Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

Nano Banana Google Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 18 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

Nano Banana

23.8 arena score

#21 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

23.4 arena score

#27 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

Nano Banana

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 18

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'behind' spatial instruction for the plant
  • + Realistic soft lighting with dust motes and shadows
  • + Consistent materials on the cube and book
  • The sphere is floating unnaturally inside the cube
  • The cube edges are very thick, bordering on a solid block rather than a hollow box

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + High resolution and realistic textures on the book and table
  • + Realistic physics with the sphere resting on the bottom of the cube
  • + Clean reflections on the glass surfaces
  • The plant is partially to the side rather than fully behind for viewing through the cube
  • The blue sphere is quite large for the prompt 'small blue sphere'

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt accurately, but Nano Banana captured the specific spatial requirement of seeing the plant through the glass much better. However, Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a more visually polished image with better material rendering and more natural physics, as the sphere sits on the surface rather than floating. Nano Banana's lighting and atmosphere are slightly more artistic, though Wan 2.5 feels more like a high-end photograph.

Man and Car in California

Editing
Edit instruction

“Make a photo of the man driving the car down the California coastline”

Source
Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent source car preservation, maintaining the specific details and silhouette of the Rolls-Royce
  • + Realistic lighting and motion blur on the wheels/road
  • + Captures the iconic Big Sur style California coastline accurately
  • The driver's face is quite small and lacks detail
  • The driver is positioned slightly too far to the right for a standard driver's seat position

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully incorporates palm trees and coastal scenery characteristic of California
  • + Good contrast and vibrant color palette
  • + Accurately places the driver behind the wheel
  • The car's proportions are slightly altered, particularly around the rear and trunk area
  • The driver's appearance is less identifiable as the man from the source image compared to model A
  • Minor artifacting on the palm tree textures

Verdict: Nano Banana followed the instructions more effectively by precisely preserving the model of the car from the source image while placing it into a convincing Big Sur-style coastline. Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a high-quality image, but slightly more distortion occurred to the car's body shape and the driver's head is less distinct.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent mood and cinematic lighting.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'light rain' and 'wet pavement' aspects with realistic reflections.
  • + Better integration of the subject into the environment.
  • The bike anatomy is slightly distorted, especially the frame/handlebar connection.
  • Lacks the requested 'motion blur from passing cars' as the background cars appear frozen.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Exceptional level of detail in skin texture and facial features.
  • + Realistic 'candid' interaction with tools shown on the ground.
  • + Accurate red bicycle design and high-quality bokeh.
  • The bike's kickstand and shadows on the ground are physically nonsensical.
  • The overall lighting feels a bit too bright for a rainy day scenario.
  • Missing the requested 'motion blur from passing cars'.

Verdict: Both models captured the core prompt well, but Nano Banana (Model A) provided a much more atmospheric and cinematic result that truly felt like a rainy evening in Japan. While Wan 2.5 (Model B) had superior fine detail in the man's face and hands, the physics errors in the bicycle's kickstand and the overly bright lighting made it feel less cohesive than Nano Banana.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent depiction of ornate, relief-carved plate armor
  • + Highly realistic facial features and skin texture
  • + Strong use of warm lighting and background bokeh for atmosphere
  • The 'small beads' in the hair requested in the prompt are metallic rings rather than beads
  • The background torches look slightly artificial

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'small beads' in the hair request
  • + Exceptional realism in the cloth underlayer and leather textures
  • + Masterful cinematic lighting and shallow depth of field
  • The character looks somewhat young for a 'battle-worn' paladin
  • The armor details, while good, feel slightly less 'ornate' than Model A

Verdict: Both models performed exceptionally well, but Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the winner due to its superior realism and stricter adherence to specific prompt details like the small beads and the distressed texture of the cloth underlayer. Nano Banana produced a more stereotypical hero aesthetic with heavier engraving on the armor, but Wan 2.5 (Preview) achieved a more lifelike, cinematic quality in the eyes and skin.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent typography with nearly perfect spelling
  • + Clean and professional layout that looks like a real-world document
  • + Vibrant accents and high-quality food photography
  • The grid of photos includes items like pancakes which do not match the savory menu items below
  • Minor spelling error in 'APPETIERS'

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Strong visual use of color accents to separate sections
  • + High-quality, consistent food styling across all images
  • Poor text rendering with numerous gibberish words and spelling errors
  • The layout is cluttered and the text is difficult to read
  • The 'Pizza' and 'Mains' sections include photos that don't match the category labels

Verdict: Nano Banana is the clear winner as it produces a functional, professional-looking menu with legible text and a logical layout. Wan 2.5 (Preview) struggles significantly with text generation and creates a cluttered design that would require extensive editing to be usable.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent typography rendering with consistent fiery glow effects.
  • + Highly detailed and photorealistic food textures, especially the grill marks on the patty.
  • + Perfect adherence to all prompt elements including the starburst and specific currency.
  • The composition feels slightly more static compared to the flow of Model B.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Dynamic composition with a strong sense of motion and 'exploding' components.
  • + Creative dripping effect on the main title that enhances the fiery theme.
  • + High contrast and vibrant colors that make the ad pop.
  • The bun texture looks slightly less realistic than Model A's.
  • Lacks the grounded environment (lava floor) present in Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, producing high-quality advertisements with accurate text and fiery effects. Nano Banana stands out for its superior photorealism in the food textures and consistent typography, while Wan 2.5 (Preview) offers a more dynamic sense of movement and bold colors. Nano Banana is the subtle winner for its technical precision in food photography detail.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent text rendering with perfect spelling across all items.
  • + Highly realistic chalk texture and thin, natural handwriting style.
  • + Great perspective and integration with the surrounding cafe environment.
  • The title is in a print-script hybrid rather than a clearly distinct 'elegant cursive' as requested.
  • The wooden frame texture is slightly repetitive.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Beautiful, bold chalk texture with realistic smudges and wiping marks.
  • + Highly stylized handwriting that feels authentic to a cafe chalkboard.
  • + Good adherence to the requested price points and menu items.
  • Failed to include 'Herbs' in the second menu item, providing only 'Lemon & $28'.
  • The title is in a bold sans-serif style rather than elegant cursive.
  • Text on the bottom line becomes slightly garbled and less legible.

Verdict: Nano Banana is the superior choice because it successfully rendered every word of the complex menu prompt accurately, including the full 'Lemon & Herbs' description which Wan 2.5 (Preview) partially omitted. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) had a more artistic chalk-smudge aesthetic, Nano Banana's clarity, spelling precision, and consistent letter forms make it more effective for a text-heavy challenge.

Outfit Transfer Challenge

Editing
Edit instruction

“Use Image 1 as the base person. Dress them in the exact elaborate outfit from Image 2 (including all layers, accessories, jewelry, and shoes). Carefully adapt the clothing to the body shape and pose in Image 1 while maintaining realistic fabric behavior, correct proportions, and perfect lighting/shadow matching. Keep the person’s exact face, hair, and background completely unchanged.”

Source
Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent preservation of the subject's face, hair, and vitiligo skin patterns
  • + Good lighting integration on the coat fabric
  • Failed to fully dress the subject, leaving the chest bare
  • Modified the scarf color from green to red
  • Poor garment placement that makes the coat appear to be floating

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Successfully applied the entire outfit including the coat, scarf, watch, and ring
  • + Maintained the exact color and pattern of the scarf from Image 2
  • + Excellent lighting and fabric rendering that fits the scene
  • Completely failed to preserve the source person's identity, replacing his face and removing his vitiligo
  • Removed the sand texture from the subject's face

Verdict: This comparison represents a classic failure in complex image editing: Nano Banana preserved the subject's identity perfectly but failed to apply the edit (clothing) correctly, while Wan 2.5 applied the clothing perfectly but completely lost the subject's identity. Nano Banana is slightly better as an edit because it retains the original hair and background, whereas Wan 2.5 effectively just pasted the man from Image 2 into the background of Image 1.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Natural cinematic lighting and texture
  • + Excellent capybara fur and jacket detail
  • + Realistic side-view composition

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Stronger adherence to the 'back seat' requirement for the passenger
  • + Clearer outdoor New York atmosphere
  • + Sharp focus and vibrant colors
  • Capybara paws/hands look slightly human-like and uncanny
  • The exterior perspective of the car looks a bit disjointed from the interior POV

Verdict: Nano Banana produces a more photorealistic and aesthetically pleasing image with better lighting, though it fails to place the passenger in the back seat as requested. Wan 2.5 (Preview) follows the spatial instructions perfectly, placing the woman in the back and the capybara in the front, but the capybara's hands are somewhat distorted and the overall look is more digital.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent text rendering with no spelling errors across all requested fields.
  • + Very intricate border of thorns and webs that creates a high-quality vintage frame effect.
  • + Superior cinematic lighting and atmosphere that feels more 'polished' as requested.
  • The jack-o-lantern is a bit small within the composition relative to the large border.
  • The parchment texture is mostly relegated to the very outer edge.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Dynamic and creative central illustration with flames visible inside the jack-o-lantern.
  • + Strong use of the parchment texture across the entire background.
  • + Good layout of elements with a clear hierarchy of visual information.
  • Minor spelling error in the title where 'Halloween' is missing a letter ('Hallowen').
  • The thorn border is less dense and looks slightly less 'gothic' than model A's version.
  • The composition feels slightly crowded with the large pumpkin and text overlapping the background circle.

Verdict: Nano Banana is the winner because it successfully followed every text instruction perfectly, which is critical for an invitation prompt. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a more vibrant and artistic central pumpkin, the spelling error in the word 'Halloween' makes it unusable as a final product. Nano Banana also achieved a more cohesive 'vintage gothic' atmosphere with its dark, moody lighting and sophisticated border detail.

Bald man challenge

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Give the person a full, thick head of natural hair with realistic texture, density, and a natural hairline. Preserve facial features and lighting.”

Before After
Nano Banana
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent texture that matches the beard
  • + Highly realistic messy/natural wavy style
  • + Perfect preservation of source image lighting
  • Small stray hairs slightly overlap the top of the glasses frame

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Solid hair volume and density
  • + Good integration with the sideburns area
  • Hair looks slightly too groomed and stiff compared to the rugged environment
  • Slightly plastic/smooth texture in the front

Verdict: Nano Banana provided a much more realistic result by creating a hair texture and messy style that perfectly matches the subject's existing beard and rugged desert aesthetic. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) produced a clean edit, the hair looks slightly artificial and overly styled, whereas Nano Banana's version looks like an original, unedited photograph.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent adherence to the diorama base requirement with an intricate tiled wood design.
  • + Accurate sushi variety including nigiri and maki with clean PBR textures.
  • + Perfect text layout and high-clarity isometric perspective.
  • The 'Ginger' garnish is slightly abstract/geometric compared to the rest of the scene.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Beautiful soft lighting and subsurface scattering on the fish textures.
  • + Very clean typography that integrates well with the overall aesthetic.
  • + Simple and elegant composition.
  • Missed the plural 'sushi' implication by only showing a single piece.
  • The diorama base is a simple cylinder rather than a detailed scene requested in the prompt.

Verdict: Nano Banana followed the prompt's structural instructions much more closely, providing a set of sushi on a detailed tile-and-wood diorama base as requested. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) has slightly superior lighting and 'softer' material rendering, it failed to provide the variety and specific 'miniature scene' complexity described in the prompt.

Over-the-top cartoon caricature

Editing
Edit instruction

“Create a caricature of me and my job. Make it exaggerated and humorous, incorporating my profession as a tv show anchor and my love for dogs and hockey.”

Source
Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent caricature style that maintains a very strong facial resemblance to the source image.
  • + Rich narrative detail including a dog audience, hockey-themed newspaper, and scoreboards.
  • + High-quality line art and coloring that feels like a professional editorial illustration.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Strongly preserves the clothing (denim shirt and black top) from the source image.
  • + Clear, vibrant vector-style illustration.
  • + Explicitly includes the dogs and hockey stick as requested.
  • The facial resemblance is significantly weaker than the other model, feeling more like a generic avatar.
  • The background hockey screen looks like it is on a field rather than an ice rink.
  • The composition is a bit basic and less creative compared to Model A.

Verdict: Nano Banana is the clear winner as it masters the caricature art style, maintaining an unmistakable likeness to the woman in the source image while being incredibly creative with the environmental details like the dog audience. Wan 2.5 (Preview) does a better job of preserving her specific outfit, but the face lacks character and the overall composition feels much more generic.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'tumbling together' aspect of the prompt with a natural-looking pile-up.
  • + Warm, cohesive lighting that feels magical yet soft.
  • + Superior rendering of the fox and kitten's facial features and fur textures.
  • The butterfly on the puppy's ear is slightly oversized and less realistic in its placement.
  • The composition is a bit static with the animals mostly facing directly forward.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Captures high energy and the 'chasing' aspect of the prompt with dynamic poses.
  • + The 'dew sparkles' are creatively represented as large, crystalline water droplets.
  • + Deep, vibrant colors in the wildflowers and background.
  • The fox's eyes appear unnaturally blue and glowing, deviating from 'photorealistic'.
  • Anatomical issues with the kitten's tail/body connection and the puppy's front paw.
  • Heavy digital artifacts are visible in the background bokeh and light rays.

Verdict: Nano Banana is the winner because it achieves a much higher level of photorealism and anatomical accuracy, whereas Wan 2.5 (Preview) struggles with distorted limbs and unnatural eye colors. While Wan 2.5 (Preview) captures the sense of motion better, Nano Banana delivers a more polished 'masterpiece' look with superior fur textures and lighting.

Studio Ghibli Anime Style

Editing
Edit instruction

“Transform this photo into a Studio Ghibli–inspired illustration. Use soft pastel colors, hand-painted textures, gentle lighting, dreamy backgrounds, and a warm, nostalgic mood”

Source
Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent source preservation, maintaining the original faces and poses exactly.
  • Failed to apply the requested edit, only slightly softening the focus rather than creating an illustration.
  • Does not evoke the Studio Ghibli art style at all.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Perfectly captures the Studio Ghibli illustration style with clean linework and warm lighting.
  • + Maintains the composition and recognizable features of the 'Distracted Boyfriend' meme while transforming it into art.
  • + Features dreamy hand-painted textures and soft pastel tones as requested.
  • None, the model successfully interpreted the prompt while keeping the source essence.

Verdict: Nano Banana failed to perform the requested style transformation, essentially outputting a slightly blurred version of the original photo. Wan 2.5 (Preview) successfully transformed the image into a high-quality Studio Ghibli-inspired animation frame while maintaining the iconic composition of the source meme.

Golden Hour Stroll

Image Editing
Edit instruction

“Add dynamic motion to this photo: make hair blow in the wind, add leaves flying, energetic and lively feel.”

Before After
Nano Banana
Before After
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + The autumn leaves have a realistic texture and distinct shapes.
  • + Successfully recreates natural-looking windblown hair.
  • + Maintains high fidelity to the subject's facial features.
  • The orange leaves contrast strangely with the lush green background of the park.
  • Some leaves appear to be merged into the dog's fur.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + The green leaves match the color palette of the existing background perfectly.
  • + The hair motion looks very organic and flows well with the composition.
  • + Excellent source preservation including the dog's expression and background details.
  • The leaves appear somewhat flat and lack detailed texture.
  • Less variety in the types of leaves added compared to the other model.

Verdict: Both models successfully added motion and secondary elements as requested. Nano Banana chose vibrant autumn leaves, which makes the edit pop but feels slightly inconsistent with the green trees, whereas Wan 2.5 (Preview) used green leaves that integrated more naturally into the environment. Wan 2.5 (Preview) is the winner for a more cohesive aesthetic and slightly better hair rendering that looks less 'cut out'.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent typography with a high-end vintage calligraphic feel
  • + Clean vector aesthetic that perfectly matches the 'emblem style' request
  • + Perfect spelling and placement of 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'
  • Missing the explicit 'steam' element requested in the prompt
  • Logo is slightly off-center within the canvas

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Includes all prompted elements including the cloche with steam
  • + Strong visual hierarchy and centering of the logo elements
  • + Text is clear and correctly spelled
  • Background texture is a bit heavy-handed and looks like crumpled paper rather than 'subtle'
  • The illustration style is slightly more 'clip-art' and less 'classic luxury' than the other model

Verdict: Nano Banana produces a more sophisticated and professional-looking logo that better captures the 'classic' and 'minimalist vector' aesthetic, despite missing the steam element. Wan 2.5 (Preview) is more literal with the prompt requirements like the steam and banner, but the overall design feels less refined for a high-end restaurant brand. Nano Banana is the winner for superior typography and design elegance.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

Nano Banana
Wan 2.5 (Preview)

AI Judge Analysis

Nano Banana

  • + Excellent adherence to the clean, flat vector aesthetic.
  • + Successful rendering of most text including mission name and astronaut surnames.
  • + Superior iconography and organized layout that feels like a professional infographic.
  • Missed step 5 (Descent) and incorrectly labeled step 6 as step 5 visually but numbered it 6.
  • Typo in 'ARMSRONG'.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

  • + Includes all 6 steps required by the prompt.
  • + Detailed and accurate color palette following NASA's navy, white, and red theme.
  • + High-quality vector illustrations of the Saturn V and Lunar Module.
  • Layout is cluttered and the flow between steps is confusing.
  • Text is poorly integrated with 'Descent' and 'Landing' appearing as floating labels without specific icons.
  • Graphic style is less consistent, mixing flat design with more detailed rendering.

Verdict: Nano Banana produces a much more polished and professional 'infographic' look with consistent icon styles and a clean layout, though it missed one step and has a minor typo. Wan 2.5 (Preview) captured all the required steps but the composition is messy and fails to function effectively as an infographic. Nano Banana is preferred for its superior adherence to the requested art style and visual coherence.

Next steps

Explore each model