GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI vs GPT Image 2 OpenAI

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Accurately depicts the plant behind the glass with realistic distortion.
• + Clear soft lighting that matches the requested direction.
• + Excellent material rendering for the wood and glass edges.

• − The plant is very blurry compared to the foreground.
• − The book is slightly oversized for the cube's top surface.

GPT Image 2

• + Superior photographic texture on the red book cover.
• + Sharp focus throughout the composition, including the plant leaves.
• + Very strong adherence to all spatial requirements.

• − The window framing on the left is a bit tight and cuts off abruptly.
• − The blue sphere's shadow is slightly less soft than the requested 'soft window light' implies.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent skin texture and realistic lighting
• + Convincing shallow depth of field
• + Emotional and cinematic atmosphere

• − Anatomical issues with the hands blending into the bike frame
• − Missing the wider street context requested in the 'candid street photo' prompt

GPT Image 2

• + Stronger adherence to 'candid street photo' with wider framing
• + Accurate depiction of a Japanese urban environment
• + Good inclusion of motion blur and wet pavement reflections

• − Slightly less realistic skin texture compared to Model A
• − Composition is a bit cluttered with the foreground sign and post

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent depiction of warm torchlight reflecting on metal surfaces
• + Highly detailed engraving on the plate armor
• + Strong adherence to the battle-worn skin texture and scars

• − Missed the request for small beads in the hair braids
• − The leather straps are present but lack the extreme textural detail of Model B

GPT Image 2

• + Includes beads in the hair braids as requested
• + Incredible lifelike detail in the eyes and skin texture
• + Excellent material definition on the leather straps and underlayer

• − Lighting feels more like natural daylight with a small warm backlight rather than a primary torchlight focus
• − The bokeh sparks are very subtle compared to Model A

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent typography rendering with zero spelling errors
• + Follows the grid layout requirement for food photos
• + High contrast and bold use of sans-serif fonts

• − The left side of the menu is completely blank with no item descriptions or prices
• − Food photography looks slightly more artificial/stock-like

GPT Image 2

• + Complete, functional menu design with descriptions and pricing
• + Vibrant accents and professional branding make it look like a real-world design
• + High quality food photography that appears appetizing and consistent

• − Small text suffers from minor legibility issues common in AI generation
• − Layout is more complex than the 'minimalist' request suggests

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent typography legibility and spacing
• + Clean, centered composition
• + Realistic food textures with a professional studio lighting feel

• − Static appearance of the burger components
• − Very simple, flat background

GPT Image 2

• + Outstanding dynamic motion and energy with flying splashes and angled components
• + Stunning fiery background and particle effects
• + Highly detailed food rendering including onions and sauce splashes not explicitly in the prompt

• − More cluttered composition makes the text slightly harder to read at a glance
• − The 'Limited Time Only' text box is a bit basic compared to the rest of the graphics

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent text legibility and alignment.
• + Accurate spelling of all requested menu items.

• − The font appears too uniform and digital, missing the 'handwritten' request.
• − Lacks the 'cozy café' environmental context requested.

GPT Image 2

• + Successfully captures the elegant cursive and handwritten chalk texture.
• + Provides a superior café atmosphere with lighting and background details.

• − The date '2026' is slightly less crisp than other text.
• − Minor smudging on the board reduces legibility of smaller letters.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Matches the background and lighting of the source image perfectly.
• + Maintains the likeness of the individual from Image 2.
• + Good clothing detail preservation including the scarf pattern.

• − Fails to replicate the specific crossed-leg pose from Image 1.
• − Only shows one foot on the stool, altering the dynamic balance of the original pose.
• − The right arm/hand is positioned differently than the reference.

GPT Image 2

• + Successfully replicates the complex crossed-leg pose from Image 1.
• + Preserves the character's facial features and accessories with high accuracy.
• + Incorporates the specific scarf and clothing from Image 2 while fitting the pose.

• − The character's head is tilted slightly differently than Image 1's extreme angle.
• − Small anatomy artifact where the left hand retains red fingernails from the woman in Image 1.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and composition.
• + Highly detailed texture on the space suit and horse's coat.

• − Completely failed the semantic instruction to have the horse on top.
• − Standard interpretation of the prompt without the requested surreal reversal.

GPT Image 2

• + Successfully followed the difficult 'horse on top' instruction.
• + Creates a truly surreal and humorous image as requested.
• + Good texture on the moon surface and space suit.

• − The transition where the horse's body meets the astronaut is anatomically messy.
• − The leather straps are floating and disconnected in several places.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent replication of the outfit details including the coat, scarf pattern, and watch.
• + Successfully renders vitiligo patterns on the hands and arms to match the subject's face.
• + Good integration of the full body in the environment.

• − Fails to keep the face and hair completely unchanged as requested.
• − The posture and facial orientation of the person were altered significantly.

GPT Image 2

• + Successfully keeps the person's exact face and hair completely unchanged.
• + Maintains the original head tilt and leaning pose of the subject while applying the clothing.
• + Accurately replicates the layers and accessories from Image 2.

• − The transition between the neck and the clothing has a slightly unnatural sharpness.
• − The skin visibility is limited to the face, missing the opportunity to show skin patterns on the hands.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent photorealism in the capybara's fur and the lighting of the scene.
• + Strong cinematic composition with a deeper depth of field that emphasizes the character's expression.
• + Follows the prompt about the driver's jacket and cap style effectively.

• − The capybara only has one hand clearly visible on the steering wheel, whereas the prompt asked for both.

GPT Image 2

• + Follows the prompt for 'both front paws on the steering wheel' more accurately.
• + The background cityscape is more recognizable as a city environment with visible shop signs and rain effects.
• + The capybara's hat includes a logical 'T' logo for taxi.

• − The capybara's right paw is fused awkwardly with the steering wheel texture.
• − The lighting is slightly flatter and feels less like a cinematic film still compared to the other image.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent legibility and clean text layout
• + Moody cinematic lighting on the central pumpkin
• + Perfectly followed the request for a dark parchment texture

• − Simple composition with a lot of empty space
• − The scroll banner is somewhat plain compared to the rest of the art

GPT Image 2

• + Intricate and detailed border design with webs and thorns
• + Strong gothic font choice that fits the vintage aesthetic
• + Highly creative background including the NYC cityscape and arches as requested

• − Text density makes the small banner slightly harder to read
• − The top border is quite busy, distracting from the central title

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Clean and elegant minimalist composition
• + Excellent text integration and high-quality type rendering
• + Smooth, refined materials that perfectly match the 'soft 3D cartoon' aesthetic

• − The diorama base is extremely simple, barely feeling like a diorama
• − Lacks a bit of the variety one might expect from a 'miniature scene'

GPT Image 2

• + Superb interpretation of a miniature diorama with intricate details like the lantern and stone base
• + Highly realistic PBR material textures for the sushi fish and rice
• + Dynamic 3D text style that pops from the background

• − Failed the 'minimal garnish' request by including a complex garden scene and many extra items
• − Individual rice grains look slightly more like standard food photography than the requested '3D cartoon' style

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent action-oriented composition with all animals jumping or running.
• + Clean and simple background that makes the subjects pop.
• + Very clear, large expressive eyes on the puppy and fox.

• − The kitten looks slightly stiff and lacks a 'tumbling' or playful posture compared to the others.
• − The lighting feels a bit more flat and less atmospheric than the competitor.

GPT Image 2

• + Beautiful atmospheric lighting with clearly defined 'god rays' and warm golden hour glow.
• + Dynamic interaction with the kitten actively reaching for a butterfly.
• + High level of detail in the grass and wildflowers, including dew-like sparkles.

• − The puppy's front left paw is anatomically awkward and lacks defined toes.
• − The bunny is somewhat obscured and less 'playful' in its pose compared to the other animals.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Excellent typography with correct accent usage on 'Caffè'.
• + Clean, high-contrast vector style.
• + Accurate text rendering for the requested banner and name.

• − Failed the requirement for a 'light background' by using a solid black background.
• − The banner is more of a horizontal block rather than a flowing banner style.

GPT Image 2

• + Perfect adherence to the 'light background' and 'cream tones' request.
• + Sophisticated vintage cross-hatching and texture details.
• + Elegant logo composition with a classic heraldic frame.

• − The Cloche is slightly off-center within the frame.
• − The 'E' in 'Caffè' has a slightly unconventional accent mark shape compared to standard typography.

GPT Image 1 Mini

• + Successfully follows the requested flat-vector style with crisp outlines.
• + Accurately represents all 6 requested steps in the infographic sequence.
• + Adheres strictly to the requested muted color palette.

• − The composition is messy, with trajectory lines overlapping text and icons in a confusing way.
• − Text is cut off at the bottom of the image frame.
• − Iconography is somewhat inconsistent in line weight and level of abstraction.

GPT Image 2

• + Excellent layout with clear headers, sections, and professional typography.
• + Includes very high-quality icons and detailed illustrations for each stage.
• + Features perfect spelling and high-resolution rendering of the crew and landing site.

• − The style leans more toward detailed 3D/realistic illustration rather than the requested 'flat-vector' style.
• − The scale of the Saturn V and Earth orbit icons creates a slightly crowded look in those specific panels.