GPT Image 2 OpenAI vs Qwen Image 2.0 Alibaba

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent physical realism and materials, especially the leather texture of the book.
• + Flawless glass rendering with accurate refraction of the plant behind it.
• + Very high resolution and natural lighting that captures the soft window light perfectly.

• − The plant is slightly more to the side than directly 'behind' the cube.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Correctly places the plant directly behind the cube as requested.
• + Meets all prompt requirements including the blue sphere and red book placement.

• − The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally in the center of the air.
• − The glass cube has internal vertical seams that make it look like multiple panes rather than a single cube.
• − Lower overall texture quality on the table and book compared to the competitor.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh realism.
• + Superior skin texture and natural lighting on the subject.
• + Captures the motion blur from passing cars perfectly as requested.

• − The bike's proportions and rear wheel structure are slightly warped.
• − The toolbox in the foreground looks a bit cluttered.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Strong reflection on the wet pavement.
• + Clearer focus on the mechanical action of repairing the pedal.
• + Good adherence to the red bicycle prompt.

• − The skin texture appears somewhat oversaturated and gritty rather than natural.
• − Lacks the motion blur from cars requested in the prompt.
• − The composition feels a bit more staged than personal/candid.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent skin texture with realistic dirt and freckles
• + Beautifully detailed engraving on the plate armor
• + Subtle and sophisticated lighting that feels like a real photograph

• − The hair beads are somewhat small and less distinct than in Model B
• − The close-crop composition cut off the top of the character's head

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Strong adherence to the 'beads in hair' and 'braids' prompt requirements
• + Effective use of bokeh sparks and warm lighting colors
• + Clearly visible scars as requested

• − The eyes appear unnatural with a glowing yellow effect not specified in the prompt
• − Noticeable anatomical issues with the hand on the sword hilt
• − Visual quality feels slightly more like a digital painting than a 'lifelike' photograph

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent text rendering with clear, legible names and descriptions.
• + Perfect logical organization matching the requested categories of appetizers, pizza, and mains.
• + Professional graphic design elements including icons, pricing, and social media badges.

• − The layout is very dense, which slightly pushes the boundaries of 'minimalist'.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Strong minimalist aesthetic with large, clean image tiles.
• + High-quality photographic realism for the food items.
• + Simple grid structure that is easy to scan.

• − Text is largely unintelligible gibberish.
• − The grid does not logically follow the requested categories (pizzas are mixed into other columns).
• − Missing detailed descriptions requested by the prompt.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent text integration with consistent fiery effects across all labels
• + Perfect 'exploded' view with clearly separated and recognizable components
• + Superior sense of motion through sauce splashes and embers

• − The composition is a bit crowded with large text elements

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Clean, professional font choice for the 'MAGIC BURGER' title
• + Good food texture and lighting on the bun and patty

• − Fails the 'exploded' prompt as most components are still stacked together
• − The '€6.99' text lacks the requested fiery/glowing effect, appearing metallic instead
• − Low contrast in the 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text makes it hard to read

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the prompt's text requirements with zero spelling errors.
• + Very realistic chalk texture with dusty, semi-transparent strokes that mimic real handwriting.
• + Consistent and elegant cursive style for the title as requested.

• − The spacing between lines is slightly tighter at the bottom, though this is common in real chalkboards.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Dynamic lighting and realistic smudging on the chalkboard surface give it a lived-in feel.
• + Good handwriting style that varies naturally in size and slant.

• − The title lacks the specific 'elegant cursive' style requested, appearing more like standard print.
• − The text layout is slightly messy with unnecessary line breaks for the last two items.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to the specific 'horse on top' prompt instruction
• + Realistic textures on the space suit and horse fur
• + Coherent surrealist composition with the horse holding the reins

• − The astronaut's hands/gloves are shaped more like feet than human hands

Qwen Image 2.0

• + High visual quality with vibrant colors and lighting
• + Dynamic sense of motion with the horse running through space
• + Good level of detail on the space suit and horse's mane

• − Failed the primary prompt instruction to have the horse on top of the astronaut
• − Included strange scaly skin artifacts on the horse's neck

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and textures that feel very photorealistic.
• + Accurate composition with the passenger clearly in the back seat as requested.
• + Detailed taxi driver cap with a logically placed logo.

• − The capybara's hands/paws on the steering wheel look slightly like human gloves.
• − The camera angle is slightly tight, obscuring more of the cab interior.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + High clarity and vibrant colors in the Manhattan background.
• + Good rendering of the capybara's fur and individual claws.
• + The passenger's expression perfectly matches the 'bored' requirement.

• − The passenger is sitting in the front passenger seat rather than the back seat.
• − The capybara's paw placement on the wheel is anatomically awkward.
• − The blue interior seats feel less like a standard New York taxi than the neutral tones in A.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent typography with a cohesive gothic font for all sections.
• + Stunning visual complexity with intricate borders, background silhouettes, and atmospheric lighting.
• + Perfect adherence to all prompt details, including the specific date and location.

• − The parchment texture is quite dark, making parts of the thorns less distinct.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Clean, readable layout with a clear focal point on the jack-o-lantern.
• + Accurately represents all requested text and objects.

• − The background and trees look somewhat generic compared to the 'cinematic' request.
• − Text rendering on the scroll is slightly shaky and less integrated than Model A.
• − Lighting feels flat and lacks the 'moody' atmosphere requested.

GPT Image 2

• + Perfectly adheres to the 3D cartoon style with high-quality PBR materials.
• + Flawless text rendering and icon placement that matches the requested layout.
• + Exceptional detail in the diorama base, including stone textures and miniature pagoda.

• − The composition is slightly crowded for a 'minimal' request, though it fits the diorama theme.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Clean, minimalistic layout that focuses on the food.
• + Accurate colors and solid background as requested.

• − Fails to capture the 'miniature 3D cartoon' aesthetic, appearing more like a standard photo.
• − Text and flag icon are plain and lack the stylized visual appeal requested.
• − The diorama base is just a simple wooden block rather than a detailed scene.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent depiction of god rays and warm golden light.
• + All four animals are clearly visible and well-structured anatomically.
• + Dynamic sense of movement with the cat reaching for a butterfly.

• − The fox's eyes appear slightly more stylized/cartoonish compared to the others.
• − The depth of field makes the foreground flowers a bit distracting.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Successfully captures the 'tumbling together' part of the prompt with animals interacting physically.
• + High-quality fur texture and realistic anatomy for the fox and rabbit.
• + Very detailed wildflower environment with a soft, misty background.

• − The cat's front right paw is anatomically muddled where it meets the other animals.
• − The dog's left eye looks slightly unfocused or misaligned with its gaze.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent adherence to vector emblem style with professional framing.
• + Perfect spelling and elegant typography suitable for a vintage logo.
• + Detailed hatching and texture create a high-quality vintage feel.

• − The steam is a bit wispy and disconnected from the cloche.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Clean, simple execution of the requested elements.
• + Good color palette adherence to warm brown and cream tones.

• − The steam appears to be coming through the cloche rather than from underneath it.
• − The composition feels slightly unbalanced due to the banner's asymmetrical scroll.
• − Lacks the 'vintage minimalist' sophistication, leaning more towards a generic illustration.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors across all six steps and additional headers.
• + Comprehensive layout including crew silhouettes and a landing site map that follows the color palette instructions.
• + Professional illustration style with high-quality vector-like assets for the Saturn V and Lunar Module.

• − The step icons are more like detailed illustrations than the 'flat-vector' style requested in the prompt.
• − The 'Apollo 11' badge in the top right contains some slightly blurred text.

Qwen Image 2.0

• + Follows the 'flat-vector' style more closely with simplified shapes and icons.
• + Clean, vertical composition that logically flows through the mission steps.

• − Spelling error present in step 3: 'Translunjar' instead of 'Translunar'.
• − Text formatting is inconsistent, with some labels overlapping their icons (e.g., 'Lunar Orbit').
• − Missing some of the requested NASA-inspired palette's richness, feeling a bit sparse compared to Model A.