Recraft V4 Recraft AI vs Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

Recraft V4

• + Excellent photographic realism in the glass and wood textures.
• + Accurate reflection and refraction of the blue sphere within the glass base.
• + Very faithful interpretation of the soft window lighting.

• − The blue sphere appears to be floating mid-air inside the cube, which might be physically impossible if it is a hollow glass container.
• − The plant in the background is less distinct through the glass than in Model B.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Naturalistic placement of the sphere resting on the bottom of the cube.
• + Strong adherence to the 'partially visible through the glass' instruction for the plant.
• + Good perspective and composition of the wooden table.

• − The glass cube has some geometric inconsistencies, such as the bottom edge appearing like a mirror rather than clear glass.
• − The lighting is slightly flatter and less cinematic than in Model A.

Recraft V4

• + Excellent depiction of motion blur from passing cars
• + Strong adherence to 'imperfect framing' and 'shallow depth of field'
• + Realistic atmospheric rain and light reflection

• − The bicycle frame is anatomically incorrect with the wheel passing through a structural bar

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Natural and detailed skin texture on the face
• + Clearer depiction of the 'repairing' action with hands on the handlebars
• + Good reflection on the wet pavement

• − Missed the 'motion blur' requirement; the car in the background is static
• − The bicycle has structural issues, including the kickstand merging into the chain ring

Recraft V4

• + Excellent depiction of grit and dirt, fitting the 'battle-worn' description perfectly.
• + High-relief ornate engraving on the plate armor with convincing metal textures.
• + Strong prompt adherence regarding the beads in the braids and the intense eyes.

• − The sparks look a bit like static orange lines rather than blurry embers.
• − The armor design is a bit busy and physically improbable near the neck.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Superior photographic quality with more realistic bokeh sparks and lighting.
• + Extremely lifelike eyes and skin texture that looks like a real photograph.
• + Better leather strap details with realistic wear and buckle construction.

• − The character looks less 'battle-worn' and cleaner compared to Model A.
• − The scar on the forehead is a bit faint and simple.

Recraft V4

• + Excellent text legibility and correct spelling
• + Perfectly clean white background and minimalist grid
• + Consistent photography style and lighting across all food items

• − Composition feels slightly empty with large white spaces
• − Layout is more like a gallery than a functional one-page menu

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Sophisticated graphic design elements including logos, icons, and a footer
• + Creative presentation as a flyer/menu on a wooden table with props
• + Better use of space and hierarchy for a casual dining context

• − Significant spelling errors throughout the text (e.g., 'Caesa Salad', 'Sparkiing')
• − Food photos are somewhat inconsistent in framing and quality
• − Text is too small and cluttered to be functional

Recraft V4

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bread
• + Realistic physics and sauce drips conveying a natural sense of motion
• + Crisp, integrated 'MAGIC BURGER' typography with high-quality textures

• − The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is cut off at the bottom edge
• − The starburst for the price is a bit simple and lacks the 'fiery' rendering requested

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Strong adherence to all text requirements including 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' positioning
• + Vibrant, symmetrical composition that feels like a finished marketing graphic
• + Powerful fiery glow effects on the text and throughout the background

• − The meat patty and cheese look slightly more artificial/digital than those in Model A
• − The inclusion of cucumbers/pickles and herbs was not requested in the prompt

Recraft V4

• + Excellent photographic composition with realistic café background and depth of field
• + Includes charming chalk illustrations that complement the menu items
• + High legibility and accurate text rendering

• − Text lacks the requested 'elegant cursive' for the title
• − The handwriting looks a bit too clean and consistent, bordering on a digital font appearance

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Successfully captures the elegant cursive style for the title and menu items
• + Handwriting has a more authentic chalk texture with varying weights
• + Fills the frame well with large, easy-to-read text

• − The 'A' in 'April' is slightly malformed
• − Background is less detailed and lacks the cozy atmosphere of a full café scene

Recraft V4

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere
• + High level of texture detail on the astronaut and horse
• + Dynamic composition with floating rocks that fits the 'cinematic' prompt

• − Failed the negative constraint: astronaut is riding the horse, not the horse riding the astronaut

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Crips, high-resolution visual quality
• + Clean rendering of the astronaut suit and horse

• − Failed the negative constraint: astronaut is riding the horse, not the horse riding the astronaut
• − Composition feels flat and less 'surreal' or 'cinematic' than requested

Recraft V4

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur and clothing.
• + The composition perfectly captures the scale of a backseat passenger relative to the front seat.
• + The blurred Manhattan background feels authentic to a night-time professional photograph.

• − The passenger's phone is slightly warped and lacks detail.
• − The passenger is partially obscured by the car seat, making her expression less visible.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + High clarity on the passenger's face and expression.
• + Strong lighting on the capybara and well-defined front paws on the steering wheel.

• − The steering wheel and passenger are positioned awkwardly, making the interior space look flat and unrealistic.
• − The capybara's hands/paws look slightly too primate-like rather than typical capybara morphology.

Recraft V4

• + Excellent photographic realism in the center pumpkin and background
• + Modern cinematic lighting with a moody atmospheric effect
• + Accurate text rendering for all requested details

• − The 'scroll banner' is just a flat white rectangular box
• − The text overlay feels like a digital layer rather than an integrated part of a 'vintage parchment'

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Stronger adherence to the 'vintage' and 'parchment' aesthetic
• + Proper execution of the scroll banner and ornate gothic border
• + Unified artistic style where text and illustration blend seamlessly

• − The style is more of a clean vector/illustration rather than 'cinematic' realism
• − Added extra text elements not requested in the prompt like 'Est. 1847'

Recraft V4

• + High realism in food textures and lighting.
• + Accurate text placement and minimal, clean typography.

• − Failed the '3D cartoon scene' requirement, opting for a realistic photo-style.
• − The diorama base looks like raw salt or crushed ice rather than a cohesive miniature base.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Perfectly captures the 'miniature 3D cartoon' and 'soft refined texture' aesthetic.
• + Excellent render quality with clear PBR materials and gentle lighting.
• + Clever interpretation of the diorama base that looks like a high-quality toy or model.

• − Included extra text elements and icons not requested in the prompt.
• − The flag icon is placed to the right instead of at the top-center above the text.

Recraft V4

• + Excellent fur texture and detail on all four animals.
• + Rich, immersive environment with multiple layers of foliage and butterflies.
• + Beautiful lighting with visible god rays and convincing dew sparkles.

• − The bunny appears a bit small relative to the other animals' scale.
• − Composition is a bit crowded with many butterflies overlapping.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Natural interaction and 'tumbling' movement between the animals.
• + Strong adherence to all subject types requested.
• + Clean, bright sunrise lighting and clear focus.

• − The fox's front leg and the kitten's position have minor anatomical glitches where they overlap.
• − Fur texture on the cat and fox looks slightly more digitally smoothed compared to the pup.
• − Fewer butterflies and less 'magic' in the atmosphere compared to the other model.

Recraft V4

• + Excellent text legibility and clean font choices.
• + Perfect adherence to the requested flat-vector style with crisp icon lines.
• + Intuitive layout for the creative 'Crew' section.

• − The layout is fragmented and lacks a clear 'flow' for a mission timeline.
• − Stylistically very sparse with significant empty white space.
• − The icon for the Saturn V is less detailed compared to Model B.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Superior infographic composition with a vertical timeline flow.
• + Includes more detailed mission metadata and accurate NASA-inspired iconography.
• + Better adherence to the requested color palette against a navy background.

• − Minor spelling errors such as 'DESCRIPT' instead of 'DESCENT' and 'Tranquilicy'.
• − The icons for descent and landing are identical, lacking the visual progression seen in model A.