Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI vs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent photographic quality with realistic glass reflections and refractions.
• + The sphere feels more integrated into the scene's lighting.
• + The composition is clean and follows the rule of thirds effectively.

• − The sphere is floating unnaturally in the center of the cube without support.
• − The plant is pushed far to the right, barely visible through the cube itself.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Successfully positions the plant directly behind the cube as requested.
• + The sphere is naturally resting on the bottom surface of the cube.
• + Includes nice atmospheric details like dust motes in the window light.

• − The red book has perspective issues and appears to be clipping through the top of the glass cube.
• − The reflection of the sphere on the bottom of the cube is slightly misaligned with its base.
• − The glass cube looks less like solid glass and more like a thin-walled box.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent depiction of motion blur and bokeh in the background cars.
• + Captures the mood of a rainy day with realistic textures on the wet jacket and cap.
• + The imperfect framing feels authentically 'candid' and street-style.

• − The red bicycle is partially cropped out and less visible.
• − The man's skin texture is a bit muddy in shadows.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Crisp details on the man's face and hands showing realistic age and skin texture.
• + Strong reflections on the wet pavement.
• + Clearer view of the 'red bicycle' and repair tools.

• − Misses the 'motion blur' request for passing cars.
• − Framing is very centered and symmetrical, lacking the 'imperfect framing' requested.
• − Lighting and rain effects feel slightly more digital and less cinematic than Model A.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent hyper-realistic skin texture and detailed scars
• + Superior integration of ornate engraving on the plate armor
• + More naturalistic lighting and atmospheric bokeh

• − The braids and beads are a bit subtler than in Model B

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Very clear interpretation of the 'hair braided with small beads' prompt
• + Strong representation of the cloth underlayer and leather straps
• + Vibrant colors and high contrast subjects

• − The scars look a bit like smudged makeup or dirt rather than physical tissue damage
• − Image feels slightly more 'digital' and less cinematic in its lighting falloff

Recraft V4.1

• + Exceptional text rendering with perfect spelling and logical item descriptions.
• + Clean, professional typography using bold sans-serif fonts as requested.
• + Effective use of vibrant color accents through section underlines and UI elements.

• − The photo layout is a vertical stack rather than a true grid.
• − Composition is slightly heavy on the left side with a lot of empty white space in the center.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent photographic grid layout that looks visually appetizing.
• + Strong adherence to the 'colorful food photos in grid' part of the prompt.
• + Great sense of depth and realistic lighting on the food items.

• − Text is largely nonsensical gibberish and poorly rendered.
• − Includes literal text from the prompt (e.g., 'Modern minimalist') in the header which feels like an AI error.
• − The sections for Appetizers/Pizza/Mains are confusingly mixed with the photo grid.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent fiery texture rendering on the main title text.
• + The burger patty texture is highly photorealistic and detailed.
• + Integrated the starburst element exactly as requested for the price.

• − Missing the bottom bun entirely, failing a key part of the exploded burger prompt.
• − The composition feels a bit sparse with significant empty black space in the middle.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfectly captured the exploded burger assembly with all requested components including both buns.
• + Superior sense of motion and dynamic composition with flying sauce droplets and embers.
• + Highly creative interpretation of the fiery text, using a 'melting cheese' aesthetic for the glow.

• − The '€6.99' text is slightly less clean than Model A's version.
• − The glowing embers are represented as simple orange streaks rather than detailed sparks.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic grain and pressure variations
• + Perfectly followed prompt text including the third menu item
• + Letters look genuinely handwritten with natural inconsistencies

• − The cursive requirement for the title was not fully met as it appears as print-script

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong composition with a warm café background context
• + Better adherence to the cursive title requirement
• + Text is very legible and well-spaced

• − Text looks like a digital font rather than authentic chalk handwriting
• − Errors in text rendering including ‘...with Lemon & $28’ missing the herbs and repeating the price
• − Duplicate pricing for the cookies

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent high-detail textures on the horse and suit
• + Cinematic lighting with a clear light source and asteroid field
• + Higher overall resolution and sharpness

• − Failed to follow the negative constraint of 'horse on top'
• − The astronaut has three legs visible under the saddle

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Dynamic composition and pose for the horse
• + Smooth color gradients in the nebula and background
• + Clean rendering of the astronaut suit

• − Failed to follow the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top
• − Minor anatomical issues with the horse's left front leg

Recraft V4.1

• + Natural, cinematic lighting that feels photorealistic
• + Accurate depiction of the passenger's expression and behavior
• + Excellent capybara texture and realistic paws on the steering wheel

• − The capybara is not wearing the requested jacket

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Higher creative interpretation of the driver's uniform and jacket
• + Vibrant colors and clear details on the background city lights

• − The capybara's paws look more like human hands with claws, which is slightly unsettling
• − The passenger's face is slightly blurry and lower quality than the driver

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent vintage gothic aesthetic with a distressed parchment texture.
• + Superior integration of text within the spooky composition.
• + Highly detailed and realistic jack-o-lantern carving.

• − The 'invite you...' text on the tiny scroll is slightly blurred and harder to read.
• − The layout is a bit bottom-heavy with wide spacing on the event details.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfectly legible text for all required details and phrases.
• + Clean, vibrant artistic style with an excellent thorny border.
• + Creative addition of a spooky castle in the background.

• − The lighting feels a bit more like a modern digital illustration than a 'vintage parchment' invitation.
• − The central pumpkin graphic has some fire artifacts that look slightly disconnected from the carving.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent PBR material rendering with realistic food textures and soft lighting.
• + Adheres strictly to the 45-degree isometric perspective and diorama base request.
• + Clean, professional typography and layout that feels like a completed graphic.

• − The text is a bit small compared to the scale of the base.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong '3D cartoon' aesthetic with bold, rounded shapes.
• + High clarity and vibrant colors that pop against the background.
• + Large, legible typography that follows the bold text instruction.

• − Perspective is more eye-level than the requested 45-degree top-down isometric view.
• − Text and flag are floating in the air rather than being integrated into the graphic design smoothly.
• − The diorama base is very simple compared to the detailed textures in the other model.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent depiction of god rays and atmospheric lighting.
• + Highly detailed fur texture and realistic animal anatomy.
• + Dynamic composition with animals looking at a specific point of interest.

• − The fox kit has a slightly awkward pose tucked at the bottom.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Successfully includes all four animals in a clear, front-facing composition.
• + Vibrant colors and clear 'dew sparkles' interpreted as large droplets.
• + Captures the 'jumping/tumbling' aspect of the prompt well.

• − The fox's eyes appear unnaturally blue and slightly distorted.
• − The floating dew drops look artificial and disconnected from the environment.
• − Fur detail is softer and less defined than in the competing image.

Recraft V4.1

• + Excellent typography rendering with the correct accent on 'Caffè'.
• + Clean vector aesthetic that feels modern yet vintage.
• + High contrast and balance between the icon and text.

• − Missing the requested 'subtle texture' on the background.
• − The cloche icon is somewhat generic compared to the high-quality text.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Beautiful parchment texture that perfectly matches the 'vintage' prompt.
• + Excellent emblem composition inside a decorative border.
• + Text rendering is accurate and well-integrated into the banner.

• − The accent mark on 'Caffè' is stylized in a way that looks slightly like a dot.
• − The secondary 'Est. 1720' text is slightly less crisp than the primary logo.

Recraft V4.1

• + Executes a very clean, consistent flat-vector design style.
• + Perfect spelling on all labels and headers.
• + Highly legible grid layout that clearly follows the stages in order.

• − Step numbering contains a repetition error (two '04's).
• − Icons for 'Descent' and 'Landing' are identical, lacking the requested surface icon for the final step.
• − Text rendering includes some redundant sub-captions (e.g., 'Saturn Vicon' misspelled under 'Launch').

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + More dynamic composition that visually connects the mission stages with trajectory lines.
• + Includes more detailed and varied iconography for each specific stage.
• + Accurately represents the lunar surface for the final landing stage.

• − Fails to include distinct icons/text for the 'Descent' stage, leaving them as floating labels.
• − Includes a strange shuttle-like spacecraft icon that does not match the Saturn V or Lunar Module.
• − Text rendering is slightly less crisp with some minor alignment issues.