Recraft V4.1 Pro Recraft AI vs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent surface textures on the wood and book cover
• + Clean and realistic glass refractions and reflections
• + Very high resolution and sharp details

• − The glass cube appears to have no top side, giving the book a floating effect
• − The blue sphere is quite dark and lacks vibrancy

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong adherence to the 'soft window light' prompt with visible light beams
• + Solid 3D representation of the glass cube with clear edges
• + Vibrant colors that pop

• − Floating dust/artifact particles throughout the air look unnatural
• − The book seems to be slightly hovering above the glass instead of resting on it

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent execution of car motion blur in the background.
• + Highly realistic, grainy film texture and 'candid' feel with imperfect framing.
• + Conveyed light rain streaks very effectively across the midground.

• − The subject's hands are anatomically distorted and lack detail.
• − Some vignetting/border artifacts in the corners distract from the image quality.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Superb reflections on the wet pavement and clear rain splashes around the subject.
• + Anatomical accuracy in the man's hands and face is noticeably higher.
• + The bicycle and tools have much sharper, more realistic mechanical details.

• − Failed to include the requested motion blur from passing cars.
• − The lighting and focus feel a bit too 'clean' and staged compared to the requested 'candid' street photo.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Exceptional texture detail on skin, dirt, and engraved metal.
• + Stronger adherence to the 'close portrait' instruction with a cinematic tight crop.
• + Realistic lighting and bokeh sparks that integrate well with the subject.

• − The eyes, while detailed, have an slightly unusual pupils shape under close inspection.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Clear representation of the requested beads in the hair.
• + Good contrast between the warm torchlight and the cool shadows.
• + Accurate leather and strap textures.

• − The character looks significantly younger and less 'battle-worn' than requested.
• − The engraving on the armor is less intricate compared to Model A.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent text legibility and correct spelling across the entire document.
• + Realistic food photography that matches the provided descriptions.
• + Clean, professional layout that looks like a real-world graphic design asset.

• − The grid of photos is slightly fragmented rather than a single unified block.
• − Minor spelling error in the description of the Salmon Fillet ('sraalmon').

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Stronger adherence to the 'grid' aspect of the prompt for photos.
• + Consistent lighting across all food photography.

• − Severe text rendering issues with nonsense words and gibberish characters.
• − Layout feels cluttered due to the repetition of similar-looking plates.
• − Inconsistent font styles that look less professional.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent text rendering with a crisp, fiery texture across all elements.
• + Highly realistic food textures, particularly the lighting on the lettuce and the grill on the bun.
• + Clean composition with a sophisticated use of negative space and smoke.

• − The '€6.99' starburst is a bit overwhelmed by the glow, sacrificing some legibility.
• − The sauce element looks slightly static compared to the burger components.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Dynamic and energetic composition with many small flying debris and droplets.
• + Creative melting effect on the 'MAGIC BURGER' title that adds to the 'fiery' theme.
• + Perfectly executed starburst graphic for the price tag as requested.

• − The burger patty looks slightly less photorealistic and more like a rendering compared to Model A.
• − The 'MAGIC BURGER' text is slightly warped, losing some of the professional ad feel.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent adherence to the 'handwritten' request with realistic chalk texture and stroke variations.
• + Perfect transcription of the text including the full menu items.
• + The perspective and lack of a frame make it feel more integrated into a natural scene.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Nice layout with a wooden frame and centered composition.
• + Consistent chalk style across all text.

• − Text feels slightly more like a digital font designed to look like chalk rather than actual hand-lettering.
• − Includes duplicate symbols and repeating price for the last item, making it less clean.
• − Missed the 'Herbs' portion of the second menu item.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and textures.
• + Highly detailed background with realistic nebula and planet rendering.

• − Failed the spatial reasoning instruction completely, putting the astronaut on top of the horse.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Clean visual style with a vibrant color palette.
• + Good rendering of the space suit and saddle details.

• − Failed to follow the specific instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent photorealistic texture and cinematic lighting
• + Highly accurate fur detail and realistic capybara proportions
• + Natural integration of the character within the car's interior geometry

• − The camera angle obscures most of the Manhattan background
• − The businesswoman's face is slightly out of focus

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfectly follows all prompt details including the jacket and bored expression
• + The front-on composition allows for a better view of both characters and the NYC background
• + Captures the professional, focused expression of the capybara effectively

• − The capybara's hands/paws look slightly like primate hands
• − Text on the car light is garbled

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent typography with a cohesive gothic font for the title and clear body text.
• + Cinematic lighting with a very realistic jack-o-lantern texture.
• + Sophisticated border design that feels integrated into the vintage aesthetic.

• − The parchment effect is very subtle compared to the requested 'dark parchment poster'.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Stronger adherence to the 'parchment' texture and 'webs and thorns' border prompt.
• + Vibrant color contrast between the orange pumpkin and the blue night sky.
• + Good placement of the scroll banner and detailed thorns.

• − The text layout is slightly curved and less elegant than the layout in Model A.
• − The jack-o-lantern's flame effects look a bit like digital clipart compared to the realism of Model A.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent adherence to the 45-degree isometric perspective.
• + Highly realistic PBR material textures on the fish and rice grains.
• + Sophisticated diorama base design with embedded rice texture.

• − The text placement is slightly off-center compared to the bottom subject.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Clean, vibrant cartoon aesthetic with high-quality soft lighting.
• + Perfectly centered composition for both text and subject.
• + Accurate rendering of all text and icon elements.

• − Perspective is more eye-level/cinematic than the requested 45-degree isometric top-down view.
• − The diorama base is very simple compared to the detailed scene requested.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Expertly captured the 'tumbling together' action with dynamic, intertwined posing.
• + Superior lighting and atmosphere, featuring realistic backlighting on fur and dew drops.
• + Photorealistic textures for the fur and wildflower meadow that avoid a synthetic look.

• − The golden retriever puppy has an extra limb/paw visible behind its head.
• − The fox's tail positioning is slightly awkward in the top right corner.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Includes all four distinct animals clearly and prominently in the frame.
• + Captures the 'big expressive eyes' and 'joyful' vibe very literally.
• + Strong adherence to color requests like the orange monarch-style butterflies.

• − Has a distinctly digital/AI-smooth aesthetic that falls short of 'hyper-photorealistic'.
• − The dew drops are rendered as floating, physics-defying liquid blobs rather than sparkles on grass.
• − The fox's eyes appear overly saturated and unnatural compared to the rest of the scene.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent typography rendering with perfect spelling of 'Caffè Florian'.
• + True vector-style minimalism with clean, sharp edges.
• + Strongest adherence to the flat 'vector emblem' style requested.

• − The steam element is a bit overly simplified/abstract.
• − The 'Est. 1720' text is very small and less balanced within the graphic.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Beautiful use of warm brown and cream tones with high-quality textures.
• + Excellent composition with the ribbon banner containing both the name and year.
• + Better visual representation of the metallic cloche and steam.

• − Included a framing border and paper effects not explicitly requested.
• − Slightly less 'minimalist' than Model A, trending more toward a detailed illustration.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Excellent typography and clean vector aesthetic
• + Correctly identified and labeled all six requested mission steps
• + Followed the specific icon requests precisely, including the Saturn V and trajectory arc

• − Step numbering contains a duplicate '05' for both Descent and Landing
• − Literal interpretation of prompt noise resulted in 'Saturn Vicon' as text

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Visually striking composition with good use of depth and color
• + High-quality rendering of the Lunar Module and Saturn V rocket
• + Correct spelling for all major labels

• − Failed to provide distinct icons for 'Descent' and 'Landing', leaving them as floating text
• − Inconsistent iconography style between the realistic moon and flat-vector earth
• − Included a bizarre third astronaut icon wearing what looks like a helmet from a different era