Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI Wan 2.6 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

Recraft V4.1

17.6 arena score

#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.6

23.3 arena score

#28 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Top 2 in Image-to-Video
Vote tally

Where the votes landed

Recraft V4.1

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.6

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Sophisticated glass rendering with realistic refractions and reflections.
  • + Clean, modern aesthetic with high photographic clarity.
  • + Excellent adherence to lighting and composition instructions.
  • The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally in the center of the cube.
  • The plant is slightly less 'behind' the cube and more to the side compared to model B.

Wan 2.6

  • + High level of realism in textures, specifically the aged book and wooden table.
  • + Strong adherence to the spatial relationship regarding the plant being behind the cube.
  • + The blue sphere is physically resting on the bottom surface of the cube.
  • The glass cube has some structural inconsistencies, particularly in the thickness of the glass visible at the top.
  • The sphere's reflection on the bottom of the cube is slightly messy.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions very well. Recraft V4.1 produced a cleaner, more stylized image with superior glass physics, while Wan 2.6 excelled in organic textures like the worn book and the placement of the plant. Recraft V4.1 is the slight winner for its overall aesthetic polish and more consistent geometry.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent depiction of surface reflections and bokeh
  • + Subtle, realistic motion blur on background vehicles
  • The framing feels slightly too tight, cutting off the bicycle wheels
  • The subject's pose obscures facial details significant to the prompt

Wan 2.6

  • + Strong adherence to the 'elderly Japanese man' subject description
  • + Rich environmental context with clear shop signs and rain effects
  • Raindrop artifacts appear as floating glass beads on the jacket
  • The skin texture and highlights look somewhat artificial/rendered

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 delivers a more cinematic and realistic photographic atmosphere with superior motion blur and lighting. Wan 2.6 provides better character detailing and framing, but fails on texture realism due to the distractingly uniform raindrops on the subject's clothing.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent shallow depth of field with beautiful bokeh sparks.
  • + Superior engraving detail on the plate armor.
  • + Lifelike skin texture and very subtle, realistic scarring.
  • The braids and beads are a bit subtle and blended into the background.
  • Slightly less 'battle-worn' in appearance compared to Image B.

Wan 2.6

  • + Excellent depiction of decorative hair beads and complex braiding.
  • + Strong textures on the leather straps and frayed cloth underlayer.
  • + Very moody and atmospheric lighting with clear torch sources.
  • The dirt on the face looks somewhat like digital paint or patches rather than natural grime.
  • The armor engraving is slightly less crisp than seen in Recraft V4.1.

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this complex prompt. Recraft V4.1 is preferred for its superior photographic realism, specifically in the armor engravings and skin texture, whereas Wan 2.6 provided a more dramatic interpretation of the 'battle-worn' state and the braided hair accessories.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect English text rendering throughout the document.
  • + Highly functional, professional layout suitable for actual use.
  • + Excellent use of whitespace and bold sans-serif typography as requested.
  • The food photos are not in a strict 'grid' but rather a right-aligned column.
  • The visual style is slightly generic compared to Model B's more colorful border accents.

Wan 2.6

  • + Follows the 'grid' request for food photos literally.
  • + Includes more vibrant decorative colorful accents in the borders.
  • + High aesthetic appeal for a design mockup.
  • Text is comprised of gibberish and numerous spelling errors.
  • The food photos are repetitive, showing mostly pizza even under the 'Appetizers' heading.
  • Poor logic in pricing and layout coherence.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it produces a functional, professional menu with flawless text rendering and logical content. While Wan 2.6 adheres better to the 'grid' layout instruction, its failure to generate readable text and its repetitive imagery make it unusable as a design asset.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent typography rendering with crisp fire effects.
  • + Captures all requested text elements accurately.
  • + Clean, professional product photography aesthetic for the burger ingredients.
  • The 'exploded' effect feels a bit static and less integrated than the other model.
  • The starburst for the price looks like a simple digital overlay rather than a fiery integrated element.

Wan 2.6

  • + Superb sense of motion with sauce drips and swirling embers.
  • + Highly creative and 3D-feeling 'MAGIC BURGER' title with realistic fire.
  • + The burger composition feels more dynamic and 'exploded' within the environment.
  • The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is partially obscured by the foreground fire.
  • The price text is slightly less polished in its integration compared to the main title.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 produces a very clean, professional advertisement with superior legibility for the smaller text elements. However, Wan 2.6 is the more visually striking image, offering a much better sense of motion, more realistic fire integration, and a more dynamic interpretation of the 'exploded' burger prompt. Wan 2.6 is preferred for its superior artistry and atmospheric depth despite the slightly messy secondary text.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent text accuracy and legibility.
  • + The chalk texture is highly realistic with visible grain.
  • + Followed the truncated prompt to complete the third menu item logically.
  • The composition is a bit flat and direct.
  • The handwriting style is somewhat uniform for a manual chalkboard.

Wan 2.6

  • + Beautiful cursive title that matches the 'elegant cursive' prompt requirement.
  • + Dynamic composition with a realistic cafe background and chalk dust at the base.
  • + Natural variations in handwriting size and slant.
  • Significant spelling errors in the third menu item ('Brown Butter Chocolate' becomes 'Brown Butter Chlp').
  • The '2026' in the date has some letter merging issues.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the text requirements perfectly, providing a clear and accurate menu, though the layout is quite simple. Wan 2.6 captured the 'elegant cursive' and 'cozy café' atmosphere much better, but failed on the technical accuracy of the text strings. Recraft V4.1 is the winner for its superior text rendering and adherence to the specific menu items.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent asteroid field composition adds depth.
  • + High-quality lighting effects with realistic lens flares.
  • + Strong cinematic atmosphere with a gritty texture.
  • Failed the negative constraint: astronaut is on top of the horse.
  • Slight anatomical issues on the horse's rear leg connection.

Wan 2.6

  • + Beautiful color palette with vibrant nebulae.
  • + Highly detailed spacesuit and horse tack.
  • + Clean orbs of light and cosmic reflections on the helmet.
  • Failed the negative constraint: astronaut is on top of the horse.
  • The ground surface at the bottom contradicts the 'in space' setting.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt instruction to place the 'horse on top' of the astronaut, choosing instead the conventional 'astronaut riding horse' composition. Recraft V4.1 is preferred for its superior cinematic lighting and more believable zero-gravity environment using floating asteroids, whereas Wan 2.6 included a ground plane that broke the space immersion.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent photographic texture and realistic lighting throughout the cabin.
  • + The woman's expression is perfectly aligned with the 'bored' instruction.
  • + Natural-looking capybara fur and a more realistic taxi steering wheel position.
  • The capybara is not wearing the requested dark jacket.
  • The capybara's head is slightly out of scale with the vehicle interior.

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully included both the yellow cap and the dark jacket on the capybara.
  • + Great atmospheric detail with the rain and city bokeh.
  • + Both front paws are clearly placed on the steering wheel as requested.
  • The woman looks worried or distressed rather than 'bored'.
  • The capybara's jacket/arms look slightly artificial and disconnected from the body.
  • The taxi sign on top of the car features nonsensical characters.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 produces a much more believable and high-quality photograph, capturing the specific bored demeanor of the passenger perfectly, though it missed the jacket requirement. Wan 2.6 followed the clothing instructions more closely for the capybara but failed to capture the 'business as usual' expression for the passenger and has lower anatomical and text coherence.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent typography style that matches the gothic aesthetic perfectly.
  • + Realistic textures on the jack-o-lantern and parchment.
  • + Dynamic composition with a circular frame created by the trees.
  • Missed the label prefixes (Date, Time, Location) at the bottom.
  • The center banner is a bit small and less prominent than requested.

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfect adherence to all text instructions, including the bottom labels.
  • + Highly effective use of the scroll banner for the secondary text.
  • + Color contrast between the blue night sky and orange jack-o-lantern is vibrant.
  • The main title text has a slightly digital glitter texture that clashes with the 'vintage' prompt.
  • Wait, the layout is slightly cramped with the large trees and banner fighting for space.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Wan 2.6 is the winner for its superior adherence to the text layout, correctly including the labels 'Date', 'Time', and 'Location' while featuring a much clearer scroll banner. Recraft V4.1 has more artistic and authentic-looking gothic typography, but it missed several text elements from the prompt.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent typography with clean, professional font rendering
  • + High-quality PBR material textures on the fish and platform
  • + Sophisticated studio lighting with realistic soft shadows
  • The scale of the sushi relative to the platform feels slightly large for a true miniature look

Wan 2.6

  • + Perfectly captures the miniature isometric diorama aesthetic
  • + Clear and bold typography that matches the requested layout
  • + Great use of multiple levels for the base platform
  • Texture on the fish and rice is slightly less realistic than the competitor
  • The shrimp sushi looks a bit more like a toy than a food item

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 produces a higher fidelity image with superior material rendering and cleaner typography. However, Wan 2.6 better captures the 'miniature isometric diorama' essence requested in the prompt. Recraft V4.1 is the winner due to its overall visual polish and more appealing food textures.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent depiction of god rays and sunrise lighting
  • + Dynamic and natural-looking interaction between animals
  • + High level of texture detail in the fur and meadow flora
  • The fox kit has blue eyes which is unconventional for the species

Wan 2.6

  • + Includes all four requested animals clearly facing the viewer
  • + Strong bokeh effect and sparkling dew drops
  • + Whimsical color palette with vibrant butterflies
  • The fox and kitten have slightly distorted facial proportions
  • Floating debris and inconsistent scale of butterflies

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 delivers a much more photorealistic and compositionally sound image with superior fur textures and realistic lighting interactions. While Wan 2.6 captures the 'wholesome' vibe well, it suffers from minor anatomical warping and feels more AI-generated compared to the polished masterpiece quality of Recraft V4.1.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent typography with a classic, elegant serif choice
  • + Perfect centered composition for an emblem
  • + Crisp vector-style rendering with clean lines
  • The 'subtle texture' requested is virtually non-existent
  • The accent on 'Caffè' is stylized in a way that looks slightly disconnected

Wan 2.6

  • + Successfully incorporated the 'subtle texture' on the background
  • + Good use of warm brown and cream tones provided in the prompt
  • + Accurate representation of a vintage banner and steam
  • The placement of the 'Est. 1720' banner is uncomfortably tucked to the side
  • The font is a bit more generic compared to the first image

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 produces a much more professional and balanced logo design with superior typography, though it missed the requested background texture. Wan 2.6 followed the texture instructions well, but the overall composition is weaker due to the awkward placement of the banner element. Recraft V4.1 is the winner for its high-quality vector aesthetic and layout.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

Recraft V4.1
Wan 2.6

AI Judge Analysis

Recraft V4.1

  • + Strictly follows the infographic structure and includes all requested mission steps.
  • + Excellent text rendering for headings and crew names.
  • + Perfectly matches the requested NASA-inspired flat vector style.
  • Numerical markers contain a sequence error, repeating '04' for steps 4 and 5.
  • The 'Saturn V' icon looks more like a generic rocket than a specific Saturn V silhouette.

Wan 2.6

  • + Maintains the requested color palette and includes crew names.
  • + Text rendering for 'APOLLO 11' and main labels is clear.
  • Fails to include any of the six requested mission stages/icons.
  • Visual style is more like a textured towel or fabric print rather than a vector infographic poster.
  • Composition is mostly empty space with stars instead of informational content.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 successfully created a comprehensive infographic following all steps of the prompt, including specific icons and clear text for each mission stage. Wan 2.6 failed the instructions significantly, omitting all of the required mission steps and producing a very simple layout with a textured finish that contradicts the 'clean vector' request. Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner despite minor numbering repetition errors.

Next steps

Explore each model