Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

Qwen Image Edit 2509 Alibaba Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance

Settled by community votes across 7 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

Qwen Image Edit 2509

7.8 arena score

#32 of 32 in Image Editing

Skill signature · Image Editing

Seedream 5.0 Lite

23.7 arena score

#22 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

Qwen Image Edit 2509

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Seedream 5.0 Lite

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 7

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Successfully merges the car into a California coastline environment.
  • + Preserves the specific model and details of the Rolls Royce very well.
  • + Captures the hair texture and general likeness of the man.
  • The man is poorly positioned, appearing to sit too high and behind the headrest.
  • The lighting on the man does not match the warm sunset glow of the environment.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the man's specific clothing and scarf.
  • + Realistic placement of the driver with hands correctly positioned on the steering wheel.
  • + The composition feels natural and the car's details are perfectly preserved.
  • The motion blur on the wheels and road is slightly inconsistent with the sharpness of the car body.
  • The coastline background is slightly less dramatic than the one in the other model.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner as it successfully preserved the specific details from both source images, including the man's unique plaid coat and black scarf. While Qwen Image Edit 2509 created a beautiful environment, it failed to realistically seat the driver in the car and changed his outfit completely.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Preserves the original image source almost entirely.
  • Completely failed the edit instruction by not changing the character to the one from Image 2.
  • Only applied a slight color saturation filter to the original Image 1.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent adherence to the character reference, including the face, sunglasses, scarf, and black clothing.
  • + Successfully mapped the complex pose from Image 1 onto the new character.
  • + Maintained the environmental lighting and color palette of Image 1.
  • The transition from the black sweatshirt to the bare legs/feet is slightly abrupt.
  • The character's right hand (lower left) has some anatomical distortions.

Verdict: Qwen Image Edit 2509 failed this task completely, returning a version of the source image with no character change. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed all instructions perfectly, successfully placing the character from Image 2 into the specific pose and environment of Image 1 while retaining his specific clothing and accessories.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Successfully transferred the entire outfit including lower body garments.
  • + Correctly followed the logic of adding accessories like the sunglasses.
  • Failed to preserve the exact face and hair of the person in Image 1, merging the two subjects instead.
  • Overall image quality is lower with visible artifacts around the edges of the person.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent preservation of the person's exact face, skin vitiligo patterns, and head from Image 1.
  • + High visual quality and seamless integration of the outfit onto the subject's torso.
  • + Great attention to detail by including the sunglasses, watch, and ring from Image 2.
  • Cropped the image to torso-level, failing to show the full outfit adaptation (jeans and shoes) as requested.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner for its superior ability to preserve the identity of the person from Image 1 while realistically skinning the new outfit onto them. While Qwen Image Edit 2509 attempted to show the full body, it fundamentally failed the primary instruction by altering the subject's face and hair to match Image 2, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite maintained the original model's unique features with high fidelity.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Excellent preservation of the original face, eyes, and facial structure.
  • + Maintains the exact lighting and background from the source image.
  • + High detail in the hair texture and strands.
  • The hairstyle is slightly exaggerated/voluminous for the character's rugged look.
  • The blending near the temples is a bit soft.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Natural, realistic hairstyle that fits the character's overall aesthetic.
  • + Good integration of the hairline with the sideburns.
  • Significantly alters the person's facial features, particularly the eyes and bridge of the nose.
  • The face appears slightly smoother or 'beautified' compared to the rugged original.

Verdict: Qwen Image Edit 2509 is the clear winner for image editing because it successfully added the hair while keeping the subject's face identical to the source. Seedream 5.0 Lite provided a more proportionally realistic haircut, but it failed the core editing requirement by changing the man's facial features, essentially creating a different person.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Excellent caricature style with exaggerated facial features that still resemble the source.
  • + Creative composition merging a news desk with a hockey rink background.
  • + Maintains the outfit details like the denim jacket and black undershirt perfectly.
  • The dog is very small and lacks detail.
  • Text in the speech bubble and on the screen is garbled nonsense.
  • The caricature of the man in the background is a bit distracting.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Features a much larger and more prominent dog, better meeting the 'love for dogs' prompt.
  • + Clean, modern vector illustration style.
  • + Includes specific hockey equipment like a stick and puck clearly.
  • The facial features are very generic and bear little resemblance to the original person's unique structure.
  • The 'TV news anchor' sign is literal and unnecessary compared to a visual cue.
  • The hand holding the hockey stick is anatomicaly awkward.

Verdict: Qwen Image Edit 2509 is the clear winner for its interpretation of 'caricature,' successfully exaggerating the source subject's features while maintaining a recognizable likeness and a humorous tone. Seedream 5.0 Lite produces a nice illustration with better dog representation, but the face becomes a generic cartoon character that no longer looks like the woman in the original photo.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Excellent application of soft pastel colors and textures
  • + Strong 'dreamy' background interpretation
  • + Faithfully reproduces the specific facial expressions and character poses
  • Shifted the red dress to pink, missing some color preservation
  • Overlay texture is a bit uniform/grainy across the whole image

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli cel-shaded animation style
  • + Preserves the original color palette (red dress) more accurately
  • + The background detail balance remains consistent with the source
  • Characters are a bit more simplified/flat compared to the requested 'painterly' texture
  • Lighting is clean but lacks the 'warm, nostalgic' glow requested as much as Model A

Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of translating a famous meme into an anime style while maintaining the composition. Qwen Image Edit 2509 leaned more into the 'painterly' and 'nostalgic' prompts with a soft, textured finish, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a cleaner, high-quality cel-shaded look that better preserved the source colors. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the likely winner for its more authentic Ghibli character design and better preservation of the original image's core elements.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
Qwen Image Edit 2509
Before After
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

Qwen Image Edit 2509

  • + Successfully applied dramatic wind effect to the hair.
  • + Added maple leaves that contrast well with the background.
  • + Excellent preservation of the source image's identity and background.
  • The hair strands appear somewhat stiff and repetitive like a texture pattern.
  • Many maple leaves appear regardless of the summer-like green foliage in the background.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Very realistic wind-blown hair effect that looks natural.
  • + Consistent green leaf style matching the existing trees.
  • + Perfectly preserved the original face and clothing.
  • The leaf placement and size feels a bit repetitive.
  • Motion blur on the leaves is slightly inconsistent.

Verdict: Both models followed the instructions very well, effectively adding motion through hair and flying leaves while maintaining the source image's integrity. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner because the wind effect on the hair is far more realistic and the leaves match the surrounding greenery better than the autumnal leaves chosen by Qwen Image Edit 2509.

Next steps

Explore each model