Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 19 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

GPT Image 1 Mini

25.0 arena score

#13 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

23.4 arena score

#27 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

GPT Image 1 Mini

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 19

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'small blue sphere' prompt requirement
  • + Clean and minimalist composition with realistic glass edge rendering
  • + Soft, diffuse lighting that creates a calm atmosphere
  • The glass cube is depicted as a hollow frame/vessel without a top face, appearing physically impossible with the book floating on thin edges

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Dynamic lighting with attractive shadows and light rays
  • + Higher level of detail in the textures of the book and plant
  • + Realistic glass reflections on the bottom surface of the cube
  • The sphere is quite large, ignoring the 'small' descriptor in the prompt
  • Noticeable dust/particle artifacts in the air that may look like noise

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini followed the spatial and scaling instructions more accurately, specifically regarding the size of the blue sphere. However, Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a more visually rich image with superior lighting and texture, despite the sphere being larger than requested. GPT Image 1 Mini is preferred for strict prompt adherence, while Wan 2.5 is better for overall aesthetic quality.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent preservation of the man's identity, including his hairstyle and specific plaid coat/scarf.
  • + Realistic composition and lighting that matches the outdoor sunset setting.
  • + Accurate car model details and interior leather matching the source.
  • The steering wheel placement is slightly awkward in relation to his hands.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully places the car on a California-style coastline with palm trees.
  • + Maintain the motion blur on the road and wheels for a 'driving' feel.
  • + The car's exterior design is kept very close to the original image.
  • The man is barely visible and loses almost all specific features from the source image.
  • The man's hair and facial features are generic compared to Image A.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini is the clear winner because it successfully integrated the specific person and his clothing from the second source image into the car from the first source image. Wan 2.5 focused too much on the landscape and car, making the man an unrecognizable background element and failing to preserve the detailed identity requested by the multi-image prompt.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent skin texture and hyper-realistic facial details
  • + Authentic shallow depth of field with 50mm lens look
  • + Effective use of subtle rain droplets and muted cinematic color grading
  • The bike anatomy is slightly incoherent around the wheel and chain guard
  • The car in the background is static rather than showing motion blur

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Outstanding reflections on the wet pavement
  • + Dynamic wide shot with good environmental storytelling
  • + Excellent prompt adherence regarding the rain intensity and street setting
  • The man's feet and shoes look distorted and poorly integrated with the ground
  • The mechanical parts of the bike and tools are a cluttered mess of artifacts

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini captures the requested 'candid' and 'no stylization' feel more effectively through its superior skin texture and realistic lighting. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) handles the environmental reflections and rain interaction better, its failure to render the subject's feet and the bike's mechanics correctly makes it feel more like an AI generation than a real photo.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent atmospheric lighting and skin texture
  • + High level of intricate detail in the plate armor engravings
  • + Strong emotional depth in the subject's expression
  • The braids are very subtle and lack the requested beads
  • Leather and cloth textures are somewhat obscured by the dark composition

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Explicitly includes the beads in the braids as requested
  • + Superb texture on the leather straps and frayed cloth underlayer
  • + Dynamic lighting with a visible torch and high-contrast armor reflections
  • The character looks slightly young for a 'battle-worn' description
  • The armor plating on the far shoulder has some minor geometric inconsistencies

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini excels in mood and facial realism, but fails to include the beads mentioned in the prompt. Wan 2.5 (Preview) follows the prompt more accurately by including the beads and providing highly distinct textures for the leather and cloth, resulting in a more complete technical interpretation.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent text readability with perfect spelling of headers.
  • + Consistent grid layout that aligns images with categories.
  • + High image quality for the food items which look appetizing and realistic.
  • Lacks any descriptive menu text or pricing, making it look like a template.
  • Very basic composition that feels almost too empty on the left side.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Features a more complex and professional menu layout with item descriptions.
  • + Includes a variety of colorful food photography that matches the prompt's 'vibrant accents'.
  • + Good use of color-coded dividers for different sections.
  • Significant text rendering issues with 'gibberish' descriptions and titles.
  • Several food items look repetitive (the same basil garnish used on almost every plate).

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini provides a crystal-clear, minimalist template with perfect typography but lacks the detailed content expected of a full menu. Wan 2.5 (Preview) produces a more realistic menu structure with descriptions and varied layout, but it suffers from severe text artifacts and repetitive food styling. GPT Image 1 Mini is the better choice for a design base due to its clean execution and legible headers.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography rendering with consistent fiery glow effect.
  • + Clean, professional layout that balances the text and burger perfectly.
  • + Highly realistic food textures, particularly the burger bun and patty.
  • The 'exploded' effect is a bit static and vertical compared to the requested dynamic motion.
  • The background is somewhat empty apart from the glowing embers.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Strong sense of dynamic motion with ingredients angled and scattered in mid-air.
  • + Creative fiery starburst design that incorporates literal flames.
  • + Good incorporation of smoke and flying sauce droplets to enhance the 'magic' theme.
  • One slice of tomato and some lettuce leaves appear to be floating somewhat unnaturally thin or poorly lit.
  • The text 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' is slightly warped to follow the curve of the main title.

Verdict: Both models followed the complex prompt very well, but GPT Image 1 Mini produced a cleaner, more professional advertisement with superior text legibility and better food realism. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) executed the 'dynamic' and 'exploded' aspect more accurately with more energy in the composition, the overall polish and clarity of GPT Image 1 Mini make it the more effective ad.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent text legibility and spelling accuracy for all requested items.
  • + The chalk texture is very realistic with convincing grain and pressure variations.
  • + Perfect adherence to the requested items and pricing.
  • The heading is in print/architectural style rather than the 'elegant cursive' requested.
  • The overall composition is very flat and lacks the 'cozy café' environmental context.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successful use of cursive handwriting for the text as requested.
  • + Good environmental context showing a café interior in the background.
  • + Dynamic composition with natural-looking chalk smudges and smears for realism.
  • Significant text errors including redundant pricing and mangled words in the footer.
  • Failed to include 'Herbs' in the Grilled Octopus line.
  • The handwriting style is slightly more inconsistent in legibility compared to Model A.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini provides a much more accurate rendering of the text and specific menu items, though it failed the 'cursive' instruction for the title. Wan 2.5 (Preview) captured the requested handwriting style and cafe atmosphere better but suffered from repetitive text glitches and omitted words. GPT Image 1 Mini is the preferred choice for a functional and accurate menu representation.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent moody, cinematic lighting that blends the horse and astronaut into the environment.
  • + Strong anatomical consistency for the horse.
  • + Captures a mysterious, surreal atmosphere.
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be 'on top' of the astronaut.
  • Lower dynamic range compared to Model B.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Vibrant colors and high-resolution details in the nebula and planet.
  • + Sharp rendering of the space suit textures.
  • + Dynamic sense of motion with the dust and hair.
  • Failed the negative constraint/specific instruction for the horse to be 'on top' of the astronaut.
  • The horse's front legs have slightly awkward posing near the hooves.

Verdict: Both models failed the specific 'horse on top' spatial instruction, which was a logic test; both defaulted to the standard 'astronaut on horse' trope. GPT Image 1 Mini offers a more cohesive, cinematic art style, while Wan 2.5 (Preview) provides a more vibrant, commercial high-detail look.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully preserved the unique vitiligo skin patterns from the base person.
  • + Correctly transferred the full outfit including the plaid scarf, pea coat, jeans, and watch.
  • + Maintained the overall composition and background of the original beach scene.
  • Altered the person's face significantly, making them look older and changing features.
  • Lost the sand textures on the person's skin present in the source image.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent replication of the outfit details including the sunglasses and specific scarf pattern.
  • + Maintained the exact background and lighting of the first image.
  • Completely failed to use the person from Image 1 as the base, using the face and skin of the person from Image 2 instead.
  • Ignored the vitiligo pattern which was the defining feature of the base person.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini followed the instructions much better by attempting to merge the two images, successfully keeping the vitiligo skin pattern of the subject while applying the new clothes. Wan 2.5 (Preview) essentially just placed the person from Image 2 into the background of Image 1, failing the primary instruction to use Image 1 as the base person. While both models struggled to keep the face 100% identical, GPT Image 1 Mini is the clear winner for respecting the subject's physical identity.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent photorealistic lighting and bokeh effects.
  • + High-quality fur texture and realistic anatomy of the capybara paw.
  • + Moody, professional cinematic atmosphere that fits the 'night' prompt.
  • Only one paw is visible on the steering wheel.
  • The scene is a bit dark, making it harder to see the yellow taxi details.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully shows both front paws on the steering wheel.
  • + Clearly shows more of the 'Yellow Taxi' environment, including the external lights and signs.
  • + Great character expressions for both the capybara and the businesswoman.
  • The paws look slightly like human fingers or claws rather than natural capybara feet.
  • Lower lighting realism compared to Model A, with some over-saturated elements.

Verdict: Both models captured the surreal nature of the prompt very well. GPT Image 1 Mini produced a more photorealistic, cinematic image with superior textures, while Wan 2.5 (Preview) followed the specific prompt instructions more closely by including both paws on the wheel and more of the taxi's exterior sign and vibrant Manhattan background.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent font legibility and clean text rendering.
  • + Highly cohesive dark parchment aesthetic that fits the 'vintage gothic' prompt.
  • + Effective use of subtle atmospheric depth with the trees and bats.
  • The border of thorns and webs is very faint and lacks detail.
  • The lighting on the pumpkin is a bit flat compared to the other model.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Dynamic and high-quality illustration of the jack-o-lantern with fiery eyes.
  • + Border elements like thorns and webs are very detailed and prominent as requested.
  • + Strong cinematic lighting and color contrast between the blue sky and orange pumpkin.
  • Text rendering is slightly inconsistent, with a slight misalignment in the top title.
  • The overall composition feels a bit cluttered with the mix of illustrative styles.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini provides a superior graphic design layout with perfect text legibility and a very consistent vintage feel, making it immediately usable as an invitation. Wan 2.5 (Preview) has much stronger artistic details and dynamic lighting, but its text placement and font choices are less polished for a professional-looking poster.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
GPT Image 1 Mini
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully added a thick head of hair as requested.
  • + Maintains the general color palette of the original.
  • Failed to preserve facial features, significantly altering the subject's nose, eyes, and brow structure.
  • The hair texture looks somewhat blocky and lacks fine-grained realism at the edges.
  • Altered the position and shape of the glasses.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent source preservation, keeping the facial features and expression nearly identical to the original.
  • + High-quality realistic hair texture and natural integration with the sideburns.
  • + Preserved the background and clothing details perfectly.
  • The hairline transition on the forehead is slightly sharp, though still realistic.

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the clear winner as it perfectly followed the instructions to preserve the subject's facial features while adding realistic hair. GPT Image 1 Mini essentially generated a new person who looks vaguely similar, failing the 'source preservation' aspect of the editing task.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent adherence to the 45-degree isometric perspective.
  • + Beautiful text rendering and clean layout.
  • + The textures perfectly capture the requested soft refined 3D cartoon style.
  • The rice grains are slightly less defined compared to the other model.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + High clarity on the individual rice grains.
  • + Accurate text rendering and placement.
  • + Soft, pleasing lighting.
  • Failed to capture the requested 45-degree isometric perspective, opting for a lower eye-level view.
  • The composition feels slightly more generic and less like a miniature diorama.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini captured the prompt's stylistic requirements perfectly, especially the isometric perspective and the 3D miniature aesthetic. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a high-quality image with excellent texture on the rice, it failed to follow the specific camera angle requested.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent character likeness to the source person within the caricature style.
  • + Charming hand-drawn pencil/crayon aesthetic that feels authentic to a street caricature.
  • + Perfectly integrates the hockey puck and stick alongside the news desk theme.
  • The 'NEWS' text is a bit generic compared to a full studio environment.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Creative use of a hockey jersey on one of the dogs and a game on the monitor.
  • + High-contrast digital vector style that is very clean.
  • + Clearly incorporates all requested elements in a vibrant composition.
  • The facial likeness is significantly weaker than Model A, appearing more generic.
  • The hand holding the microphone is poorly rendered with an incorrect finger count/structure.
  • The large white border and floating composition feel less like a cohesive scene.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini is the clear winner because it maintains a much stronger facial resemblance to the woman in the source image while delivering a classic caricature art style. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) adds clever details like the dog in a jersey, its failure on the facial likeness and the mangled hand holding the microphone makes it a less successful edit.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent anatomical realism for all four animals.
  • + Beautifully soft, naturalistic lighting that feels cohesive with the scene.
  • + The fox kit has a very realistic, earthy appearance.
  • The 'god rays' are a bit subtle compared to the other model.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Stronger adherence to 'god rays' and 'dew sparkles' with very bright lighting.
  • + High contrast and vibrant colors that make the subjects pop.
  • The fox's eyes appear unnaturally blue/glowing, almost alien.
  • The kitten's proportions feel slightly off, with a very long neck and small head.
  • The dew drops look more like floating glass spheres than natural dew.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini provides a much more photorealistic and grounded scene, with excellent anatomical accuracy and soft, convincing fur textures. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) is more vibrant and captures the specific lighting effects like dew and rays more aggressively, it suffers from uncanny valley effects in the fox's eyes and awkward animal proportions.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Successfully captures a hand-painted, soft texture reminiscent of colored pencils or pastels.
  • + Maintains the warm, nostalgic color palette requested.
  • + Strongly preserves the specific facial expressions from the original meme.
  • The style feels more like a children's book illustration than the specific Studio Ghibli anime aesthetic.
  • The colors are a bit washed out and lack contrast.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli character design style and cel-shading.
  • + Effectively uses dreamy lighting and floating leaves to enhance the mood.
  • + Maintains the exact composition of the source image while translating it into high-quality anime art.
  • The facial expressions are slightly softened compared to the intensity of the original meme.

Verdict: While GPT Image 1 Mini provides a lovely hand-textured look, Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the clear winner for its perfect execution of the Studio Ghibli style. Wan 2.5 (Preview) manages to transform the image into a high-quality anime cel that feels authentic to the requested studio's aesthetic while maintaining excellent source preservation.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
GPT Image 1 Mini
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Strong prompt adherence regarding the flying leaves
  • + Significant hair movement creates a clear sense of dynamic motion
  • Fails to preserve the original subject's face, making it look like a different person
  • Alters background elements like the bridge significantly

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the woman's face and original features
  • + Realistic hair motion that looks integrated into the original scene
  • + Uses green leaves that match the existing foliage colors
  • The flying leaves look somewhat like floating digital elements rather than blowing naturally

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the better choice for this task because it successfully applies the motion edits while keeping the subject's face and identity intact. GPT Image 1 Mini effectively captures the requested 'energetic' feel, but it essentially regenerates a new person and scene, failing the 'source preservation' aspect of the editing challenge.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent typography rendering with correct accent marks
  • + Clearer texture within the gold/brown elements
  • + Good use of the Est. 1720 banner as requested
  • Completely ignored the request for a 'light background'
  • The black background creates high contrast that feels more modern than 'vintage minimalist'

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Adhered perfectly to the 'light background' request
  • + Superior vector emblem style with clean lines
  • + Excellent paper texture and vintage atmosphere
  • The accent mark on 'Caffè' is slightly misplaced/oversized compared to standard typography
  • The cloche handle is slightly off-center

Verdict: Wan 2.5 (Preview) followed the prompt instructions much more accurately, specifically concerning the light background and vintage texture requirements. While GPT Image 1 Mini has strong typography, it failed a significant portion of the stylistic prompt by delivering a high-contrast image on a black background.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

GPT Image 1 Mini
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

GPT Image 1 Mini

  • + Excellent text legibility and spelling for all labels.
  • + Clean, consistent vector icon style that matches the requested flat aesthetic.
  • The 'Translunar' icon is an abstract scribble that doesn't clearly represent a trajectory.
  • The layout is somewhat fragmented and lacks a cohesive background.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Sophisticated composition with a dark navy background that feels more space-themed.
  • + Includes clever details like the crew portraits with names and a 'Tranquility' marker.
  • Failed to provide separate icons or numbered steps for Descent and Landing.
  • The 'Translunar' label is placed next to a large moon, which is confusing within the sequence of the infographic.

Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini adhered much more strictly to the specific 6-step structure requested in the prompt, resulting in a more functional infographic. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a more visually striking poster with higher artistic detail, it failed to separate the final stages of the mission and had slightly less coherent icon placement.

Next steps

Explore each model