Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI vs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent photographic realism with clean glass reflections
• + Correctly places the plant behind the cube visible through the glass
• + Atmospheric lighting that matches the requested side-lit window direction

• − The blue sphere is levitating unrealistically in the center of the cube
• − The cube edges are slightly overly sharp/perfect for a physical object

Wan 2.7

• + Highly realistic book texture and wooden table aging
• + Natural placement of the sphere resting on the bottom of the cube
• + Excellent window light integration into the scene

• − The glass cube appears to have a mirrored or solid back panel rather than being fully transparent
• − The plant's visibility through the cube is obscured by internal glass reflections/merging

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent natural skin texture and realistic water droplets on clothing.
• + Effective use of shallow depth of field and bokeh that feels cinematic.
• + Strong adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' aspects of the prompt.

• − The red bicycle is only partially visible, making the 'repairing' action less clear.
• − Motion blur on the background cars is subtle rather than prominent.

Wan 2.7

• + Clearer depiction of the full red bicycle and the act of repairing it.
• + Captures a very authentic Japanese street scene with appropriate architecture and signage.
• + Good reflections on the wet pavement.

• − Fails to provide the requested shallow depth of field, with the background being mostly in focus.
• − Lacks the requested motion blur for the cars.
• − The framing is very centered and conventional, ignoring the 'imperfect framing' request.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent photorealistic skin texture and lifelike eyes
• + Beautifully intricate filigree engraving on the armor
• + Stunning cinematic lighting with realistic bokeh

• − Composition is very tight, clipping the top of the head

Wan 2.7

• + Clear representation of all prompt elements including leather straps and beads
• + Strong battle-worn aesthetic with visible scars and dirt
• + Good balance of torchlight and sparks in the background

• − Slightly more 'digital' or rendered look compared to model A
• − Armor textures are a bit less fine than the competitor

Recraft V4.1

• + Exceptional text rendering with perfect legibility and zero spelling errors.
• + Clean, professional white background that adheres strictly to the minimalist design request.
• + Accurate categorization of items into Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.

• − The food images are varying sizes and not in a perfectly aligned grid.
• − The layout lacks a bit of the 'casual dining' character, feeling slightly more like a digital document.

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent grid layout for food photos that creates a cohesive visual rhythm.
• + Strong brand identity with color accents, logos, and contact information.
• + High-quality food photography that fits a professional menu aesthetic.

• − Text is mostly illegible placeholder or contains significant spelling errors.
• − Failed to strictly follow requested categories (included Sides, Drinks, and Desserts instead of focusing on the three requested).
• − The presence of lifestyle props like rosemary and pens distracts from the 'menu design' focus.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat patty and lettuce.
• + Successful integration of all required text with high legibility.
• + The fiery texture within the 'MAGIC BURGER' font is very detailed.

• − The composition feels a bit bottom-heavy and slightly cluttered in the lower left.
• − The starburst element looks a bit like a flat clip-art sticker compared to the 3D scene.

Wan 2.7

• + Superb layout and composition with a strong sense of gravity and 'explosion'.
• + Creative use of sauce splashes and flying seeds to enhance the sense of motion.
• + The starburst for the price is better integrated into the overall fiery aesthetic.

• − The text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' is slightly less cohesive with the top title's style.
• − The food textures look slightly more 'illustrated' or CGI than the photorealism in Model A.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic dusty residue
• + Authentic handwritten feel with natural variations in letter height and slant
• + Perfect text accuracy including the complicated brown butter cookie item

• − The top title is not in 'elegant cursive' as requested, but rather a standard print style

Wan 2.7

• + Clean, highly legible text
• + Includes more of the cafe environment in the frame
• + Better attempt at a stylized title font

• − Text looks like a digital font overlay rather than real hand-drawn chalk
• − Fails to capture the requested grainy chalk texture
• − The 'elegant cursive' request was interpreted more as a rounded font than actual cursive handwriting

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere with vibrant nebula effects
• + Higher level of textural detail in the asteroid field and space environment
• + Strong sense of motion and action in the horse's pose

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the horse being on top

Wan 2.7

• + Clean and clear composition with a high-resolution feel
• + Physically plausible anatomy for both the horse and the astronaut's gear
• + Good use of planetary elements for depth

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the horse being on top
• − The image feels somewhat static and less 'surreal' compared to Model A

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur
• + Perfectly captures the 'bored' expression requested for the passenger
• + Atmospheric lighting and cinematic depth of field

• − The capybara is missing the requested dark jacket
• − The scale of the capybara is slightly too large for the front seat

Wan 2.7

• + Followed all prompt instructions including the dark jacket
• + Clearer visibility of the Manhattan street environment
• + Accurate rendering of the capybara's paws on the steering wheel

• − The passenger is sitting in the front seat instead of the requested back seat
• − The capybara's head looks somewhat superimposed on the body
• − Texture looks slightly more digital/artificial compared to Model A

Recraft V4.1

• + Features a highly atmospheric and moody lighting style.
• + Excellent integration of the gothic title text into the scene.
• + The central jack-o-lantern has realistic textures and a genuine glow.

• − The scroll banner text is very small and slightly difficult to read.
• − Missing the thorn elements requested for the border.

Wan 2.7

• + Perfectly follows all layout instructions including the parchment style and scroll banner.
• + Exceptional text rendering for both the large title and the small event details.
• + Includes all requested elements like thorns, webs, and specific event details.

• − The art style is more illustrative and less 'cinematic' than the prompt suggested.
• − Composition is a bit cluttered with extra unrequested elements like the cauldron and books.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent clean typography and centered text.
• + High-quality textures on the fish and diorama base.
• + Superior lighting that creates a realistic 3D miniature feel.

• − The chopsticks are placed awkwardly over the plate.
• − Fewer sushi varieties than shown in Model B.

Wan 2.7

• + Great variety of sushi types including rolls and tamago.
• + Excellent adherence to the '3D cartoon' aesthetic with smooth, clay-like textures.
• + Includes extra details like soy sauce and ginger.

• − The shrimp head looks a bit unusual/unnatural.
• − The text is slightly heavy and blocks a bit more of the background.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent atmospheric lighting with realistic god rays and backlighting on fur.
• + Dynamic and natural-looking interaction between all four animals.
• + Highly detailed fur textures and sharp focus on expressive eyes.

• − The kitten's single outstretched paw is slightly out of proportion with its body.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully includes all four requested animals in a clear, front-facing arrangement.
• + Vibrant colors and clear butterfly details.

• − The animals feel somewhat like they are floating or pasted onto the grass rather than interacting with it.
• − The kitten's tongue and mouth area look slightly distorted.
• − The god rays are a bit more artificial and repetitive compared to Model A.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent clean typography that perfectly matches the 'Caffè Florian' request
• + Effective minimalist aesthetic with sharp vector lines
• + Accurate implementation of the 'Est. 1720' banner

• − The steam element above the cloche is very basic and small
• − Slightly lacks the 'subtle texture' requested on the background

Wan 2.7

• + Beautiful vintage emblem style with a cohesive circular layout
• + Great use of requested warm brown and cream tones with subtle paper texture
• + Clear and stylized steam illustration

• − Spelling error in the main text, rendering it as 'Florion' instead of 'Florian'
• − Less minimalist than requested due to the inclusion of stars and floral elements

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent typography rendering with almost no spelling errors.
• + Clean, consistent grid layout that is very professional.
• + Highly crisp vector iconography that perfectly matches the requested style.

• − Step numbering is incorrect, skipping 05 and repeating 04.
• − Iconography for 'Descent' and 'Landing' is identical rather than distinct.

Wan 2.7

• + Stronger vertical flow that visually represents a mission timeline.
• + Includes impressive detail such as dates, durations, and mission data.
• + The 'Descent' icon shows the lunar module rotated, adding a sense of motion.

• − Several spelling errors like 'DESCRIPT' and 'Tranquiliry'.
• − Text legibility is slightly lower due to smaller font sizes and tighter spacing.
• − Layout feels a bit more cluttered compared to the clean grid of the competitor.