Qwen Image 2.0 Alibaba vs Wan 2.6 Alibaba

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the book and table surface.
• + Accurate representation of refraction and reflections within the glass panels.

• − The plant appears to be fused with or immediately behind the glass rather than having clear depth.
• − The sphere is floating unnaturally in the center of the cube without support.

Wan 2.6

• + Natural composition with a potted plant clearly positioned behind the object.
• + Beautiful lighting with soft shadows and realistic caustic reflections on the table.
• + The sphere is realistically resting on the bottom surface of the cube.

• − The glass cube is slightly less sharp in terms of edge definition compared to Model A.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent natural skin texture and realistic age spots on the subject
• + Successful capture of 'imperfect framing' with the candid crop
• + Very authentic wet pavement reflections and subtle rain effects

• − The rear wheel of the bicycle is significantly warped and lacks structure
• − The hands and fingers of the subject are anatomically messy while working

Wan 2.6

• + Better overall composition and cinematic atmosphere
• + The red bicycle is rendered with much higher structural accuracy
• + Excellent execution of light rain and rain droplets on surfaces

• − The 'rain' on the man's jacket looks more like glass beads than water droplets
• − The skin texture feels slightly more processed and digital compared to model A

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent portrayal of 'battle-worn' with realistic skin texture, deep wrinkles, and scars.
• + Highly detailed engraving on the plate armor and clear representation of beads in the hair.
• + Strong color contrast and sharp focus on the character's facial features.

• − The lighting feels more like a large fire rather than specific 'warm torchlight' as requested.
• − Small anatomical glitches on the hand resting on the hilt.

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect interpretation of torchlight lighting, creating realistic shadows and warm highlights.
• + Superior rendering of detailed leather straps and the frayed cloth underlayer as requested.
• + Highly lifelike, glossy eyes that capture the specified emotion and lighting.

• − The scale mail/cloth textures at the bottom left are slightly blurry compared to the face.
• − The 'battle-worn' aspect is mostly communicated through mud splatters rather than physical scarring/exhaustion.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent photo-realistic food imagery
• + Logical alignment of sections with relevant photos
• + Clean and readable section headers

• − Garbled and unreadable body text
• − Repetitive pricing values
• − Visual layout feels like a catalog rather than a functional menu

Wan 2.6

• + Accurately depicts a menu layout with actual price lists and descriptions
• + Incorporates vibrant geometric accents as requested
• + Better hierarchy between titles, subtitles, and price points

• − Confusing categorization where pizzas are shown under the 'Appetizers' heading
• − Less consistent photo quality compared to Model A
• − Text is still largely gibberish

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent text legibility and high-quality font rendering.
• + Professional advert layout with the price starburst visually balanced.
• + Sharp textures on the burger ingredients and glowing fire effects.

• − The burger is less 'exploded' and looks more like a standard stack with a floating bun.
• − Background is slightly more generic with less environmental depth.

Wan 2.6

• + Successfully captures the 'exploded' motion with components scattering realistically in space.
• + Dynamic use of smoke and embers creating a sense of heat and depth.
• + Good 3D effect on the main title text.

• − The price starburst looks like a flat clip-art element that clashes with the photorealistic scene.
• − Small visual glitch with a sauce drip connecting the bun to the burger unnaturally.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Text is perfectly legible and correctly spelled across all items.
• + The background café scene is well-lit and adds to the cozy atmosphere.
• + Successfully interprets the cut-off prompt to complete the third item as logical 'Chocolate Chip Cookies'.

• − The handwriting looks slightly digital/synthetic despite the chalk texture.
• − The chalkboard lacks a physical frame, making it look like a floating green panel.

Wan 2.6

• + Superior chalk texture with realistic dust, smudges, and varying pressure.
• + Authentic cursive title that better matches the 'elegant cursive' prompt instruction.
• + The composition feels more grounded with a visible wooden frame and chalk dust on the ledge.

• − Warped characters in the bottom line of text (e.g., 'options').
• − Minor inconsistencies in common letterforms across different words.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Crisp and clear visual quality with interesting scaly textures on the horse neck.
• + Dynamic composition with floating water droplets that add to the surreal theme.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.

Wan 2.6

• + Beautiful cinematic lighting and vibrant nebulae in the background.
• + Detailed rendering of the space suit and saddle leather.

• − Completely failed the negative constraint to have the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − Anatomical oddity with a third leg or leg fragment appearing near the back of the horse.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur and the jacket fabric.
• + Realistic phone lighting reflecting on the woman's face.
• + Good sense of depth with the blurred city lights and passing car.

• − The transition between the capybara's paws and the steering wheel looks slightly AI-generated and messy.
• − The perspective makes the capybara look significantly larger than the person.

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect adherence to the prompt regarding the woman's bored expression.
• + Includes great environmental details like raindrops on the windshield and taxi roof sign.
• + Stable hand and paw anatomy on the steering wheel.

• − The capybara's head looks a bit stiff and cutout-like against the background.
• − The interior cabin feels slightly cramped for a New York taxi.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent typography with a clean, classic gothic font
• + Clean and highly legible text layout
• + Strong parchment texture and a cohesive vintage aesthetic

• − Lighting is a bit flat compared to the 'cinematic' request
• − The border feels more like a sketch than a physical frame

Wan 2.6

• + Atmospheric cinematic lighting with a strong orange glow and deep blue sky
• + Intricate 3D-looking border with layered thorns and webs
• + Gold-leaf effect on the title text adds an elegant touch

• − Small text at the bottom is slightly less crisp than Model A
• − Text alignment in the banner is slightly off-center

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent photographic realism in the sushi textures.
• + Perfect text rendering of 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.
• + Clean, professional composition.

• − Failed the '3D cartoon' and 'miniature isometric' style request, looking like a real photo instead.
• − Perspective is not a true 45-degree isometric projection.

Wan 2.6

• + Perfectly captures the '3D cartoon' and 'isometric' aesthetic requested.
• + Follows the instruction for a 'small raised diorama base' much better than Model A.
• + Accurate text and flag placement.

• − The textures are more simplified compared to the 'realistic PBR' request.
• − Slightly less crisp resolution on the text edges compared to Model A.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent interaction between the animals, with a realistic 'tumbling' dynamic.
• + Vibrant and detailed wildflowers that fill the foreground effectively.
• + Strong adherence to the fox kit and tabby kitten descriptions.

• − The fox's face/mouth looks slightly distorted as it rolls over.
• − The butterfly on top of the kitten's head looks a bit flat and pasted on.

Wan 2.6

• + Exceptional lighting with beautiful god rays and sparkling dew effects as requested.
• + Very clean 'masterpiece' quality with professional-grade bokeh.
• + Highly expressive and cute facial features on all animals.

• − The kitten and fox are positioned slightly repetitively next to each other.
• − The floating seeds/particles in the air are a bit distracting.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent typography with proper accent mark and spacing.
• + Clear banner implementation that adheres to the requested layout.
• + Clean vector-style shading and a pleasant warm color palette.

• − The placement of the steam inside the cloche is conceptually strange compared to a standard logo.
• − The line work on the banner scroll is a bit cluttered.

Wan 2.6

• + Elegant minimalist composition that better reflects a modern vector emblem.
• + Beautiful subtle texture application around the edges of the light background.
• + Creative and realistic placement of the steam detail above the cloche.

• − The banner is very small and tucked to the side rather than being a primary structural element.
• − Missing the grave accent on the letter 'e' in 'Caffè'.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent adherence to the sequential steps requested in the prompt.
• + Accurate and legible text rendering for mission phases.
• + Clean vector aesthetic with a correct NASA-inspired color palette.

• − Includes a spelling error in 'Translunjar' (Translunar).
• − Vertical layout is slightly cluttered at the bottom.

Wan 2.6

• + Successfully incorporated the astronaut names with correct spelling.
• + Maintains the requested color palette.

• − Completely failed to include the requested infographic steps and icons.
• − Very Poor composition with large amounts of empty space.
• − Does not meet the 'infographic' requirement for mission phases.