Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

18.4 arena score

#50 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Seedream 5.0 Lite

23.7 arena score

#22 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX1.1 [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Seedream 5.0 Lite

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealism with sharp textures on the book and glass.
  • + Distinctly follows the lighting direction prompt with clear reflections.
  • + Vibrant colors and high resolution.
  • The glass object is more of a tall rectangular prism than a cube.
  • The blue sphere is levitating rather than resting, which may look unnatural.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Correctly interprets the 'cube' geometry more accurately than the competitor.
  • + Natural positioning of the sphere resting on the bottom of the glass.
  • + Soft, realistic lighting that matches the requested window light.
  • The glass has slightly hazy edges and less refraction detail compared to Image A.
  • The background plant is a bit more blurred, losing some detail.

Verdict: Both models followed all prompt instructions accurately. Seedream 5.0 Lite produced a more geometrically correct cube and a grounded composition, while FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a visually striking image with superior texture rendering and sharper details, despite making the cube too tall.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent depiction of wet pavement reflections and bokeh.
  • + Captures the requested imperfect framing and candid street atmosphere well.
  • + Good use of color contrast between the red bike and blue street tones.
  • Serious anatomical and structural issues with the bicycle and the man's feet.
  • The man is standing rather than performing a repair action.
  • No visible motion blur from the passing cars.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully captures the specific action of 'repairing' the bicycle.
  • + Includes visible motion blur from a passing car as requested.
  • + High level of detail in skin texture, raindrops on the jacket, and bicycle components.
  • The composition is a bit tight, missing the 'imperfect framing' feel of a street photo.
  • The background text is slightly generic but legible.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] excels at atmospheric lighting and the 'feel' of a street photograph, but it fails significantly on the physical logic of the bicycle and the man's pose. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed all prompt instructions including motion blur and the specific repair action, while maintaining high anatomical and mechanical accuracy.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Exceptional skin texture with realistic dirt and pores
  • + Dynamic lighting with highly effective bokeh sparks
  • + Intense, lifelike eye detail
  • Missed the request for beads in the hair braids
  • The portrait is so close that most of the ornate armor details are obscured

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly adhered to the braid and beads instruction
  • + Beautifully engraved plate armor that matches the prompt
  • + Excellent lighting and warm torchlight reflections
  • The scars look a bit like surface drawings rather than skin depth
  • Skin texture is slightly smoothed compared to Model A

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] wins on raw photographic realism and grit, capturing the 'battle-worn' aesthetic with incredible skin textures. However, Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the specific prompt details much better, including the braided beads and clearly visible engraved armor, making it a more accurate interpretation of the full request.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent presentation for a mockup, including cutlery and layered pages.
  • + Captures a sophisticated minimalist layout that feels professional and spacious.
  • + Includes various accent colors and a clean grid of high-quality food photography.
  • The text is largely illegible gibberish, failing to provide actual menu content.
  • The layout is somewhat cluttered compared to the 'modern minimalist' request.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect legibility of text with clear headers for Appetizers, Pizzas, and Mains.
  • + Strict adherence to the 'grid' request with highly relevant food photos for each section.
  • + Clean, bold sans-serif typography that is extremely easy to read.
  • The design feels a bit like a template and lacks the artistic flair of a professional mockup.
  • Some minor spelling errors like 'Steak Faiitas' instead of 'Fajitas'.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] excels at creating a beautiful lifestyle mockup that looks like a professional photograph, Seedream 5.0 Lite is significantly more functional, providing readable text and a perfectly organized grid layout that matches the prompt's structural requirements. Seedream 5.0 Lite is preferred for actually designing the menu, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] is better for a conceptual visual presentation.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Crisp and professional text rendering for the primary titles.
  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and lettuce.
  • + Strong lighting depth with a clear foreground/background separation.
  • Failed to create an 'exploded' view; the burger is mostly assembled.
  • Missing the starburst element for the price, which was explicitly requested.
  • Double text for 'Magic Burger' creates an unbalanced composition.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfectly captures the 'exploded' burger concept with suspended components.
  • + Includes all requested elements, including the glowing starburst price badge.
  • + Captures the fiery, glowing aesthetic consistently across all text elements.
  • The bottom bun has an unusual circular indent, appearing more like a bagel.
  • The price text within the starburst is slightly less crisp than other text.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt much more accurately, successfully delivering the exploded view and all specific text elements like the starburst. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a high-quality image, but failed on the core conceptual request of suspended mid-air components and missing specific UI elements.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent background composition with a cozy café atmosphere
  • + High-quality text rendering with realistic chalk texture and natural slant
  • Hallucinated the menu items by splitting the octopus into two lines with incorrect prices ($228 and $98)
  • Misspelled 'Chipkies' and 'giluten'

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully captured the chalk texture and aging on the board surface
  • + Followed the menu item list more closely than the competitor
  • + Text follows the requested layout with underlines
  • Spelling errors in every line including 'Heriss', 'Beliter', and 'frese opstoons'
  • Text lacks the 'elegant cursive' style requested for the title

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much more visually appealing and realistic image with better handwriting aesthetics, but it struggled significantly with prompt adherence by doubling a menu item and inventing high prices. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt's item list better, but suffered from numerous spelling errors and a less sophisticated handwriting style. FLUX1.1 [pro] is the preferred choice for its superior composition and realistic chalk look, despite the content errors.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and texture
  • + High level of anatomical detail on the horse
  • + Successfully creates a surreal atmosphere with atmospheric clouds and space background
  • Failed the spatial logic prompt: the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the horse riding the astronaut

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Vibrant, colorful space background
  • + Clean composition with clear subject matter
  • Failed the spatial logic prompt: the astronaut is riding the horse instead of the horse riding the astronaut
  • Lower technical quality with visible artifacts around the horse's legs
  • Generic composition compared to Model A

Verdict: Both FLUX1.1 [pro] and Seedream 5.0 Lite failed the negative constraint/spatial reasoning test, producing a standard astronaut-on-horse image instead of a horse-on-astronaut image. However, FLUX1.1 [pro] is the superior image due to its cinematic lighting, superior textures, and more dramatic composition, whereas Seedream 5.0 Lite looks like a more basic digital composite.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Atmospheric cinematic lighting that captures a night-time New York feel.
  • + High aesthetic quality and clean textures.
  • + The woman is successfully looking at her phone as requested.
  • Failed the steering wheel requirement; paws are floating in the air.
  • Anatomical issues with the capybara's arms and paws.
  • Composition is slightly confusing with the passenger seemingly in the front or a very cramped middle.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'both front paws on the steering wheel' requirement.
  • + Captures the bored, indifferent expression of the businesswoman perfectly.
  • + Realistic vehicle interior with high level of functional detail.
  • The exterior taxi light is strangely placed inside the windshield frame.
  • Slightly less 'cinematic' lighting compared to the opponent.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite is the clear winner because it correctly placed the capybara's paws on the steering wheel and clearly separated the driver from the back-seat passenger. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a beautiful image but failed significantly on the anatomical interaction with the car controls and the spatial logic of the taxi interior.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern and moon
  • + Clean, intricate thorn border that frames the central artwork well
  • Repetitive and confusing text layout with multiple redundant lines
  • Spelling errors in the small banner text such as 'inivited' and 'frights:'
  • Incorrect aspect ratio, providing a vertical poster rather than the requested square format

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect adherence to the requested square format
  • + High text accuracy and legibility for all event details
  • + Strong 'dark parchment' texture consistent with the vintage gothic prompt
  • The thorns and spiderwebs in the border look a bit like separate clip-art elements rather than being fully integrated
  • Composition is a bit crowded with the large header text

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the instructions much more accurately, specifically adhering to the square format and rendering the complex text prompts correctly. While FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more atmospheric and artistically coherent illustration, it failed on the aspect ratio and produced messy, repetitive text with spelling errors.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent typography style with soft, cohesive colors
  • + Highly detailed miniature 3D aesthetics with complex textures
  • + Beautiful 45-degree isometric composition
  • Failed to include the requested small flag icon
  • The 'SUSHI' text is very small and difficult to read
  • Includes strange non-sushi garnishes like small tomatoes

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully followed all instructions including 'SUSHI' text placement and flag icon
  • + Very clean and accurate isometric perspective
  • + Simple and clear miniature 3D style with realistic materials
  • Text is slightly off-center and the font choice is a bit generic
  • The sushi models are simpler than the other model's output
  • The drop shadows on the text feel slightly dated

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more visually rich and artistically complex illustration, Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt more precisely by including the flag icon and correctly layering the text as requested. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner for total prompt adherence, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] is better for high-end aesthetic appeal but missed specific elements.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic rim lighting and bokeh effects.
  • + Beautifully detailed fur texture that feels soft and realistic.
  • + Highly expressive eyes that capture the 'wholesome' vibe.
  • Failed to include the red fox kit requested in the prompt.
  • Missing the playful 'tumbling' interaction; animals are largely static.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals (dog, cat, bunny, and fox).
  • + Better adherence to the 'tumbling' and 'chasing butterflies' action described.
  • + Clearly visible 'god rays' and dew sparkles as requested.
  • The aesthetic leans more toward a 3D digital illustration than 'hyper-photorealistic'.
  • The anatomy of the red fox kit is highly stylized and cartoonish.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much more photorealistic image with superior lighting and texture, it failed to include all the animals requested in the prompt. Seedream 5.0 Lite followed the prompt instructions more accurately by including the fox and depicting the specific actions, despite having a more 'CGI' or illustrative appearance compared to the realism of FLUX.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent ornamental detail and vintage aesthetic
  • + Beautiful woodcut-style cloche illustration
  • + Authentic subtle texture and border design
  • Significant spelling errors in the brand name ('Cafeé Fratilian')

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Perfect spelling of 'Caffè Florian'
  • + Clean, minimalist vector style
  • + Accurate execution of the 'Est. 1720' banner
  • The cloche design is overly simplistic compared to the vintage request
  • The typography for the brand name lacks the requested classic character

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] creates a much more visually appealing and authentic 'vintage' logo with beautiful engraving details, but it fails significantly on spelling. Seedream 5.0 Lite adheres perfectly to the text requirements and minimalist style, though the resulting design feels a bit generic. Seedream 5.0 Lite is the winner because it actually contains the correct name requested, which is critical for a logo.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Seedream 5.0 Lite

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Successfully incorporates all aesthetic requirements including the navy palette and muted red accents.
  • + Effective use of layout with a central lunar focus and connecting lines.
  • Text rendering is poor with several misspelled words and nonsensical labels.
  • The sequencing of the numbered steps is illogical and cluttered.

Seedream 5.0 Lite

  • + Excellent prompt adherence for all six specific stages described.
  • + Clean, readable typography and highly accurate iconography relative to the request.
  • + Perfect adherence to the NASA-inspired color palette and flat-vector style.
  • The 'Translunar' step icon is a bit sparse compared to the others.
  • A few minor compression artifacts are visible around the white text.

Verdict: Seedream 5.0 Lite significantly outperforms FLUX1.1 [pro] by following the requested step-by-step structure with perfect legibility and logical flow. While FLUX1.1 [pro] created a more artistic composition, its text is unreadable and the icon sequence fails to follow the prompt's requirements.

Next steps

Explore each model