FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs vs Recraft V4.1 Pro Recraft AI

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent clarity and sharpness in the glass and sphere.
• + Highly accurate lighting consistent with window placement.
• + Perfect color saturation for the blue sphere and red book.

• − The glass container is a tall rectangle rather than a cube.
• − The sphere is levitating, which might not have been the intended physics.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + The glass container is a perfect cube shape as requested.
• + Realistic interaction between objects, with the sphere resting on the bottom.
• + Natural textures on the wooden table and book cover.

• − The blue sphere is quite dark, appearing almost black in some areas.
• − The composition is a bit tight, with the book and plant feeling slightly cramped.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent handling of wet pavement reflections and bokeh.
• + Captures the cinematic mood and lighting requested very well.
• + Highly detailed facial texture on the man.

• − The bicycle is missing its rear half, hovering as a broken frame.
• − Failed to include noticeable motion blur from the background traffic.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Stronger adherence to the 'motion blur from passing cars' request.
• + Excellent realistic skin texture and age spots.
• + Successful implementation of 'imperfect framing' and a candid street photography feel.

• − The rain effect looks like a static overlay rather than integrated environmental moisture.
• − The bicycle geometry is slightly warped near the front tire.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Intense, lifelike gaze with exceptional eye detail
• + Excellent skin texture and realistic dirt patterns

• − Missed the request for small beads in the braided hair
• − The engraving on the armor is less ornate than requested

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Superior adherence to specific details like the beads in hair
• + Exquisite ornate engraving on the plate armor
• + Great inclusion of texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer

• − The character's eyes appear slightly glazed or less lifelike than Image A
• − The scars are a bit more faint than the 'battle-worn' description implies

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent presentation of the menu in a real-world context with silverware
• + Good grid layout for food photography
• + Includes many colorful food photos as requested

• − Text is largely illegible gibberish
• − The layout feels slightly cramped with overlapping elements

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfect text rendering with realistic dish names and prices
• + Very clean minimalist aesthetic with high legibility
• + Accurate implementation of vibrant color accents for different categories

• − Food photos are less integrated into a grid and feel a bit scattered
• − Composition is a bit sparse with significant whitespace on the right

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent photorealistic lighting and depth
• + Vibrant colors and professional food styling aesthetic

• − Failed the 'exploded burger' requirement, showing a mostly assembled burger
• − Did not include the starburst for the price
• − Redundant 'MAGIC BURGER' text and hallucinated footer text

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfectly executed 'exploded burger' layout with suspended components
• + Strong prompt adherence for the fiery glowing text and price starburst
• + Dynamic sense of motion with sauce splashes and embers

• − The tomato slices look a bit flat/artificial compared to the rest of the image
• − The price text is slightly cut off at the edge of the starburst

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent photographic quality and warm café atmosphere.
• + Good legibility of written text.

• − Failed to render the text content accurately, repeating the octopus item and adding 'Chipkies'.
• − Text looks like a digital handwriting font rather than real chalk on a board.
• − Incorrect pricing logic ($228 for octopus).

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfect adherence to the requested text content including the specific date and menu items.
• + Authentic chalk texture with realistic smudging and variations in letter weight.
• + Natural handwriting style that actually looks hand-drawn on a physical surface.

• − The composition is slightly tight on the left edge.
• − Background blur is less detailed than in the competing image.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent textural detail on the astronaut suit and horse mane.
• + Dynamic composition with dramatic, cinematic lighting.

• − Failed to follow the core spatial instruction: the horse is not on top of the astronaut.
• − Anatomy of the horse's underside where it meets the saddle is slightly garbled.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + High resolution and very clean visual quality.
• + Atmospheric 'space' background with beautiful nebulae and planet rendering.

• − Failed to follow the core spatial instruction: the horse is being ridden by the astronaut, not vice versa.
• − The horse's back hooves dissolve into sparkle effects, losing physical definition.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara.
• + Successfully followed the instruction for the woman to look at her phone.

• − Failed the spatial composition as the capybara and woman appear to be in the same seat or side-by-side rather than front/back seats.
• − Missing the steering wheel and the capybara's paws are not visible as requested.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfectly executed the composition with the capybara in the driver's seat and the woman in the back seat.
• + Accurately rendered both paws on the steering wheel as requested.
• + Captures the professional, calm expression of the capybara very well.

• − The woman in the background is slightly blurry/out of focus compared to the foreground.
• − The yellow cap is a slightly different style than a traditional taxi cap (more newsboy style).

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Atmospheric cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern and trees
• + Intricate thorny border with a torn-paper effect

• − Text contains several spelling errors and repetitive lines
• − Layout is vertically squashed compared to the requested square format
• − Incorrectly repeats the date, time, and location fields

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfect text rendering for all requested strings with zero spelling errors
• + Follows the square format request perfectly
• + Includes specific details like spider webs and skulls in the border

• − The jack-o-lantern rendering is a bit more aggressive and less polished than the surrounding environment

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent miniature 3D cartoon aesthetic with soft, tactile textures.
• + Very clean layout and high-quality rendering of the various sushi pieces.
• + Follows the text hierarchy for 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI' accurately.

• − Failed to include the requested flag icon.
• − Text rendering is slightly softer and less professional looking than the rival.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Includes all requested content including the flag icon and specific text placement.
• + Graphic design elements and typography are crisp and professionally composed.
• + Creative use of raw rice grains within the diorama base adds texture and realism.

• − The 3D models of the sushi are less diverse and detailed than Model A.
• − The lighting is slightly cooler, making the food look less appetizing.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Excellent golden lighting and soft dreamlike atmosphere.
• + Very cute, expressive facial features on the animals.

• − Failed to include the red fox kit completely.
• − The animals are sitting still rather than chasing and tumbling as requested.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
• + Performs the action of 'playfully chasing' and 'tumbling' perfectly with dynamic poses.
• + Superb detail on dew sparkles and realistic fur textures.

• − The bunny's front paw seems slightly elongated/unnatural.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Exquisite ornate detail and vintage aesthetic.
• + Beautiful color palette with rich brown tones.

• − Major spelling error in the primary brand name.
• − The cloche looks more like a decorative dome or building.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfect text rendering for both the name and date.
• + Accurate interpretation of a restaurant cloche.
• + Clean minimalist vector style.

• − Composition feels slightly fragmented with text separate from the icon.
• − The 'Est. 1720' text is very small and hard to read.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

• + Features a visually striking central illustration of the Saturn V rocket.
• + Includes a lot of descriptive placeholder text to simulate a full poster.
• + The celestial background is atmospheric and colorful.

• − The infographic structure is chaotic with overlapping numbers and incorrect labels.
• − Text legibility is poor with many gibberish characters.
• − Fails the 'flat vector' style by using complex shading and illustrative details.

Recraft V4.1 Pro

• + Perfectly adheres to the clean, flat vector infographic style requested.
• + Follows the logical sequence of steps with clear iconography and exact labels.
• + Text rendering is crisp and professional with no spelling errors.

• − The composition is a bit simple with significant white space.
• − Duplicated the number '05' for the 'Landing' step.