Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI Wan 2.7 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 20 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

GPT Image 1 Mini

24.9 arena score

#13 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.7

20.5 arena score

#39 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

GPT Image 1 Mini

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.7

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 20

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent adherence to lighting instructions with logical soft light from the left side.
  • + Clean, minimalist composition with a high-quality glass effect.
  • + Accurate spatial arrangement of all requested items.
  • The plant in the background is quite blurry and doesn't clearly show the 'partially visible through glass' effect as well as Model B.

Wan 2.7

  • + Highly realistic textures on the wooden table and the book spine.
  • + Includes complex reflections and refractions within the glass cube.
  • + Clearly demonstrates the plant visible through the glass panels.
  • The reflections inside the cube create visual clutter, showing extra blue spheres that shouldn't be there.
  • The light source feels more diffused and overhead rather than specifically 'from the left'.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. GPT Image 1 Mini produced a cleaner, more aesthetically balanced image with better lighting, while Wan 2.7 excelled in realistic textures and the rendering of the plant through the glass. GPT Image 1 Mini is the likely winner for its superior lighting and lack of confusing artifacts like the duplicate sphere reflections seen in Wan 2.7.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, hair, and distinctive clothing.
  • + Convincing lighting integration where the sunset glow hits the man's plaid coat.
  • + High visual quality with motion blur that creates a realistic sense of speed.
  • The man appears slightly too large relative to the scale of the car's interior.

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully transitions the car from a showroom to a coastal road environment.
  • + Preserves the specific model and details of the car from the source image accurately.
  • Completely failed to incorporate the man from the second source image, showing a distorted figure instead.
  • Low-quality rendering of the driver's face, which appears as a blurred artifact.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini is the clear winner as it successfully combined both source images, maintaining the identity and wardrobe of the man while placing him in the car. Wan 2.7 failed the primary task of including the specific person provided, instead generating a nonsensical, blurred figure in the driver's seat.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Exceptional skin texture and realistic facial details
  • + Strong colors and effective shallow depth of field
  • + High degree of realism in the rain droplets on the bicycle seat
  • Anatomical issues with the hands merged with the bike frame
  • Missing the requested motion blur for passing cars

Wan 2.7

  • + Captures the 'candid street' and 'imperfect framing' feel better
  • + Excellent pavement reflections and environmental atmosphere
  • + Better global composition showing more of the street scene
  • The scale of the bicycle is slightly too small for the man
  • Lacks the shallow depth of field requested (background is quite sharp)
  • Slightly less detail in facial textures compared to Image A

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini produces a superior portrait with incredible skin detail and a cinematic feel, but it fails on complex interactions between the hands and the bike. Wan 2.7 captures the candid street photography prompt more holistically with a more natural environment and better reflections, though it misses the shallow depth of field requirement. GPT Image 1 Mini is the winner for its impressive photographic quality, despite the anatomical clipping at the hands.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent atmospheric lighting and mood
  • + Highly intricate and consistent engraving on the armor
  • + Very natural skin texture and faint scarring
  • Missed the request for beads in the hair
  • The hair braids are less distinct than requested

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfect adherence to specific details like the beads in the hair
  • + Strong representation of the battle-worn skin and scars
  • + Realistic leather texture on the straps
  • Lighting is a bit flat compared to Model A
  • The armor engraving is less ornate than Model A
  • Background detail is slightly distracting

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini creates a more cinematic and mood-heavy piece with superior armor engraving, while Wan 2.7 follows the specific prompt details like the hair beads much more accurately. Ultimately, GPT Image 1 Mini is preferred for its superior artistic composition and realistic lighting, despite missing one minor detail.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography rendering with perfect spelling
  • + Strict adherence to the requested grid photo layout
  • + Clean and highly legible design
  • Lack of menu items and pricing makes it feel like a template rather than a finished menu
  • The layout is somewhat rigid and overly simplistic

Wan 2.7

  • + Complete, functional menu design with item names, descriptions, and pricing
  • + Stronger aesthetic for casual dining with vibrant accents and branding elements
  • + High-quality, realistic food photography
  • Several spelling errors in the item names (e.g., 'Bisge', 'Calanrfri')
  • The text in the small descriptions is garbled and unreadable

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini produced a clean, professional template with perfect text rendering but lacked the specific item details to feel like a completed design. Wan 2.7 created a much more visually compelling and realistic menu for a casual dining environment, though it suffered from characteristic AI spelling errors in the smaller text. Wan 2.7 is the likely winner for better capturing the 'vibrant' and 'complete' feel requested in the prompt.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography with a cohesive glowing ember effect.
  • + Highly photorealistic textures on the bun and patty.
  • + Clean composition that follows safe margins for an ad.
  • The 'exploded' effect is a bit static and vertical rather than dynamic.
  • Missing some minor debris or 'motion' elements mentioned in the prompt.

Wan 2.7

  • + Truly dynamic 'exploded' composition with ingredients flying at different angles.
  • + Includes all requested text and specific elements like the starburst.
  • + Great sense of motion with sauce splashes and flying seeds.
  • The 'MAGIC BURGER' text looks slightly cartoonish with the flame toppers compared to the photorealistic burger.
  • The lighting on the ingredients is a bit inconsistent with the dark background.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini produces a very professional, clean advertisement with superior photorealism and elegant typography. However, Wan 2.7 captures the 'dynamic' and 'exploded' aspect of the prompt much more effectively, creating a high-energy composition that feels more like a modern food ad.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent chalk texture that feels authentic to the medium
  • + Perfect rendering of all requested text with no spelling errors
  • + Accurate representation of hand-sketched lettering with varying strokes
  • The title is not in the requested 'elegant cursive' style
  • The composition is a bit tight with the frame

Wan 2.7

  • + Beautiful cafe atmosphere and lighting in the background
  • + Captures an elegant cursive-inspired flare in the lettering
  • + Excellent spelling and text layout
  • The text looks more like a digital font or vector overlay than authentic chalk
  • The drop shadows and perfectly clean edges break the illusion of a hand-drawn board

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini wins because it accurately captures the texture and feeling of real chalk on a board, adhering to the requirement for a 'realistic chalk handwriting style' without looking digital. While Wan 2.7 has a more appealing background and better cursive adherence for the title, the text appears as a clean digital font, failing the prompt's core stylistic constraint.

Pose & Character Mashup

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully integrated character features from Image 2 including facial hair, sunglasses, and the checkered scarf.
  • + Captured the yellow background and red ottoman from Image 1.
  • + Followed the instruction to transfer the character and clothing style to the new scene.
  • Failed to match the exact complex 'body position' from Image 1, opting for a generic kneeling pose instead.
  • Anatomical issues in the lower leg and foot on the ottoman.
  • Lighting is very flat compared to the source images.

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfectly preserved the original background and pose from Image 1.
  • Completely failed the primary instruction to change the character to the man from Image 2.
  • The image is essentially a slightly lower-resolution copy of Image 1 with no meaningful edits.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini attempted the complex task of merging character features and clothing from Image 2 into the environment of Image 1, though it simplified the difficult pose. Wan 2.7 failed the prompt entirely, failing to perform any character replacement and simply returning a version of the source Image 1.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent atmospheric lighting and cinematic mood
  • + High level of detail on the space suit and horse fur texture
  • + Sophisticated color palette that feels surreal and grounded
  • Failed the negative constraint; the horse is on the bottom, not the top

Wan 2.7

  • + Bright, clear rendering with vibrant colors
  • + Good composition using the Earth's curvature
  • + Clean, sharp details on the astronaut equipment
  • Failed the negative constraint; the horse is on the bottom, not the top
  • The horse's legs and hooves have anatomical inconsistencies

Verdict: Both models failed the specific prompt constraint of 'horse on top, not vice versa,' instead providing the standard interpretation of an astronaut riding a horse. GPT Image 1 Mini is the winner because it provides a much more cinematic and high-quality artistic execution with superior lighting and textures compared to Wan 2.7.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully replicates the specific outfit items (pea coat, plaid scarf, blue jeans) from Image 2.
  • + Maintains consistent skin textures and lighting that matches the original beach scene.
  • Significantly changes the model's facial features and bone structure, losing the identity from Image 1.
  • Changes the background and perspective of the wooden structure.

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfectly preserves the source person's face, hair, and the background environment from Image 1.
  • + Correctly adapts the new clothing to the person's original pose and body shape.
  • Fails to use the outfit from Image 2, instead generating a generic gothic/elaborate coat.
  • The generated clothing looks slightly 'stuck on' with some flat shading.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini followed the clothing instructions much better but failed the preservation task by completely changing the person's face and the environment. Wan 2.7 perfectly preserved the source person and background, which is the primary goal of an image edit, even though it hallucinated a different 'elaborate' outfit instead of the specific one shown in Image 2. Wan 2.7 is preferred for maintaining the subject's identity.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and depth of field consistent with a night scene.
  • + Captures the bored, nonchalant expression of the passenger perfectly.
  • + High-quality fur texture and realistic garment integration on the capybara.
  • The passenger's hands and phone are slightly blurry and less defined.
  • Only one paw is clearly visible on the steering wheel.

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully places both paws on the steering wheel as requested.
  • + Wide shot provides more context of the yellow taxi and Manhattan city background.
  • + Clearer rendering of the passenger's face and phone.
  • The passenger is seated in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
  • The capybara's head looks poorly composited onto the body, with a noticeable seam at the neck.
  • The lighting is overly bright and lacks the atmosphere of a night-time taxi ride.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini is the superior image due to its high level of photorealism, atmospheric lighting, and accurate placement of the passenger in the back seat. While Wan 2.1 followed the instructions for steering wheel placement better, it failed the spatial requirement of the passenger's location and suffered from poor anatomical blending and unrealistic daytime-like lighting.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography with a cohesive vintage feel.
  • + Mood perfectly matches the 'dark parchment' and 'cinematic lighting' requirements.
  • + Strong, central Jack-o'-lantern focal point with high-quality glowing effects.
  • The parchment texture is a bit grainy and muddy.
  • The 'webs and thorns' border is very subtle and loses some detail in the shadows.

Wan 2.7

  • + Ornate and highly detailed border incorporating webs, thorns, and skulls.
  • + Very sharp and clean illustration style with great contrast.
  • + Includes all requested elements and adds extra thematic details like a cauldron and crows.
  • The lighting is very bright and flat, failing to capture the 'moody' and 'cinematic' light requested.
  • The 'parchment' look is generic and lacks the dark, aged texture requested.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini captured the atmosphere much better, delivering a truly moody, dark gothic invitation that feels like a polished final product. While Wan 2.7 has impressive detail and sharpness, its bright and clean aesthetic feels more like a modern cartoon than a vintage gothic poster.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
GPT Image 1 Mini
Before After
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully added thick, voluminous hair.
  • + The hair texture matches the rugged aesthetic of the image.
  • Failed to preserve facial features, significantly altering the man's face.
  • The glasses and ear shape were modified compared to the original.
  • Lost a significant amount of the background and jacket detail through a re-generation of the entire scene.

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfectly preserved almost every pixel of the source image outside of the hair area.
  • + Maintained the exact facial features, glasses, clothing, and background.
  • + Realistic integration of hair with the existing sideburns and ear.
  • The hairline on the forehead is slightly abrupt in its transition.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini failed as an editor by re-generating the entire image, leading to a loss of the subject's identity and original background details. Wan 2.7 performed a high-quality local edit, adding realistic hair while perfectly preserving the original's facial features and environment.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent clean typography and graphic design layout
  • + Perfect 3D miniature 'cartoon' aesthetic with soft textures
  • + High clarity and faithful execution of the solid blue background
  • Simple composition with only three pieces of sushi
  • The wood texture on the base is slightly repetitive

Wan 2.7

  • + Highly detailed realistic PBR materials, especially on the fish and rice
  • + More complex and interesting variety of sushi types and garnishes
  • + Excellent text rendering and icon placement
  • Slightly more cluttered than the 'minimal' request
  • The shrimp has a somewhat odd 'eye' artifact that looks more like a creature than food

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini delivers a much cleaner, more 'graphic design' style image that perfectly matches the requested cartoon miniature aesthetic with simple, soft shapes. Wan 2.7 provides more realistic textures and a richer variety of sushi, but fails to capture the same level of ultra-clean minimalism requested in the prompt. GPT Image 1 Mini's adherence to the 'cartoon' and 'minimal' instructions makes it the stronger overall layout.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Perfectly captures the caricature art style with hand-drawn pencil textures.
  • + Accurately represents all elements including the TV desk, a dog, and hockey gear.
  • + High likeness preservation while exaggerating facial features for humorous effect.

Wan 2.7

  • + Very creative integration of hockey onto a dog with the tiny helmet.
  • + Maintains the selfie perspective from the source image.
  • + Includes multiple dogs as requested in the 'love for dogs' prompt.
  • Text rendering errors in speech bubbles like 'Dogs Rolee!'.
  • The hockey element is a bit small and less focal than in Image A.
  • The face looks somewhat generic and loses some of the specific likeness of the source.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini captured the classic caricature essence much more effectively, using professional-looking pencil textures and a clear news anchor setting. While Wan 2.7 was more energetic and better maintained the selfie-style composition of the original photo, it suffered from spelling errors and a slightly less recognizable facial likeness.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent dynamic motion with the animals leaping and jumping
  • + Superior lighting with soft, natural-looking god rays
  • + Extremely wide and expressive eyes that match the 'fluffy baby animal' aesthetic
  • The fox kit has somewhat dark, muddy paws that lack fine detail
  • The kitten's tail is slightly awkwardly positioned

Wan 2.7

  • + Beautifully detailed meadow with vibrant, varied wildflowers
  • + Excellent rendering of the 'dew sparkles' mentioned in the prompt
  • + High level of texture detail on the kitten's fur
  • The kitten and fox look more like adults than babies
  • The fox's facial structure is slightly distorted and less 'cute'
  • The god rays look a bit more artificial and linear compared to Image A

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini captures the 'joyful wholesome vibe' and baby-like features of the animals much better, showing them in active play. While Wan 2.7 has better environment details like flowers and dew, the animals themselves look older and the fox's face is less polished. GPT Image 1 Mini is the preferred winner for better adherence to the 'baby animal' and 'tumbling together' aspects of the prompt.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully captures the Ghibli soft-focus aesthetic with pastel colors
  • + Maintains the composition and meme-accuracy perfectly while stylizing characters
  • + Provides a warm, nostalgic texture reminiscent of hand-drawn animation
  • The filter is a bit heavy, losing original facial features in the grain

Wan 2.7

  • + Excellent watercolor texture application that preserves fine details
  • + Hand-painted feel is very high quality with clear line art
  • + Strong source preservation with facial expressions matching the original very closely
  • Looks more like a general watercolor illustration than specifically Ghibli-inspired
  • Lighting feels a bit flatter compared to the 'dreamy' request

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well on this image editing task. GPT Image 1 Mini captured the 'dreamy' and 'nostalgic' atmosphere of Studio Ghibli more effectively through its use of soft lighting and color grading, whereas Wan 2.1 provided a cleaner, more detailed watercolor illustration that preserved the original actors' likenesses better. GPT Image 1 Mini is the likely winner for better adhering to the specific 'Ghibli' mood requested.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
GPT Image 1 Mini
Before After
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Strong adherence to the 'flying leaves' instruction with many clearly defined leaves.
  • + Noticeable motion effect applied to the woman's hair.
  • Low source preservation as the woman's face has been significantly altered from the original.
  • Anatomical issues introduced, such as the dog's leash appearing to merge into its neck/fur incorrectly compared to the source.

Wan 2.7

  • + Excellent source preservation, keeping the woman's face and the dog's appearance nearly identical to the original.
  • + Successfully added hair motion and leaves while maintaining the integrity of the original image.
  • The flying leaves are fewer and slightly more blurred than in Model A.
  • A small artifact is present on the dog's chest where a leaf appears to be overlapping/emerging.

Verdict: Wan 2.7 is the clear winner because it successfully applied the requested edits—adding wind-blown hair and flying leaves—while perfectly preserving the identity of the woman and the dog from the source image. In contrast, GPT Image 1 Mini significantly changed the woman's facial features and posture, failing the primary goal of an image editing task which is source preservation.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography with correct spelling and accent placement.
  • + Strong minimalist vector aesthetic that feels modern yet vintage.
  • + High contrast and clean lines suitable for a professional logo.
  • Failed to provide the requested light background, resulting in a black background.
  • The cloche dome illustration is slightly abstract compared to a standard dome shape.

Wan 2.7

  • + Accurately followed the prompt's request for a light background with subtle texture.
  • + Clean emblem composition that fits the 'vintage minimalist' request well.
  • + Good use of color palette with warm brown and cream tones.
  • Minor spelling error in the name ('Florion' instead of 'Florian').
  • The cloche dome looks more like a glass lid on a stand than a classic dinner cloche.

Verdict: Wan 2.7 followed the specific environmental instructions much better, providing the light background and textured paper look, but it suffered from a typo in the main brand name. GPT Image 1 Mini produced much cleaner typography and a more striking professional emblem, though it completely missed the background color requirement. GPT Image 1 Mini is the better choice for a logo due to its superior text rendering and vector clarity.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography with flawlessly rendered text
  • + Logical and clean flow of information in the diagram
  • + Highly consistent vector line-weight and iconography style
  • Step 3 'Translunar' icon is slightly abstract compared to the others
  • Small crop at the bottom edges

Wan 2.7

  • + Detailed layout that includes dates, times, and specific astronaut names
  • + Strong adherence to the requested NASA-inspired color palette
  • + Professional poster composition with a clear header and footer
  • Several spelling errors including 'Tranquiliry', 'Descript', and 'Deccent'
  • The icons and text become very small and harder to read at full scale
  • Iconography is less consistent in style compared to the other model

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini produces a superior infographic by prioritizing readability and perfect text rendering, which is crucial for this format. While Wan 2.7 provides more historical context and a complete poster layout, it suffers from multiple spelling errors and less consistent iconography. GPT Image 1 Mini feels more like a professional vector illustration, whereas Wan 2.7 feels like a busy data sheet with technical flaws.

Next steps

Explore each model