FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs vs Wan 2.6 Alibaba

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent photorealism and clean glass rendering
• + Highly intricate texture on the red book cover
• + Perfect adherence to the lighting direction through the glass and on the sphere

• − The glass container is a rectangular prism rather than a cube
• − The blue sphere appears to be floating unnaturally in the center

Wan 2.6

• + Correctly interpreted the 'cube' shape
• + More naturalistic placement of the sphere resting on the bottom
• + Realistic weathered texture on the old book

• − The plant is positioned next to the cube rather than behind it as requested
• − Minor distortion in the glass reflections

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent bokeh and city background lighting
• + Realistic skin and clothing textures for an elderly man

• − The bicycle geometry is broken, appearing to lack a complete frame or rear wheel
• − The man is just holding the handle rather than actively 'repairing' it as requested

Wan 2.6

• + Successfully depicts the action of repairing with tools on the ground
• + Exceptional detail on rain droplets and wet surfaces
• + Stronger adherence to the Japanese street aesthetic

• − The rain droplets on his jacket look slightly like plastic beads rather than soaked fabric
• − The composition is a bit tight compared to a classic candid street photo

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Intense, high-fidelity facial textures and lifelike iris detailing
• + Excellent use of shallow depth of field for a cinematic effect
• + Matches the 'close portrait' instruction perfectly

• − Missed the request for beads in the hair braids
• − The plate armor is cropped out significantly compared to the other image

Wan 2.6

• + Excellent adherence to the 'hair braided with small beads' and 'leather straps' prompt
• + High level of detail on the ornate engraved plate armor
• + Stronger visual storytelling through the inclusion of background torches

• − Skin texture appears slightly more waxy and less organic than Model A
• − Composition is a medium shot rather than a close portrait

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent presentation with realistic mock-up elements like cutlery
• + High-quality, distinct food photography in a clear grid section
• + Clean, professional typography using bold sans-serif fonts

• − Section headers contain spelling errors like 'MAN & DREAFRY'
• − The white space usage makes some text very small and difficult to read

Wan 2.6

• + Strong geometric color accents that match the prompt's request for vibrant accents
• + Clearer text rendering for the main item names
• + Good balance between the food grid and the informational sections

• − The food photos are repetitive, with pizza appearing in almost every slot regardless of the section label
• − Slightly cluttered header area with redundant 'RESTAUR MENU' text

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent text legibility and clean graphic design elements
• + High photorealistic detail on the textures of the bun and patties

• − Failed the core request for an 'exploded' burger, showing a mostly assembled one
• − The neon blue 'Magic Burger' text conflicts with the fiery background prompt
• − Missing the starburst element for the price

Wan 2.6

• + Perfectly follows the 'exploded burger' layout with suspended components
• + Text rendering correctly applies the requested fiery/glowing effect to all words
• + Accurately includes the starburst graphic for the price

• − The smoky/fiery effects slightly obscure some of the food textures
• − The 'Limited Time Only' text at the bottom is slightly less crisp than model A

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Text is highly legible and focused within the frame.
• + The composition is clean and follows the general menu structure requested.

• − The text looks more like a digital marker or vector font than actual chalk on a chalkboard.
• − Major hallucinations in text content, splitting the octopus item into two lines with incorrect prices ($228 and $98).
• − Handwriting style is inconsistent and looks sterile.

Wan 2.6

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudges, dust, and variations in pressure.
• + Followed the prompt instructions for menu items and pricing with near-perfect accuracy.
• + The cursive 'TODAY'S SPECIALS' title is elegant and fits the required style perfectly.

• − The word 'Cookies' (requested as 'But...') has minor letter overlapping.
• − The angle of the board is slightly tilted, though this adds to the realism.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Features a more cinematic color palette and lighting.
• + The horse has a larger, more imposing feel relative to the frame.
• + The background contains interesting planetary details.

• − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is riding the horse.
• − Significant anatomy issues with the horse's front legs and torso attachment.
• − The clouds and terrain suggest a planetary surface rather than space.

Wan 2.6

• + Visually clear image with high-contrast space nebulae in the background.
• + Correctly placed the astronaut on a horse (though also failed the inverted request).
• + Good strap and saddle detailing.

• − Completely failed the specific 'horse on top' spatial instruction.
• − The horse anatomy in the front legs is somewhat distorted.
• − The interpretation is a standard cliché of the prompt rather than surreal.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and photorealistic textures
• + The capybara's expression is very calm and fits the 'professional' prompt description
• + The woman's positioning in the actual back seat is more logical

• − The capybara is not holding the steering wheel
• − The perspective makes the capybara look much larger than the human
• − The woman is looking at the capybara rather than looking down at her phone

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect adherence to the steering wheel and paws instruction
• + Captures the woman's 'bored' expression and focus on her phone correctly
• + The rainy exterior adds to the New York night atmosphere

• − The woman is sitting in the passenger seat next to the driver, not the back seat
• − The capybara is wearing a police-style cap rather than a taxi driver cap
• − The composition feels a bit cramped compared to Model A

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent torn edges effect for a vintage parchment feel.
• + Clear, cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern.

• − Significant text repetition at the bottom of the poster.
• − Spelling errors in the small scroll text, such as 'inimted' instead of 'invited'.
• − Failed the requested square format.

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect adherence to all text requirements with zero spelling errors.
• + Includes all visual elements like webs, thorns, and twisted trees in a balanced composition.
• + Correctly followed the square format instruction.

• − The lighting on the pumpkin is slightly flatter compared to Model A.
• − The background blue sky is a bit bright for a 'dark parchment' aesthetic.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent miniature 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft, high-quality textures.
• + The text 'JAPAN' is rendered with a stylistically appropriate bold font that matches the scene.
• + Greater variety of sushi pieces and a more filled composition while maintaining cleanliness.

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
• − The text 'SUSHI' is relatively small and lacks the 'large bold' presence of the first word.

Wan 2.6

• + Includes all requested textual elements including the flag icon.
• + Follows the diorama base instruction literally with a distinct raised platform.
• + Very clean, minimalist composition that adheres well to a isometric 45° angle.

• − The text composition feels a bit cramped and less integrated than Model A.
• − The sushi models are slightly more generic and less visually appealing in texture compared to the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent backlit rim lighting on the fur.
• + Very cute, expressive character design.
• + High resolution and clean soft-focus background.

• − Failed to include the fox kit requested in the prompt.
• − Missing the 'playfully chasing' action, with animals appearing more static.
• − Butterflies are simple glowing shapes rather than detailed insects.

Wan 2.6

• + Included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Captured the 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' action much better.
• + Detailed butterflies and clear 'god rays' from the sun.

• − The fox kit has somewhat unnatural black paws/limbs.
• − The lighting is slightly harsh with high contrast compared to the requested 'soft' vibe.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent vintage engraving style with detailed shading on the cloche.
• + Elegant composition with a decorative border and star accents.
• + Accurate 'Est. 1720' placement and inclusion of steam.

• − Significant spelling errors in the main name, rendering it 'Cafeé FRATILIAN'.
• − The typography is cluttered and uses too many competing styles.

Wan 2.6

• + Perfect text rendering for 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'.
• + Strong alignment with the 'minimalist' and 'vector emblem' part of the prompt.
• + Clean, professional graphic design suitable for a real logo.

• − The banner for 'Est. 1720' is slightly small and off-center.
• − The texture on the edges of the background is a bit generic.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to the infographic aesthetic with a clean vector style.
• + Successfully attempted to visualize the specific stages like orbit and descent.
• + Colors match the requested NASA-inspired palette perfectly.

• − Text rendering is mostly nonsensical gibberish despite correct placement.
• − The numbering system is inconsistent and redundant.

Wan 2.6

• + Text rendering of 'APOLLO 11' and astronaut names is clear and legible.
• + The composition is clean and organized.

• − Failed to include any of the 6 requested steps or icons in the prompt.
• − Image looks more like a printed towel or fabric texture than a vector infographic poster.
• − Missed the complexity of the infographic requirement entirely.