Seedream 4.5 ByteDance vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfectly followed spatial instructions with the book clearly on top of the glass cube.
• + Excellent rendering of light refraction and shadows on the wooden surface.
• + Very high photographic realism with convincing textures for the paper and glass.

• − The blue sphere is merged with the bottom edge of the glass cube rather than sitting freely inside.
• − The plant in the background is quite blurry.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + The plant is large and clearly visible as requested.
• + The blue sphere is well-rendered and placed centrally.
• + High image clarity and clean composition.

• − Failed spatial instruction: the book is inside/under the cube rather than on top of it.
• − The sphere appears to be floating unnaturally above the book.
• − The glass cube edges look more like plastic/acrylic than glass.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent adherence to the 'motion blur from passing cars' prompt element.
• + Very detailed skin texture and fabric realism which matches the cinematic/realistic requirement.
• + Superior depth of field and lighting with realistic wet pavement reflections.

• − Minor anatomical/mechanical issues where the wrench is positioned against the bike chain inconsistently.
• − The bicycle's rear structure is slightly warped near the axle.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Good overall composition and portrayal of the 'light rain' atmosphere.
• + The elderly man's posture feels natural for a candid photo.

• − Failed to include motion blur from passing cars; the vehicles in the background are sharp.
• − The bicycle's front fork and wheel alignment are physically impossible/broken.
• − Skin textures are slightly smoother and less realistic than Model A.

Seedream 4.5

• + Exceptional texture detail on skin, scars, and ingrained dirt
• + Beautifully rendered warm torchlight reflections and bokeh sparks
• + High-quality engraving detail on the pauldrons

• − Hair beads are integrated but slightly less distinct as individual elements

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Good inclusion of braids and chainmail textured layers
• + Ornate filigree on the armor is intricate
• + Strong direct eye contact

• − Lighting feels flatter and less directional than requested
• − Missing the beads in the hair requested by the prompt
• − Composition is a medium shot rather than a close portrait

Seedream 4.5

• + Strict adherence to all requested sections: Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.
• + Excellent text legibility and clean sans-serif typography.
• + High-quality food photography that accurately reflects the section headers.
• + Clean, professional minimalist layout with vibrant color-coded accents.

• − Some repetition in the specific names of menu items under the headers.
• − The layout is more of a vertical list than a complex grid.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Creative interpretation of the 'grid' requirement with a gallery-style border.
• + Strong visual appeal and variety in the food photography shown.

• − Poor text rendering with significant gibberish and misspelling in headers (e.g., 'MAIMAES', 'PIZETZA').
• − Failure to clearly delineate the specific requested sections within the text area.
• − Layout feels more like a generic template than a functional menu due to illegible body text.

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfectly renders all requested text including the starburst pricing.
• + Excellent sense of motion with blurred flying ingredients.
• + Clean photographic lighting on the burger textures.

• − The 'exploded' effect is slightly conservative compared to some dynamic food photography.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Intense, high-contrast fire effects and lighting.
• + Good burger texture with realistic melting cheese.

• − Completely failed to include any of the requested text.
• − The burger is mostly stacked rather than 'exploded' with components in mid-air.
• − The 'starburst' and pricing elements are missing entirely.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors.
• + Perfect adherence to specific menu items and pricing.
• + Realistic chalk texture and handwriting style that matches the prompt.

• − The date is slightly repetitive in the layout but accurate.
• − Moderate cropping on the background compared to a full room view.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Good environmental composition showing the café interior.
• + Correct usage of chalk-style aesthetic for the background.

• − Numerous spelling errors including 'Todaay', 'Ottpups', and 'Cholcalte'.
• − Failed to include the requested year '2026', using '2024' instead.
• − The text is messy and becomes illegible in the lower sections.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent color grading and cinematic lighting using purple and blue nebulas.
• + Higher level of fine detail in the horse's fur and the astronaut's suit textures.
• + Cleaner rendered composition with a clear focal point.

• − Failed the paradoxical logic part of the prompt by having the astronaut ride the horse instead of 'horse on top'.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Strong sense of movement and speed through the 'dust' and atmosphere trails.
• + The globe of the Earth in the background adds a great sense of scale.

• − Failed the negative constraint logic ('horse on top, not vice versa') completely.
• − Anatomical issues with the horse's front legs appearing distorted or blending into the smoke.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent adherence to the full prompt including both the driver and the bored passenger.
• + High photorealism with convincing textures and lighting consistent with a night scene.
• + Clean and relevant text on the taxi cap.

• − The capybaras paws are slightly deformed where they meet the steering wheel.
• − The passenger is on the left side of the vehicle, which is unusual for a passenger seat behind a right-side driver in a US taxi context.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + High detail on the clothing and fur textures.
• + Good dynamic lighting and bokeh effects in the background.

• − Completely failed to include the passenger and phone requested in the prompt.
• − The perspective is from outside looking in, rather than 'inside the taxi'.
• − The hand/paw anatomy is poorly rendered and nonsensical.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent text rendering with clean, readable fonts
• + Accurate adherence to all provided event details
• + Highly polished cinematic lighting and realistic textures

• − The 'parchment' effect is subtle rather than being the literal border
• − Lacks complex thorns mentioned in the prompt, opting for barbed wire textures instead

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Strong 'vintage parchment' style with a physical-paper look
• + Good illustrative style that fits the gothic theme

• − Failed to include the specific event details (Date, Time, Location)
• − Text becomes garbled and messy at the bottom of the scroll
• − Composition feels cluttered with the oversized moon

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent layout adherence with text positioned at the top-center as requested.
• + Very clean and professional 3D render with soft, realistic PBR materials and lighting.
• + Exactly matches the 'minimal garnish' and 'solid background' requirements.

• − The salmon nigiri texture is slightly distorted where it meets the rice.
• − The 'JAPAN' text is simple flat 2D rather than having a 3D effect to match the scene.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + High level of detail in the miniature sushi models and textures.
• + Creative 3D implementation of the 'JAPAN SUSHI' text on a sign.
• + Vibrant colors and a high 'toy' aesthetic appeal.

• − Failed the layout instruction to place text at the 'top-center'.
• − The scene is cluttered with many pieces of sushi and garnish, ignoring the 'minimal' request.
• − Text layering issues where 'SUSHI' overlaps the flag pole.

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect adherence to text and accent marks in 'Caffè'.
• + Clean vector illustration style with professional shading.
• + Balanced composition with well-executed typography.

• − Simple background texture could be more pronounced.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Stronger vintage paper texture on the background.
• + Follows the warm brown and cream color scheme well.

• − Misspelled the name as 'Cafféé' which is a significant error.
• − The cloche illustration is confusingly fragmented with floating elements.
• − The banner layout is cluttered compared to the prompt's request for minimalism.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent adherence to the logical sequence of steps 1 through 6 with corresponding labels.
• + Very clean, modern vector aesthetic with clear typography and legible text.
• + Highly accurate iconography for the Saturn V, Lunar Module, and Earth/Moon orbits.

• − The 'Descent' icon appears to be a generic satellite rather than a descending lunar module.
• − Missing some of the requested 'small supporting' details mentioned in the prompt's tail end.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Follows the requested NASA-inspired color palette effectively.
• + Good use of space and composition for a poster format.

• − Fails to follow the requested 1-6 step sequence entirely.
• − Text is complete gibberish and unreadable.
• − Inaccurate iconography, including a space shuttle-style orbit instead of a Saturn V.