Qwen Image Alibaba vs Seedream 4.5 ByteDance

Qwen Image

• + Excellent photographic quality and depth of field
• + Accurate representation of a wooden table texture
• + Reflections within the glass cube are very realistic

• − The green plant is in the background but not clearly visible through the glass as requested

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect adherence to the instruction of the plant being visible through the glass
• + Realistic lighting interaction with the glass and book
• + The sphere looks like natural blue glass

• − The book's scale feels slightly large for the cube
• − Minor aliasing/noise on some of the glass edges

Qwen Image

• + Excellent full-body composition
• + Realistic skin textures and clothing folds
• + Reflections on the wet pavement are very convincing

• − Missed the request for motion blur on passing cars
• − The rain effect is very subtle and looks static
• − The bicycle mechanics are slightly nonsensical around the chain area

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfectly captures the request for motion blur from passing cars
• + Strong adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' feel
• + Detailed water droplets on the raincoat and vibrant reflections

• − The man's hands are mangled and clearly AI-distorted
• − The red bicycle is partially cut off
• − The background neon signs introduce a level of stylization against the 'no stylization' prompt

Qwen Image

• + Excellent depiction of ornate engraving on the pauldron
• + Direct gaze with high contrast creates a powerful presence
• + Clear rendering of leather straps and buckles

• − The scars look like surface paint rather than physical wounds
• − Hair beads look a bit like plastic toys, disjointed from the fantasy setting
• − The torch flame and sparks have a slightly synthetic, digital feel

Seedream 4.5

• + Incredible skin texture with realistic dirt and faint scarring
• + Sophisticated lighting showing warm reflection on the face and armor
• + Exceptional braided hair detail with integrated metallic beads

• − The 'close portrait' crop cuts off some of the armor detail compared to the other model
• − The background bokeh sparks are a bit overwhelming in the foreground

Qwen Image

• + Excellent adherence to the 'grid' layout requested in the prompt
• + Professional typography and layout that feels like a real restaurant menu
• + Clean, vibrant image quality for the food items

• − Text contains gibberish spelling errors
• − Combines pizza/mains into one section instead of separating them

Seedream 4.5

• + Clear separation of the three requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
• + Vibrant color accents used as borders for image categories
• + High-quality, realistic food photography

• − Failed to provide a 'grid' layout as requested
• − Text rendering is poor with frequent misspellings and repetitive items
• − Layout is quite basic and lacks the modern minimalist design polish of a professional menu

Qwen Image

• + Excellent text legibility and clean graphic design elements.
• + Vibrant lighting with clear distinguishability between burger components.
• + Accurate adherence to the starburst and pricing request.

• − The 'exploded' effect is less pronounced, as the main burger body remains mostly intact.
• − Some floating pieces look a bit like clip-art rather than being naturally integrated.

Seedream 4.5

• + Dynamic sense of motion with realistic motion blur on flying ingredients.
• + Strong artistic integration of the fiery theme within the text and starburst.
• + More 'exploded' composition with better height between the top bun and patty.

• − The pricing starburst is slightly messy with overlapping sparks.
• − Text has a slightly less polished, more 'melted' look which can reduce legibility compared to Model A.

Qwen Image

• + Excellent layout with bold, readable text.
• + Accurately captured the full list of menu items from the prompt.
• + Realistic wood grain on the frame.

• − Included a significant typo in the year, rendering it as '20026'.
• − The text looks slightly like a digital font overlay rather than textured chalk.

Seedream 4.5

• + Superb chalk texture with realistic dust smudges and variations in pressure.
• + Correct date rendering matching the prompt exactly.
• + Text feels integrated into the board's surface.

• − Mistakenly repeated the price for the first item on its own line.
• − The handwriting style is a bit less 'elegant cursive' as requested compared to the title of Model A.

Qwen Image

• + High resolution image with very clean edges and cinematic lighting.
• + Detailed rendering of the astronaut's suit and the horse's anatomy.
• + Strong composition with a clear sense of being in earth's orbit.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint/spatial instruction of 'horse on top'.
• − Result is a generic interpretation of a popular prompt rather than the specific request.

Seedream 4.5

• + Beautiful, vibrant celestial background with nebulae and stardust.
• + Dynamic pose for both the horse and the astronaut.
• + Good lighting coherence between the subject and the environment.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint/spatial instruction of 'horse on top'.
• − Small anatomical artifact where a third leg or hooves appear to be emerging from the horse's midsection.

Qwen Image

• + High-quality hair rendering and lighting on the capybara's fur.
• + Excellent composition that feels more cinematic and professionally framed.
• + Sharp details on the clothing materials and taxi interior.

• − The paws look more like primate hands than capybara paws.
• − The perspective relative to the taxi's exterior roof light is slightly disjointed.

Seedream 4.5

• + Accurately renders capybara anatomy, particularly the blunt, webbed appearance of the paws.
• + Strong adherence to the 'bored expression' prompt for the passenger.
• + The 'TAXI' text on the cap is clear and legible.

• − The lighting is somewhat flat compared to Model A.
• − Minor artifacting where the capybara's shoulder meets the car frame.

Qwen Image

• + Successfully included the dark parchment background effect.
• + Highly accurate borders with thorns and spider webs as requested.
• + Good cinematic lighting and spooky atmosphere.

• − Small spelling error in the word 'Halloween' in the main title.
• − The text at the very top is garbled gibberish.
• − The layout feels slightly cramped within the inner frame.

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested fields with zero spelling errors.
• + Excellent clarity and high-quality rendering of the jack-o-lantern and trees.
• + Better spacing and overall professional composition.

• − Missed the request for a 'dark parchment' poster effect.
• − Does not include the full frame-style border of webs and thorns, placing them only in corners.

Qwen Image

• + Excellent typography with clean white text that pops against the background.
• + Very consistent 'cartoon' aesthetic with soft, rounded 3D shapes.
• + Superior lighting and soft shadows that create a high-quality 3D render feel.

• − The 3D flag icon next to the text is slightly distorted.
• − The rice texture is a bit repetitive/patterned compared to realistic sushi.

Seedream 4.5

• + Impressive realistic PBR materials, especially on the salmon texture and the stone-like base.
• + Clean, accurate Japanese flag icon.
• + Effective use of depth of field to emphasize the miniature scale.

• − The black text lacks the 'ultra-clean' aesthetic requested and feels a bit heavy.
• − The composition is slightly off-center with more empty space at the top than the bottom.

Qwen Image

• + Excellent anatomical accuracy for all four animals
• + Clear and beautifully rendered god rays and dew sparkles
• + Balanced composition with each animal distinctively visible

• − The posing is a bit static for a chasing and tumbling scene
• − Butterflies appear a bit flat and pasted on

Seedream 4.5

• + Captures the activity of chasing and tumbling much more dynamically
• + Engaging and expressive facial features on the animals
• + Beautiful integration of light and bokeh effects

• − The fox's eyes appear overly stylized/cartoonish compared to the rest of the realism
• − Anatomical issues with the animals' paws/legs during the motion
• − The bunny is partially obscured in the background

Qwen Image

• + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic
• + Correct color palette with warm brown tones
• + Accurate representation of the cloche and steam

• − Serious typography issues with overlapping letters
• − The text 'Florian' is barely legible due to strange kerning and font choice

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent typography with clean, legible text
• + Classic vintage aesthetic with nice cross-hatching details
• + Well-composed emblem layout that looks professional

• − Texture on the background is very subtle, almost flat
• − Cloche drawing is slightly more complex than 'minimalist' might imply

Qwen Image

• + Successfully captures a flat vector style with subtle gradients as requested.
• + Matches the specified NASA color palette accurately.

• − Significant spelling errors in both the mission details ('Tranar Orbit') and the crew names.
• − Chronological flow is confusing with numbered steps appearing out of order spatially.
• − Missing one of the three crew members and the third name is illegible.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent layout with a clear, linear timeline that is easy to read.
• + High text accuracy with correct spellings for all mission stages and crew names.
• + Consistent iconography that perfectly follows the requested steps.

• − Includes a satellite icon for 'Descent' which is technically inaccurate for the Lunar Module.
• − The infographic style is slightly more 'clinical' than 'artistic' compared to some modern poster designs.