FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs vs Vidu Q2 ShengShu Technology

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent optical realism with reflections on the glass and sphere
• + Clear adherence to the 'soft window light' lighting instruction
• + High-quality texture on the red book cover

• − The glass container is more of a rectangular prism than a perfect cube
• − The sphere is floating unnaturally rather than resting on the bottom

Vidu Q2

• + Perfect geometric cube shape
• + Highly realistic physics with the sphere resting on the bottom and the book at an angle
• + Strong lighting composition creating dynamic shadows

• − The sphere appears slightly matte, lacking the refractive depth seen in the other model

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Captures the rainy atmosphere and wet pavement reflections beautifully
• + Excellent use of depth of field and bokeh
• + Perfectly nails the cinematic street photography aesthetic requested in the prompt

• − The bicycle anatomy is broken, with the frame appearing severed in the middle
• − The man is leaning on the bike rather than actively 'repairing' it

Vidu Q2

• + Much better focus on the 'repairing' aspect of the prompt
• + Incredible skin textures and realistic hand details
• + The bicycle architecture is more coherent and detailed

• − The 'imperfect framing' is a bit too aggressive, cutting off the man's head
• − Doesn't feel as much like a 50mm lens shot compared to Model A

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Exceptional skin texture with realistic pores and weathering.
• + High-quality 'lifelike eyes' that capture the intensity of the character.
• + Superior bokeh effect and depth of field that emphasizes the portrait.

• − The hair beads requested in the prompt are very subtle or missing.
• − The armor engraving is less detailed compared to Model B.

Vidu Q2

• + Excellent adherence to technical details like hair beads and specific armor engraving.
• + Visible leather straps and cloth underlayers as requested.
• + Strong metallic reflections and warm lighting.

• − The character looks much younger and less 'battle-worn' than requested.
• − The 'close portrait' framing is missed, resulting in a medium shot.
• − Skin texture is slightly too smooth and looks more like a 3D render than a photo.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent professional presentation with realistic cutlery and layered menu cards.
• + Followed the grid photo prompt accurately with clear, high-quality images of pizza and food.
• + The typography is clean and highly legible, maintaining a realistic restaurant hierarchy.

• − The text content is mostly placeholder gibberish upon closer inspection.
• − The grid layout is slightly crowded at the bottom of the center card.

Vidu Q2

• + Strong use of vibrant colors and accents as requested in the prompt.
• + Each section is clearly defined with colorful photography.

• − The text and spelling are very poor and distorted (e.g., 'APEČIZEN', 'Piтaa').
• − The images look more like digital illustrations or heavily filtered photos rather than clean professional photography.
• − The font styles are inconsistent and lack the professional minimalist feel requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the burger patties and bun
• + Clean typography with various modern styles
• + Beautiful use of depth of field and bokeh in the background

• − Failed the 'exploded' instruction as the burger is mostly assembled
• − The main burger text is redundant and uses a blue neon style instead of the requested fiery effect
• − Missed the 'starburst' container for the price

Vidu Q2

• + Perfectly adhered to the 'exploded' burger layout with suspended components
• + Text effectively uses the requested fiery, glowing style
• + Successfully included the starburst element for the price

• − The price symbol is incorrect (rendered as an 'E' cross or hash instead of the Euro '€' symbol)
• − The lighting on the bun and lettuce is slightly flatter compared to Model A
• − The background is very busy, making the 'exploded' effect slightly harder to distinguish

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent text legibility and correct spelling for almost all items.
• + Clean and elegant presentation with a realistic wooden frame.
• + Background blur creates a pleasant café ambiance.

• − The text has a slightly digital feel and lacks the crumbly texture of real chalk.
• − Repeated and hallucinated line for the octopus dish with incorrect pricing ($228).

Vidu Q2

• + Superb chalk texture with smudge marks and dusty residues that feel authentic.
• + Better adherence to the 'handwritten variation' prompt with varying letter sizes and strokes.
• + Captures the tactile quality of a real chalkboard surface better.

• − Significant spelling and character errors throughout the menu items (e.g., 'Lemepun', 'Octopd').
• − The handwriting becomes chaotic and difficult to read toward the bottom of the board.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmosphere
• + Realistic textures on the spacesuit and horse hair
• + Great dynamic posing of the horse

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut
• − Anatomy of the horse's underside and legs is slightly distorted

Vidu Q2

• + Vibrant colors and creative 'nebula' texture on the horse
• + Excellent clarity and sharp details
• + Compositionally balanced with the galaxy background

• − Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut
• − The rider's hands and reins have some clipping and logical issues

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and bokeh in the background
• + High-quality fur texture and realistic lighting on characters

• − The composition places the passenger in the front passenger seat rather than the requested back seat
• − The capybara's front paws are not on a visible steering wheel

Vidu Q2

• + Strict adherence to composition instructions with the businesswoman in the back seat
• + Perfect execution of the capybara holding the steering wheel with both paws
• + Captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger perfectly

• − The capybara's hands look slightly more primate-like than capybara-like
• − The lighting on the capybara is slightly flat compared to the background

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent atmospheric lighting and mood
• + Very crisp high-detail jack-o-lantern rendering
• + Clean, legible font for the event details

• − Repetitive text with multiple 'Party' and 'Location' lines
• − Incorrect spelling in the scroll banner: 'You inivted to a n night of frights'
• − Does not show the 'parchment' texture as clearly as model B

Vidu Q2

• + Strong 'vintage parchment' texture and aged aesthetic
• + Includes spiderwebs explicitly mentioned in the prompt
• + Accurate representation of thorns and twisted trees around the border

• − Severely garbled and misspelled text throughout ('Intovztion', 'invieed ta might of fiigts')
• − Incorrect date '30.70.2025' and mangled time 'Tmm'
• − Low-resolution artifacts around the text and borders

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent typography and layout.
• + Smooth, professional 3D stylized rendering with gentle lighting.
• + Higher resolution and cleaner details on the diorama elements.

• − Missed the flag icon completely.
• − The 'sushi' sub-text is a bit small and low contrast.

Vidu Q2

• + Included the requested flag icon.
• + Very accurate 45-degree top-down isometric perspective.
• + Better adherence to the requested text hierarchy.

• − The 'J' and 'N' in the text have slight rendering artifacts.
• − The rice texture is slightly lumpy and lacks the refined PBR look of the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent shallow depth of field and soft lighting
• + Very consistent and high-quality fur texture
• + Expressive and soulful eyes

• − Failed to include all four requested animals, missing the red fox kit
• − The butterflies are represented as glowing light blobs rather than detailed insects

Vidu Q2

• + Included all four requested animal types (puppy, kitten, bunny, fox)
• + Captured the dynamic 'tumbling' and 'chasing' actions requested in the prompt
• + Accurate butterfly anatomical details and diverse coloring

• − The fox's front right leg is anatomically incorrect and looks like it is floating
• − The image has a more 'digital art' feel compared to the photorealistic requirement
• − Some artifacts in the grass and flower rendering around the animal paws

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Elegant decorative filigree and ornamentation.
• + High-quality vector aesthetic with clean lines.
• + Correct rendering of the establishment date 'Est. 1720'.

• − Misspelled the primary brand name as 'Caffé Franilian'.
• − The central icon looks more like a dome or cathedral than a typical restaurant cloche.

Vidu Q2

• + Accurately depicts the requested 'cloche dome' icon.
• + Included a subtle paper-like texture on the background as requested.
• + Matches the warm cream and brown color palette well.

• − Significant text failures including multiple misspellings like 'Farmiin' and 'Esttt'.
• − Redundant and garbled text at the bottom of the emblem.
• − The steam effects lack the clean vector look requested.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent adherence to the navy, white, and muted red color palette.
• + Sophisticated composition that feels like a professional modern infographic.
• + High-quality vector aesthetic with crisp lines and elegant background details.

• − The text is largely illegible gibberish, failing to properly label the requested steps.
• − The icons for the six steps are repeated or out of order (e.g., using two icons labeled '1').

Vidu Q2

• + Layout follows a clear linear progression of steps (1, 2, 4, 5).
• + Icons for the Lunar Module and Saturn V-style rocket are more distinct and recognizable.
• + Much cleaner text rendering, even though several words are misspelled.

• − The color palette is mostly light gray and lacks the requested navy blue focus.
• − Missing the 'Apollo 11' title, instead using a nonsensical heading.
• − The composition feels like a collection of clipart rather than a cohesive infographic poster.