GPT Image 2 OpenAI vs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the 'partially visible through glass' instruction for the plant.
• + Very clean glass textures with realistic refractions.
• + Simple and balanced composition that highlights all prompt elements.

• − The blue sphere appears slightly floating rather than resting on the bottom surface.

Wan 2.7

• + Features more realistic, aged textures on both the book and the wooden table.
• + Sophisticated handling of reflections on the glass surfaces.
• + The sphere has a tangible weight and sits naturally on the surface.

• − The plant is mostly behind the glass but doesn't feel as integrated into the transparency as Image A.
• − There is a ghostly duplicate of the blue sphere occurring on the left side of the cube that isn't a natural reflection.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent depiction of motion blur from passing cars as requested.
• + Captures the textures of the wet environment and skin very realistically.
• + Shallow depth of field is well-executed with convincing bokeh.

• − The bike anatomy is slightly warped near the rear wheel and spokes.
• − The 'imperfect framing' prompt led to a slightly cluttered foreground with the white sign.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully captures a wide-angle candid street atmosphere.
• + Strong reflections on the wet pavement add to the cinematic feel.
• + Good portrayal of light rain texture.

• − Fails to include motion blur on the passing cars as requested.
• − The man's hands are fused to the handlebars in a nonsensical way.
• − The background figures and cars lack the 'shallow depth of field' requested.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent skin texture with realistic dirt and fine pores
• + Atmospheric lighting with high-quality bloom and bokeh
• + Ornate metal engraving with realistic pitting and wear

• − Hair beads are very small and less prominent than requested
• − Narrower composition hides most of the cloth underlayer textures

Wan 2.7

• + Strong adherence to the 'beads' and 'scars' requirements with clear visibility
• + Good balance of plate, leather, and cloth textures
• + Highly distinct and vibrant bokeh sparks

• − The facial skin has a slightly 'plastic' or smooth digital sheen compared to the armor
• − The armor engraving looks a bit more generic and less finely etched than its counterpart

GPT Image 2

• + Exceptional text rendering with coherent descriptions and accurate spelling.
• + Strong professional layout that perfectly follows the requested section headers (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains).
• + High-quality food photography that looks consistent and appetizing.

• − The layout is a bit dense with text, making it look slightly cluttered in the footer.

Wan 2.7

• + Aesthetically pleasing presentation with realistic environmental props like the pen and rosemary.
• + Good use of color accents and rounded UI-style buttons for navigation.
• + Clean grid layout for the food images.

• − Poor text rendering with numerous spelling errors (e.g., 'Calanrfri', 'Bisge', 'Sannon').
• − Failed to organize by the specific sections requested; items are mixed in a single grid without clear headers.
• − The food descriptions are illegible gibberish.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat patty and bun.
• + Text rendering is perfectly integrated with the fiery theme using consistent glowing effects.
• + Highly dynamic composition with realistic sauce splashes and flying embers.

• − The 'exploded' view is slightly compressed vertically compared to Model B.
• − Large amount of fiery texture can occasionally obscure the finer details of the background.

Wan 2.7

• + Strong 'exploded' effect with clear separation between all requested ingredients.
• + Clean, legible typography that follows the prompt instructions well.
• + Creative use of smoke and sparks to add motion.

• − The textures look more like a digital illustration than the requested 'photorealistic' style.
• − Some gravity-defying elements look a bit static and less integrated into a single cohesive scene.
• − Floating nuts or seeds on the top left feel out of place.

GPT Image 2

• + Features highly realistic chalk texture with dusty, varied strokes
• + Successfully renders all text accurately as requested
• + Achieves an authentic handwritten cursive style for the title

• − The lighting in the background is slightly dark compared to the subject

Wan 2.7

• + Perfect text accuracy and alignment
• + Clean, high-contrast composition

• − Text appears as a clean digital font rather than natural chalk handwriting
• − Fails to provide the 'elegant cursive' requested for the title
• − Lacks the gritty, dusty realism of actual chalk on a board

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the character reference, including face, sunglasses, and the specific black and white scarf.
• + Precisely replicates the complex pose and body position from Image 1.
• + Accurately blends the clothing style from Image 2 onto the body position of Image 1.

• − The transition between the neck and the scarf/shoulders is slightly messy.
• − Left hand has an unnatural finger structure and red nail polish carried over from the source image's subject.

Wan 2.7

• + High resolution and visual clarity.

• − Completely failed the edit instruction to replace the character.
• − Ignored the character reference (Image 2) entirely.
• − The image is essentially a filtered version of Image 1 with no character change.

GPT Image 2

• + Perfectly follows the specific role-reversal instruction of the horse on top of the astronaut.
• + High level of texture detail in the astronaut suit and horse fur.
• + Strong surrealist composition that aligns with the prompt's tone.

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and galactic background details.
• + High clarity and clean rendering of the horse and astronaut.

• − Failed the core prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut (role reversal).
• − The horse and astronaut are not wearing any breathing apparatus despite being in space.

GPT Image 2

• + Perfectly replicates the coat, scarf, jeans, and accessories from Image 2.
• + Maintains the subject's face, hair, and vitiligo patterns with high accuracy.
• + Provides high-quality realistic fabric texture and lighting integration.

• − The scarf's positioning is slightly stiff and doesn't fully account for the lean against the post.

Wan 2.7

• + Maintains the background and the subject's facial features and skin patterns well.

• − Completely failed to use the outfit from Image 2, substituting it with a generic fantasy costume.
• − The feet and shoes are poorly rendered and appear distorted into the sand.
• − The proportions of the body feel elongated and unnatural compared to the source.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the capybara's fur
• + Perfectly captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger in the back seat
• + Cinematic lighting and authentic NYC night atmosphere

• − The capybara's right paw is rendered somewhat ambiguously on the wheel

Wan 2.7

• + Strong composition showing both the taxi roof sign and interior
• + Good details on the capybara's paws holding the wheel

• − The human passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the 'back seat' as requested
• − The lighting on the capybara feels a bit flat compared to the background

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent atmospheric lighting and cinematic mood.
• + Flawless rendering of all requested text.
• + Highly intricate gothic border with visible thorns and skulls.

• − The parchment texture is slightly less literal than Model B.

Wan 2.7

• + Clean, readable layout with a clear parchment aesthetic.
• + Accurate rendering of the banner and all requested text.
• + Follows the framing of the prompt well with twisted trees and bats.

• − The art style is more like a modern illustration than a 'vintage gothic' poster.
• − Lighting feels flat compared to the requested 'cinematic' style.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with a 3D effect that matches the diorama style
• + Incredibly detailed textures for the fish, rice, and wood
• + Perfectly follows the layout instructions with a centered diorama base

• − Includes some extra decor like the stone lantern not explicitly requested

Wan 2.7

• + Clean, minimalist aesthetic that fits the '3D cartoon' prompt well
• + Simple and clear composition with accurate text placement
• + Effective soft lighting and smooth PBR materials

• − Text is flat and less integrated into the 3D scene compared to Model A
• − The sushi details are slightly more generic/plastic in appearance

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent dynamic posing that makes the animals look like they are actively running.
• + Highly detailed fur textures with convincing rim lighting.
• + Accurate butterfly anatomy and vibrant color palette.

• − The fox kit has slightly strange anatomy where its left leg meets the body.

Wan 2.7

• + Beautiful dew sparkle effects that add to the morning atmosphere.
• + Solid variety of wildflower species as requested in the prompt.
• + Clear, sharp focus on all four subjects.

• − The tabby kitten's anatomy is distorted around the neck and front legs.
• − The posing is more static and less 'tumbling' compared to the other image.
• − The fox kit's face looks slightly more mature than a 'baby' kit.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with a professional, balanced layout.
• + Authentic vintage texture and woodcut-style engraving.
• + Highly detailed and elegant banner and cloche design.

• − The frame/shield is slightly off-center relative to the top edge.

Wan 2.7

• + Clean vector-style execution with a clear circular composition.
• + Correct adherence to all text elements and the cloche dome requirement.

• − Slight misspelling in the name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian').
• − Visual style feels more like modern clip-art than a 'vintage minimalist' logo.
• − The cloche dome design is a bit simplistic and lacks the requested steam texture.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography and nearly perfect spelling throughout the entire infographic.
• + Highly detailed and accurate illustrations of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
• + Strong aesthetic adhering to the NASA-inspired color palette with a professional layout.

• − Step 3 includes a miniature moon that makes the scale of the trajectory confusing.
• − The eagle in the mission patch looks slightly more like a literal eagle than the stylized mission insignia.

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully captures a true 'flat-vector' minimalist icon style as requested.
• + Good use of factual data points like orbital altitude and times in the supporting text.

• − Multiple spelling errors including 'Tranquiliry', 'Descript', and 'Deccent'.
• − The icons are very small and leave too much empty space in the center compared to the dense star field.
• − The NASA logo in the corner is poorly rendered and inaccurate.