OpenAI's cost-effective image generation model for when image quality isn't the top priority
Settled by community votes across 7 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
GPT Image 1 Mini
#13 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Qwen Image Edit 2509
#32 of 32 in Image Editing
Where the votes landed
GPT Image 1 Mini
0%
win rate
Ties
0%
Qwen Image Edit 2509
0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Man and Car in California
Editing“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + Successfully merges the exact man and his unique outfit from the source image into the car.
- + Maintains high resolution and realistic lighting that matches the sunset coastline.
- + The car remains very close to the original source model with accurate interior details.
- − The scale of the man relative to the car is slightly too large.
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Excellent depiction of the California coastline and cinematic motion blur.
- + The composition and perspective of the car on the road are very natural.
- − Fails to use the specific man from the source image, replacing him with a generic figure.
- − The man is barely visible and the distinct clothing from the source is lost.
Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini is the clear winner as it successfully performed the complex task of taking two distinct subjects (the man and the car) and merging them into a new environment while preserving their specific details. Qwen Image Edit 2509 created a beautiful scene but failed the core requirement of the edit by not using the specific person provided in the source image.
Pose & Character Mashup
Editing“Use Image 1 as the exact pose reference and Image 2 as the character reference. Recreate the person/character from Image 2 in the exact dynamic pose and body position from Image 1. Keep the exact face, hair, clothing style/details, and expression from Image 2. Match the lighting and environment of Image 1. The final image must show the character from Image 2 performing the precise action/pose from Image 1 with perfect anatomy and natural integration.”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + Successfully integrated character features like the sunglasses, scarf, and black clothing from Image 2.
- + Maintained the yellow background and red ottoman from Image 1.
- + Reasonable face and hair similarity to the character in Image 2.
- − Failed to match the exact dynamic pose, choosing a much simpler kneeling position instead.
- − The anatomy of the feet and legs is slightly awkward.
- − Lost the specific 'sculptural' quality of the pose from the source image.
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Perfectly preserved the pose and environment from Image 1.
- − Completely failed to incorporate the character from Image 2.
- − Produced a filtered version of Image 1 without any of the requested edits.
- − Ignored all clothing and facial features of the secondary reference.
Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini is the clear winner because it actually attempted the complex task of merging the two images, successfully transferring the clothing and features of the man in Image 2 onto a figure in the environment of Image 1. While it failed to replicate the exact pose, Qwen Image Edit 2509 failed the edit entirely by returning the source image with a slight filter, ignoring the character reference completely.
Outfit Transfer Challenge
Editing“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + Successfully replicates the specific plaid pattern and coat style from Image 2.
- + Maintains very high visual quality and realistic lighting/fabric textures.
- + Faithfully reproduces the vitiligo pattern on the hands and face.
- − Changes the person's pose and camera angle significantly rather than editing the source.
- − The face, while resembling the man in Image 1, has been regenerated and is not an exact match.
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Correctly preserves the original composition, pose, and background from Image 1.
- + Accurately includes accessories like sunglasses and rings found in Image 2.
- − The face has been significantly altered to look more like the man in Image 2.
- − Poor edge blending where the new head choice meets the original hair line.
- − Lower overall resolution and clarity compared to the other model.
Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini creates a more aesthetically pleasing and high-quality image, but it fails as an edit because it completely recreates the scene in a new pose rather than using Image 1 as a base. Qwen Image Edit 2509 follows the instruction to keep Image 1 as the base much better, but it fails to preserve the subject's exact face and suffers from jarring artifacts around the head and hair. GPT Image 1 Mini is the better image, but both struggled with the 'Image Editing' constraint of face/pose preservation.
Bald man challenge
Image Editing“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + The hair has a very natural, matte texture that matches the environment.
- + The transition between the forehead and the added hair is believable.
- − The facial features were slightly altered, making the man look younger and changing his eye shape.
- − The glasses were modified significantly from the source image.
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Perfect preservation of the original facial features, glasses, and background.
- + High-resolution hair strands that match the lighting of the scene.
- − The hair style is a bit overly groomed and 'wavy' for the rugged setting.
- − The hair sits slightly high on the head, though still within acceptable limits.
Verdict: Qwen Image Edit 2509 is the clear winner as it successfully adds the requested hair while perfectly preserving the identity, glasses, and environment of the source image. GPT Image 1 Mini generates a natural-looking head of hair but fails the preservation criteria by altering the person's face and eyewear.
Over-the-top cartoon caricature
Editing“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + Excellent caricature style with great hand-drawn textures.
- + Captures all requested elements: anchor desk, dog, and hockey stick/puck clearly.
- + Maintains strong facial resemblance to the source image while exaggerating features.
- − The composition is a bit flat and static compared to Model B.
- − The news background is very simple.
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Very creative composition combining a TV studio with a hockey rink.
- + Strong preservation of the source image's pose and denim outfit.
- + Dynamic 'selfie' perspective that mirrors the original photo's framing.
- − The dog is very small and lacks the 'love for dogs' emphasis requested.
- − Text in the speech bubble and on the monitors is nonsensical gibberish.
- − The face preservation is slightly weaker, losing some of the specific character of the original person's eyes.
Verdict: GPT Image 1 Mini captures the requested themes (TV anchor, dog, hockey) with better balance and a more appealing hand-drawn artistic style. While Qwen Image Edit 2509 has a more creative setting by placing the studio on ice, it fails to prioritize the dog element and contains distracting gibberish text.
Studio Ghibli Anime Style
Editing“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + Successfully captures a hand-painted, soft texture reminiscent of colored pencils or pastels.
- + Maintains the facial expressions and positions of all three characters perfectly.
- + Excellent use of warm, nostalgic lighting that blends the figures into the environment.
- − The color of the foreground dress is still very saturated red rather than Ghibli-style pastel pink/red.
- − The detail in the background buildings is extremely simplified compared to the source.
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Clean cel-shaded anime aesthetic that definitely feels like an illustration.
- + Excellent preservation of background details like the red bus and specific buildings.
- + The color palette is lightened and softened to a pastel range as requested.
- − The line art is a bit too sharp and digital to truly feel like a hand-painted Ghibli work.
- − Character faces have been slightly homogenized into a generic anime style, losing some of the specific likeness of the original meme.
Verdict: Both models did an excellent job of preserving the composition of the iconic 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme while applying the requested style. GPT Image 1 Mini leans into a hand-painted, textured look that feels more artistic and nostalgic, while Qwen Image Edit 2509 creates a cleaner, more readable anime illustration that better retains background elements. GPT Image 1 Mini is the likely winner for better capturing the 'soul' and lighting of a Ghibli-inspired scene.
Golden Hour Stroll
Image Editing“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”
AI Judge Analysis
GPT Image 1 Mini
- + Excellent integration of flying leaves with shadows on the ground
- + Realistic hair movement and wind-blown texture
- + Maintains strong consistency with the woman's facial features from the original image
- − The dog's tail is slightly altered from the original
- − Large leaves in the foreground are a bit blurry compared to the rest of the scene
Qwen Image Edit 2509
- + Successfully adds highly dynamic, flowing hair effects
- + Leaves are colorful and diverse in shape
- + Preserves the dog and background elements with high fidelity
- − The hair has a slightly 'drawn-on' or plastic appearance with many fine, separate strands
- − Leaves lack shadows and feel somewhat like flat 2D overlays rather than inhabiting the 3D space
Verdict: Both models followed the instructions well, but GPT Image 1 Mini feels more cohesive as a single photograph because it correctly renders shadows for the flying leaves and provides more realistic hair texture. Qwen Image Edit 2509 creates a very dramatic wind effect, but the leaves look like stickers applied over the image rather than being integrated into the lighting of the scene.
Explore each model
Alibaba's Qwen image editing model for instruction-based image modifications and transformations