FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs vs Seedream 4.5 ByteDance

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent photographic clarity and texture on the book and table.
• + The glass has realistic refraction and internal reflections.

• − The glass container is a tall rectangle or prism rather than a cube.
• − The blue sphere is levitating rather than resting on the base.

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect adherence to the geometry, showing an actual cube.
• + Excellent lighting and shadow work that aligns with the window light source.

• − The red book lacks the fine fabric-like texture seen in the other model.
• − The background plant is slightly more obscured.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent wet pavement reflections and bokeh
• + Accurate 50mm lens perspective and depth of field
• + Realistic skin texture and age-appropriate lighting

• − Major anatomical and structural failure with the bicycle and man's legs
• − Lack of visible passing cars or significant motion blur

Seedream 4.5

• + Successfully captures both the act of repairing and the requested motion blur
• + Highly realistic textures on the raincoat and hands
• + Imperfect framing gives it a genuine candid street photo feel

• − The white car in the background is slightly disjointed from the environment
• − The bicycle handlebar in the top right is cut off awkwardly

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Intense, lifelike expression with highly detailed eyes
• + Effective bokeh and ember effects distributed throughout the frame
• + Exceptional skin texture Detail

• − Braided hair with beads is less prominent and harder to distinguish
• − The armor engraving is slightly muddied compared to the competitor

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect adherence to the prompt regarding braided hair with beads
• + Exquisite detail on the ornate engraved plate armor and leather straps
• + Better representation of warm torchlight reflecting off the metal

• − The sparks/bokeh appear a bit more generic in the background
• − The skin texture across the forehead is slightly smoother and less weathered than the face

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent presentation for a casual dining layout with a mockup feel
• + Includes a grid of various food photos that look appetizing and realistic
• + Captures the professional, multi-page feel of a real restaurant menu

• − Text consists of nonsensical characters and distorted fonts
• − Includes some unnecessary artifacts/small icons that clutter the layout
• − The food grid is slightly cramped at the bottom

Seedream 4.5

• + Very clean, minimalist aesthetic with clear sans-serif headings
• + Excellent text legibility and alignment for main category titles
• + Vibrant color accents used effectively around the photo borders

• − The placeholder text under categories is repetitive and nonsensical
• − The layout is very basic and lacks the 'grid' variety requested in the prompt
• − Only shows three specific items rather than a full menu layout

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the burger bun and patties
• + Clean typography with neon and minimalist styles
• + Crisp resolution and clear focus on the subject

• − Failed the 'exploded burger' requirement as the main burger is mostly assembled
• − Missing the starburst for the price
• − Text effect is more neon than the requested fiery/glowing effect

Seedream 4.5

• + Followed all prompt instructions including the exploded composition and fiery text
• + Accurately rendered the price in a glowing starburst
• + Stronger sense of motion with blurred floating vegetable slices

• − The main burger assembly looks a bit messy/tilted compared to standard food photography
• − Lower resolution or slight softness on the fine details of the bottom bun

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Features a very clean and attractive café background with warm lighting.
• + The handwriting has a nice flow and is legible in most areas.

• − Serious failures in text adherence, including 'Chipkies' and repeating Grilled Octopus twice.
• − Text rendering looks like a digital font overlay rather than realistic chalk texture.
• − Includes nonsensical pricing like '$228' and typos like 'giluten'.

Seedream 4.5

• + Excellent adherence to the full prompt text including the third menu item 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies'.
• + Superior chalk-board texture with realistic dust smudges and textured handwriting strokes.
• + Perfectly captures the 'handwritten' aesthetic without looking like a digital font.

• − Slightly repetitive layout where first menu item name and price are stacked redundantlly.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Exceptional level of cinematic detail and texture.
• + Dynamic, dramatic composition with a sense of scale.
• + High realism in both the spacesuit and horse's anatomy.

• − Failed the negative constraint entirely by placing the astronaut on top of the horse.
• − The environment looks more like a high-altitude planet surface than outer space.

Seedream 4.5

• + Vibrant, cosmic color palette that fits the 'space' prompt.
• + Good lighting on the astronaut's visor gold leafing.
• + Smooth, clean digital art style.

• − Failed the negative constraint entirely by placing the astronaut on top of the horse.
• − Anatomical issues with the horse's legs appearing disjointed.
• − The reigns being held by the astronaut are physically incoherent with the horse's head position.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent high-contrast cinematic lighting.
• + Strong texture detail in the capybara fur and jacket fabric.
• + The businesswoman's outfit and scarf fit the professional description.

• − The capybara is not driving; it is sitting in the passenger seat.
• − The woman is sitting in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat.
• − The capybara's paws are not on a steering wheel.

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect adherence to the specified composition with the capybara driving and woman in the back seat.
• + Accurately depicts both paws on the steering wheel as requested.
• + The woman's 'bored' expression perfectly matches the prompt.

• − The lighting is a bit flat compared to Model A.
• − Some slight distortion in the businesswoman's finger holding the phone.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Strong composition with a thorny border that creates a clear frame.
• + Captures the parchment aesthetic well with an aged, deckled edge.
• + Excellent atmospheric lighting on the jack-o-lantern and trees.

• − Significant text errors including redundant 'Party Party' lines and typos like 'You inivted'.
• − Failed to provide the requested square format, opting for a vertical orientation.

Seedream 4.5

• + Flawless text rendering with perfect spelling and placement on the banner.
• + Adheres to the square format requested in the prompt.
• + High visual clarity and realistic textures on the pumpkin and thorny vines.

• − The parchment/poster texture is less pronounced than requested.
• − Composition is slightly more generic compared to the framed look of the competitor.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent soft, refined cartoon textures consistent with the '3D cartoon' prompt.
• + Clean, professional typography that fits the aesthetic.
• + High-quality rendering with smooth lighting and minimal noise.

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
• − The 'sushi' text is a bit small compared to the 'JAPAN' text.

Seedream 4.5

• + Included the requested flag icon next to the text.
• + Good adherence to the isometric diorama base requirement.
• + Accurate text rendering for both 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.

• − Texture quality is slightly grainy, particularly on the wooden base.
• − The lighting is a bit harsh compared to the 'gentle lighting' request.
• − The sushi models look a bit more generic compared to the stylized charm of Model A.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent backlit fur texture
• + High-clarity soft focus aesthetics
• + Adorable expressive eye details

• − Missing one of the requested animals (red fox kit)
• − Composition is more static than the requested 'chasing and tumbling' action

Seedream 4.5

• + Successfully includes all four requested animals (dog, cat, rabbit, fox)
• + Dynamic composition captures the movement of 'chasing'
• + Accurate god rays and dew sparkle effects per the prompt

• − The fox looks slightly more illustrative/stylized than photorealistic
• − A few floating artifacts resembling bubbles/dew that are physically inconsistent

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent vintage illustrative style with woodcut details.
• + Provides a more complete brand identity look with the decorative border.
• + Accurate 'Est. 1720' text placement.

• − Major spelling errors in the main name ('Cafeé FRATILIAN' instead of 'Caffè Florian').
• − Symmetry is slightly off in the cloche detailing.

Seedream 4.5

• + Perfect adherence to text spelling for 'Caffè Florian'.
• + Clean, minimalist vector aesthetic that fits the 'logo' prompt well.
• + Correct execution of all requested elements, including the banner and steam.

• − The 'Est. 1720' text is slightly off-center on the banner.
• − The texture on the background is very subtle, almost unnoticeable.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent primary heading typography
• + Artistic vector style with a strong sense of space
• + Adheres well to the requested color palette

• − Failed the specific step-by-step logic and numbering
• − Text for small labels is mostly gibberish
• − The iconography does not match the specific mission events requested

Seedream 4.5

• + Strictly followed all 6 requested steps with correct sequence and numbering
• + High-quality text rendering for labels and astronaut names
• + Clean, consistent iconography that accurately represents the Saturn V and Lunar Module

• − Step 5 (Descent) is represented by a generic satellite instead of a descending lunar module
• − The layout is a bit more rigid and linear compared to a dynamic poster design