Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs Recraft V4.1 Recraft AI

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

18.4 arena score

#50 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Recraft V4.1

17.6 arena score

#53 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX1.1 [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Recraft V4.1

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent refraction and internal reflections within the glass.
  • + Crisp lighting that perfectly matches the 'window from left' prompt.
  • + Very clear textures on the red book cover and wood grain.
  • The glass container is a tall rectangular prism rather than a strictly equal-sided cube.
  • The blue sphere appears floating in a way that looks slightly disconnected from the scene physics.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect adherence to the 'cube' shape for the glass container.
  • + The red book looks more realistic in terms of thickness and placement.
  • + Beautifully soft, natural-looking interaction between the light, the sphere, and the wood grain.
  • The plant in the background is less 'behind the cube' and more off to the side.
  • Slightly less clarity in the glass edges compared to model A.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the winner as it accurately rendered all specific spatial prompts, particularly the 'cube' shape which FLUX1.1 [pro] interpreted as a tall prism. Recraft V4.1 also provided a more grounded, realistic photographic quality with better integration of light and shadows on the table.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Captures a great sense of rainy atmosphere on the pavement
  • + Includes background elements like traffic cones and lights that feel realistic to a city
  • + Adheres to the 50mm lens and bokeh request
  • Major structural failures on the bicycle, with disconnected frame parts and a strange third wheel/artifact by the man's feet
  • The man's hands are mangled and poorly rendered over the handlebars

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent 'candid' feel with more natural skin textures and wet fabric details
  • + Much better adherence to the 'repairing' action with focused hand movements
  • + The bicycle structure is more coherent than the competitor
  • The composition is very tight, cutting off much of the man and the bike
  • Raindrops are rendered as static white dots rather than having the requested motion blur effect for a 50mm shot

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the winner because it successfully depicts a man actually repairing a bicycle, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] produces a nonsensical bicycle structure with floating parts and severely deformed hands. Recraft V4.1 also achieves a much more convincing 'candid' photographic look with realistic textures on the man's skin and clothing.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent skin texture with realistic dirt and pores.
  • + Intense, lifelike gaze with sharp eye details.
  • Braided hair and beads are less distinct.
  • Plate armor detail is somewhat obscured by the tight crop.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Ornate engraved patterns on armor are very clear.
  • + Stronger adherence to the braided hair and bead prompt.
  • Lighting on the face is slightly flat.
  • Skin texture appears a bit smoother and less weathered.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the preferred model for its superior rendering of the ornate engraved armor and clear braided hair with beads as requested. While FLUX1.1 [pro] offers a more intense and realistic skin texture, it misses the clarity of the specific ensemble details like the armor engraving and the braided beads.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent presentation for a marketing mockup including silverware and paper textures.
  • + Great food photography quality with appetizing lighting.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'colorful food photos in grid' part of the prompt.
  • The text is largely nonsensical 'Lorem Ipsum' style gibberish.
  • The layout is slightly cluttered with icons and decorative flakes that detract from the minimalism.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect text rendering with zero legibility errors across names, descriptions, and prices.
  • + Strict adherence to the requested sections: appetizers, pizza, and mains.
  • + Excellent implementation of bold sans-serif fonts and clean minimalist design.
  • The grid of food photos is a bit disconnected and lacks the cohesive layout of Model A.
  • The background is very flat white compared to a realistic mockup view.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it generates perfectly legible, logical text for a real menu, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] fails to produce readable words. While FLUX1.1 [pro] creates a more visually appealing mockup with beautiful food photography and realistic lighting, Recraft V4.1 better serves the functional intent of the prompt by including the specific requested categories and accurate typography.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun
  • + Clean typography with sophisticated lighting effects
  • + Professional composition suitable for a high-end food advertisement
  • Failed the 'exploded burger' requirement, as the burger is mostly assembled
  • Missing the requested starburst for the price tag
  • Neon blue text color deviates from the 'fiery, glowing' prompt instruction

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfectly followed the 'exploded burger' layout with all components suspended
  • + Accurately included the starburst for the price and fiery text effects as requested
  • + Strong sense of motion and dynamic composition
  • The bun texture looks slightly dry and less appetizing than the competitor
  • The sauce splash in the bottom left appears a bit messy and less photorealistic
  • Composition feels slightly cluttered at the bottom

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed every specific detail of the prompt, including the exploded assembly, fiery text, and the starburst element. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more appetizing, high-quality image of a burger, but it failed to follow the core structural instruction of an 'exploded' view. Recraft V4.1 is the winner for its superior prompt adherence and creative execution of the requested effects.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent background atmosphere and lighting
  • + Highly legible and stylistic handwriting
  • Numerous spelling and factual errors in the menu list
  • Text looks like a digital overlay rather than physical chalk

Recraft V4.1

  • + Highly realistic chalk texture and grain
  • + Near-perfect prompt adherence for text content and pricing
  • Background is less detailed and a bit blurry
  • Cursive style requested for the title is very subtle

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the complex text instructions with high accuracy, capturing both the requested pricing and the specific chalk texture. While FLUX1.1 [pro] created a more aesthetically pleasing background environment, it failed significantly on the text content, repeating lines and making numerous spelling errors.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and cloud/space atmospheric blending
  • + High level of anatomical detail on the horse
  • + Creative interpretation of the horse having a mechanical or spacesuit-like underbelly
  • Completely failed the reversal prompt instruction; the astronaut is on top, not the horse
  • Background feels more like a planetary surface than deep space

Recraft V4.1

  • + Beautiful starry nebula and asteroid field background
  • + Strong cinematic contrast and lighting
  • + Realistic textures on the astronaut suit and horse mane
  • Failed the specific reversal prompt instruction; the astronaut is on top
  • Minor artifact where the reins blend into the horse's neck

Verdict: Both FLUX1.1 [pro] and Recraft V4.1 completely ignored the negative constraint/spatial instruction 'horse on top, not vice versa,' instead producing the standard 'astronaut riding a horse' trope. Recraft V4.1 is slightly better as a general image due to its more convincing deep space environment compared to the cloud-heavy atmosphere of FLUX1.1 [pro].

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Beautiful cinematic lighting and bokeh.
  • + Clear, legible text on the driver hat.
  • + High skin and fur texture detail.
  • The passenger is sitting in the front/middle rather than the back seat.
  • The capybara's paws are not on the steering wheel as requested.
  • The perspective makes the interior layout feel anatomically incorrect for a car.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent adherence to the 'both paws on steering wheel' instruction.
  • + Perfect captures the requested 'bored' expression of the passenger.
  • + Stronger framing of the taxi exterior which helps establish the scene.
  • The passenger's hands and phone interaction are slightly distorted.
  • The capybara is not wearing the requested dark jacket.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] has higher aesthetic quality and lighting, it failed significantly on the spatial layout and specific character actions, placing the passenger in the front seat and missing the steering wheel interaction. Recraft V4.1 followed the prompt much more closely, correctly placing the characters and depicting the capybara driving, even though it missed the detail about the jacket.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent clarity and cinematic lighting on the jack-o-lantern
  • + Clean, highly readable typography for the event details
  • + Well-defined thorns and central composition
  • Text contains several spelling errors like 'You inivted'
  • Repeats data fields multiple times, cluttering the bottom
  • Aesthetic is slightly more modern/digital than 'vintage parchment'

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect text rendering with no spelling errors in any section
  • + Captures the 'dark parchment' and 'vintage gothic' texture much better
  • + Successfully includes complicated elements like the spider webs and skulls in the border
  • The dark background at the bottom makes the date and location text slightly hard to read
  • Composition feels a bit more crowded at the top compared to the bottom

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the prompt requirements much better, specifically regarding the texture of the parchment and the accuracy of the text. While FLUX1.1 [pro] has beautiful lighting, its text is plagued with misspellings and redundant information, making Recraft V4.1 the superior choice for a usable invitation.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent 3D cartoon stylization with soft, pleasing textures
  • + Great composition with a diverse variety of sushi pieces
  • + Very clean, high-clarity rendering of the miniature scene
  • Failed to include the requested flag icon
  • Text positioning is slightly cramped at the top

Recraft V4.1

  • + Included every specific prompt element including the flag icon
  • + Impressive 'realistic PBR materials' on the fish textures
  • + Strong adherence to the 'small raised diorama base' with clean legs
  • The sushi looks more realistic than 'cartoon', missing the requested stylistic aesthetic
  • Chopsticks are incorrectly rendered as three separate sticks

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 followed the prompt instructions more comprehensively by including the flag icon and the specific diorama base legs, though it struggled with the cartoon style and object logic (three chopsticks). FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much more visually appealing 'cartoon' aesthetic with better variety, but failed on the flag requirement and was less literal with the PBR materials.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Exceptional backlighting and soft glow on the fur textures
  • + Vibrant and warm color palette
  • + Very clean and aesthetically pleasing composition
  • Failed to include the red fox kit from the prompt
  • The animals are mostly sitting rather than 'tumbling' or 'chasing' as requested
  • Butterflies are simplified and glowy rather than realistic

Recraft V4.1

  • + Successfully included all four specific animals: golden retriever, tabby kitten, bunny, and fox kit
  • + Better dynamic action showing the animals tumbling and reaching for butterflies
  • + Excellent execution of god rays and dew sparkles on the wildflowers
  • The kitten's anatomy and pose look slightly distorted near the mid-section
  • The dog's mouth has some minor rendering artifacts in the teeth

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it followed the complex prompt much more accurately, including all four requested baby animals while FLUX1.1 [pro] missed the fox. Recraft V4.1 also captured the dynamic 'tumbling' action and specific atmospheric details like god rays and dew much more effectively.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent emblem composition and integrated design
  • + Sophisticated vintage aesthetic with intricate detail
  • + High-quality vector style with beautiful filigree elements
  • Misspelled requested name as 'FRANILIAN'
  • Cloche dome looks more like a building cupola than a food cloche

Recraft V4.1

  • + Perfect text accuracy for both the main name and the date
  • + Follows 'minimalist' instruction much better than Model A
  • + Clear and literal interpretation of a retro cloche dome
  • Composition feels slightly unbalanced with the small icon and large text
  • Less 'vintage texture' compared to Model A

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner because it correctly rendered the text 'Caffè Florian', whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] made a significant typo. While FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more ornate and visually stunning emblem, Recraft V4.1 adhered more closely to the 'minimalist' prompt and functional logo requirements.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Recraft V4.1

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Clean aesthetic with a strong central visual focus.
  • + The large planetary curves create a nice sense of scale.
  • Text is largely gibberish and highly repetitive (multiple step 6s).
  • Doesn't follow the requested infographic step-by-step structure clearly.
  • Includes 'Saturn Vicon' as literal text, misinterpreting the prompt's 'Saturn V icon' instruction.

Recraft V4.1

  • + Excellent adherence to the logical step-by-step layout requested.
  • + Perfect text rendering for all titles and labels.
  • + Very clean, consistent vector iconography that follows the NASA palette perfectly.
  • Small numbering error (two number 4s and a skipped 5).
  • The composition is a bit more static compared to the more cinematic Model A.

Verdict: Recraft V4.1 is the clear winner as it successfully created a functional, readable infographic with crisp vector icons following the specific sequence requested. While FLUX1.1 [pro] has an attractive illustration style, its total failure to produce legible text or a logical flow of information makes it a poor infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model