GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI vs Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect adherence to the spatial requirements of the prompt.
• + Higher photographic realism with soft, natural lighting.
• + Clean composition with a clear view of the plant through the glass.

• − The blue sphere appears slightly larger than a 'small' sphere.
• − The book is floating slightly above the glass rim rather than resting flat.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + High clarity and sharp details on the wooden surface and glass edges.
• + Accurate interpretation of the plant being behind the cube.

• − Failed to place the red book on top of the cube, placing it underneath instead.
• − The lighting is harsh and direct rather than the requested 'soft window light'.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh
• + Highly realistic skin texture and facial lighting
• + Strong cinematic atmosphere with natural, muted colors

• − The white car in the background lacks the requested motion blur
• − Anatomical issues with how the man's hands are interacting with the rear wheel spokes

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Better adherence to the motion blur request for passing vehicles
• + Captures the scale of a Japanese street with the bus and signage
• + Vibrant colors and convincing wet pavement reflections

• − The 'rain' looks like static vertical lines rather than realistic droplets
• − The bicycle geometry is broken (seat post missing, frame alignment)
• − Overall image has a slightly AI-processed 'sheen' that ignores the 'no stylization' request

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent depiction of warm torchlight reflecting off the metal surfaces.
• + Highly detailed skin texture with convincing dirt and aging.
• + The ornate engraving on the plate armor is complex and aesthetically pleasing.

• − Missed the request for small beads in the braided hair.
• − The armor engraving lacks some of the physical depth/relief found in the competitor.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Very crisp skin texture and striking, lifelike eyes.
• + Excellent implementation of braided hair as requested.
• + The 'battle-worn' aesthetic is strong with visible dirt and high-contrast armor detailing.

• − The 'warm torchlight' lighting is much weaker and less atmospheric than Model A.
• − Lacks the requested 'beads' in the hair.
• − The metal of the armor looks slightly flat or overly bright in some areas despite being battle-worn.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect text rendering of the requested headers
• + Clean and highly professional grid layout that matches the 'modern minimalist' prompt
• + High-quality, distinct food photos that correspond to the sections

• − Lack of menu items or descriptions under the section headers
• − Slightly less 'vibrant' than a typical casual dining menu

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + More comprehensive layout featuring actual menu pricing and item lines
• + Includes a wider variety of food imagery in the grid
• + Good use of white space and vertical design

• − Poor typography with significant spelling errors (e.g., 'APPETIZRS', 'MAIMAES')
• − The grid layout feels a bit cluttered and overlaps the main menu column
• − Fails to accurately follow the 'Pizza' section header requirement

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent integration of all three requested text elements with the correct glowing effect.
• + Clear 'exploded' layout showing distinct mid-air suspension of layers.
• + Very high photorealistic texture on the bun and patty.

• − The lighting on the burger is slightly flat compared to the intense background.
• − The splash of sauce is a bit minimal.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Intense, dynamic lighting and high-quality fire effects.
• + Rich, glistening textures on the melted cheese and patties.

• − Failed to include any of the requested text or the starburst element.
• − Does not show an 'exploded' view; the burger is mostly assembled.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent text rendering with perfect spelling of the entire requested menu.
• + Highly realistic chalk texture with dusty, hand-drawn edges.
• + Strict adherence to the 2026 date and specific price points.

• − The Title is in print capitals rather than the requested 'elegant cursive'.
• − The composition is a tight crop rather than showing the full 'cozy café' environment.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Better environmental context showing the café interior and furniture.
• + Includes decorative elements like chalk borders and frames.

• − Severe text artifacts and multiple spelling errors (e.g., 'TODAAY', 'Cholcalte', 'Cockies').
• − Failed the date requirement, showing 2024 instead of 2026.
• − The text style looks like a digital brush rather than authentic hand-lettered chalk.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent anatomical detail on the horse
• + High visual clarity and cinematic lighting
• + Balanced composition with a clear focal point

• − Failed the negative constraint/logic check as the astronaut is on top, not the horse

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Dynamic sense of movement and scale with the planet background
• + Highly detailed spacesuit and horse tack textures
• + Good use of color and atmospheric effects

• − Failed the specific positional instruction that the horse should be on top
• − The horse's muzzle and bridle area are slightly garbled

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Successfully includes the human passenger in the back seat looking at a phone.
• + The capybara's expression and posture perfectly match the 'professional driver' request.
• + Excellent cinematic lighting that feels photorealistic for a night scene.

• − The capybara only has one paw clearly on the steering wheel, while the prompt requested both.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + The foreground capybara has very sharp, detailed fur texture.
• + Vibrant colors on the clothing and car exterior.

• − Completely failed to include the human businesswoman in the back seat.
• − The anatomy of the capybara's hands/paws is distorted and unrealistic.
• − The capybara appears to be wearing human pants, which was not requested.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested details.
• + Clean and cohesive vintage grainy aesthetic.
• + Excellent layout balance with strong central focus.

• − Lighting is a bit flat compared to the requested 'cinematic' style.
• − The border is very subtle, almost blending into the darkness.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Highly detailed parchment texture with torn edges.
• + Dynamic composition with a bright moon and twisted trees.
• + Atmospheric lighting and color contrast.

• − Failed to include the date, time, and location details entirely.
• − The text in the scroll banner contains gibberish characters.
• − Incorrect layout with the jack-o-lantern not being the central focus.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent adherence to the 'cartoon' and 'soft refined texture' style requirements.
• + Perfectly rendered text and flag exactly as requested in the prompt.
• + Ultra-clean composition with the specified solid light blue background and centered layout.

• − The textures are perhaps too simplified or 'plastic' to be considered realistic PBR materials.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Higher detail in sushi modeling and more complex arrangement.
• + Uses a more sophisticated dark diorama base with realistic surface textures.
• + Includes more variety of sushi types.

• − Failed to place the text 'at top-center' as requested, opting for a 3D sign in the scene.
• − The composition feels cluttered and lacks the 'minimal' aesthetic requested.
• − Chopsticks are floating awkwardly and the background has a textured grain rather than being 'solid'.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent anatomical accuracy for all four animals.
• + Rich, tactile fur texture and clear, expressive eyes.
• + Clearer rendering of the 'god rays' and sunrise lighting mentioned in the prompt.

• − Composition feels a bit crowded towards the edges.
• − Butterflies appear slightly flat compared to the animals.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Dynamic composition with a nice sense of movement and 'tumbling'.
• + Good use of bokeh and depth of field in the foreground/background.
• + Inclusion of plenty of butterflies to match the 'playfully chasing' prompt.

• − The kitten has anatomically incorrect large, pointed fox-like ears.
• − Lower overall sharpness and fine detail in the fur textures.
• − Lighting feels a bit washed out in the center.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent typography and spelling of the main brand name.
• + Precise execution of the cloche dome illustration with clean lines.
• + High-contrast vector style that would work well for physical branding.

• − Ignored the request for a light background, providing a black one instead.
• − The texture is very subtle, almost appearing as noise.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Followed the background and color palette instructions perfectly.
• + Includes the subtle paper-like texture and corner flourishes requested in the vintage prompt.
• + Captures a more authentic 'logo on menu' aesthetic.

• − Spelling error in the brand name ('Cafféé' instead of 'Caffè').
• − The cloche dome illustration is slightly messy and disconnected.
• − The banner contains the name instead of the date, reversing the prompt request.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors
• + Accurately follows the specific 6-step logical sequence requested
• + Clean, consistent vector style that matches the modern infographic prompt

• − The 'Translunar' icon is just a scribble and doesn't clearly represent a trajectory
• − The composition is missing the 'crew' details at the bottom of the frame

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

• + Strong NASA-inspired color palette and atmospheric feel
• + Good use of space with detailed lunar surface illustration

• − Fails to follow the 6-step instruction entirely
• − Contains significant text gibberish and artifacts
• − Depicts a space shuttle instead of the requested Saturn V rocket