Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX1.1 [pro] Black Forest Labs Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 Google

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX1.1 [pro]

18.4 arena score

#50 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

17.1 arena score

#54 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX1.1 [pro]

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent transparency and realistic glass thickness
  • + High-quality texture on the red book cover
  • + Strong adherence to the lighting and background blur requests
  • The glass container is a tall rectangular prism rather than a cube
  • The sphere appears to be floating without a visible support mechanism

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect cube geometry for the glass object
  • + Excellent material physics with realistic reflections and refractions
  • + The sphere looks more physically integrated into the scene
  • One side of the 'glass' cube appears opaque or mirror-like rather than fully transparent
  • The plant behind the cube is less distinct

Verdict: Both models followed the complex spatial instructions perfectly. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 produced a more accurate cube shape and highly realistic lighting, whereas FLUX1.1 [pro] created a rectangular prism instead of a cube but excelled in depicting the translucency of the glass and the fine texture of the book.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent mood and cinematic lighting.
  • + Strong adherence to the 'motion blur' and 'candid' aspects of the prompt.
  • + Realistic street atmosphere with accurate pavement reflections.
  • Anatomical and structural errors where the bicycle meets the ground behind the man.
  • The bicycle itself is fragmented and missing its rear half.
  • The man appears to be pushing the bike rather than actively repairing it.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Stronger adherence to the specific action of 'repairing' with tools shown.
  • + Vivid colors and much higher level of detail on the subject's face and clothing.
  • + The bicycle frame is coherent and recognizable.
  • The 'motion blur from passing cars' is minimal or absent.
  • The skin texture and lighting feel slightly more 'rendered' and less like a raw 50mm candid photo.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] better captures the requested photographic style including motion blur and imperfect framing, it fails significantly on the physical logic of the bicycle. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 provides a much more coherent image of a man actually performing a repair, with superior detail and a cleaner composition, making it the more successful image despite missing some of the atmospheric blur.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Superb skin texture including pores and fine hairs
  • + Highly expressive, lifelike eyes with realistic reflections
  • + Natural integration of bokeh sparks into the depth of field
  • The 'braided hair with small beads' is very subtle and mostly obscured
  • The scars appear more like simple dirt or blood splatters rather than healed tissue

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Excellent depiction of ornate, engraved plate armor
  • + Very clear implementation of braided hair with numerous beads
  • + Strong warm light source showing clear highlights and shadows
  • Skin texture looks somewhat waxy and artificial compared to the other model
  • Spark bokeh looks like a flat overlay rather than being integrated into the 3D space
  • The leather straps lack the requested high-detail texture

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produces a much more realistic portrait with incredible skin and eye detail, though it misses the specific 'braids' request in a prominent way. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 adheres better to the specific armor and hair details, but the overall image quality feels more like a 3D render than a photorealistic portrait. FLUX1.1 [pro] is preferred for its superior textures and cinematic depth.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent presentation for a menu with realistic flatware and layered cards.
  • + Strong photo integration within the central menu pane.
  • + Realistic typography scaling that mimics a physical document.
  • Text includes several typos and garbled characters.
  • The layout is quite cluttered with overlapping panels.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect adherence to the grid-based food photo request.
  • + Extremely clean and modern minimalist aesthetic with vibrant geometric accents.
  • + Clear, legible section headers for Appetizers, Pizza, and Mains.
  • Text is largely nonsensical 'Lorem Ipsum' style placeholder text.
  • The layout feels more like a digital website UI than a physical printed menu.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 followed the specific structural instructions much better, delivering a clear grid of food photos and distinct headers for appetizers, pizza, and mains. While FLUX1.1 [pro] created a more realistic scene of physical menu cards, it failed to provide the clean grid layout requested and had noisier text rendering.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and bun.
  • + Vibrant lighting with clear, legible text integration.
  • + Effective use of depth of field to create motion.
  • The burger is not truly 'exploded'; most of it is still assembled.
  • Failed to place the price in a starburst as requested.
  • The glowing effect is blue neon for the title rather than the requested fiery glow.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Strong adherence to the 'exploded' composition with separated layers.
  • + Followed all text styling and placement instructions, including the fiery starburst.
  • + Dynamic layout that feels more like a professional advertisement.
  • The cheese has a slightly plastic, less photorealistic appearance compared to the other components.
  • The price uses a comma instead of a period for the decimal point (€6,99).

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 is the clear winner as it followed all specific prompt instructions, including the 'exploded' layout, fiery text effects, and the starburst element. FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a high-quality image but failed to separate the burger components and missed the starburst requirement.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent chalk-like texture with realistic smudging and pressure variations.
  • + Great overall atmosphere and cafe aesthetics in the background.
  • + Correct date and most item names rendered with legible handwriting.
  • Hallucinated the pricing and split the octopus dish into two separate entries with incorrect prices ($228 and $98).
  • Minor spelling errors like 'Chipkies' and 'Herbss'.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Better logic on prices and items, capturing the 'Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies' accurately.
  • + Maintains a clean and very legible handwritten style throughout the board.
  • Included internal prompt instructions as literal text on the board (e.g., 'Tittle', 'Elegant chalk hand').
  • The handwriting looks more like a digital font than actual chalk on a board.
  • Several spelling errors in the footer text like 'veriaens' and 'charectties'.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] fails to follow the logical list of menu items perfectly, its aesthetic quality and realistic chalk texture are far superior to the competition. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 fails significantly on the prompt adherence by literally printing the instructional text (like 'Tittle' and 'Footer') onto the chalkboard, making it unusable.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and texture on the horse's coat.
  • + High level of anatomical detail in the horse's musculature.
  • + Strong sense of scale and movement.
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.
  • The composition feels more like a lunar surface than deep space.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Beautiful star-field rendering and cosmic effects on the horse's body.
  • + Clean, crisp digital art style with vibrant colors.
  • + Creative interpretation of the horse walking on a galactic plane.
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.
  • The horse's front leg has some anatomical awkwardness at the joints.

Verdict: Both FLUX1.1 [pro] and Imagen 4.0 failed the specific prompt instruction to place the horse on top of the astronaut, instead generating standard 'astronaut riding a horse' images. FLUX1.1 [pro] is visually superior for its more realistic textures and cinematic lighting, while Imagen 4.0 provides a more magical and stylized space aesthetic.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmospheric bokeh.
  • + Realistic fur texture on the capybara.
  • + High artistic quality with a professional photograph feel.
  • The passenger appears to be sitting in the front seat based on scale and perspective.
  • The capybara's paws are not clearly on the steering wheel.
  • The steering wheel is barely visible and poorly defined.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect adherence to the layout instructions with the passenger clearly in the back seat.
  • + Accurately depicts both paws on the steering wheel.
  • + Clear inclusion of the requested taxi driver cap and jacket.
  • The 'TAXI' sign is floating inside the car roof erroneously.
  • Lighting is somewhat flat compared to the other model.
  • The capybara's paws have slightly strange, claw-like appendages.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produces a more aesthetically pleasing and photorealistic image with superior lighting, but it fails the spatial composition of the prompt by placing the passenger next to the driver. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 follows every aspect of the complex prompt accurately, including the positioning of characters and the specific action of the paws, despite some minor anatomical and structural errors like the floating taxi sign.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent cinematic lighting and atmospheric depth
  • + Authentic vintage parchment paper texture
  • + Detailed and intricate thorn border design
  • Numerous text errors including 'univted' and repeating lines of event details
  • The layout feels cramped with the text compressed at the bottom

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect text rendering for all requested details including the scroll banner
  • + Balanced and clean composition that feels like a professional invitation
  • + Accurately includes all elements like spiderwebs which were requested
  • Slightly more illustrative and less 'gritty' than the requested gothic parchment style
  • The scroll on the left side feels a bit bulky and disconnected from the rest of the frame

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] excels at creating a moody, cinematic atmosphere with beautiful textures, it fails significantly on text accuracy and layout organization. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 provides a much more functional invitation with impeccable text rendering and a clear visual hierarchy, making it the better choice for a specific text-heavy prompt.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Perfectly followed all text requirements including 'JAPAN' and 'SUSHI'.
  • + Accurately rendered the 3D isometric cartoon style with soft textures.
  • + Clean execution of the solid light blue background and diorama base.
  • Missing the specific 'small flag icon' requested at the top-center.
  • Text rendering is a bit soft around the edges of 'SUSHI'.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + High visual clarity and realistic materials on the sushi items.
  • + Good adherence to the 'small raised diorama base' instruction.
  • Failed to include any of the requested text ('JAPAN', 'SUSHI').
  • Did not follow the 'solid light blue background' instruction.
  • Ignored the 'cartoon scene' style request in favor of realism.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] significantly outperformed Imagen 4.0 by adhering to nearly every prompt instruction, including complex text and specific stylistic choices like the 3D isometric cartoon look and the blue background. Imagen 4.0 produced a realistic image but completely failed to include the requested text elements and background color.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent photographic bokeh and realistic lighting effects.
  • + Ultra-detailed fur textures and highly expressive, wet-looking eyes.
  • + Magical, warm atmosphere with glowing backlighting and dew-like sparkles.
  • Missed the red fox kit completely.
  • The butterflies are stylized glowing shapes rather than realistic insects.
  • Failed to include the four distinct animals requested.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Successfully included all four requested animals: puppy, kitten, bunny, and fox kit.
  • + Stronger adherence to the 'tumbling/playful' action described in the prompt.
  • + Vibrant and detailed wildflower meadow with clear dew drops on the grass.
  • The image leans toward an illustrative or CGI style rather than the requested 'hyper-photorealistic' look.
  • The puppy's paws and the fox's landing look slightly unnatural.
  • Lighting is a bit flat compared to the dramatic god rays requested.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] produced a much more visually stunning and realistic photograph, but it failed the prompt adherence test by omitting a fourth animal. Imagen 4.0 Generate 001 followed the complex prompt much more accurately by including all four specific animals and the tumbling action, though it looks more like a high-quality illustration than a real photo. Because it captured the full scene description including the fox, Imagen 4.0 is the more functional result for this specific request.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent decorative flourishes and vintage texture
  • + Strong use of the 'Est. 1720' banner integrated into the emblem
  • + High detail in the dome illustration
  • Serious spelling error in the main text ('FRANILIAN' instead of 'FLORIAN')
  • Layout is more ornate than 'minimalist' as requested

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Perfect text rendering for both the name and date
  • + True minimalist vector aesthetic that matches the prompt exactly
  • + Clean and balanced composition
  • The 'steam' lines are a bit generic
  • The banner for the date is quite simple compared to the 'vintage' request

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] captures a more authentic 'vintage' texture and ornate detail, it fails significantly on the primary text rendering. Imagen 4.0 provides a clean, perfectly spelled, and genuinely minimalist logo that adheres exactly to all aspects of the prompt instructions.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX1.1 [pro]
Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro]

  • + Excellent NASA-inspired color palette.
  • + Includes all requested steps even if numbering is confused.
  • + High aesthetic value with a balanced composition.
  • Poor text rendering with garbled descriptions.
  • Step numbering is illogical and repetitive (1, 2, 3, 6, 6).
  • The rocket design is generic rather than a Saturn V.

Imagen 4.0 Generate 001

  • + Clean, professional flat-vector aesthetic.
  • + Accurate Saturn V rocket illustration.
  • + Superior text legibility and logical flow.
  • Does not complete all steps requested to the landing phase.
  • The 'Translunar' graphic is placed after the moon rather than between Earth and moon.
  • Slightly less creative use of space than model A.

Verdict: Imagen 4.0 delivers a much cleaner and more professional-looking vector infographic with perfectly legible text and a correct Saturn V representation. While FLUX1.1 [pro] captures the requested color palette well and attempts more of the steps, its failure to render readable text and its chaotic numbering system makes it less functional as an infographic.

Next steps

Explore each model