Qwen Image Alibaba vs Recraft V4 Recraft AI

Qwen Image

• + Excellent photographic quality and lighting
• + Matches all spatial prompt requirements perfectly
• + The glass cube has realistic thickness and internal reflections

• − The plant is quite blurred in the background
• − The sphere appears more like a plastic marble than glass

Recraft V4

• + Strong adherence to the 'visible through the glass' instruction
• + Realistic texture on the red book and wooden table
• + Sophisticated glass refraction effects

• − The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally without support
• − The lighting feels a bit harsher than 'soft window light'

Qwen Image

• + Excellent depiction of surface reflections and wet pavement
• + Natural and realistic skin texture on the man's hands and face
• + Superior bicycle anatomy and structural coherence

• − The car in the background lacks the requested motion blur
• − The 'imperfect framing' prompt led to a slightly awkward pole on the left edge

Recraft V4

• + Perfectly captures the motion blur and bustling city atmosphere
• + Strong sense of 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' street photography aesthetic
• + Beautifully rendered rain drops and lighting effects

• − Severe anatomical errors with the bicycle, specifically the floating handlebars and disconnected frame
• − The man's posture and interaction with the bike are less logical than in Model A

Qwen Image

• + Excellent use of a photography grid as requested
• + Strong modern graphic design aesthetic with vibrant background blocks
• + Clear categorization into titled sections

• − Text consists of nonsensical gibberish
• − The 'Pizza/mains' section uses a slash instead of separating the categories

Recraft V4

• + Perfect English text rendering with logical descriptions and pricing
• + Highly realistic food photography with consistent lighting
• + Strictly follows the requested sections: Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains

• − Layout is a standard vertical list rather than the requested 'grid' of photos at the top
• − Less 'vibrant' branding compared to the colorful blocks in model A

Qwen Image

• + Excellent fiery backgrounds and glowing text effects that meet the prompt's stylistic requirements perfectly.
• + Very high visual quality with vibrant colors and professional-looking food product lighting.
• + Perfect text rendering for all requested elements, including the starburst.

• − The burger is not fully 'exploded'; the core ingredients are still mostly stacked rather than individually suspended.
• − The placement of the '€6.99' starburst overlaps some background elements, making it feel slightly crowded.

Recraft V4

• + Highly effective 'exploded' view, with all components clearly separated and suspended in mid-air as requested.
• + Excellent photorealistic textures on the bun and patty, looking more like real, unedited food photography.
• + The composition uses the vertical space well to show the motion of the ingredients.

• − The background is quite dark and lacks the requested 'fiery background with glowing embers' intensity.
• − The fiery effect on the text is less pronounced and less integrated than in the competing image.
• − Includes a white plate at the bottom which was not requested and slightly disrupts the floating effect.

Qwen Image

• + Excellent chalk texture and smudging effects on the blackboard surface.
• + Bold, legible text that captures the requested 'handwritten' aesthetic well.
• + Correct spelling for almost all menu items.

• − Significant error in the date, rendering it as '20026' instead of '2026'.
• − Text lacks the 'elegant cursive' requested for the title.

Recraft V4

• + Perfect adherence to the requested date and text content.
• + Beautifully rendered chalk illustrations that enhance the café theme.
• + The text style is more consistent and delicate, fitting a high-end menu.

• − The text is quite small and slightly harder to read against the busy chalkboard texture.
• − The font style is a bit uniform, appearing slightly more like a digital font than Model A.

Qwen Image

• + Excellent clarity and lighting on the space suit
• + Smooth, cinematic composition with a clear view of the planet
• + Precise rendering of the horse's anatomy and tack

• − The horse legs look slightly unaligned in their floating stance
• − Standard 'stock photo' aesthetic lacks a bit of the requested surrealism

Recraft V4

• + High artistic value with dynamic movement and texture
• + Excellent cinematic lighting and grit matching the 'surreal' prompt
• + Intricate detail in the asteroid field and stardust

• − The astronaut's suit is less distinct and blends into the horse
• − Composition is a bit cluttered with rocks, making the main subject harder to see

Qwen Image

• + Excellent high-resolution rendering of the capybara's fur and the taxi interior.
• + Clearer view of the driver's outfit and detailed taxi cap.
• + Accurate portrayal of the bored businesswoman in the background.

• − The capybara's hands look more like primate hands than capybara paws.
• − The taxi sign on the roof appears to be backwards or awkwardly placed.

Recraft V4

• + Features more realistic, stubby capybara-like paws on the steering wheel.
• + The inclusion of rain on the window adds to the atmospheric New York aesthetic.
• + Accurate New York City skyline visible in the background.

• − Overall image is slightly more grainy/noisy than Model A.
• − The businesswoman in the back is slightly out of focus and less detailed.

Qwen Image

• + Excellent typography rendering with almost no errors
• + Strong thematic bordering that incorporates both thorns and webs as requested
• + Clean and balanced vertical hierarchy of text elements

• − The main title 'Hallow Party' misses the 'een' in the primary gothic font
• − The lighting is somewhat flat compared to the other model

Recraft V4

• + High visual detail with complex textures for the pumpkin and trees
• + Dynamic lighting and atmospheric rain/fog effects
• + Perfect spelling on the main title and event details

• − The 'scroll banner' is just a flat white label that feels out of place
• − The thorn element in the border is less distinct than the web detail

Qwen Image

• + Excellent adherence to the '3D cartoon scene' and 'soft refined textures' style.
• + Perfectly follows all text instructions with bold typography and a logical layout.
• + The diorama base is clean and reflects the miniature isometric aesthetic well.

• − The salmon nigiri sushi looks slightly simplified/plastic compared to realistic PBR textures.
• − Includes an extra physical flag on the tray not explicitly mentioned besides the top icon.

Recraft V4

• + Features more realistic PBR materials for the fish and rice as requested.
• + Clean typography that fits the high-end food photography look.
• + Accurate sushi types (maguro, sake, maki) with impressive detail.

• − Failed to follow the '3D cartoon' style, opting for a realistic photo style instead.
• − The salt/ice diorama base feels a bit messy compared to the 'ultra-clean' requirement.
• − Positioning of the flag icon is at the very top edge, slightly cramped.

Qwen Image

• + Strong bokeh and lighting effects create a warm, cinematic atmosphere.
• + Clean fur textures and clear, expressive eyes on all animals.
• + Balanced central composition with distinct character placement.

• − The characters feel static and 'posed' rather than playfully chasing and tumbling.
• − The golden retriever appears much larger and more mature compared to the other 'baby' animals.

Recraft V4

• + Excellent depiction of movement and playful energy, matching the 'tumbling' and 'chasing' prompt.
• + Superior lighting effects with visible god rays and dew sparkles throughout the scene.
• + More accurate scale between the different baby animals.

• − The bunny's anatomy is slightly awkward with its upright, floating posture.
• − Lower sharpness on the kitten's face compared to the other animals.

Qwen Image

• + Strong minimalist vector style
• + Excellent use of the requested banner element
• + Clear warm brown and cream color palette

• − Confused typography with overlapping letters
• − The texture is a bit flat compared to the other model

Recraft V4

• + Beautiful, high-end classic typography
• + Sophisticated cross-hatching detail on the cloche
• + Perfect spelling and legibility of all text

• − Failed to include a 'banner' as requested, opting for a semi-circle instead
• − Steam is very subtle compared to Model A

Qwen Image

• + Stronger visual appeal through background elements and moon surface detail
• + Vibrant colors that pop against the dark navy background

• − Poor text rendering with several misspellings and gibberish phrases
• − Confused flow of steps that mixes Earth and Lunar descriptions
• − Incorrectly included prompt instructions like '(Stop at landing)' as part of the header text

Recraft V4

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors in names or titles
• + Followed all six steps of the mission chronologically and accurately
• + Includes all requested icons in a clean, professional vector layout

• − Composition feels a bit sparse with a lot of white space
• − The Saturn V icon is very small and lacks detail