ByteDance's latest image generation model unifying text-to-image and image editing in a single architecture, with improved text rendering and 30-40% faster generation than v4.0
Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
Seedream 4.5
#9 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Wan 2.6
#28 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
Seedream 4.5
62.5%
win rate
Ties
0.0%
Wan 2.6
37.5%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent photorealism with very clean textures on the glass and book.
- + Accurately places the plant behind the cube as requested.
- + Realistic refraction and caustic lighting effects on the wooden table.
- − The sphere is quite small relative to the cube, though the prompt did specify 'small'.
Wan 2.6
- + Strong composition with a rustic, atmospheric feel.
- + Good rendering of the book's worn texture and aged pages.
- − The plant is placed next to/behind the cube but is not clearly 'visible through the glass' as a primary feature.
- − The glass cube has distracting internal reflections and structural inconsistencies.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it perfectly follows the spatial instructions, placing the green plant behind the cube so it is visible through the glass. Wan 2.6 places the plant more to the side and has less clean geometry for the 'glass cube' element.
Man and Car in California
Editing“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent preservation of the man's physical features, hairstyle, and specific outfit details from the source image.
- + Highly detailed car interior and door mechanism that matches the Rolls-Royce style from the source.
- + Natural interaction between the subject, the steering wheel, and the seat.
- − The open car door while driving creates a safety/logic error in the scene composition.
- − The lighting on the man feels slightly flat compared to the bright outdoor background.
Wan 2.6
- + Beautiful and vibrant California coastline scenery with motion blur on the road and wheels.
- + Dynamic and realistic lighting that blends the subject and car into the environment.
- + Great composition that captures a clear sense of movement.
- − Significantly altered the man's hair texture and facial structure compared to the source image.
- − The man's outfit lost the distinct plaid patterns and details visible in the original photo.
- − Minor artifacting where the man's hand meets the steering wheel.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 excels at source preservation, keeping the man's face, hair, and complex plaid outfit perfectly intact while merging him into the vehicle. However, it makes a strange compositional choice to have the car door swinging open while driving. Wan 2.6 creates a much more cinematic and visually appealing environment with superior lighting, but it fails to maintain the specific likeness and clothing of the subject provided in the source image.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on passing cars
- + Naturalistic hand-to-object interaction that feels grounded
- + Strong atmospheric reflections in ground puddles
- − The composition feels slightly cropped, cutting off the front of the bike and the top of the rain hood
- − Lower level of fine skin texture compared to the competitor
Wan 2.6
- + Highly detailed skin and clothing textures that look very realistic
- + Better framing of the subject and the entire red bicycle
- + Includes realistic repair tools on the ground which adds to the narrative
- − Water droplets on the jacket look like static beads rather than flowing rain
- − The 'motion blur' on the car in the background is less convincing and looks more like simple depth of field
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Wan 2.6 is the subtle winner for its superior detail in skin texture and better overall framing of the scene. While Seedream 4.5 captured the requested motion blur of passing cars more effectively, Wan 2.6 felt more like a complete street photograph with the inclusion of tools and a clear view of the red bicycle.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent high-resolution skin texture with realistic pores and fine hairs
- + Beautifully intricate engraving on the armor palette
- + Sophisticated use of lighting and shallow depth of field for a cinematic feel
- − The 'beads' in the hair look more like metal studs or fasteners than decorative beads
Wan 2.6
- + Strong adherence to the 'battle-worn' descriptor with heavy dirt and grime
- + Includes colored beads in the braid as requested by the prompt
- + Excellent texture work on the frayed cloth underlayer
- − The face appears slightly smoother and less detailed compared to Model A
- − Lighting on the face feels a bit flat despite the presence of torches
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 produces a superior portrait in terms of raw visual fidelity and realistic lighting, capturing the 'lifelike eyes' and ornate metalwork perfectly. Wan 1.0 does a slightly better job with the specific prompt requirements for beads and a grittier 'battle-worn' aesthetic, but it lacks the professional cinematic polish of the former.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent typography with very high legible and logical text.
- + Very clean, minimalist aesthetic aligned with the 'modern' prompt requirement.
- + Food photography is high quality and looks appetizing.
Wan 2.6
- + Stronger adherence to the 'food photos in grid' instruction.
- + More complex and interesting design with vibrant accents.
- + Correctly displays multiple menu columns and a larger variety of dishes.
- − Text contains frequent gibberish and character artifacts.
- − The layout feels a bit cramped compared to the minimalist request.
- − Some food photos are repetitive copies of the same pizza.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 produced a much cleaner and more professional-looking menu with surprisingly legible text, though it took a very simplified approach to the layout. Wan 2.6 followed the prompt's structural requirements for a grid and specific sections more closely, but suffered from significant text hallucinations and messy typography. Seedream 4.5 is preferred for its higher production quality and functional legibility.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent typography with a clean fiery glow effect.
- + Well-balanced composition with sharp focus on the central burger.
- + Effective use of motion blur on the flying vegetable slices.
- − The burger is not very 'exploded'; most components are still stacked.
- − A bit less dynamic in the ingredient separation compared to the prompt's request.
Wan 2.6
- + Strong 'exploded' effect with ingredients flying outwards and sauce dripping.
- + Impressive 3D text effects for the main title with realistic flames.
- + High level of detail in the background texture and smoke.
- − The starburst for the price is a bit cluttered and less integrated than Model A.
- − The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is placed at the bottom, which is slightly less conventional for an ad layout.
Verdict: Wan 2.6 captures the 'exploded' aspect of the prompt much better, showing motion and separation through flying tomatoes and dripping sauce. Seedream 4.5 has cleaner graphic design and typography but presents more of a floating burger than an exploded one. Wan 2.6 is the preferred choice for its dynamic energy and superior adherence to the 'exploded' requirement.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent text legibility and clean composition
- + Highly accurate rendering of the prompt's specific menu items and date
- + Natural chalk texture on the board surface including subtle dust smears
- − Repeated the price for the first item on two different lines
- − The cursive style for the title is more print-script than elegant cursive
Wan 2.6
- + Very realistic chalk texture with heavy smudging and dust at the bottom
- + Dynamic handwriting with more natural variation in letterform thickness
- + Good adherence to the requested menu items
- − Repeated the price for the first two items on two different lines which looks messy
- − The perspective makes some text slightly harder to read at the edges
- − Missed the '$' symbol for the first item's top line
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt's text requirements exceptionally well. Seedream 4.5 offers a cleaner, more readable presentation with very sharp text, while Wan 2.6 captures a more authentic 'messy' chalkboard aesthetic with heavier smudging and dust. Seedream 4.5 is the winner because it avoids the redundant price lines on the second item and maintains a more professional café composition.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere
- + Strong dynamic pose for both the horse and astronaut
- + Clean, high-quality rendering of the space suit
- − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be 'on top'
- − The astronaut has an extra leg protruding from the horse's side
Wan 2.6
- + High detail in the horse's mane and the astronaut's visor reflections
- + Cinematic use of light rays and dust particles
- + Well-composed and balanced layout
- − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be 'on top'
- − The reins are physically incoherent, floating/merging with the astronaut
Verdict: Both Seedream 4.5 and Wan 2.6 failed the negative constraint to have the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, instead providing the standard astronaut-on-horse interpretation. Seedream 4.5 is slightly less refined due to a significant anatomical error (the astronaut has a third leg), whereas Wan 2.6 offers better texture work and lighting despite its logical issues with the reins.
Outfit Transfer Challenge
Editing“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent preservation of the person's identity and facial features
- + Successfully included specific details like the gold watch and ring from Image 2
- + Applied the coat and scarf with very high accuracy to the reference image patterns
- − Confused the skin pattern for a shirt design, resulting in a strange patch of skin appearing over a black shirt
Wan 2.6
- + Included the sunglasses from Image 2 which the other model omitted
- + Maintained skin and hair details perfectly
- + Good fabric texture and lighting integration
- − Failed to include accessories like the gold watch or the specific multi-layered look of the open coat and shirt
- − The scarf pattern is less accurate to the reference than Model A
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 captures the intricate details of the outfit much better, including the jewelry and the specific drape of the open coat, though it makes a logical error by blending the person's skin onto the shirt. Wan 2.6 provides a cleaner overall image and correctly interprets the sunglasses, but fails on the complex layering and accessory requirements. Seedream 4.5 is the preferred model for its superior adherence to the 'exact outfit' requirement, despite the skin/shirt artifact.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur and clothing.
- + Clearly legible text on the driver's cap.
- + Very clean composition that feels physically plausible despite the surreal subject.
- − The passenger's hands and phone interaction are slightly blurry/AI-deformed.
- − The capybara's paws look more like primate hands than rodent paws.
Wan 2.6
- + Dynamic side-profile composition that captures both the driver and the rainy NYC exterior.
- + The passenger's expression and coat perfectly match the 'bored businesswoman' prompt.
- + Adds atmospheric rain and light streaks that enhance the night theme.
- − The driver's cap looks more like a police/military officer cap than a taxi driver cap.
- − The interior seat and door frame show significant AI artifacts and 'melting' textures.
- − The capybara's paws are not correctly placed on the steering wheel.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the winner because of its superior image clarity and realistic rendering of the capybara. While Wan 2.6 captures a better 'cinematic' angle and more accurate passenger expression, it suffers from heavy artifacts in the car's interior and a confusing hat design. Seedream 4.5 delivers a high-quality, professional-looking image that follows almost every part of the prompt with clean execution.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent text legibility and clean character rendering
- + Highly cinematic lighting with a realistic 3D feel
- + Creative use of barbed wire to fulfill the thorns requirement
- − The dark parchment background feels more like a standard photo backdrop than paper
- − Lacks a cohesive ornate border compared to the other model
Wan 2.6
- + Perfectly captures the vintage dark parchment and gothic border aesthetic
- + Superior composition with the twisted trees framing the central elements
- + Rich artistic texture in the gold lettering
- − Slightly less crisp text rendering on the scroll compared to the other model
- − The glowing effect is a bit more illustrative and less realistic
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality invitations with perfect text accuracy. Wan 2.6 is the preferred choice as its layout, ornate gothic border, and parchment texture better capture the 'vintage' aesthetic requested, whereas Seedream 4.5 feels slightly more like a modern digital composite.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Perfect preservation of original facial geometry and background
- + Seamless blend of the new hairline with the existing forehead
- + Natural hair texture that matches the beard
- − Hair volume is relatively conservative compared to the request for 'full, thick' hair
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent interpretation of 'full, thick' hair with high volume
- + Realistic hair texture and flow
- − Significantly alters the person's facial structure, making him look like a younger/different person
- − Minor artifacts where the hair meets the side of the glasses
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner for image editing as it successfully adds the requested hair while perfectly preserving the identity of the person in the source image. In contrast, Wan 2.6 provides a more stylish hairstyle but fails the preservation requirement by heavily modifying the facial features and bone structure of the subject.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent text rendering and placement according to instructions
- + Strong PBR material qualities especially on the salmon texture
- + Higher overall resolution and detail in the 3D assets
- − The diorama base texture is a bit grainy compared to the requested soft textures
- − The flag icon is slightly orphaned to the right of the text rather than integrated smoothly
Wan 2.6
- + Clean isometric composition with a very clear diorama base
- + Accurate representation of the requested flag icon and text elements
- + Simple and effective cartoon/miniature aesthetic
- − The text layout is slightly off-center and 'SUSHI' is on the same line as the flag
- − The resolution and textures are noticeably softer/blurrier than the competitor
- − Materials look more like simple plastic than realistic PBR
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 captures the requested 'realistic PBR' quality much better, with superior detail in the sushi textures and cleaner text rendering. While Wan 2.6 follows the 'minimal' and 'miniature' aspect well, it lacks the sharpness and visual fidelity found in Seedream 4.5.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + High level of facial resemblance to the source image while correctly applying the large-head 'caricature' effect.
- + Successfully integrates all professional and hobby elements (anchor desk, microphone, hockey stick, gloves, puck, and dog).
- + Maintains the realistic lighting and textures of the source material.
- − The transition between the desk and the sofa in the background creates some spatial confusion.
- − The hands to the left of the microphone are somewhat small and muddy in detail.
Wan 2.6
- + Strong illustrative caricature style that feels very fun and expressive.
- + Includes a fully realized studio environment that enhances the 'TV show anchor' theme.
- + Incorporates multiple dogs and hockey equipment in a clear, narrative way.
- − Loss of specific facial likeness from the original source image, moving toward a generic cartoon character.
- − Anatomical errors such as the pug's paw having humans hands to hold the stick.
- − Completely ignores the clothing and facial structure of the original subject.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner because it maintains an impressive facial likeness to the original woman while creatively applying the caricature distortion. It seamlessly blends the hockey and broadcasting elements into one cohesive image. In contrast, Wan 2.6 provides a generic cartoon that does not resemble the source subject and contains several anatomical artifacts.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent dynamic composition showing actual movement and play
- + Vibrant colors and beautiful sunrise lighting with clear god rays
- + Extremely soft and detailed fur textures on all animals
- − The fox kit has stylized, almost cartoonish eyes compared to the more realistic puppy and kitten
- − Dew sparkles appear more like floating bubbles than realistic light reflections
Wan 2.6
- + Highly realistic animal anatomy and expressions for all four subjects
- + Beautifully rendered environment with realistic ground-level dew and mist
- + Strong adherence to the 'hyper-photorealistic' part of the prompt
- − The composition is a bit crowded with subjects all clustered in the center
- − The background butterflies are a bit static and less integrated into the 'chase'
Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt perfectly, including all four specific animals. Seedream 4.5 offers a more cinematic and joyful layout with better sense of motion, while Wan 2.6 provides superior photorealism, particularly in the faces and eyes of the animals. Wan 2.6 is the slightly stronger choice for achieving the 'hyper-photorealistic' goal without veering into stylization.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI judge analysis unavailable for this challenge.
Golden Hour Stroll
Image Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent depiction of dynamic motion with horizontal hair flow and blurred foreground leaves.
- + The overall lighting and color grading successfully contribute to an 'energetic and lively feel'.
- + The person's pose is modified to look like they are in mid-stride, adding to the motion.
- − Low source preservation as the woman's face, clothing, and the background details have been significantly altered/regenerated.
- − The color of the leaves changed from green (source) to autumn brown.
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent source preservation, keeping the woman's face and clothing almost identical to the original.
- + Successfully added wind-blown hair and flying leaves while maintaining the original background.
- + Matches the green color of the existing trees for the flying leaves.
- − The 'motion' feels slightly less energetic compared to Model A due to the static pose of the subjects.
- − The flying leaves are a bit sparse and some look like flat overlays.
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the superior model for this image editing task because it perfectly preserves the identity of the person and the details of the environment while accurately applying the requested hair and leaf effects. Seedream 4.5 creates a more dynamic and artistic result, but it fails as an 'edit' because it essentially regenerates a new person and changes the color palette of the scene.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to all text elements including the banner and correct date.
- + Balanced circular composition typical of a professional vector emblem.
- + Clean, classic typography that curves elegantly over the central icon.
- − Subtle texture on the background is very faint, appearing almost as a solid color.
Wan 2.6
- + Nice use of 'vintage' texture around the edges of the light background.
- + Correct spelling and accentuation on 'Caffè Florian'.
- + Clean vector style for the cloche icon.
- − Failed to place the date in a primary banner as requested, tucking it into a small, awkward flag on the side.
- − Composition is bottom-heavy with a large gap at the top.
- − The cloche and steam are slightly off-center relative to the text below.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner as it perfectly followed the layout instructions, creating a cohesive emblem with the date correctly placed in a central banner. Wan 2.6 struggled with the composition, resulting in an unbalanced logo with a poorly integrated 'Est. 1720' element.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
Seedream 4.5
- + Excellent adherence to the step-by-step infographic structure requested in the prompt.
- + Clean, legible typography and accurate spelling for all mission stages and names.
- + Precise vector style with a NASA-inspired color palette that matches the professional infographic aesthetic.
- − The icon for 'Descent' (step 5) looks like a satellite rather than a descending lunar module.
- − Minor visual overlap between the Saturn V and the Earth orbit ring.
Wan 2.6
- + Strong, minimalist poster aesthetic with good color choices.
- + Creative use of silhouettes for the crew members.
- − Completely failed to include the requested 6-step infographic content.
- − Large amount of empty space that serves no informational purpose.
- − Text layout on the silhouettes is slightly messy/overlapping.
Verdict: Seedream 4.5 followed the complex instructions perfectly, creating a detailed 6-stage infographic with icons and labels as requested. In contrast, Wan 2.6 produced a minimalist cover page that ignored almost all the specific content requirements regarding mission steps and iconography. Seedream 4.5 is the clear winner for its superior prompt adherence and functional design.
Explore each model
Alibaba's multimodal generation model from the Wan AI suite, supporting text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-to-video with audio, and text-to-image, in both Chinese and English