LongCat-Image Meituan vs Wan 2.6 Alibaba

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent clean glass rendering with realistic reflections and refractions
• + Accurate spatial arrangement as per the prompt
• + Clean, modern aesthetic with sharp focus on the central objects

• − The glass cube has no visible top face although the book is resting on it
• − The lighting feels slightly more studio-lit than natural window light

Wan 2.6

• + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and weathered red book
• + Strong adherence to the lighting instruction with realistic shadows
• + Excellent depiction of the plant seen through the glass

• − The glass cube has some geometric inconsistencies on the right vertical edge

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent depiction of raining environment and wet pavement reflections
• + Includes clear motion blur from passing cars as requested
• + Captures an 'imperfect framing' look characteristic of street photography

• − Anomalous bicycle structure with an extra wheel appearing behind the front
• − Skin texture on the man's face feels slightly smoothed and less 'natural' than requested

Wan 2.6

• + Exceptional skin texture and realistic age details on the man
• + High attention to detail with rain droplets clinging to the man's jacket
• + Correct bicycle anatomy and logical interaction with a tool

• − Failed to include the requested motion blur on the passing car
• − The rain effect on the jacket looks slightly static/frozen like pearls rather than a candid shot

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent depiction of ornate engraved plate armor
• + Clear and symmetrical composition
• + Vibrant warm colors and effective bokeh sparks

• − The character looks a bit too clean and youthful for 'battle-worn'
• − The hair beads look somewhat like modern plastic jewelry

Wan 2.6

• + Superb adherence to the 'battle-worn' and 'dirt on skin' prompts
• + Highly lifelike and emotional eyes with wetness texture
• + Excellent clothing texture with frayed cloth and rugged leather straps

• − The composition is a bit more crowded than Model A
• − Slightly less emphasis on the 'ornate' aspect of the armor engraving compared to A

LongCat-Image

• + Includes all requested food categories including mains and appetizers
• + Dynamic layout with vibrant color blocks

• − Text is largely gibberish and poorly rendered
• − Graphic design feels cluttered and lacks whitespace

Wan 2.6

• + Excellent clean and professional minimalist layout
• + High-quality, realistic food photography in a neat grid
• + Text is legible and uses appropriate sans-serif fonts

• − The grid relies heavily on pizza photos, showing less variety for mains
• − The vibrant accents are limited to the corners rather than throughout the design

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent graphic design layout with clean typography
• + High-quality, appetizing burger rendering
• + Vibrant and well-executed starburst graphic

• − Fails the 'exploded view' requirement, showing a mostly assembled burger
• − Lacks the sense of motion requested in the prompt

Wan 2.6

• + Successfully captures the 'exploded' concept with ingredients suspended in air
• + Strong sense of motion with sauce drips and smoke
• + Fiery text effects are highly integrated into the background theme

• − Starburst graphic is a bit cluttered in the corner
• − Text at the bottom is slightly less legible against the fire

LongCat-Image

• + Features a clear, centered composition of a chalkboard stand in a café environment.
• + Captures a stylized chalk-like weight to the text.

• − Text is largely unintelligible with major spelling errors like 'ToAYS GYAYS' and 'ARLIL'.
• − Failed to render the requested specific menu items correctly.
• − Text rendering looks like a digital font attempt rather than natural handwriting.

Wan 2.6

• + Excellent prompt adherence with near-perfect spelling of all requested menu items.
• + Realistic chalk texture including smudges and dust on the board.
• + Authentic handwritten cursive and print styles that look human-made.

• − The perspective is slightly angled rather than a direct front-on shot.
• − One small character overlap in the title 'SPECIALS'.

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent anatomical clarity for the horse's legs and structure.
• + Includes detailed lunar landscape and multiple background celestial bodies.

• − Failed the inverse prompt instruction (astronaut is riding the horse).
• − The randomly floating aircraft in the top left feels out of place and low resolution.

Wan 2.6

• + Impressive cinematic lighting and color palette with vibrant nebulae.
• + High level of detail in the horse's mane and the reflections on the visor.

• − Failed the inverse prompt instruction (astronaut is riding the horse).
• − Anatomical issues with the horse's front legs appearing merged or confusingly posed.

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent fur texture on the capybara and clean lighting.
• + Dynamic perspective and sharp focus on the subjects.

• − Internal car perspective shows the capybara partially emerging from the windowsill.
• − Includes two passengers instead of the requested single businesswoman.
• − The capybara's hand/paw looks like a bird talon/human hybrid.

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect adherence to the single businesswoman requirement.
• + Captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger perfectly.
• + Great environmental atmosphere with the rain and Times Square lights.

• − The passenger is seated in the front seat instead of the back seat as requested.
• − The capybara's head is slightly centered rather than in the driver's seat position.

LongCat-Image

• + Includes all requested elements like thorns and webs clearly
• + Title text is very sharp and readable

• − Hallucinates names like 'Julie' and misspells the location as 'The Armiees'
• − Visual composition looks a bit cluttered and less cinematic

Wan 2.6

• + Excellent text accuracy for all details including the location
• + Cinematic lighting and high-quality artistic composition
• + Better integration of the 'parchment' aesthetic within the background

• − The 'webs and thorns' border is a bit messy and overlaps with the background trees
• − Scroll banner is slightly less detailed than the rest of the image

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent 3D miniature toy-like texture and rendering
• + Clean and readable text with professional typography
• + Vibrant colors and appealing stylization

• − The flag is a waving icon rather than a flat graphic as requested
• − Composition is slightly off-center vertically

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect 45-degree isometric perspective and composition
• + Strict adherence to the 'raised diorama base' and 'solid background' prompts
• + Excellent placement and scaling of text and flag

• − The textures look slightly flatter and less 'refined' than Image A
• − Lighting is a bit more clinical compared to the soft warmth of the competitor

LongCat-Image

• + Strong god ray effect and vibrant colors
• + Clear subject focus

• − Failed to include the rabbit as a separate animal, merging it into a 'cat-rabbit' hybrid
• − Butterflies appear flat and lack realistic integration with the lighting
• − Anatomical issues with the animals' paws and ears

Wan 2.6

• + Successfully included all four distinct animals requested in the prompt
• + Dynamic and playful composition that matches the 'tumbling' request
• + Realistic lighting integration with beautiful fur texture and dew sparkles

• − The fox's facial features are slightly distorted
• − Some floating dandelion seeds appear overly sharp or disconnected

LongCat-Image

• + Excellent adherence to the vintage woodcut/subtle texture request
• + Good rendering of the banner and date
• + Accurate text spelling

• − Repetitive text ('Caffè' appears twice)
• − Composition feels a bit cluttered and cramped
• − Steam lines are somewhat chaotic

Wan 2.6

• + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic
• + Clean and balanced composition
• + Good color palette adherence with warm brown and cream tones

• − The banner is very small and tucked to the side compared to the central placement requested
• − Less emphasis on the vintage texture

LongCat-Image

• + Strong adherence to the vector icon style and layout requested.
• + Correctly follows the NASA-inspired color palette.
• + Includes multiple specific stages of the mission visually.

• − Text rendering is garbled and contains nonsensical characters.
• − Includes a space shuttle icon which is historically inaccurate for the Apollo missions.

Wan 2.6

• + Legible and accurate text for the mission and crew names.
• + Clean, minimalist aesthetic that follows the requested color palette.

• − Completely fails to include the requested 6-step infographic steps.
• − The background contains digital textures/noise that deviate from the 'clean' and 'flat-vector' instruction.
• − Composition is very sparse and lacks the requested iconography.