HiDream I1 Fast HiDream AI vs Vidu Q2 ShengShu Technology

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Clean glass rendering with logical edge highlights
• + Sphere is centered and well-contained within the cube structure

• − The sphere is quite large, ignoring the 'small' descriptor in the prompt
• − The glass cube lacks a top lid, making the book appear to float or sit on the thin edges

Vidu Q2

• + Highly accurate adherence to the 'small' descriptor for the blue sphere
• + Exceptional realism in the textures of the book and the wooden table grain
• + Successfully captures the specific lighting interaction, including shadows from the plant

• − The plant is more overhead than strictly 'behind' the cube
• − Minor distortion in the glass refraction at the front edge

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Excellent atmospheric lighting and reflections on the wet pavement.
• + Accurately represents the 50mm shallow depth of field requested.
• + Strong composition with a cinematic mood.

• − Misses the 'motion blur' requirement for the car in the background.
• − The man is sitting on the bike rather than actively repairing it.
• − The bicycle's anatomy is slightly simplified and unrealistic in the frame area.

Vidu Q2

• + Successfully captures the specific action of 'repairing' the bicycle.
• + Outstanding skin texture and realistic detail in the hands and face.
• + Includes subtle motion blur on the passing vehicle as requested.

• − The composition is very tight, making the framing feel cramped rather than 'imperfect' and candid.
• − The bicycle's frame geometry is physically impossible (dual front forks/frames intersecting).

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Excellent adherence to the 'beads in braids' requirement with vibrant details.
• + Superior engraving fine-detail on the armor plates.
• + Strong atmospheric lighting with effective torchlight reflections and bokeh.

• − The scars look a bit like face paint rather than physical wounds.
• − Hair merging slightly into the armor on the left side.

Vidu Q2

• + Naturalistic skin texture and dirt application that feels authentic.
• + Excellent technical detail on leather straps and textile underlayers.
• + Very lifelike eyes and expression.

• − The braid beads are very sparse compared to the prompt request.
• − Armor engravings are less intricate than Model A's.

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Strong typography in the header
• + Well-defined grid layout for food photos
• + High contrast and bold design elements

• − Nonsensical header text
• − Poor rendering of smaller text and numbers
• − Lacks variety in food items, showing mostly pizza

Vidu Q2

• + Excellent adherence to the sections requested (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains)
• + Vibrant and high-quality food photography
• + Superior design aesthetics that mimic a real modern menu

• − Text consists of gibberish characters
• − Slightly cluttered composition due to the amount of content

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Text rendering for 'MAGIC BURGER' is extremely clean and legible.
• + Excellent photorealistic detail on the textures of the bun and sesame seeds.
• + Integrated a clear starburst for the price as requested.

• − Failed the 'exploded' requirement as the burger remains largely assembled.
• − The secondary text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' is garbled and contains spelling errors.
• − Lacks a strong sense of motion in the burger components.

Vidu Q2

• + Followed the 'exploded' instruction well, showing clear separation between layers.
• + Captures a dynamic sense of motion with splashes of sauce and floating components.
• + Successfully rendered all requested text elements accurately and legibly.

• − The currency symbol in the price starburst is slightly deformed.
• − The fire effect is a bit more illustrative and less photorealistic than Image A.

HiDream I1 Fast

• + The handwriting style is very neat and mostly legible.
• + Includes the full café context with plants, lighting, and a coffee cup.

• − Numerous overlay artifacts where text overlaps or doubles up.
• − Many spelling errors such as 'Buter' and 'Herbs' having numbers mixed into letters.
• − Significant 'ghost' text and digital-looking artifacts in the middle of the board.

Vidu Q2

• + Very realistic chalk texture with smudges and natural handwriting variations.
• + Captures the cursive title accurately as requested.
• + The 'handwritten' feel is more authentic than a digital replica.

• − Significant spelling errors throughout the menu items (e.g., 'Truffe Mushhoom', 'Octopd wpiln').
• − Missed a few of the specific pricing requests (e.g., $34 instead of $24).

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Clean, high-resolution rendering of the space suit and horse.
• + Consistent lighting and shadows on the ground.

• − Completely failed the semantic prompt to put the horse on top of the astronaut.
• − Failed the location prompt by placing the subject in a desert instead of space.
• − Traditional, non-surreal composition.

Vidu Q2

• + Successfully adhered to the 'in space' setting with a vibrant, celestial background.
• + Incorporated surreal elements with the galaxy-textured horse skin.
• + Highly detailed and artistic interpretation of the subject matter.

• − Failed the specific structural instruction 'horse on top, not vice versa'.
• − Some anatomical awkwardness in the horse's front legs.

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Excellent photographic quality and bokeh effect
• + High-quality fur texture and lighting
• + Realistic New York street atmosphere

• − The driver has human hands instead of capybara paws
• − The passenger is sitting in the front/middle seat rather than the requested back seat
• − The capybara's head is not anatomically connected to the body naturally

Vidu Q2

• + Successfully places the passenger in the back seat as requested
• + Includes animal-like paws on the steering wheel
• + Stronger adherence to the overall spatial layout requested in the prompt

• − The lighting in the cabin is a bit flat and less realistic than model_a
• − The capybara's head is slightly disproportionate to its body
• − The passenger's phone and hand grip look unnatural

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Includes all elements of the prompt including webs and trees
• + The date text '30.10.2026' is rendered perfectly
• + Clean illustrative style with good contrast

• − Failed to include 'Invitation' in the main title
• − Text on the scroll banner and event location contains messy, overlapping characters
• − Vignette feels a bit flat compared to the requested cinematic lighting

Vidu Q2

• + Excellent integration of the 'thorns' into the border composition
• + Better parchment texture and lighting on the jack-o-lantern
• + Captured the full title including the word 'Invitation'

• − Significant spelling errors in every single line of text
• − Incorrect date (2025 instead of 2026)
• − The web and thorn border is slightly cluttered and cuts off at the edges

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Excellent typography and layout design
• + Very clean 3D render with soft, professional lighting
• + Follows the isometric miniature aesthetic perfectly

• − The salmon nigiri has an odd cross-section texture that looks like a maki roll
• − Slightly less variety in sushi types compared to the other image

Vidu Q2

• + Includes a nice variety of sushi types (shrimp, tuna, etc.)
• + Good placement of the flag icon in relation to the text
• + Captures the diorama base requirement well

• − Text rendering is slightly blurry with some haloing artifacts
• − Shadows and lighting are less refined than the competitor
• − The 'JAPAN' text has a slight letter distortion on the 'N'

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Excellent fur texture rendering and soft lighting.
• + Expressive and aesthetically pleasing facial features for the animals.
• + Strong rim lighting that enhances the golden sunrise theme.

• − Failed to include the baby bunny entirely.
• − The animals are sitting still rather than 'playfully chasing butterflies' or 'tumbling'.
• − One of the kittens is duplicated/blended into the composition.

Vidu Q2

• + Successfully included all requested animals: retriever, kitten, fox, and bunny.
• + Captures the action of 'playfully chasing' with dynamic posing.
• + Includes more butterflies and visible dew sparkles as requested in the prompt.

• − Anatomy errors present, such as the fox kit having a puppy-like fourth leg/tail confusion.
• − The fox kit has a slightly distorted face compared to the other animals.
• − Image composition feels a bit cluttered with many overlapping elements.

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Excellent typography with correct spelling of 'Caffè Florian'
• + Clean vector emblem style with high contrast
• + Well-balanced composition with a clear banner element

• − Typos in the numerical date showing '17210' instead of '1720'
• − Steam elements are a bit stylized and look like detached arcs

Vidu Q2

• + Subtle texture on the background matches the prompt
• + Good representation of steam coming from the cloche

• − Severe spelling errors including 'Farmiin' and 'Fopli20'
• − Confused composition with redundant and redundant text lines
• − Poor typography that lacks professional logo quality

HiDream I1 Fast

• + Stronger adherence to the requested navy, white, and red color palette
• + Composition more closely resembles a traditional infographic poster with a central focal point
• + Illustrations like the Saturn V and US flag are recognizable

• − Text rendering is severely garbled and includes misspellings like 'DESCENG'
• − The logical flow of the steps is confusing and doesn't follow a clear sequential path

Vidu Q2

• + Much cleaner vector icons with consistent line weights and style
• + Higher visual quality with crisp, modern execution of the 'flat-vector' request
• + Clearer grid-based information hierarchy

• − Failed the main title text entirely, displaying 'ALFONCH' instead of 'Apollo 11'
• − Text throughout the image is gibberish despite having a clean font
• − Included unnecessary green and blue tones that deviate from the requested NASA palette