GPT Image 2 OpenAI vs Wan 2.7 Pro Alibaba

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with a clear left-side window source
• + Materials look highly realistic, especially the texture of the red book cover
• + Very clean geometry on the glass cube

• − The plant is quite close to the cube, making the 'behind' and 'through' effect less pronounced than Model B

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Successfully shows the plant clearly through the glass walls of the cube
• + Highly detailed wooden table texture with realistic weathering
• + Accurate sphere reflection on the bottom glass panel

• − The glass cube has some structural inconsistencies in its vertical edges
• − The lighting feels a bit flatter compared to the distinct window light in Model A

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' aspects of the prompt
• + Captures motion blur from passing cars very effectively
• + Natural skin texture and realistic, weathered blue jacket

• − The bicycle frame geometry is slightly warped where it connects to the wheel
• − The background bokeh has some chunky digital artifacts

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Beautiful, high-quality reflections on the wet pavement
• + The subject and bicycle are very clearly defined with great detail
• + Excellent rendering of light rain through vertical streaks

• − Failed to include the requested motion blur on the cars
• − Composition is very centered and clean, missing the 'imperfect framing' instruction
• − The bicycle doesn't actually have a kickstand or support, yet stands upright on its own

GPT Image 2

• + Sublime metal textures and intricate engraving detail
• + High-quality skin texture and realistic, lifelike eyes
• + Excellent cinematic lighting and composition

• − Beads in hair are a bit subtle compared to the prompt
• − Leather strap detail is less prominent than in the competitor

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Clearer depiction of 'small beads' in braids
• + Strong bokeh sparks and visible torch light sources
• + Distinct scars as requested in the prompt

• − Slightly less realistic skin texture compared to Model A
• − The armor engraving feels a bit more generic or stamped on

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent text legibility and correct spelling across multiple menu items.
• + Clear adherence to the specific section requests for appetizers, pizza, and mains.
• + Professional, well-balanced distribution of food photography and whitespace.

• − The 'Mains' category features a mix of plate styles that aren't perfectly uniform.
• − Some slight repetitions in descriptions, though typical for AI.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Aesthetically pleasing layout with a nice top-down presentation and props.
• + Successful use of vibrant accents and a clean grid system.
• + Good variety in the food photography shown.

• − Significant text issues including misspellings like 'Garlic Herb Bread' being written as 'Garfic' and 'Calamari' as 'Calariri'.
• − Failed to properly implement the specific requested sections (Appetizers/Pizza/Mains) into the actual body of the list, mixing them all together.

GPT Image 2

• + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including price and secondary message
• + Superior photorealistic detail in the textures of the meat and bun
• + Excellent sense of dynamic motion through sauce splashes and embers

• − The composition is a bit crowded with large text overlapping embers

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Clean 'exploded' view that clearly separates components
• + Attractive glowing effect on the main title text

• − Failed to include 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' and '€6.99' text
• − Lighting on bottom bun is inconsistent with the fiery theme
• − The background and elements feel more like a digital illustration than photorealistic

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the 'handwritten chalk' requirement with realistic texture and spacing.
• + Correctly rendered all requested text including the truncated line from the prompt.
• + Perfectly captures the aesthetic of a cozy café with a natural, messy chalk board.

• − The date '2026' is slightly less clean than other characters but still legible.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + High resolution and very clean visual presentation.
• + The chalkboard background has realistic smudge marks and decorative doodles.

• − Text appears to be a digital font rather than natural chalk handwriting.
• − Repeats the phrase '& Herbs - $28' twice on the same line, creating a layout error.
• − Fails the 'no printed or digital fonts' requirement, as letters of the same type are identical.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the character reference, including face, hair, and clothing.
• + Perfectly replicates the complex pose from Image 1.
• + Successfully combines the character's black clothing and scarf with the source image's yellow environment.

• − The scarf's physics are slightly stiff for the downward angle.
• − The fingernails on the raised hand retain red polish from the original model in Image 1.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Perfectly preserves the source image 1's content.

• − Failed the editing task entirely by providing the original source image 1.
• − Did not incorporate the character or clothing from Image 2.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the 'horse on top' instruction
• + Highly detailed textures on the spacesuit and lunar ground
• + Imaginative and surreal interpretation of the prompt

• − The horse's front legs and harness are a bit anatomically confused where they meet the saddle

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Clean, cinematic composition
• + Good rendering of the horse and astronaut textures
• + Playful use of miniatures planets in the background

• − Completely failed the negative constraint to put the horse on top
• − Common AI artifacting where the horse's back leg blends into the stomach

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the clothing style, colors, and patterns from Image 2.
• + Maintains the person's face, hair, and sand texture perfectly.
• + Correctly adapts the pose and shadows to the new outfit.

• − Cropped the image closely compared to the original aspect ratio.
• − Failed to include the watch and ring visible in Image 2.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Successfully integrated a full-body view onto the original background.
• + Maintains the vitiligo pattern on the hands and chest well.

• − Failed to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a generic gold-patterned jacket.
• − The scarf and specific pea coat from Image 2 are completely missing.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the 'back seat' and 'looking at her phone' details for the passenger.
• + Highly realistic texture on the capybara fur and the driver's jacket.
• + Strong cinematic composition that feels like a real photograph from inside the car.

• − The capybara's paw on the steering wheel looks slightly distorted.
• − The lighting on the passenger is a bit dark, making it harder to see her expression.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Very clear and professional lighting across the entire scene.
• + The capybara's 'calm, professional expression' is well-captured.
• + Solid rendering of both paws on the steering wheel.

• − The passenger is sitting in the front seat next to the driver, failing the 'back seat' instruction.
• − The passenger is not looking at her phone as requested.
• − Perspective makes the capybara look unusually small in the driver's seat.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with perfect adherence to the requested text and formatting.
• + Highly detailed and moody atmosphere with realistic lighting and texture.
• + Superior composition that integrates the background elements and border seamlessly into the vintage aesthetic.

• − The parchment texture makes the lower text secondary, though still legible.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Successfully includes all requested text with clear legibility.
• + Clean, vector-like illustration style that feels professional as a digital card.
• + Good use of the thorny border and rose motifs.

• − Lighting is flat and less 'cinematic' than requested.
• − The pumpkin and trees look more like modern cartoons than 'vintage gothic'.
• − The scroll banner looks slightly awkward hanging from thin wires.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent text rendering and layout centered vertically.
• + High-quality textures and materials, particularly on the fish and wood.
• + Strong miniature diorama feel with the stone base and lantern.

• − The diorama base is quite complex with many additional elements not requested like the lantern and bushes.
• − The sushi pieces feel slightly crowded on the plate.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Perfect adherence to the 'minimal garnish' and 'soft refined textures' request.
• + Very clean, professional infographic-style layout.
• + Accurate sushi anatomy and high-clarity 3D rendering.

• − The text is off-center to the left, violating the 'top-center' and 'perfectly centered' instructions.
• − Small floating artifacts/particles in the top corners and bottom-right corners.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent dynamic motion and energy in the poses
• + Vibrant colors and natural-looking backlight with god rays
• + High facial detail and expressive eyes across all four animals

• − The fox's front right paw is a bit blurry and anatomically confusing

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Strong adherence to all subject requirements
• + Clear rendering of fur textures with good backlighting
• + Whimsical interactions between the animals

• − The kitten has an anatomical error with its tail appearing to sprout from the puppy's back or as a fifth leg
• − The fox has an extra limb/fragmented leg visible between it and the kitten
• − Perspective of the kitten's placement feels slightly flat

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with correct spelling and beautiful classic serif styling.
• + Superior execution of the vintage paper texture and stippled shading on the cloche.
• + Highly professional layout and visual balance appropriate for a formal logo.

• − None identified based on the prompt.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Includes additional thematic elements like 'Venezia Italia' and coffee beans in the background.
• + Strong vector-style circular emblem layout.

• − Spelling error in the main brand name, rendering it as 'Florion'.
• − Lower quality linework on the cloche and steam compared to Model A.
• − Clutter in corners detracts from the minimalism requested in the prompt.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with clean, readable, and mostly accurate text.
• + High-quality, detailed vector illustrations for each mission stage.
• + Includes great additional details like the mission patch and crew names in a professional layout.

• − The style leans more toward high-detail digital illustration than the requested 'flat-vector' style.
• − The landing site graphic features a misspelling ('TRANQUILITY' instead of 'Tranquillity' as per NASA convention, though both are used) and the eagle on the patch looks a bit like a photograph.

Wan 2.7 Pro

• + Perfect adherence to the 'flat-vector' style and icon-heavy layout requested.
• + Very clean use of the NASA color palette (navy, white, red, light gray).
• + Includes specific mission data like burn durations and altitudes, adding to the infographic feel.

• − Significant text rendering issues, including 'DESCRIPT' instead of 'Descent' and 'Tramquilicy'.
• − The icons are very small and some are overly simplified compared to the rest of the poster.
• − The NASA logo in the corner is distorted.