Black Forest Labs' enhanced 12-billion parameter flow transformer with 6x faster generation than FLUX.1 [pro], delivering superior composition, detail, and artistic fidelity
Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.
FLUX1.1 [pro]
#50 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Recraft V4
#11 of 62 in Text-to-Image
Where the votes landed
FLUX1.1 [pro]
0%
win rate
Ties
0%
Recraft V4
0%
win rate
Challenge by challenge
The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.
Geometric Composition
Text-to-Image“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Exceptional photographic realism with sharp focus and vibrant colors
- + Accurate depiction of glass refraction and surface texture on the book
- + Follows all spatial instructions including the light source direction
- − The glass container is more rectangular than a 'cube'
- − The blue sphere appears to be floating rather than resting on the bottom
Recraft V4
- + Closer to a true cube shape for the glass object
- + Excellent realization of the green plant visible through the glass refraction
- + Highly realistic aged texture on the wood and book
- − The sphere is quite large relative to the glass container
- − The book is slightly too wide for the surface of the cube
Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a cleaner, high-end commercial photo aesthetic with better lighting, while Recraft V4 captured a more organic, rustic feel with superior glass refraction effects. FLUX1.1 [pro] is slightly preferred for its overall clarity and visual appeal.
Candid Street Photography
Text-to-Image“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent mood and cinematic lighting
- + High detail in the facial texture and wet pavement reflections
- + Good interpretation of the 'candid' and 'imperfect framing' prompt
- − Serious anatomical and structural failure with the bicycle's frame and rear wheel
- − The man is holding a bicycle that is missing its rear half
- − Lack of visible rain compared to the prompt's request
Recraft V4
- + Strong adherence to the motion blur and light rain requirements
- + More realistic and logical bicycle anatomy
- + Captures a busy street atmosphere that feels authentically Japanese
- − The man's skin texture looks slightly more plastic/smooth compared to Model A
- − The shallow depth of field is a bit aggressive, blurring the background into flat shapes
Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] produces a more atmospheric and detailed portrait with beautiful skin textures, it fails completely on the physics of the bicycle, which appears broken or non-existent in the back. Recraft V4 follows the complex technical requirements of the prompt—including motion blur, rain, and a coherent bicycle—much more effectively, resulting in a more believable scene.
Fantasy Warrior
Text-to-Image“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Exceptional photorealistic skin texture and eye detail
- + Dramatic high-contrast lighting that emphasizes the battle-worn theme
- + Excellent shallow depth of field rendering
- − Hair lacks clear beads as requested in the prompt
- − Tight crop hides most of the plate armor and leather details
Recraft V4
- + Perfect adherence to specific design elements like braided hair with beads and ornate engraving
- + Includes all requested elements like leather straps and cloth underlayers in view
- + Strong composition showing the full set of armor and setting
- − Lighting and skin textures feel slightly more muted and less lifelike than the competitor
- − The 'faint' scars look a bit like skin protrusions or heavy swelling rather than natural scarring
Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produces a more visceral and photorealistic portrait with stunning skin micro-details, but it misses several specific prompt instructions like the beads and full armor display. Recraft V4 captures every element of the prompt with high accuracy, providing the braids, beads, and intricate armor detail, making it the better choice for prompt adherence despite slightly flatter lighting.
Modern Clean Menu
Text-to-Image“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent presentation for a casual dining mockup including cutlery
- + Complex grid layout for photos that feels realistic to a brochure
- + Good balance of negative space and vibrant accents
- − Text is largely illegible gibberish
- − Food photos in the grid lack clear definition compared to the other model
Recraft V4
- + Perfectly legible, high-quality typography
- + Crisp food photography with consistent lighting and shadows
- + Highly accurate adherence to the specific sections requested (appetizers, pizza, mains)
- − Layout is a bit repetitive and simple compared to a full menu design
- − Missing 'mains' descriptions for the chicken and stir fry
Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it produces a functional, professional menu with perfectly legible text and high-quality individual food photography. While FLUX1.1 [pro] creates a nice stylistic mockup with a realistic presentation of silverwear, its text is unreadable, making it less useful for a design challenge.
Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge
Text-to-Image“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Clean and professional layout that looks like a high-end digital ad.
- + Very high visual quality on the burger textures and fire effects.
- + Perfectly rendered text with no spelling errors.
- − Failed the 'exploded' instruction; the burger is mostly assembled rather than having suspended components.
- − The text is clean but lacks the requested 'fiery effect' (mostly neon and flat white).
- − Missing the starburst element for the price.
Recraft V4
- + Accurately captures the 'exploded' requirement with all components clearly separated and suspended.
- + Strong adherence to text styling, featuring the fiery glow and the starburst for the price.
- + Excellent sense of motion with crumbs and dripping sauce.
- − The lighting on the bottom bun is slightly harsh and blown out.
- − The composition feels slightly more cluttered compared to the sleekness of Model A.
- − The 'MAGIC BURGER' text has a slight rendering artifact on the 'R'.
Verdict: Recraft V4 followed the prompt much more closely, successfully delivering an exploded burger view and the specific fiery text/starburst elements requested. While FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more polished-looking final image, it ignored the core instruction to have a dynamic, exploded view of the ingredients and missed several text formatting requirements.
Chalkboard Menu
Text-to-Image“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent chalk-like texture on the lettering
- + Captures a cozy indoor cafe atmosphere well
- − Failed to follow content instructions, doubling the octopus item and butchering the prices
- − Spelling errors like 'Chipkies' and 'Herbs s'
- − Text appears too clean and digital in its placement despite the texture
Recraft V4
- + Perfect adherence to the menu text and pricing requested
- + Includes creative chalk illustrations that enhance the menu theme
- + Realistic chalk dust and smudge effects on the board background
- − The font for the bottom disclaimer is too small and uniform, looking slightly digital
- − The cursive requested for the title is more of a slanted print
Verdict: Recraft V4 followed the prompt instructions much more accurately, correctly rendering all the requested menu items and their prices, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] hallucinated incorrect prices and duplicated list items. Recraft V4 also added charming chalk illustrations that fit the café aesthetic perfectly.
The Reversed Rodeo
Text-to-Image“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent visual clarity and cinematic lighting
- + Creative interpretation of the horse's anatomy appearing as a 'living space vessel'
- + High level of detail in the textures and background
- − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse instead of the horse on top of the astronaut
Recraft V4
- + Strong composition with a sense of scale and movement
- + Very high resolution and realistic rendering of the horse and astronaut gear
- + Atmospheric asteroid field adds to the cinematic quality
- − Failed the negative constraint; the astronaut is on top of the horse
- − The prompt specifically asked for a horse on top of an astronaut, which was ignored
Verdict: Both models failed the specific spatial logic request to place the horse on top of the astronaut, instead defaulting to the common trope of an astronaut riding a horse. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more vibrant, surreal image, while Recraft V4 provided a more gritty, realistic cinematic aesthetic. The winner is a tie because both models equally failed the core challenge of the prompt's logical inversion.
The Capybara Taxi Driver
Text-to-Image“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara
- + High cinematic quality with professional bokeh
- + Warm, moody atmosphere that fits a New York night
- − Failed the spatial request; the woman is in the front passenger seat instead of the back seat
- − Paws are not visible on the steering wheel
- − Composition is very tight and obscures much of the taxi interior
Recraft V4
- + Perfect adherence to character placement with the woman in the back seat
- + Correctly shows the capybara with paws on the steering wheel
- + Realistic exterior New York background with recognizable architecture
- − The woman's hand holding the phone is slightly distorted
- − Lower overall sharpness and contrast compared to the other model
Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner as it followed every detail of the prompt, including the specific seating arrangement and the capybara's interaction with the steering wheel. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a more aesthetically pleasing image in terms of lighting and texture, but it failed the layout instructions by placing the passenger in the front seat.
The Halloween Invitation
Text-to-Image“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Strong composition with a clear central focus and vintage poster aesthetic.
- + Excellent lighting with a moody, high-contrast gothic atmosphere.
- + Creative thorn border that adheres well to the requested theme.
- − Multiple spelling errors and duplicated text lines in the invitation details.
- − The layout resulted in a rectangular poster inside a square frame rather than a square design.
Recraft V4
- + Perfect text rendering with zero spelling errors for all requested information.
- + Excellent adherence to the square format request.
- + High level of detail in the cobweb border and environment textures.
- − Lighting is a bit flat compared to the cinematic request.
- − The 'small scroll banner' is a simple white rectangle rather than an elegant parchment scroll.
Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner due to its flawless execution of the text requirements, which are critical for an invitation. While FLUX1.1 [pro] captures a more 'cinematic' and moody artistic style, the presence of duplicated and misspelled text makes it unusable as a functional design.
Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes
Text-to-Image“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Perfectly captures the 3D cartoon miniature style requested.
- + Excellent lighting and soft, refined PBR textures.
- + Very clean layout with a smooth, professional diorama base.
- − Failed to include the small flag icon specifically mentioned in the prompt.
- − Text layout for 'SUSHI' is relatively basic and lacks the spacing elegance of the competitor.
Recraft V4
- + Included all text and the small flag icon as requested.
- + Highly realistic textures on the sushi and the unique ice diorama base.
- + Excellent typography with professional letter-spacing.
- − Failed to follow the 'cartoon' style constraint, opting for realism instead.
- − The diorama base is made of ice/salt crystals rather than the smooth '3D cartoon' look implied.
- − Lighting is harsher with very dark shadows, contrasting the 'gentle lighting' request.
Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] followed the stylistic instructions much more closely, delivering a charming 3D cartoon miniature that looks like a professional 3D render, although it missed the flag icon. Recraft V4 accurately included all prompt elements including the flag and text spacing, but completely ignored the 'cartoon' style requirement in favor of photorealism. FLUX1.1 [pro] is the winner for better overall adherence to the aesthetic vision of the prompt.
Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow
Text-to-Image“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent use of backlighting and 'god rays' for a magical atmosphere
- + Very cute expressions and cohesive illustrative style
- + High quality texture on the fur especially where light hits
- − Failed to include the red fox kit mentioned in the prompt
- − The animals are sitting rather than 'tumbling and chasing' as requested
Recraft V4
- + Includes all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox
- + Perfectly captures the 'tumbling' and 'chasing' motion in the meadow
- + Detailed butterflies and realistic dew sparkles on the grass
- − The fox's front legs have slightly awkward anatomy/merging
- − The rabbit is positioned directly behind the kitten which a bit cluttered
Verdict: Recraft V4 followed the complex prompt much more accurately, including all four specific animals and depicting the active motion of chasing and tumbling. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a beautiful, high-quality image, but missed the fox entirely and opted for a static, posed composition.
Vintage Cafe Logo
Text-to-Image“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent hand-drawn woodcut aesthetic that fits the vintage theme.
- + Well-executed decorative border and subtle parchment texture.
- + Strong use of the cloche dome and steam iconography.
- − Significant spelling error in the primary brand name, writing 'FRATILIAN' instead of 'FLORIAN'.
- − Extra characters and symbols added to the word 'Cafeè' reduce legibility.
Recraft V4
- + Perfect adherence to text prompt spelling for 'Caffè Florian'.
- + Clean, professional vector style that looks like a modern-retro logo.
- + Effective use of negative space in the cloche illustration.
- − The 'Est. 1720' text is placed in a semi-circle rather than the requested banner.
- − The background texture is very subtle, almost appearing as a flat white.
Verdict: Recraft V4 is the clear winner because it followed the text instructions perfectly, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] significantly misspelled the brand name as 'Fratilian'. While FLUX1.1 [pro] offered a more authentic vintage texture and border, Recraft V4 produced a much more usable and accurate vector-style logo for a commercial context.
Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility
Text-to-Image“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”
AI Judge Analysis
FLUX1.1 [pro]
- + Excellent large-scale composition that feels like a professional poster design.
- + Strong adherence to the requested color palette and vector style.
- + Creative use of a central celestial body to anchor the infographic.
- − Text rendering is mostly gibberish with several typos like 'Apolo 1'.
- − The sequential logic of the numbered points is messy and inconsistent.
- − Failed to follow the specific icon descriptions for some steps.
Recraft V4
- + Near-perfect text rendering and legibility for all headers and labels.
- + Strict adherence to the 6-step logical sequence requested in the prompt.
- + Very clean, consistent iconography that accurately represents space flight hardware.
- − The layout is a bit sparse and lacks the 'poster' feel of the competitor.
- − The white background makes the 'muted red' accents look a bit thin.
- − Composition is more like a slide deck than a visual infographic poster.
Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] excels in artistic composition and visual style, creating a more attractive poster, but fails significantly on text legibility and logical flow. Recraft V4 followed every instruction perfectly, including exact labels, specific icons, and the correct 6-step sequence, making it the superior infographic despite a more utilitarian layout.
Explore each model
Recraft's latest text-to-image generation model with high-quality output, supporting various aspect ratios and custom color palettes