GPT Image 2 OpenAI vs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent structural geometry of the cube
• + Realistic glass thickness and refraction
• + Clean and professional photographic quality

• − The scale of the sphere is very small compared to the prompt's focus
• − Composition is a bit static

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Better lighting with dynamic window shadows on the table
• + The blue sphere is more prominent and visually appealing
• + Natural-looking dust motes add to the realism of the scene

• − The glass cube geometry is slightly warped on the top left corner
• − The red book looks a bit worn compared to the clean aesthetic of the other objects

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent handling of motion blur from passing cars
• + Features highly realistic, imperfect framing that feels like a genuine street photo
• + Superb tool and environment details, including legible Japanese text

• − The man's hands are slightly distorted around the bicycle spokes

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong reflections on the wet pavement and visible rain droplets
• + Good composition with a clear shallow depth of field
• + Accurate representation of the requested red bicycle

• − The bicycle structure is physically impossible, with spokes and frame components clumping together
• − Lacks the requested motion blur for passing cars
• − The lighting on the man's hair and shirt feels slightly digital rather than natural

GPT Image 2

• + Exquisite detailing on the engraved plate armor and worn leather straps.
• + Masterful handling of natural-looking skin textures, faint scars, and dirt.
• + Sophisticated lighting and shallow depth of field that creates a lifelike, cinematic atmosphere.

• − The beads in the hair are very subtle and blend in with the hair texture.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Literal interpretation of 'hair braided with small beads'.
• + Strong presence of the torchlight and bokeh sparks as requested.
• + Good representation of the tattered cloth underlayer and chainmail.

• − The facial features and skin texture look slightly more digital/less lifelike than Model A.
• − The 'battle-worn' effect on the face looks more like painted-on smudges than authentic dirt and scarring.

GPT Image 2

• + Exceptional text rendering with perfect spelling and legibility.
• + Highly professional layout that follows graphic design principles.
• + Logical and diverse food photography that matches the item descriptions.

• − Very dense layout that might feel slightly cluttered compared to extreme minimalism.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong minimalist aesthetic with plenty of white space.
• + Consistent lighting and styling across all food photography.

• − Garbled, nonsensical text in titles and descriptions.
• − Incorrect categorizations, such as showing non-pizza items in the pizza section.
• − Significant spelling errors in prominent headings like 'Restormalit Menue'.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun
• + Perfect adherence to the fiery text effect request
• + Complex and realistic deconstructed burger arrangement

• − The composition feels slightly cluttered with the large text blocks
• − Less overall sense of 'exploded' centrifugal motion compared to Model B

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong sense of dynamic motion with ingredients flying outward
• + Clean composition with professional-looking graphic design elements
• + Accurate rendering of all requested text and price starburst

• − The burger ingredients look slightly more illustrative and less photorealistic than Model A
• − The 'glow' on the price tag is more of a sticker effect than a fiery integration

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the 'chalk texture' requirement with grainy, realistic strokes.
• + Perfect spelling and inclusion of all prompt details, including the completed cookie name.
• + Highly realistic cursive handwriting style that looks authentically human.

• − The lighting in the upper left is slightly harsh but fits the cafe aesthetic.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Dynamic composition with a nice perspective angle.
• + Strong chalk smudge effects on the board surface for realism.

• − The text looks more like a digital chalk-style font rather than organic handwriting.
• − Failed to complete the 'Herbs' text in the octopus dish.
• − Repeats the price for the cookies across two lines awkwardly.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the specific prompt instruction of having the horse on top.
• + Highly surreal concept that perfectly matches the requested tone.
• + Clean textures and realistic lighting on both the spacesuit and horse fur.

• − The leather straps and reins have nonsensical physics and connections.
• − The astronaut's hands are splayed in a somewhat unnatural, finger-heavy pose.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Dynamic composition with a sense of movement and energy.
• + Beautiful cosmic background with vibrant colors and a spiral galaxy.
• + High level of detail in the horse's anatomy and the astronaut's suit.

• − Failed the negative constraint/specific instruction to have the horse on top.
• − Clipped hooves and repetitive tail/mane patterns.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent preservation of the subject's unique identity, face, and hair
• + Higher quality rendering of the scarf pattern
• + Perfectly preserved the original background details and lighting

• − Missed the sunglasses from the second image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Correctly included the sunglasses from the second image

• − Failed to preserve the base person's identity and face
• − Overlaid the person from Image 2 onto Image 1's setting instead of editing Image 1
• − Slightly more compressed/blurry fabric textures

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent photorealism with cinematic lighting and natural depth of field
• + Accurate depiction of a business traveler with a convincing 'bored' expression
• + Fur texture and clothing materials look highly realistic

• − The capybara's hands look slightly more like paws than true anatomy, though this fits the prompt's request for paws

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong composition from the front of the vehicle showing the taxi lights
• + Good adherence to the prompt's details like the cap and jacket
• + The background lights provide a vibrant sense of Times Square/NYC

• − The capybara's hands are strangely human-like/primate-like rather than paws
• − The businesswoman's face is slightly less detailed and more generic
• − The textures feel slightly more synthetic and less photorealistic compared to the competitor

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with a genuine vintage gothic feel.
• + Highly detailed monochromatic 'dark parchment' aesthetic that matches the theme.
• + Sophisticated incorporation of NYC elements like the bridge in the background.

• − The parchment texture is very dark, which may reduce readability in some areas.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Clear text legibility for all event details.
• + Vibrantly colored central jack-o-lantern with a high-quality flame effect.

• − The 'Halloween Party Invitation' text looks like a modern 3D layer rather than vintage gothic calligraphy.
• − The composition feels like a digital collage rather than a cohesive vintage poster.
• − The blue sky and bright lighting clash with the requested 'moody night sky' and 'dark parchment' feel.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the isometric miniature diorama request
• + Highly detailed sushi varieties with realistic PBR material effects
• + Perfect text rendering and layout placement

• − Background is a bit saturated, almost neon blue compared to the subject
• − The chopsticks are a bit short in proportion to the platform

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Clean, soft 3D cartoon aesthetic
• + Effective use of lighting and depth of field
• + Accurate text rendering

• − Missed the 'isometric' perspective core instruction
• − Failed to include a square diorama base
• − The flag icon is partially merged with the text improperly

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent anatomical accuracy for all four animals.
• + Beautiful lighting with natural-looking god rays and backlight through the fur.
• + High level of detail in the textures of the fur and the surrounding wildflowers.

• − The 'dew sparkles' are present but less pronounced than in the competing image.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Clear inclusion of dew drops and sparkles as requested.
• + Dynamic composition with all animals appearing to be in mid-leap.
• + Bright and vibrant color palette that enhances the joyful vibe.

• − The fox's eyes appear unnaturally blue and glowing, bordering on uncanny.
• − Anatomical issues with the animals, particularly the kitten's front right leg and the fox's facial structure.
• − The water droplets appearing in the air look more like floating glass orbs than natural dew.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with correct accents and distinct font weights
• + High-quality etching detail and texture
• + Flawless rendering of all text including the date banner

• − The frame shape is slightly more complex than a minimalist vector might require

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Stronger vector aesthetic consistent with a modern-vintage logo
• + Excellent alignment of the cloche and steam elements

• − Visual artifacts and distortions on the right-hand side of the banner
• − Inconsistent letter spacing and sizing in 'Caffè Florian'
• − The paper texture background is a bit generic

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent layout with a clear chronological timeline and distinct sections.
• + Highly legible, accurate typography and iconography across all six requested steps.
• + Matches the NASA-inspired aesthetic and modern vector style perfectly.

• − The illustrations of the Lunar Module are a bit more detailed than 'flat-vector' style.
• − The Apollo 11 mission patch in the corner has minor bird-rendering artifacts.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong adherence to the flat-vector, minimalist aesthetic.
• + Good use of white space and a clean color palette that matches the prompt.

• − Layout is cluttered and non-linear, making the mission steps hard to follow.
• − Text for 'Descent' and 'Landing' is floating without associated step icons.
• − Iconography is inconsistent, such as the inclusion of a shuttle-like craft for the descent stage.