Qwen Image 2.0 Alibaba vs Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent adherence to lighting requirements with clear window light from the left.
• + Highly realistic glass textures and reflections of the blue sphere.
• + Accurate placement of all objects including the plant behind the glass.

• − The glass cube construction looks slightly like a frame rather than a solid glass object.

Recraft V4.1

• + Solid and clean geometry for the glass cube.
• + Beautiful atmospheric lighting and depth of field.
• + Very realistic wooden table texture and reflections.

• − The blue sphere looks more like a marble or liquid-filled ball than a simple sphere.
• − The plant is placed more to the side than 'behind the cube' as requested.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent natural skin texture and facial detail
• + Highly realistic reflections and wet ground physics
• + Bicycle geometry and components are very accurate

• − The cars in the background lack the requested motion blur
• − The 'imperfect framing' is very subtle

Recraft V4.1

• + Stronger cinematic atmosphere and mood
• + Better adherence to the motion blur and light rain request
• + Composition feels more like a candid street snap

• − The bicycle frame geometry is physically impossible
• − Hands and interaction with the bike are blurred and muddled
• − The subject's face is obscured and less detailed

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent depiction of colored beads in the braids
• + High level of detail on the engraved armor plating
• + Strong sense of 'battle-worn' through weathered skin texture and dirt

• − The sparks look like large, flat orange circles in the foreground
• − The hand anatomy on the sword hilt is slightly merged and messy

Recraft V4.1

• + Beautiful cinematic lighting and realistic bokeh sparks
• + Very lifelike, expressive eyes as requested
• + Intricate filigree engraving on the armor

• − The 'beads' in the hair are very subtle and few
• − Dirt textures on the face look a bit like digital smudges rather than grime

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent high-quality food photography with vibrant colors
• + Strong visual consistency across the images
• + Perfectly centered and bold typography for main section headers

• − Text for the specific dish names is largely gibberish
• − The layout is more of a gallery than a functional menu, lacking descriptions or varied prices

Recraft V4.1

• + Perfect text rendering for dish names and descriptions
• + Highly functional and realistic menu layout for a casual dining restaurant
• + Creative use of color accents for section dividers and buttons

• − The food photos are small and less detailed compared to those in Image A
• − The 'Appetizers' image grid is slightly disorganized compared to the other sections

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the patty and bun
• + Very clean and professional typography integration with a natural fire effect
• + Well-balanced composition that feels like a high-end food advertisement

• − The burger is less 'exploded' than Model B, with many components still sticking together

Recraft V4.1

• + Perfectly captures the 'exploded' request with clear separation of every single component
• + Dynamic sense of motion with sauce splashes and scattered ingredients

• − The price starburst looks like a low-quality clip-art element that clashes with the scene
• − The burger patty and lettuce look less appetizing and slightly flatter in lighting compared to Model A

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent chalk-like texture with realistic smudges and highlights
• + Beautiful handwritten style that feels organic and authentic
• + Highly legible text with clear layout

• − Slightly inconsistent character styles between the title and the bottom text

Recraft V4.1

• + Very accurate and distinct chalk texture on every letter
• + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including the full third item
• + Natural variation in letter sizing and baseline alignment

• − The background context is less defined compared to the café setting in the other image
• − The dollar signs are a bit stylized/distorted

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent anatomical rendering of the horse and astronaut
• + Very high resolution following a cinematic aesthetic
• + Creative textural details like the scales on the horse's shoulders

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse

Recraft V4.1

• + Beautiful background composition with nebulae and asteroids
• + Strong cinematic lighting and backlighting on the horse's mane

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse
• − The astronaut's left arm and rein positioning are slightly awkward

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent close-up detail on the capybara's fur and the leather texture of the steering wheel.
• + The lighting is vibrant and accurately reflects a neon-lit Manhattan night.
• + Superior clothing detail with the dark jacket and professional taxi cap.

• − The passenger is technically in the passenger seat rather than the back seat.
• − The capybara's paws look slightly mutated where they grip the wheel.

Recraft V4.1

• + Perfect adherence to the spatial prompt, correctly placing the human in the back seat.
• + The bored expression of the woman on her phone is captured perfectly according to the prompt.
• + The composition feels more like a cinematic wide shot of a vehicle.

• − The capybara is missing the requested dark jacket, appearing as bare fur.
• − The lighting is a bit flatter and less 'vibrant night street' than the first image.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent text legibility and clean formatting of event details.
• + Balanced composition with high-quality central illustration.
• + Accurate rendering of all requested elements including the scroll banner.

• − The parchment texture is a bit simple and looks slightly flat.
• − The 'moody night sky' is somewhat obscured by the background texture.

Recraft V4.1

• + Strong atmospheric lighting and deep, rich color palette.
• + Highly detailed gothic typography that fits the requested style well.
• + Complex background with interesting cloud and tree details.

• − The scroll banner text is very small and difficult to read.
• − Composition feels slightly cramped with the large header text.
• − Minor artifacting around some of the smaller bat silhouettes.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent text legibility and alignment
• + Very high textural realism on the fish and wood grain
• + Vibrant colors that pop against the background

• − The perspective is more of a side-angle than the requested 45-degree isometric view
• − The large text feels slightly unintegrated with the 3D scene

Recraft V4.1

• + Perfect adherence to the 45-degree isometric diorama perspective
• + Superior miniature 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft PBR materials
• + Clean, balanced composition with the text and icon centered well

• − Text 'SUSHI' is slightly thinner/smaller than the prompt's 'large bold' request
• − The chopsticks appear to blend into the base slightly

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent handling of complex overlapping limbs and interaction between species.
• + Vibrant and diverse color palette with sharp, detailed flowers in the foreground.
• + Precise rendering of butterflies and textures across all four animals.

• − The fox kit's face is slightly compressed underneath the other animals.
• − The lighting on the puppy's tail feels a bit flat compared to the rest of the scene.

Recraft V4.1

• + Atmospheric god rays and backlighting create a more literal 'golden sunrise' feel.
• + The animals have very expressive, consistent eyes as requested.
• + Good sense of vertical movement and playfulness.

• − The puppy's mouth rendering is slightly messy with indistinct teeth.
• − The rabbit's paws and proportions are slightly less accurate than the other animals.
• − The kitten's pose feels a bit stiff compared to the others.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Excellent typography with correct inclusion of the accent mark in 'Caffè'
• + Rich, warm tonal range and appealing illustrative style
• + Precise rendering of the cloche and banner elements

• − The placement of the steam makes it appear to be printed on the cloche rather than rising from it
• − The banner construction is slightly asymmetrical

Recraft V4.1

• + Better 'minimalist' aesthetic that feels more like a functional vector logo
• + Clean, professional composition with clear hierarchy
• + Steam is correctly positioned rising from the cloche

• − Missed the accent mark on 'CAFFÈ'
• − Text alignment is slightly off-center relative to the icon above

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Successfully included all six requested steps in a logical vertical flow
• + High level of detail on the lunar module and astronaut silhouettes
• + Good use of the requested NASA-inspired color palette in a realistic style

• − Contains a spelling error ('Translunjar')
• − Vector style is inconsistent, mixing flat elements with 3D-shaded objects
• − Iconography is not consistent in scale or style across the steps

Recraft V4.1

• + Perfect adherence to the clean, modern flat-vector style and iconography
• + Excellent text legibility and graphic design layout
• + Strict adherence to the requested color palette across all elements

• − Numbering error in the steps (labels go 01, 02, 03, 04, 04, 06)
• − The icons for Descent and Landing are identical rather than showing different states
• − The 'Translunar' icon is slightly too minimal compared to the other graphics