Distilled version of HiDream AI's 17B parameter text-to-image model
Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
HiDream I1 Fast
#51 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Wan 2.6
#28 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
HiDream I1 Fast
0%
win rate
Ties
0%
Wan 2.6
0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Clean, modern aesthetic with sharp edges on the glass cube
- + Accurate soft lighting and reflections on the sphere
- − The sphere is quite large, contradicting the 'small' descriptor in the prompt
- − The glass cube appears to have no top face, as the red book is floating or resting on the vertical edges
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent adherence to the 'small' sphere requirement
- + Superior realistic textures, especially on the worn red book and wooden table
- + Sophisticated handling of light and caustic reflections on the table Surface
- − The plant is more beside the cube than behind it, though it is still partially visible through the glass
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it captures the scale of the small sphere and the complex lighting much better than HiDream I1 Fast. While HiDream I1 Fast creates a clean image, Wan 2.6 provides much more realistic textures and more believable physical interactions between the objects.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Effective shallow depth of field
- + Good color contrast between the red bike and the blue/grey environment
- + Solid floor reflections
- − The subject appears to be sitting on or riding the bike rather than repairing it
- − Missing requested motion blur on cars
- − The bike proportions and gear/chain logic are flawed
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent adherence to the 'repairing' action with tools on the ground
- + Highly realistic skin and jacket texture with visible rain droplets
- + Accurate motion blur on the passing vehicle
- − The bicycle frame geometry is slightly broken near the handlebars
- − The lighting on the man's jacket is a bit harsh compared to a flat rainy day
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully captured the specific 'repairing' action and the motion blur requested in the prompt. While HiDream I1 Fast created a pleasant image, it missed several technical prompt requirements like the motion blur and the core activity of the subject.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Excellent engraving details on the armor and vibrant colors
- + Balanced composition with high visual appeal
- + Good representation of small beads in multiple braids
- − Face looks overly airbrushed and 'perfect' for a battle-worn character
- − Scars look more like face paint than actual tissue damage
Wan 2.6
- + Exceptional realism on skin texture, sweat, and dirt
- + Conveys a palpable sense of exhaustion and battle-weariness
- + Outstanding detail on the cloth underlayer and leather straps with fraying edges
- − Torchlight in the background has some clipping/harsh edges
- − Overall color palette is slightly muter compared to the warmth requested
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it perfectly captures the 'battle-worn' essence with realistic skin textures, grit, and fraying materials that feel authentic. While HiDream I1 Fast produces a more polished and traditionally heroic image, it feels more like a studio cosplay shoot than the gritty, lifelike portrait requested.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Strong bold header text
- + Clean grid layout for photos
- − Nonsensical header text
- − Poorly rendered food items with blurry textures
- − Limited variety in food images appearing repetitive
Wan 2.6
- + High-quality, realistic food photography
- + Sophisticated minimalist aesthetic with vibrant color accents
- + Better text organization with multiple distinct menu sections
- − Garbled text for item names and descriptions
- − Confusing classification of some images under the wrong headers
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it more successfully captures the 'modern minimalist' and 'vibrant' aesthetic requested in the prompt. While both models struggle with legible text, Wan 2.6 produces significantly better food imagery and a professional layout, whereas HiDream I1 Fast feels like a basic template with low-quality assets.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Excellent primary title rendering with clean typography
- + Accurate price inclusion in a starburst element
- + Vibrant colors on the burger ingredients
- − Failed to create an 'exploded' view; the burger is mostly assembled
- − Garbled and repetitive text in the middle right badge
- − Background fire feels less integrated with the burger
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect adherence to the 'exploded' view requirement with high a sense of motion
- + Highly realistic textures on the patty and vegetables
- + Superior integration of fiery effects and smoke for a cinematic feel
- − The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is slightly warped along the bottom
- − The starburst price badge lacks the 'fiery, glowing' effect requested compared to Model A
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully rendered the 'exploded' burger with dynamic motion and realistic textures, whereas HiDream I1 Fast produced a mostly stacked burger. While HiDream I1 Fast had cleaner typography for the main title, Wan 2.6 followed the structural instructions of the prompt much more effectively and delivered a more professional-looking advertisement composition.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Successfully includes the specific date requested
- + Pleasant background bokeh and café atmosphere
- − Significant text artifacts and overlapping characters in the middle section
- − Poor spelling and letter rendering, such as 'Buter' and 'Herbs' with extra characters
- − Text layout is messy and incoherent
Wan 2.6
- + Exceptional text rendering with no spelling errors
- + Convincing chalk texture with realistic smudges and dust on the frame
- + Perfect adherence to the complex menu item list and formatting
- − Crops the blackboard slightly at the top and left side
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it flawlessly rendered all requested text, including the truncated 'Brown But...' item which it correctly completed as 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies'. HiDream I1 Fast struggled significantly with text legibility, producing garbled characters and overlapping lines that made the menu unreadable.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Clean, high-resolution rendering
- + Physically realistic textures for the horse and environment
- − Completely failed the environment prompt by placing the subject in a desert on Earth
- − Failed the logical reversal constraint (horse on top)
Wan 2.6
- + Strong adherence to the 'in space' setting with nebulae and galaxies
- + Higher level of cinematic lighting and detail in the space suit
- + Dynamic composition with floating appearance
- − Failed the logical reversal constraint (horse on top, not vice versa)
- − Minor anatomical distortion where the horse's back leg meets the dust
Verdict: Both models failed the specific spatial logic constraint of placing the 'horse on top' of the astronaut. However, Wan 2.6 is the clear winner for following the environment prompt, successfully depicting the scene in space, whereas HiDream I1 Fast ignored the space setting entirely and rendered an astronaut in a desert.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Excellent photographic quality and bokeh effect in the background.
- + Correctly places the woman in the back seat as requested.
- − Anatomical failure where human hands are growing out of the capybara's torso.
- − The capybara's head looks like a 2D cutout pasted onto a human body.
Wan 2.6
- + Perfectly adheres to the requirement of having capybara paws on the steering wheel.
- + High level of realism in the textures of the taxi, rain, and fur.
- + Natural expression on the businesswoman's face.
- − The passenger is seated in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
- − The taxi sign on top of the car contains nonsensical characters.
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner because it correctly depicts the capybara's paws on the steering wheel, whereas HiDream I1 Fast gives the capybara human hands. Although Wan 2.6 placed the passenger in the front seat instead of the back, its overall composition, textures, and anatomical coherence are significantly superior to HiDream I1 Fast.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Strong graphic design layout that resembles a physical card
- + Clear, bold gothic font for the primary header
- + Well-defined central jack-o-lantern
- − Significant text errors including garbled words in the scroll and repeated location lines
- − Low resolution with visible compression artifacts in the background
- − Failed to include thorns in the border
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect text rendering for all requested strings, including dates and locations
- + Excellent visual quality with realistic textures on the pumpkin and trees
- + Accurately represents all prompt elements including webs and thorns
- − The parchment effect is integrated into the frame rather than being a distinct central poster
- − Gold glitter text effects might feel slightly less 'vintage gothic' than ink
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully rendered every piece of requested text with perfect spelling and legibility, whereas HiDream I1 Fast struggled with garbled characters and repeated lines. Wan 2.6 also provided a much higher level of detail in the illustration, particularly in the cinematic lighting of the pumpkin and the complexity of the thorny border.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Excellent text rendering and typography layout.
- + High clarity and vibrant, appealing 3D cartoon aesthetics.
- + Accurately follows the 'small flag icon' and 45-degree angle instructions.
- − The sushi roll inside the nigiri topping is an unusual and nonsensical interpretation of the dish.
- − The chopsticks in the foreground were not requested and slightly clutter the minimal scene.
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect adherence to the isometric miniature diorama style.
- + Clean, professional white text and flag icon implementation.
- + More realistic arrangement of sushi types (nigiri and shrimp).
- − The composition is a bit small within the square frame, leaving significant empty space.
- − Shadows on the base are a bit soft/blurry compared to the crisp focus of the subject.
Verdict: HiDream I1 Fast produces a more vibrant and detailed 3D model with excellent text, but it makes a logical error by placing a maki roll inside a nigiri piece. Wan 2.6 better captures the 'miniature diorama' and 'isometric' feel with more traditional sushi varieties, although the overall subject is rendered slightly smaller in the frame.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Warm and appealing color palette
- + High facial detail on the puppy and fox kit
- + Beautiful soft bokeh and backlighting
- − Failed to include the baby bunny requested in the prompt
- − Replaced the requested bunny with a second kitten
- − The animals are static and sitting rather than tumbling/playing
Wan 2.6
- + Excellent prompt adherence including all four requested animals (puppy, kitten, bunny, fox)
- + Captures the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action significantly better
- + Strong lighting effects with clear god rays and dew sparkles
- − Some minor anatomical wonkiness in the kitten's limb placement
- − Fox face is slightly less refined compared to the other animals
Verdict: Wan 2.6 is the clear winner as it successfully incorporated all four requested animals, including the baby bunny which HiDream I1 Fast omitted entirely. Wan 2.6 also captured the dynamic 'tumbling' and 'chasing' energy of the prompt, whereas HiDream I1 Fast produced a more static, posed portrait.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Strong vector emblem aesthetic with a professional-looking badge
- + Excellent use of warm tones and clean iconography
- + The banner is prominent and follows the prompt instructions
- − Text error: misspelled the year as '17210'
- − The steam effect is a bit clunky and less elegant
Wan 2.6
- + Perfect text rendering for both 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'
- + Beautifully subtle texture on the background as requested
- + More professional, high-end minimalist composition
- − The banner is very small and tucked to the side rather than being a central design element
Verdict: Both models followed the prompt well, but Wan 2.6 is the clear winner due to perfect typography and spelling, whereas HiDream I1 Fast added an extra digit to the founding year. Wan 2.6 also better captured the 'subtle texture' and 'minimalist' aspects of the prompt with a cleaner, more elegant execution.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
HiDream I1 Fast
- + Attempts the layout of an infographic with multiple steps
- + Follows the NASA-inspired color palette correctly
- + Incorporates relevant imagery like planets, rockets, and the American flag
- − Text rendering is poor with numerous spelling errors and garbled characters
- − Logical flow of the steps is confusing and lacks a clear sequence
- − Graphic elements are somewhat messy and inconsistently aligned
Wan 2.6
- + Text rendering for the main titles and astronaut names is clear and accurate
- + Uses a clean, minimalist design style
- + Follows the requested color palette well
- − Completely fails to include the requested 6-step infographic content
- − Ignores the specific iconography requested (Saturn V, orbit rings, lunar module)
- − Does not resemble an infographic poster, appearing more like a book cover or simplified layout
Verdict: HiDream I1 Fast attempted the complex infographic structure and iconography requested in the prompt, despite failing significantly on text legibility and logical flow. Wan 2.6 produced much cleaner text but failed to generate the actual infographic content, providing only a title and names. HiDream I1 Fast is the preferred choice for attempting the visual task, even with its technical shortcomings in text.
Explore each model
Alibaba's multimodal generation model from the Wan AI suite, supporting text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-to-video with audio, and text-to-image, in both Chinese and English