GPT Image 1.5 OpenAI vs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent photographic clarity and lighting
• + Clean glass reflections and refraction of the plant
• + Accurate adherence to all spatial instructions

• − The sphere appears slightly large relative to the 'small' descriptor
• − Table surface is a bit generic compared to model b

Wan 2.7

• + Highly realistic wood texture and weathered table details
• + Beautiful soft lighting and color grading
• + Detailed book binding and pages

• − Physical logic errors with an extra vertical glass pane inside the cube
• − Ghosting artifact of the blue sphere on the left side
• − The 'green plant behind' instruction is less clear due to overlapping composition

GPT Image 1.5

• + Successfully preserved the specific man's facial features and hair from the source image.
• + Accurately rendered California coastline features like palm trees and Highway 1 scenery.
• + Maintained the interior details and color of the car well.

• − The car is RHD (right-hand drive) despite being in California, and he is sitting in the passenger seat relative to the road side.
• − The crop cuts off most of the car, focusing heavily on the driver.
• − The steering wheel hand looks slightly unnatural.

Wan 2.7

• + Shows the full car in a dynamic driving shot that matches the prompt.
• + The lighting on the car and landscape is vibrant and aesthetically pleasing.
• + Accurately captured the cliffside road composition.

• − Completely failed to use the man from the source image, replacing him with a distorted, generic face.
• − The driver is poorly rendered and appears to have anatomical artifacts.
• − Lost the specific identity provided in the source material.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh
• + Highly detailed textures of the bicycle, clothing, and wet pavement
• + Dynamic lighting with vibrant reflections of brake lights

• − The car in the background is sharp rather than having the requested motion blur
• − Composition is a bit tight for a 'candid street photo'

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully captures a wider street scene with a documentary feel
• + Realistic urban environment in Japan
• + Good depiction of wet pavement reflections

• − The subject is holding the bicycle rather than repairing it
• − Fails to provide the requested shallow depth of field and motion blur
• − Image clarity is lower compared to Model A

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent depiction of warm torchlight reflections on weather-beaten gold armor.
• + Highly intricate texture on the underlying cloth and leather straps.

• − The composition is slightly tight, cutting off the top of the head.

Wan 2.7

• + Strong adherence to the braid and bead requirement with clear separation.
• + Effective use of shallow depth of field with visible sparks in the background.

• − The armor texture appears a bit smoother and less 'battle-worn' than requested.
• − Lighting lacks the dramatic orange glow expected from a nearby torch.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Exceptional text rendering with perfect spelling and logical item descriptions.
• + Clear categorization with distinct sections for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains as requested.
• + High-quality, appetizing food photography that complements the text layout.

• − The layout is a bit more conventional than a 'modern minimalist' grid.
• − The grid of photos is aligned only to the right rather than integrated throughout.

Wan 2.7

• + Strong aesthetic appeal with a professional-looking grid layout.
• + Includes atmospheric elements like rosemary and oil for a lifestyle feel.
• + Excellent use of vibrant accents and branding elements.

• − Poor text quality with many spelling errors and illegible fine print.
• − The food photos contain logic errors and anatomical artifacts upon close inspection.
• − The grid includes items like cake and desserts which were not explicitly in the requested sections.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun
• + Very dynamic and chaotic 'exploded' composition
• + Seamless integration of fiery text into a believable background

• − The 'exploded' effect feels more like a stack than individual pieces flying apart

Wan 2.7

• + Clean layout with very legible and creative fiery typography
• + Highly distinct separation of burger components creating a strong sense of motion

• − Illustration style lacks the requested photorealistic detail
• − Odd floating items like seeds/nuts and a cucumber slice that don't fit the 'Magic Burger' theme well

GPT Image 1.5

• + Text has a very realistic dry chalk texture with smudges.
• + The handwriting looks authentic and non-digital.
• + Perfectly follows all text prompts including completing the truncated 'Brown But...' item.

• − The composition is a tight crop showing only the board.
• − Light source is a bit uneven at the top.

Wan 2.7

• + Excellent environmental context with warm café lighting and background.
• + High contrast text that is very easy to read.
• + Accurately rendered all requested text including price details.

• − The text looks like a clean digital font rather than natural chalk.
• − The 'handwriting' is too uniform and lacks the grain/texture requested in the prompt.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Successfully integrated the specific accessories (scarf, sunglasses) and clothing from Image 2.
• + Followed the complex leg pose and arm extension instructions from Image 1.
• + Adapted the background and lighting style from Image 1 to the new character.

• − The head angle is slightly less dynamic than the original reference.
• − Anatomical issues in the feet, which appear flattened and somewhat distorted.

Wan 2.7

• + Almost perfectly preserved the composition and visual quality of Image 1.

• − Completely failed the main instruction to use Image 2 as a character reference.
• − No visible changes were made to the person's face, clothing, or gender from the original pose reference.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent dynamic lighting and highly detailed textures on both the horse and spacesuit.
• + Strong cinematic composition with realistic-looking dust and moon surface effects.
• + Great attention to detail in the horse's tack and anatomy.

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction; the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the horse being on top.

Wan 2.7

• + Clean, clear resolution with an interesting surrealist vibe in the background.
• + Good use of color and balance between the earth and the deep space elements.
• + Accurately represents an astronaut and horse set in space.

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction; the horse is being ridden by the astronaut.
• − Anatomical issues with the horse's rear right leg looking disconnected and rubbery.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent transfer of the specific jacket and scarf pattern
• + Maintains high resolution and realistic fabric textures

• − Crop fails to show the full person, violating the instruction to keep background unchanged
• − Completely cut off the subject's face
• − Changed the lighting and color grade of the overall scene

Wan 2.7

• + Keeps the full subject, pose, and background intact
• + Preserves the subject's face and unique features perfectly
• + Understands the prompt as a full-body outfit replacement task

• − Failed to use the specific outfit from Image 2, generating a generic gold-embroidered coat instead
• − Lower visual fidelity compared to the source image

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the prompt's specified viewing angle from inside the taxi.
• + Highly realistic texture on the capybara's fur and the taxi driver's cap.
• + Perfectly captures the 'bored' expression of the businesswoman in the background.

• − The capybara's paws look more like human-animal hybrid hands with dark fingers.
• − Slightly messy rendering of the taxi's dashboard in the foreground.

Wan 2.7

• + Strong cinematic lighting and sharp details on the exterior of the vehicle.
• + Captures the bored businesswoman effectively in the passenger seat.

• − Violates the prompt by placing the passenger in the front seat instead of the back.
• − The viewing angle is from outside the car, whereas the prompt requested a scene from 'inside'.
• − The capybara's fur texture appears stylistically illustrated/rendered rather than photorealistic.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent atmospheric lighting and texture that matches the 'vintage gothic' request
• + Perfect text rendering of all requested details without spelling errors
• + Strong cinematic composition with a central glowing focal point

• − The thorns and webs are a bit dense, making the border look slightly cluttered

Wan 2.7

• + Clean layout with clear separation between different elements
• + Added creative elements like the cauldron and crows that fit the theme
• + Followed all text instructions accurately including the scroll banner

• − The 'Est. 1847' text was not requested and feels out of place
• − The lighting is flat and more illustrative than 'cinematic'
• − The bright parchment creates a cartoonish rather than 'dark gothic' mood

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent texture that matches the existing beard
• + Preserves the facial features and glasses near-perfectly

• − The transition from the sideburns to the top of the head feels a bit disconnected
• − Slight change to the shape of the forehead

Wan 2.7

• + Highly realistic hair texture and styling
• + Excellent integration of the new hair with the existing facial structure and hairline sides

• − Slightly alters the nose and eye area from the original source image

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to text instructions with perfect placement of 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.
• + Rich, realistic textures and PBR materials on the wood, ceramic, and food items.
• + Superior isometric diorama composition with varied heights and interesting secondary objects like the teapot.

• − The composition feels slightly crowded compared to the 'minimal' request.

Wan 2.7

• + Captures the '3D cartoon' and 'minimal' aesthetic very well with clean, smooth shapes.
• + Very clean layout on a simple raised diorama base as requested.
• + Accurate text and flag placement.

• − The sushi textures look a bit like plastic or clay rather than 'realistic PBR materials'.
• − The text is slightly off-center relative to the diorama base.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent caricature style that maintains a strong likeness to the source person.
• + Clearly incorporates all three prompt elements: news desk, multiple dogs, and hockey in the background.
• + High-quality rendering with professional lighting and legible text.

• − The fingers on the hand holding the papers are slightly merged and anatomicaly awkward.

Wan 2.7

• + Creative use of speech bubbles and a tiny hockey rink prop.
• + Successfully preserves the 'selfie' pose from the original source image.
• + Includes multiple dogs with fun hockey-themed accessories.

• − The caricature style is a bit more generic and loses some of the subject's unique facial features.
• − The 'TV anchor' part of the profession is less clear, looking more like a living room with a TV.
• − Text in the speech bubbles contains spelling errors like 'Rolee'.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent depiction of texture, particularly the soft fur on all animals.
• + Dynamic, playful composition that captures the 'tumbling together' aspect of the prompt.
• + Stunning lighting effects with realistic god rays and integrated dew sparkles.

• − The fox's paw in the bottom right corner is slightly malformed.
• − Some of the pink flowers in the foreground exhibit minor digital smudging.

Wan 2.7

• + Clear individual subjects with good spatial separation.
• + Accurately includes all four requested species with distinct features.
• + Good rendering of the wildflower meadow and golden hour lighting.

• − The animals feel somewhat static and posed rather than 'tumbling' or 'playfully chasing'.
• − The kitten has a strange, small tongue artifact.
• − The lighting feels more like a generic filter compared to the organic warmth in Model A.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the 'dreamy' and 'warm nostalgic' mood through soft lighting and bloom effects.
• + Successfully adopts a modern anime/Ghibli-inspired character design style.
• + Perfectly captures the pastel color palette requested in the prompt.

• − The faces, while stylized, lose much of the original actors' likenesses.
• − The heavy bloom effect makes the foreground figure quite blurry compared to the source.

Wan 2.7

• + Outstanding source preservation, maintaining the recognizable facial structures of the original meme actors.
• + Accurate hand-painted watercolor texture that feels very authentic to classic animation backgrounds.
• + Maintains the composition and clarity of the source image perfectly.

• − The style leans more toward a western watercolor sketch than the specific Ghibli anime aesthetic.
• − The lighting is flat compared to the requested 'gentle, dreamy' atmosphere.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the 'hair blowing in wind' instruction with a very dynamic shape.
• + Adds a significant amount of leaves to create the requested energetic and lively feel.
• + High source preservation with minimal structural changes to the original composition.

• − The hair flow feels slightly symmetrical and artificial.
• − Some leaves are blurry or lack texture compared to the rest of the image.

Wan 2.7

• + Natural-looking hair motion that integrates well with the original hairline.
• + Leaves feel naturally integrated into the environment with realistic orientation.
• + Excellent source preservation of the woman and dog's features.

• − The 'energetic and lively' feel is more subtle compared to the other model.
• − Fewer flying leaves added than might be expected from the prompt.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent typography with a hand-drawn vintage feel
• + High-quality vector lighting and texture effects on the cloche
• + Perfect text accuracy including the accent mark in 'Caffè'

• − Failed to provide a light background as requested
• − Minimalist style is sacrificed for a more illustrative look

Wan 2.7

• + Successfully used a light background with subtle texture
• + Followed the vector emblem layout very strictly
• + Good use of the 'Est. 1720' banner within a circular frame

• − Spelling error in the main name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian')
• − Cloche dome illustration is very basic and lacks the requested 'steam' detail (shows abstract line work)
• − Typography is less elegant and feels more generic

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the NASA-inspired color palette and flat-vector style.
• + Text rendering is clear, legible, and large enough to be functional.
• + Strong layout with a logical 1-6 panel flow that fills the frame.

• − The 'Lunar Orbit' moon icon changes color slightly compared to the Earth-background moon.
• − Missing some of the technical detail requested in the 'supporting information' part of the prompt.

Wan 2.7

• + More sophisticated vertical infographic composition with a higher information density.
• + Includes specific technical data like UTC times and altitudes for each step.
• + Features a cleaner, more professional header and footer typical of poster designs.

• − Poor spelling in several places, including 'Descript' for Descent and 'Tranquiliry'.
• − Icons are significantly smaller, making the visual narrative harder to read at a glance.
• − Small artifacts in the star field and some text alignment issues.