Qwen Image 2.0 Alibaba vs Vidu Q2 ShengShu Technology

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Photorealistic materials and lighting textures
• + Accurate representation of glass reflections and window light direction
• + High naturalistic detail on the red book and wooden table

• − The blue sphere is levitating rather than sitting on a surface
• − The glass cube has internal vertical dividers that weren't requested

Vidu Q2

• + Perfect adherence to all spatial relationships including the sphere sitting inside
• + Excellent handling of shadows and light play through the glass
• + Complex plant details visible through the glass as requested

• − The lighting is a bit harsh compared to 'soft' window light
• − The book binding has slightly anomalous text-like artifacts

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent skin texture with realistic age spots and wrinkles
• + Strong composition that shows the character's face clearly
• + Accurate depiction of wet pavement and reflections

• − The hands interacting with the pedal are anatomically confusing
• − Very little rain is visible in the air, though the ground is wet

Vidu Q2

• + Effective 'imperfect framing' that heightens the candid feel
• + Impressive detail on the bicycle's mechanical parts and wear
• + Good integration of the background car and street lights

• − The man's face is largely cut off and obscured
• − The hand anatomy is quite distorted and messy
• − The perspective of the bicycle frame is slightly warped

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent depiction of colored beads in the braids
• + Strong gritty realism with visible dirt and skin texture
• + Dynamic lighting with glowing orange embers and reflections

• − The character looks more like a modern mercenary than a traditional 'paladin'
• − Hand anatomy is slightly awkward on the sword hilt

Vidu Q2

• + Ornate engraving on the plate armor is highly intricate
• + Texture on the cloth underlayer is exceptionally clear and detailed
• + Superior lighting consistency across the face and metal

• − The 'hair braided with small beads' prompt is only partially met with just a few beads
• − The background bokeh is less vibrant compared to Model A

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent photo-realistic food quality
• + Clearly legible section headers for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains
• + Extremely clean and professional grid layout

• − Sub-text for individual dishes is largely gibberish
• − The grid layout doesn't follow the section headers logically (pizzas under 'Mains')
• − Price values are repetitive and unrealistic

Vidu Q2

• + Dynamic and modern use of color accents
• + More complex layout variety resembling a multi-page menu
• + Good use of white space and hierarchy

• − Serious text rendering issues with misspellings in main headers (e.g., 'Apecizen')
• − Food photography is cluttered and looks less appetising than the other model
• − Poor source preservation of logic, leading to a confusing visual mess

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent text legibility and high-quality rendering of the fiery effect.
• + Photorealistic textures on the patty and vegetables.
• + Good use of negative space and smoke for a cinematic feel.

• − The burger is not fully 'exploded'; the bottom half is mostly stacked together.
• − The sauce is dripping down rather than being suspended in mid-air as requested.

Vidu Q2

• + Better 'exploded' composition with suspended sauce droplets and separated layers.
• + The background captures a more intense, fiery atmosphere.
• + Correct adherence to the starburst element for the price.

• − The currency symbol is incorrect, showing a pound-like hybrid instead of an Euro sign.
• − The lighting on the internal burger components is slightly flat compared to the bun top.
• − Perspective on the bottom bun is slightly warped.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent text accuracy with no spelling errors.
• + Consistent and realistic chalk handwriting texture.
• + Natural-looking lighting and background blur.

• − The 'Brown Butter' item is truncated at the end of the line.

Vidu Q2

• + Strong chalk texture and coloring.
• + Centered composition on the chalkboard.

• − Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items.
• − Garbled and illegible text at the bottom of the board.
• − Changed the price of the first item from $24 to $34.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent anatomical clarity of the horse and astronaut
• + Clean, high-resolution textures on the spacesuit and horse pelt
• + Cinematic lighting with a clear horizon line of Earth

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction 'horse on top'
• − The floating droplets look slightly disconnected from the scene

Vidu Q2

• + Beautiful surreal aesthetic with galaxy patterns on the horse
• + Dynamic composition with vibrant colors and cosmic dust
• + Highly detailed bridle and saddle equipment

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction 'horse on top'
• − Occasional artifacts in the cosmic background clouds

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent fur texture on the capybara.
• + Lighting feels cohesive with a nighttime city environment.
• + Strong adherence to the professional and calm expression requested.

• − The human passenger appears to be in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat.
• − The hand rendering on the steering wheel is anatomically messy/melted.

Vidu Q2

• + Superior perspective that clearly shows both the driver and the passenger in the back seat.
• + Crisp and realistic rendering of the vehicle interior and city lights.
• + Accurate interpretation of 'sitting in the back seat' versus the front-seat placement in Model A.

• − The capybara's hands look slightly more human-like than actual paws.
• − The human face in the background is a bit soft in detail.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested strings.
• + Excellent composition with clear cinematic lighting.
• + High-quality gothic border detail that matches the prompt exactly.

• − None notable.

Vidu Q2

• + Captures the requested border elements including thorns and webs.
• + Includes multiple bats as requested.

• − Significant spelling errors throughout all text layers.
• − The date and time details are incorrect or illegible (e.g., 2025 instead of 2026, 'Tmm' instead of '7pm').
• − Lower visual polish and flatter lighting compared to the opponent.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent typography with clean, bold font rendering
• + High photo-realism in textures and materials
• + Accurate 45-degree isometric-style camera angle

• − Missed the 'cartoon' aesthetic, opting for a realistic food photography style instead
• − The diorama base looks like a standard cutting board rather than a stylized base

Vidu Q2

• + Perfectly captures the 'cartoon' and 'miniature 3D diorama' aesthetic requested
• + Creative integration of the flag icon onto the text
• + Smooth PBR-style lighting and soft textures

• − Text rendering is slightly less sharp than Model A
• − The sushi components look a bit cluttered compared to the 'minimal garnish' request

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent adherence to the specific animal list, featuring exactly one of each requested species.
• + Strong emotional interaction between the animals, creating a literal 'tumbling together' scene.
• + Highly detailed fur textures and sharp focus on the central characters.

• − The fox kit is positioned in a way that its anatomy looks slightly confusing underneath the other animals.
• − The lighting is a bit harsh on the background grass compared to the soft forest floor aesthetic.

Vidu Q2

• + Beautiful, whimsical composition with vibrant colors and many fluttering butterflies.
• + Captures a great sense of motion and playfulness across the entire frame.
• + Excellent lighting with soft bokeh and sparkling dew effects that enhance the 'golden hour' feel.

• − Failed to follow the specific animal count, including two retriever puppies instead of one.
• − The rabbit has somewhat stylized/elongated ears that look a bit less photorealistic than other elements.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors
• + Clean vector-style composition
• + High contrast and strong logo characteristics

• − Steam looks more like a flame icon
• − Banner scroll on the right is a bit clunky

Vidu Q2

• + Elegant warm brown and cream color palette
• + Beautiful subtle paper texture
• + Graceful steam illustration

• − Frequent spelling errors in both names and dates
• − Redundant text elements cluttering the design
• − Inconsistent line weights

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Strong text legibility with mostly correct spelling including 'Launch', 'Earth Orbit', and crew names.
• + Followed the requested vertical infographic layout logically.
• + Accurate representation of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module and color palette.

• − Includes a typo in 'Translunjar'.
• − The Saturn V rocket icon is very small and lacks detail.

Vidu Q2

• + Excellent flat-vector aesthetic with clean, consistent iconography.
• + Captures the NASA-inspired color palette perfectly.
• + Creative use of icons for the trajectory and astronauts.

• − Text is largely gibberish or contains significant misspellings (e.g., 'Alfonch', 'Laup', 'Lunan Orutt').
• − Failed to follow the requested 6-step logical sequence accurately.