Appetizters', 'Festaurant').
- − Layout is linear/stacked rather than a true 'grid' as requested.
Verdict: While Seedream 4.0 produces high-quality photography and perfectly spelled headers, it fails to deliver a functional menu design, instead creating a collage of images and words. Seedream 4.5 creates a much more professional and realistic menu layout with distinct sections, prices, and vibrant accents, making it the superior choice for a design task despite some minor typos in the small text.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully captures a strong sense of motion with spiral energy trails.
- + Clean rendering of the 'MAGIC BURGER' text with a nice fire effect.
- + Good use of embers and ground-level fire for atmosphere.
- − Failed the price requirement by displaying €5.99 instead of €6.99.
- − The 'exploded' effect is slightly confused, showing two partial burgers rather than one deconstructed burger.
- − One piece of cheese appears to be floating unnaturally between the two patties.
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfect adherence to all text requirements, including the correct €6.99 price.
- + Higher level of photorealistic detail on the textures of the bun and patty.
- + Excellent composition that centers the burger while maintaining the 'exploded' motion with scattered ingredients like cucumber and tomato.
- − The 'MAGIC' text has a slight overlap with the top bun.
- − The motion blur on the flying tomato slice is a bit inconsistent with the rest of the object sharpness.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it followed every prompt instruction perfectly, specifically the numerical data for the price which Seedream 4.0 got wrong. Seedream 4.5 also produced a more cohesive single-burger deconstruction that looks like a professional food advertisement, whereas Seedream 4.0 created a disjointed image with two separate half-burgers.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Excellent chalk texture throughout the board with realistic smudging.
- + Superior cursive handwriting style that looks truly hand-made.
- + Perfect spelling and completion of the complex third menu item.
- − The perspective is slightly angled rather than a direct front view.
Seedream 4.5
- + Clean, well-centered composition with a straight-on perspective.
- + Highly legible text with consistent spacing.
- + Good adherence to the specific date and menu items requested.
- − The first menu item repeats the name and price in an awkward double-line arrangement.
- − The cursive title looks less 'elegant' and more like a standard print-script hybrid compared to Model A.
Verdict: Seedream 4.0 is the winner due to its superior artistic rendering of the chalk texture and more authentic cursive handwriting, as well as correctly formatting the list items. While Seedream 4.5 provides a clearer straight-on view, it struggles with a redundant line of text in the first menu item and has a less realistic chalk aesthetic.
Pose & Character Mashup
Editing“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully integrated clothing elements from Image 2 while attempting the pose.
- + Retained the yellow background environment well.
- − Failed to preserve the face and character identity from Image 2.
- − Pose is a significant departure from the source Image 1 with distorted anatomy.
- − Faces and hands exhibit severe artifacts and poor resolution.
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent character preservation, maintaining the face, sunglasses, hair, and expression from Image 2.
- + Highly accurate recreation of the dynamic pose from Image 1.
- + Superior visual quality with clean lines and natural lighting integration.
- − None notable; the model executed a complex character-swap and pose-transfer task flawlessly.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it precisely followed the complex instructions to merge the character from Image 2 with the pose of Image 1. Seedream 4.0 failed to maintain the character's identity and produced a distorted figure with significant anatomical errors, whereas Seedream 4.5 maintained high visual fidelity and perfect character consistency.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Excellent high-frequency detail in the horse's mane and skin texture
- + Cinematic lighting with a beautiful reflection of a nebula in the astronaut's visor
- + Strong composition with a sense of scale and motion
- − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse, not vice versa
- − The horse's front legs and hoof anatomy are slightly distorted
Seedream 4.5
- + Very atmospheric lighting with galaxy and nebula colors
- + Good central composition and dynamic floating pose
- + High visual quality with clean rendering of the space suit
- − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse
- − The astronaut has an extra leg appearing below the horse's belly
Verdict: Both Seedream 4.0 and Seedream 4.5 failed the negative constraint to have the 'horse on top', instead producing the common trope of an astronaut riding a horse. Seedream 4.0 is preferred as it features significantly better texture detail and avoids the major anatomical error seen in Seedream 4.5, where a third leg is growing out of the astronaut/horse's side.
Outfit Transfer Challenge
Editing“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully replicates the entire pose, including legs and shoes, found in Image 2.
- + Captures the intricate pattern of the scarf well.
- − Failed the primary instruction to keep the face unchanged, blending it with the person from Image 2.
- − Completely altered the original person's height and body proportions.
- − The face details are messy with overlapping textures.
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfectly preserves the identity, face, and hair of the person in Image 1.
- + Accurately adapts the clothing to the torso and arms while maintaining the original background.
- + Correctly includes the requested accessories like the watch and ring.
- − Does not show the legs and shoes requested in the prompt.
- − The fabric logic is slightly flawed where the skin shows through the open shirt area.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it followed the most critical preservation instructions, keeping the face and hair of the original subject perfectly intact. While Seedream 4.0 successfully transferred more of the outfit (including shoes), it failed the prompt by merging the faces of both subjects and significantly changing the person's physical build. Seedream 4.5 demonstrates a much better understanding of image editing and source preservation.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur and clothing.
- + Perspective feels very cinematic and realistic for a car interior shot.
- + The passenger's expression perfectly captures the 'boredom' requested in the prompt.
- − The text on the cap is slightly distorted, reading 'TAT' instead of 'TAXI'.
- − The capybara's hands look somewhat like human hands covered in fur rather than paws.
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfectly legible text on the taxi cap.
- + Strong color balance and lighting that feels authentic to NYC at night.
- + Good composition with the capybara directly facing the viewer through the windshield.
- − The capybara's paws are rendered a bit strangely, looking like multiple finger-like protrusions.
- − The passenger's hair and neck area have some minor blurring artifacts.
Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt with high accuracy, but Seedream 4.5 is the slight winner due to its superior text rendering and centered composition. While Seedream 4.0 captured the 'bored' expression of the passenger better, Seedream 4.5 provided a clearer overall image with a more professional finish.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Atmospheric cinematic lighting with a strong glow from the pumpkin.
- + Includes a complex and visually interesting thorn and cobweb border.
- + The textured, weathered appearance of the parchment background feels very authentic to the vintage theme.
- − Text on the small scroll banner is poorly rendered and difficult to read.
- − Composition is a bit cluttered, especially in the bottom text area.
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent typography with clean, legible text on both the title and the scroll banner.
- + Clear and organized layout for the event details at the bottom.
- + Good contrast between the dark blue sky and the warm pumpkin glow.
- − The 'thorns' in the border look more like modern barbed wire than natural gothic thorns.
- − Slightly less 'cinematic' and gritty than Model A, appearing more like a clean digital graphic.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Seedream 4.5 is the superior choice for an invitation because it successfully rendered all the text, including the secondary scroll banner, with high legibility. Seedream 4.0 has a more immersive gothic atmosphere and texture, but is let down by the garbled text on the banner and a more cramped composition.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully added a very full and thick head of hair
- + Maintains the exact background and clothing from the source image
- + Matches the dark hair color to the beard
- − The hairline and volume look somewhat unnatural and 'wig-like'
- − The hair texture is slightly fuzzy/blurry compared to the sharp beard texture
Seedream 4.5
- + Creates a much more realistic and believable hairline
- + Texture of the hair perfectly matches the coarse, realistic texture of the beard
- + Preserves facial features and lighting with high fidelity
- − The hair is slightly less 'full' than Model A, though more realistic
Verdict: Both models successfully added hair while preserving the identity and environment of the source image. Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it provides a much more natural hairline and realistic hair texture that blends seamlessly with the existing beard, whereas Seedream 4.0's edit looks more like a superimposed wig with a suspicious rectangular hairline.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Clean, crisp text rendering for both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.
- + Excellent miniature aesthetic with vibrant, appealing colors.
- + Very high detail on the sushi textures, particularly the grain of the fish and the rice.
- − The raised diorama base is very thin, almost looking like just a tray.
- − The flag icon is slightly simple compared to the other graphics.
Seedream 4.5
- + Accurately interprets the 'raised diorama base' as a thick, blocky platform.
- + Good use of depth of field and realistic lighting on the 3D objects.
- + Includes a literal flag icon with a flagpole, adding to the miniature feel.
- − The 'JAPAN' text has a slight artifact/glitch on the letter 'N'.
- − Overall composition feels a bit less polished than Model A.
- − The diorama base texture is somewhat grainy and less 'refined' than requested.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt closely, but Seedream 4.0 produced a much cleaner and more professional-looking graphic with perfect text rendering. While Seedream 4.5 captured the 'raised diorama' concept more literally, it suffered from a minor text artifact and a grainier texture on the base, making Seedream 4.0 the preferred choice for visual clarity.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully incorporates all elements: news desk, microphone, dog, hockey stick, and jersey.
- + Captures the 'caricature' style well with an exaggerated wide-mouth expression and bobblehead proportions.
- + Maintains a strong resemblance to the source subject's facial features despite the exaggeration.
- − Small anatomical errors such as the hand holding the phone having an extra/distorted finger.
- − The background becomes slightly more cluttered compared to the clean original.
Seedream 4.5
- + High visual clarity and very clean rendering of the anchor desk and hockey equipment.
- + Professional lighting and composition that feels like a polished 3D animation style.
- + Excellent preservation of the subject's face while applying the caricature proportions.
- − Less 'humorous' and 'exaggerated' in its expression compared to Model A, opting for a standard smile.
- − The placement of the dog on the desk feels a bit static and less integrated into the scene's story.
Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of following complex instructions and transforming the source image into a caricature. Seedream 4.0 (Model A) leans more into the 'humorous and exaggerated' request with a funny facial expression and the inclusion of a selfie-taking pose. Seedream 4.5 (Model B) has superior technical polish and cleaner rendering of objects like the hockey gloves and microphone, but is slightly more conservative in its interpretation of 'exaggerated'.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI judge analysis unavailable for this challenge.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI judge analysis unavailable for this challenge.
Golden Hour Stroll
Image Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully added blowing hair and falling leaves.
- + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the exact pose and features of the subject.
- − The falling leaves appear a bit flat and lack motion blur.
- − The overall 'energetic feel' is subtler compared to Model B.
Seedream 4.5
- + Superior dynamic feel with motion blur on leaves and a wider, more active stance.
- + Hair motion is very well-executed and feels natural to the wind direction.
- + Maintains very high visual quality and likeness to the original subject.
- − Slightly altered the subject's pose (arms are wider) compared to the source image.
- − Small artifacting where the leash meets the dog's collar.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the winner as it better captures the requested 'energetic and lively feel' by adding motion blur to the leaves and adjusting the subject's posture to look more active. While Seedream 4.0 does a perfect job of preserving the original pose, its addition of motion feels more like a static overlay than a part of the scene.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Perfect text rendering for both the name and the date banner.
- + Excellent use of texture on the background and within the logo elements.
- + Warm, cohesive color palette that matches the 'vintage restaurant' prompt.
- − The steam lines are slightly asymmetrical.
- − A bit more 'illustrated' than 'vector minimalist' but still very close.
Seedream 4.5
- + Closer to a clean 'vector' style with sharper lines.
- + Accurate text rendering and layout.
- + Well-defined highlights on the cloche dome.
- − The accent mark on 'Caffè' is oriented incorrectly (grave vs acute).
- − The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center within the banner.
- − The background texture is much more subtle, making it feel slightly flatter.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality logos. Seedream 4.0 is preferred as it correctly oriented the accent mark in 'Caffè' and provided a more authentic vintage texture, whereas Seedream 4.5 had a minor typographical error and slightly less balanced text placement.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.0
- + Successfully renders all 6 requested steps with numbers.
- + Legible main titles and astronaut names.
- + Good inclusion of 'Tranquility' as the landing site.
- − Icons for steps 5 and 6 are fused into one large illustration, ruining the step-by-step layout.
- − Inconsistent vector style with some messy lines and overlapping numbers.
- − Text alignment and spacing is cluttered.
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent clean, modern vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the 'flat-vector' request.
- + Logical layout with clear vertical guide lines for all 6 steps.
- + Superior color palette application and professional font choice.
- − Step 5 uses a generic satellite icon instead of a descending lunar module.
- − Spelling error in 'Tranquility' (missing an 'l').
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 captures the requested 'modern vector infographic' style far better than Seedream 4.0, which looks a bit like a rough sketch. While Seedream 4.0 followed the specific icon instructions for the final steps more literally, Seedream 4.5 produced a much more professional, balanced, and visually appealing layout that feels like a real NASA-inspired poster.
Explore each model
ByteDance's latest image generation model unifying text-to-image and image editing in a single architecture, with improved text rendering and 30-40% faster generation than v4.0