GPT Image 1.5 OpenAI vs Qwen Image 2512 Alibaba

GPT Image 1.5

• + Perfect adherence to the prompt's spatial instructions.
• + Excellent glass refraction showing the plant through the cube.
• + High-quality texture on the red book and wooden table.

• − The sphere is quite large relative to the cube, making the 'small' descriptor subjective.
• − The base of the cube looks slightly mirrors-like rather than simple glass.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Good lighting and realistic material textures.
• + Follows the prompt for all required elements.

• − Significant optical inconsistency where a second blue sphere appears to be inside the glass wall.
• − The sphere is off-center, making the composition feel less balanced.
• − The glass has a heavy teal tint compared to the clear glass in Model A.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent adherence to the 'repairing' action with tools visible on the ground.
• + Highly realistic lighting and reflections on the wet pavement.
• + Perfectly captured the candid feel with the subject engrossed in work.

• − The car in the background is sharp rather than showing the requested motion blur.
• − The rain is very subtle, almost difficult to see.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Strong bokeh and shallow depth of field as requested.
• + Effective motion blur on the background vehicles.
• + High facial detail and natural skin texture.

• − The subject is posing for a portrait rather than 'repairing' the bicycle as requested.
• − The bicycle anatomy is slightly warped, particularly the handlebars and frame connection.
• − Minimal visual evidence of rain beyond wet ground.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent photorealistic skin texture with subtle grime and scars.
• + Rich warm lighting that naturally reflects off the intricate engravings of the armor.
• + Highly detailed cloth and leather textures on the underlayer.

• − The bokeh sparks are a bit large and slightly distracting.
• − The hair braids are somewhat messy compared to the specific 'beads' request.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Perfect adherence to the 'hair braided with small beads' prompt with clear colorful beads.
• + Strong composition with a visible torch source adding to the narrative.
• + Intricate and sharp engraving details on the plate armor.

• − The facial skin texture is slightly smoother and less 'battle-worn' than Model A.
• − The bokeh sparks appear a bit more synthetic in their placement.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors
• + Includes specific logical categories and descriptions for items
• + High-quality, realistic food photography that matches the text labels

• − The 'grid' layout for photos is a bit irregular
• − Image is cropped tightly at the bottom

Qwen Image 2512

• + Strong minimalist aesthetic with a clean grid layout
• + Effective use of white space and bold typography

• − Contains significant gibberish text and spelling errors
• − Combines pizza and mains into one incoherent section
• − The food images are repetitive and low-detail

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent photorealism with detailed textures on the meat patty and buns
• + Perfectly followed all text requirements including 'LIMITED TIME ONLY'
• + Dynamic and intense use of light and glowing embers that fills the frame

• − The composition is slightly crowded at the top edge

Qwen Image 2512

• + Clean layout with great use of negative space
• + Accurate 3D rendering of the 'MAGIC BURGER' title with fire effects
• + Clear starburst design for the price point

• − Missed the word 'TIME' in the secondary text, displaying only 'LIMITED ONLY'
• − The burger components are less 'exploded' and more stacked compared to the other model
• − The background is less immersive and dynamic than requested

GPT Image 1.5

• + Perfect spelling of all menu items including 'Risotto'.
• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges and dusty residues.
• + Very realistic handwriting that feels organic and non-systemic.

• − The layout is a bit sparse with significant empty space at the bottom.
• − The handwriting style is slightly less 'elegant cursive' for the title as requested.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Strong composition that fills the board effectively with a cozy cafe background.
• + Beautifully rendered cursive calligraphy for the title and items.
• + Text is very high contrast and easy to read.

• − Includes a spelling error in 'Risitto' (should be Risotto).
• − The chalk looks slightly like a digital brush rather than a physical chalk stick compared to Model A.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and complex background details
• + Great texture on the horse's fur and the lunar dust
• + Correctly identifies the core concept of an astronaut riding a horse

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is on top, not the horse
• − The astronaut's left leg appears to be fused with the horse's neck

Qwen Image 2512

• + High clarity in the rendering of the astronaut and horse
• + Clean composition with a beautiful Earth curvature background

• − Failed the specific negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse, not vice versa
• − The lighting on the horse is somewhat flat compared to the astronaut
• − Astronaut's face and hands have slight anatomical inconsistencies

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent photorealism with cinematic lighting and depth of field.
• + The capybara's fur and expression are highly detailed and convincing.
• + Superior adherence to the specific hat design with legible 'TAXI' text.

• − The capybara's paws look slightly more like hands/claws than natural capybara anatomy.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Successfully captures all prompt elements including the businesswoman and the driver.
• + Good balance in the composition showing more of the car interior.

• − The capybara's front paws are incorrectly rendered, showing too many digits and a humanoid structure.
• − Lighting on the capybara's face feels a bit flat compared to the background.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent typography with perfect spelling in all requested text fields.
• + Superior vintage aesthetic with a dark, textured parchment feel.
• + Cohesive lighting that blends the glowing elements naturally with the environment.

• − The 'frights' text on the scroll has a very slight trailing artifact/underline.
• − The background graveyard is a bit cluttered compared to the clean layout of the second image.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Clean, high-resolution rendering of the central jack-o-lantern.
• + Great use of depth of field with the twisted trees in the background.
• + Very clear and readable gothic-style font choice.

• − Contains a spelling error in the main title: 'Hallowern' instead of 'Halloween'.
• − The overall lighting feels a bit more like a modern digital painting than a vintage parchment poster.
• − The blue-tinted sky deviates slightly from the requested dark parchment color palette.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent text rendering with clean, bold typography and a perfect flag icon.
• + Highly realistic textures on the sushi and wood materials that still maintain a miniature look.
• + Very high level of detail in the props, including the teapot, soy sauce bottle, and individual rice grains.

• − The composition is slightly crowded with too many extra items like the teapot and cup.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Follows the 'cartoon scene' and 'minimal garnish' instructions more closely regarding simplicity.
• + Excellent 3D miniature diorama feel with a clay-like soft texture.
• + Very clean layout that emphasizes the central plate.

• − The flag icon is integrated oddly next to the word 'Sushi' rather than as a distinct element.
• − The text styling is a bit more generic and less 'premium' than Model A.
• − Lower overall resolution and clarity compared to Model A.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Captures the 'tumbling' and 'playful' aspect of the prompt much better than Model B.
• + Excellent rendering of golden hour light, god rays, and atmospheric dew sparkles.
• + Highly expressive and varied facial expressions on each animal.

• − Anatomical issues with the kitten, including an extra paw and a confusing orientation of limbs.
• − The butterfly's scale is a bit large compared to the animals.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Clean and anatomically correct subjects with very clear, high-resolution textures.
• + Well-organized composition that ensures all four animals are clearly visible and front-facing.
• + Beautifully detailed fur and sharp focus on the faces.

• − The animals are posing for a portrait rather than 'playfully chasing and tumbling' as requested.
• − The lighting and environment feel a bit more static and less magical than the god rays in Model A.
• − Butterflies feel somewhat pasted onto the scene rather than part of the action.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Perfect adherence to all text requirements including 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'.
• + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic that works well as a logo.
• + Professional layout with a well-integrated banner.

• − Slightly generic steam effect compared to the illustrative quality of the other model.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Beautiful hand-drawn illustrative style with great woodcut texture.
• + High-quality rendering of the smoke/steam.
• + Accurate text rendering for both terms.

• − The composition is a bit more crowded than a typical 'minimalist' logo.
• − Small artifacts in the crossbar of the 'F' in Florian.

GPT Image 1.5

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors across all six steps.
• + Perfect adherence to the requested flat-vector style with crisp, consistent iconography.
• + Strong logical flow clearly dividing the mission stages into distinct panels.

• − Misses the 'translunar trajectory arc' as a standalone step, merging it into a panel with the moon.

Qwen Image 2512

• + Includes all specific icons requested in the prompt, such as the trajectory arc.
• + Captures the requested muted red and navy color palette effectively.

• − Significant text rendering issues with multiple misspellings like 'TranslauraJ' and 'Desceeint'.
• − Poor layout logic with repeated numbers and overlapping text.
• − Literal interpretation of prompt meta-text, including the phrase 'Steps stop at landing' as part of the graphic.