ByteDance's latest image generation model unifying text-to-image and image editing in a single architecture, with improved text rendering and 30-40% faster generation than v4.0
Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
Seedream 4.5
#9 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Wan 2.7 Pro
#37 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
Seedream 4.5
50.0%
win rate
Ties
0.0%
Wan 2.7 Pro
50.0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with realistic soft shadows cast from the left.
- + Highly realistic glass textures and reflections on the bottom surface.
- + Clean, modern composition with a very accurate representation of the blue sphere's scale.
- − The green plant in the background is quite blurred and less distinct than requested.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Successfully includes the window to justify the lighting source mentioned in the prompt.
- + The green plant is very clear and its visibility through the glass is well-executed.
- + Great rustic texture on the wooden table.
- − The glass cube has internal vertical lines that make it look more like a glass case or lantern than a simple cube.
- − The perspective of the cube's base feels slightly flattened compared to the table.
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including all spatial relationships and colors. Seedream 4.5 is the winner due to its superior rendering of glass and lighting physics, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro's glass cube has distracting internal structural lines.
Man and Car in California
Editing“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfectly preserves the specific man's face, hair, and every detail of his unique outfit.
- + Correctly seats the character inside the car from the second source image.
- + Excellent adherence to the coastal background request while maintaining focus on the subject.
- − The car door is open while driving, which is a logical inconsistency.
- − Small anatomical glitches in the hands on the steering wheel.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Excellent lighting and scenic composition of the California coastline.
- + Very high preservation of the car's original details and scale.
- − Completely failed to use the man from the second source image, replacing him with a different person.
- − The driver appears tiny and poorly integrated into the seat.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it successfully combined both source images, perfectly preserving the man's identity, hair, and clothing. Wan 2.7 Pro provided a beautiful landscape but failed the primary editing task by replacing the subject with a generic individual.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to motion blur and night-time cinematic lighting
- + High-quality skin texture and realistic water droplet details
- + Strong composition with imperfect framing that feels like a candid street shot
- − The red bicycle design is slightly cropped and less clear than in Model B
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Clear subject matter and realistic daylight street environment
- + Accurate depiction of the red bicycle and the elderly man's posture
- − Failed to include the requested motion blur from passing cars
- − Lacks the requested shallow depth of field, with the background being relatively sharp
- − Multiple physics artifacts, including a missing kickstand and a floating pedal
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 captures the requested atmosphere perfectly, delivering the cinematic lighting, motion blur, and shallow depth of field specified in the prompt. In contrast, Wan 2.7 Pro ignores several technical prompts like motion blur and bokeh while also introducing structural errors in the bicycle and reflection. Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner for its superior realism and adherence to photographic instructions.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Exceptional texture detail on skin, leather straps, and the textile underlayer
- + Dynamic composition with high-quality warm lighting and realistic reflections
- + Highly lifelike eyes and intricate engraving on the plate armor
- − The tight crop makes it more of a face portrait than a paladin portrait, obscuring much of the armor
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Better representation of the character's braids and beads as requested
- + Shows more of the ornate armor and character silhouette
- + Good application of the bokeh sparks in the background
- − The lighting on the face is somewhat flat and less cohesive with the surrounding torches
- − Textures on the leather and skin are less detailed compared to Model A
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 produces a much higher level of visual fidelity, with stunning skin textures and realistic lighting that truly feels 'lifelike'. While Wan 2.7 Pro better captures specific prompt elements like the beads in the braids and a wider view of the armor, it lacks the cinematic quality and fine micro-details found in Seedream 4.5.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Clean, ultra-minimalist layout with large, high-quality food photography.
- + Excellent use of vibrant, color-coded borders for different menu sections.
- − The text contains numerous spelling errors and repetitive placeholder names.
- − Layout is overly simplistic, lacking common functional menu elements like descriptions.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Sophisticated and realistic menu structure with a professional grid layout.
- + Comprehensive design including icons, QR codes, and logical category headers.
- − Smaller text elements suffer from typical AI blurring and illegibility.
- − The inclusion of background props slightly distracts from the core minimalist prompt.
Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro provides a much more functional and realistic menu design that adheres to the multifaceted nature of restaurant branding. While Seedream 4.5 offers cleaner high-resolution imagery, its lack of legible or varied text makes it less effective as a design mock-up compared to the comprehensive layout of Wan 2.7 Pro.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun
- + Highly dynamic motion blur on the flying vegetable slices
- + Superior integration of the 'Magic Burger' text into the fire theme
- − The burger is not truly 'exploded' as requested, remaining largely assembled
- − Missing some secondary ingredients like onions in the air
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' burger request with clearly separated layers
- + Accurate rendering of all specific text elements and the starburst graphic
- + High clarity and balanced composition for a commercial ad
- − The texture looks slightly more digital/artificial compared to Model A
- − The lettuce leaf is oddly large and flat in the composition
Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro followed the complex 'exploded burger' prompt much more accurately, creating a clear separation of ingredients that works perfectly for an advertisement. While Seedream 4.5 offers more impressive photorealistic textures and motion blur, it failed to actually explode the burger layers, keeping it mostly stacked.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudging and dust effects.
- + Captures the requested natural variations in letter size and slant perfectly.
- + Realistic wooden frame and cafe background depth.
- − Repeats the price '$24' unnecessarily on two lines for the first item.
- − Slightly less 'elegant' cursive in the title compared to what might be expected.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Perfect text accuracy for all requested menu items and prices.
- + Very clean, legible layout with consistent stylistic choices.
- + Good integration of the board into a cozy rustic environment.
- − The text looks a bit too digital/uniform, lacking the gritty chalk texture requested.
- − The 'handwriting' feels more like a stylized digital font than actual chalk on a board.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 captures the 'chalk' aesthetic much better than Wan 2.7 Pro, featuring realistic pressure variations, dust, and authentic handwriting quirks despite a small repetition in the text. Wan 2.7 Pro is more accurate with the text itself, but the letters look too much like a clean digital font, failing the prompt's requirement for a realistic chalk texture.
Pose & Character Mashup
Editing“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent character preservation including sunglasses, scarf, and specific clothing graphics.
- + Accurately maps the subject's face and body to the complex pose in Image 1.
- + Maintains lighting and background consistency from the source pose image.
- − The right foot is rendering with slightly unnatural toe placement on the ottoman.
- − Small artifact on the left wrist area.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Perfectly preserves the original environment and subject of Image 1.
- − Completely failed the edit instruction to change the character to the subject of Image 2.
- − No visible changes were made to the source image.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 successfully performed a complex character transfer, placing the man from Image 2 into the exact difficult pose of Image 1 while maintaining his specific clothing and accessories. Wan 2.7 Pro failed the task entirely, simply returning a copy of Image 1 with no modifications.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere with vibrant nebulae.
- + Highly detailed textures on the horse's fur and the astronaut's suit.
- + Dynamic composition with the horse in a rearing pose.
- − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Clean, high-resolution rendering with a clear view of Earth and planets.
- + Stable anatomy for both the astronaut and the horse.
- − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.
- − The surreal elements (floating small planets) feel a bit random rather than integrated into a cinematic scene.
Verdict: Both Seedream 4.5 and Wan 2.7 Pro failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut, instead providing the standard interpretation of an astronaut riding a horse. Seedream 4.5 is the superior image due to its stunning cinematic lighting and sense of movement, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro feels more like a static digital composite.
Outfit Transfer Challenge
Editing“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to the specific clothing layers, including the navy coat, plaid scarf, gold watch, and ring from Image 2.
- + Maintains the subject's face and hair perfectly from Image 1.
- + Seamless integration of shadows and lighting on the new clothing.
- − The shirt is oddly cropped or transparent in the center, showing the torso skin in a way that doesn't match the original outfit's construction.
- − The subject's right arm (viewer's left) disappears into the jacket pocket somewhat unnaturally.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Successfully keeps the person's face and the general background from Image 1.
- + Includes shoes as requested by the prompt.
- − Completely failed to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a random gold-patterned blazer.
- − Changes the subject's pose completely, failing to use Image 1 as the 'base' pose.
- − The hand detail is poor, with distorted fingers.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 followed the complex instructions much more accurately, successfully transferring the specific coat, scarf, and jewelry from Image 2 onto the subject while preserving the face and hair of Image 1. Wan 2.7 Pro failed the core task by generating an entirely different outfit and changing the pose, which was explicitly forbidden in the prompt.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to the requested front-facing composition showing both the driver and the passenger behind him
- + Highly realistic textures on the capybara's fur and the jacket
- + Clear and accurate rendering of the 'TAXI' text on the cap
- − The capybara's front paws look slightly more like human hands/fingers than actual webbed capybara paws
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Uses a more authentic chauffeur-style hat as opposed to a generic baseball cap
- + Strong sense of motion with the blurred street lights in the background
- − Fails the prompt instructions by placing the human passenger in the front seat instead of the back seat
- − Anatomical issues with the capybara's hands appearing long and primate-like
- − The passenger's hair and face have slight digital artifacts/blurring
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 followed all elements of the prompt perfectly, including the specific placement of the passenger in the back seat and a clear front-on perspective. Wan 2.7 Pro placed the passenger in the front seat, directly contradicting the prompt, and featured more unsettling primate-like hands on the capybara.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere matches the 'moody' and 'spooky' vibe well.
- + Photorealistic textures on the pumpkin and background elements create high visual clarity.
- + Text is perfectly legible with high contrast against the background.
- − Misses the 'parchment' texture requested in the prompt.
- − The 'thorns' part of the border looks like modern barbed wire instead of natural thorny vines.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Perfectly adheres to the 'parchment' and 'vintage' aesthetic with a detailed illustrative style.
- + Excellent integration of the border, including thorns, webs, and gothic motifs.
- + Comprehensive adherence to all prompt details including the scroll banner and specifically requested text.
- − The font for the date and location is a bit plain compared to the gothic title.
- − Less 'cinematic' lighting than Model A, appearing more as a flat 2D illustration.
Verdict: Both models followed the complex text instructions perfectly, which is impressive. Seedream 4.5 creates a high-impact cinematic image with realistic lighting, but Wan 2.7 Pro captures the specific 'vintage gothic parchment' aesthetic much more accurately. Wan 2.7 Pro is the winner for its superior composition, decorative border details, and adherence to the requested material texture.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfect preservation of original pixels
- + Excellent integration of hair color with existing facial hair
- + Natural-looking hairline transition
- − Hair volume is relatively low, almost looking like a very short buzz cut or receding style rather than 'full/thick'
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Strong adherence to the 'full, thick head of hair' instruction
- + Realistic texture and wavy styling
- + Excellent preservation of original facial features and lighting
- − The hairline on the left side of the forehead looks slightly sharp/artificial
- − Minor change to the shape of the upper forehead compared to the original
Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro is the clear winner for better following the prompt's request for 'full, thick' hair, whereas Seedream 4.5 provided a more conservative, thinner hair transformation. Both models did an exceptional job of preserving the source image's lighting, facial features, and background details.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent typography with clean, bold execution
- + Strong PBR feeling on the salmon texture
- + Very clean, minimal background
- − The diorama base has a rough, concrete-like texture that feels out of place for food
- − The flag icon is tucked away to the side rather than being part of a balanced header element
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Very polished 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft, appealing lighting
- + Better variety of sushi models and garnish while maintaining a clean look
- + Superior composition of text elements and graphic design at the top
- − Added extra text and elements like chopsticks/sauce not explicitly requested
- − The rice grains look slightly more like uniform beads than realistic rice
Verdict: Wan 2.7 Pro produces a significantly more professional and aesthetically pleasing result that perfectly captures the '3D cartoon miniature' style requested. While Seedream 4.5 captures the textures of the salmon well, its diorama base feels unfinished and the overall composition is less dynamic than Wan 2.7 Pro's polished layout.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent preservation of the subject's facial features in a caricature style.
- + Perfect integration of all elements including the anchor desk, microphone, dog, and hockey gear.
- + Higher visual quality with realistic textures and consistent lighting.
- − The caricature style is limited mainly to head-scaling rather than more expressive artistic exaggerations.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Successfully captures a more traditional, 'exaggerated and humorous' caricature art style.
- + Creative combination of a microphone and hockey stick.
- + Includes multiple dogs in hockey jerseys which fits the prompt well.
- − The facial likeness to the original subject is significantly weaker than the other model.
- − Unnecessary speech bubbles that feel a bit generic.
- − Minor anatomical issues with the hands.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the winner because it managed to maintain a clear and unmistakable likeness to the woman in the source image while perfectly incorporating every element of the prompt into a cohesive scene. While Wan 2.7 Pro offered a more stylistically 'exaggerated' caricature, it lost the subject's identity in the process, making it less successful as a personalized edit.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent depiction of dynamic movement with realistic motion blur
- + Vibrant, high-impact lighting and colors
- + Accurate representation of all four requested species with expressive features
- − The fox kit has somewhat stylized, overly large eyes
- − The kitten's tail is positioned awkwardly near the fox
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Clear god rays and beautiful backlight on the fur
- + Highly realistic anatomical features for each animal
- + Excellent detail in the dew-covered grass and wildflowers
- − The rabbit and fox are physically overlapping in a way that looks slightly merged
- − The kitten is quite small and lacks a bit of the 'fluffy' volume of the other animals
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, capturing the four specific animals and the golden sunrise lighting. Wan 2.7 Pro delivered a more grounded, realistic scene with beautiful nature photography qualities, while Seedream 4.5 created a more cinematic and joyful image with better a sense of action and playfulness.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfectly captures the distinct Studio Ghibli character design and line art style
- + Excellent source preservation of the underlying meme composition and character poses
- + Background elements like the red bus and watercolor buildings feel authentic to the requested studio
- − The woman in the foreground has slightly simplified features compared to the original's expression
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Strong watercolor texture application across the whole image
- + Preserves the specific facial likenesses of the original actors more closely than Model A
- − The art style is more general 'watercolor realistic' than the specific 'Studio Ghibli' aesthetic requested
- − Line art is a bit too thin and detailed to match the Ghibli animation look
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it successfully interpreted the 'Studio Ghibli' instruction, transforming the meme into a genuine anime still with the correct character designs and cel-shaded aesthetic. Wan 2.7 Pro provided a high-quality watercolor edit, but it missed the stylistic marks of the specific animation studio requested.
Golden Hour Stroll
Image Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent depiction of wind-blown hair with natural-looking strands
- + Dynamic variety in leaf sizes and motion blur creating depth
- + Preserves the subject's face and clothing with high fidelity
- − The leash handle has been slightly reshaped/merged compared to the original
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Successfully adds a wide distribution of flying leaves
- + Captures the hair movement well while maintaining the original background
- + Good preservation of the dog's features and the park setting
- − The hair strands appear a bit more 'drawn on' and less integrated than in model A
- − Some leaves look static rather than having motion blur
Verdict: Both models followed the instructions effectively, adding wind-blown hair and flying leaves while maintaining the source image's integrity. Seedream 4.5 is the winner because the motion blur on the leaves and the flow of the hair feel more authentically 'dynamic' and realistic, whereas Wan 2.7 Pro's edits feel slightly more like static overlays.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfectly spelled requested text
- + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic
- + Strong adherence to the 'banner' and 'steam' visual elements
- − The 'steam' icon is slightly disconnected from the cloche knob
- − The arched text spacing is slightly uneven at the ends
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Intricate, high-quality vintage engraving style
- + Sophisticated layout with balanced circular framing
- + Strong thematic additions like 'Venezia Italia'
- − Misspelled the primary name as 'Florion' instead of 'Florian'
- − Less 'minimalist' than requested, featuring busy borders and corner decorations
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the winner primarily because it followed the spelling of 'Caffè Florian' correctly and adhered closer to the 'minimalist' requirement. While Wan 2.7 Pro produced a more visually stunning and professional-looking vintage seal, the spelling error and higher complexity deviate from the prompt's core constraints.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Clean, professional vector aesthetic with consistent line weights.
- + Excellent text legibility and correct spelling of mission names.
- + Follows the color palette requirements perfectly using a horizon-based layout.
- − The 'Descent' icon is a satellite rather than the lunar module requested.
- − Layout feels a bit sparse in the bottom half.
Wan 2.7 Pro
- + Outstanding information density with accurate mission details and statistics.
- + Highly creative vertical layout that feels like a comprehensive poster.
- + Technically superior iconography for the lunar module stages.
- − Minor spelling errors like 'DESCRIPT' instead of 'DESCENT' and 'Tranquilicy'.
- − The iconography for the Earth and Moon is slightly less crisp than the other model.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 produces a very clean and professional-looking graphic with perfect spelling, but it fails on the specific 'Descent' icon by showing a satellite. Wan 2.7 Pro creates a much more detailed and informative infographic that feels like a real educational poster, though it suffers from minor typos. Wan 2.7 Pro is the preferred choice for its superior composition, adherence to technical icons, and the inclusion of extra relevant data.
Explore each model
Alibaba's Wan 2.7 Pro image generation and editing model with higher-quality outputs and support for 4K image generation