Head to head
Esc

Models · slot A

to navigate to pick

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs Wan 2.7 Alibaba

Settled by community votes across 13 shared challenges, with an AI judge weighing in on each.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

17.9 arena score

#51 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Skill signature · Text-to-Image

Wan 2.7

20.5 arena score

#39 of 62 in Text-to-Image

Vote tally

Where the votes landed

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

0%

win rate

Ties

0%

Wan 2.7

0%

win rate

Shared challenges 13

Challenge by challenge

The strongest take from each model on every shared challenge, with the AI judge's read.

Geometric Composition

Text-to-Image

“A glass cube on a wooden table. Inside the cube is a small blue sphere. On top of the cube sits a red book. A green plant is behind the cube, partially visible through the glass. Soft window light from the left.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent photorealism with crisp textures on the book and table.
  • + Accurate glass refraction and reflections.
  • + Perfect lighting execution according to the prompt.
  • The blue sphere is levitating rather than sitting on the bottom of the cube.
  • The sphere looks a bit like a plastic marble compared to the realism of other elements.

Wan 2.7

  • + Natural placement of the sphere resting on the cube's floor.
  • + Beautiful, rustic texture on the wooden table and weathered book.
  • + Realistic portrayal of the glass thickness and green tints in the corners.
  • The glass cube has a strange internal reflection/artifact on the left side that looks like a second sphere.
  • The lighting is consistent but slightly more diffuse than Model A.

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt instructions perfectly, including the specific spatial relationships between objects. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produced a cleaner, high-end commercial photo look, though it defied physics by floating the sphere; Wan 2.7 created a more grounded, rustic scene with highly convincing textures, despite a minor reflection artifact.

Candid Street Photography

Text-to-Image

“A candid street photo of an elderly Japanese man repairing a red bicycle in light rain, reflections on wet pavement, shallow depth of field, 50mm lens, natural skin texture, imperfect framing, motion blur from passing cars, cinematic but realistic, no stylization.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on the passing vehicle.
  • + Strong cinematic lighting with vibrant reflections on the pavement.
  • + Clear skin texture and realistic clothing details.
  • The bike anatomy is slightly flawed with the frame merging into the rear wheel area.
  • The scene feels a bit more structured and less 'candid' than the prompt suggested.

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfectly captures the 'candid street photo' aesthetic and imperfect framing requested.
  • + Highly realistic, weathered texture on the clothing and bicycle.
  • + Atmospheric rain streaks and wet pavement reflections feel very authentic to a 50mm lens look.
  • Failed to include the requested motion blur from passing cars.
  • Visible artifacts on the background pedestrian's hands and face.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra excels at the technical 'cinematic' requirements like motion blur and lighting, but Wan 2.7 delivers a much more convincing 'candid' street photography feel with superior clothing textures and a more realistic depiction of an elderly man. While Model A followed more prompt instructions regarding motion blur, Model B captured the soul and aesthetic requested more effectively.

Fantasy Warrior

Text-to-Image

“Close portrait of a battle-worn paladin in ornate engraved plate armor, hair braided with small beads, faint scars and dirt on the skin, warm torchlight reflecting off metal, shallow depth of field, bokeh sparks, lifelike eyes, highly detailed texture on leather straps and cloth underlayer.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • The output is a completely black image with no content.
  • Failed to generate any part of the requested prompt.

Wan 2.7

  • + Excellent adherence to all prompt details including the braided hair with beads and ornate armor engravings.
  • + High-quality skin texture with realistic faint scars and believable dirt smudges.
  • + Masterful use of lighting, with a warm torchlight glow reflecting naturally off the polished metal.
  • The buckle on the leather strap has a slightly inconsistent overlap with the underlying belt.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra failed to generate a visible image, resulting in a black frame. Wan 2.7, however, produced an exceptionally detailed and atmospheric portrait that followed every element of the prompt with high fidelity and artistic quality.

Modern Clean Menu

Text-to-Image

“Modern minimalist restaurant menu design, white background with colorful food photos in grid, sections for appetizers/pizza/mains, bold sans-serif fonts, vibrant accents, clean professional layout for casual dining.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Strong prompt adherence regarding the white background and grid layout.
  • + Excellent visual quality for the food photography.
  • + Professional mock-up presentation style.
  • Nonsensical text and spelling errors throughout the menu items.
  • Layout is a bit chaotic with overlapping elements and inconsistent margins.

Wan 2.7

  • + Near-perfect text rendering and legibility for a generated image.
  • + Well-structured grid that logically organizes multiple menu sections.
  • + Clean, modern aesthetic with cohesive branding elements.
  • Misses the 'bold sans-serif fonts' requirement for category headers, using a serif style instead.
  • The background contains props (herbs, bowl) rather than being a plain white background.

Verdict: While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces high-quality food photography, its text rendering and layout logic are weak. Wan 2.7 provides a much more functional and realistic menu design with legible text and a cohesive grid, despite ignoring the request for a plain white background.

Magic Burger Explosion: Fiery Photorealism Challenge

Text-to-Image

“Ad for 'Magic Burger'. Dynamic, exploded burger with all components (bun, patty, cheese, lettuce, tomato, sauce) suspended in mid-air. Emphasize photorealistic detail and a sense of motion. Dark, fiery background with glowing embers. Integrate text: 'MAGIC BURGER' as a prominent title, 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' as a secondary message, and '€6.99' in a starburst, all rendered with a fiery, glowing effect.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent photorealistic texture on the meat and buns
  • + Great atmospheric lighting with embers and bottom-lit fire
  • + Perfect text rendering for the primary and secondary messages
  • Missed the starburst element for the price
  • The burger is more of a stack than a dynamic horizontal explosion
  • Included some small halluncinated text at the bottom edge

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully followed almost all prompt instructions including the starburst
  • + Dynamic and chaotic 'exploded' composition with ingredients spread across the frame
  • + Creative fiery typography for the main title
  • Slightly more 'digital art' feel rather than pure photorealism
  • Strange floating seeds/nuts and a cucumber that weren't specifically requested
  • The smoke effect feels a bit like a flat overlay

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a much more realistic and appetizing image with superior lighting, though it fails to include the requested starburst. Wan 2.7 adheres more strictly to the complex layout requirements, including every specific graphic element requested, but has a more CG-illustrative quality. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is the likely winner for its professional advertising aesthetic and high-fidelity textures.

Chalkboard Menu

Text-to-Image

“Handwritten-style chalkboard menu in a cozy café, all text rendered in the exact same realistic chalk handwriting style with natural variations in letter size, slight slant, and chalk texture — no printed or digital fonts anywhere on the board. Title at the top in elegant cursive chalk handwriting: ‘TODAY’S SPECIALS – APRIL 30, 2026’. Below it, three menu items also in the same handwritten chalk style: ‘Truffle Mushroom Risotto – $24’, ‘Grilled Octopus with Lemon & Herbs – $28’, ‘Brown Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies – $9’. At the very bottom, smaller text in the identical handwritten chalk style (slightly smaller but still clearly legible with the same handwriting characteristics): ‘All items made fresh daily • Ask about our gluten-free options’. Warm ambient café lighting, visible chalk dust and smudges, realistic handwriting imperfections, no clean printed text anywhere.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent authentic chalk texture and imperfect handwriting
  • + Captures the request for slight slant and natural variations well
  • Significant spelling errors and repetitive gibberish text in the menu items
  • Failed to render the title in cursive as requested

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfect text rendering with no spelling mistakes
  • + Strong layout and aesthetic appeal for a café setting
  • + Follows the multi-line item list accurately
  • Text looks like a digital font rather than authentic hand-drawn chalk
  • Missed the request for cursive handwriting in the title

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra excels at the required art style, producing very realistic chalk handwriting, but fails significantly on text legibility and spelling. Wan 2.7 produces perfectly legible and accurate text, but it lacks the 'handwritten' feel requested, looking more like a digital overlay or font. Wan 2.7 is the better choice for a functional menu, despite the lack of stylistic nuance.

The Reversed Rodeo

Text-to-Image

“Horse riding astronaut in space — horse on top, not vice versa. Surreal, highly detailed, cinematic.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent visual clarity and high resolution.
  • + Cinematic composition with dynamic lighting and atmospheric curvature.
  • + Adds surreal elements like small satellites and an Earth-like planet in the distance.
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.

Wan 2.7

  • + Clean, detailed rendering of the astronaut suit and horse hair.
  • + Balanced composition with interesting background elements like galaxies.
  • + Good skin and lighting detail within the helmet.
  • Failed the specific spatial instruction for the horse to be on top of the astronaut.
  • Anatomical issues where the horse's back left leg appears to be missing or merged into the tail.

Verdict: Both FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra and Wan 2.7 failed the complex spatial coordination requested in the prompt, which specifically asked for the horse to be on top of the astronaut. Between the two, FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is the superior image due to its more cinematic lighting, higher overall polish, and lack of anatomical errors compared to Wan 2.7, which produced a horse missing a leg.

The Capybara Taxi Driver

Text-to-Image

“Photorealistic scene inside a yellow New York taxi at night. A capybara is driving, wearing a yellow taxi driver cap and a dark jacket. It has a calm, professional expression and both front paws on the steering wheel. In the back seat sits a human businesswoman in a coat, looking at her phone with a completely normal, bored expression (as if this is just another normal ride). Through the windows you can see the streets of Manhattan at night with blurred lights. Realistic taxi interior, photorealistic, detailed fur and fabric, 35mm lens, night lighting with reflections, shallow depth of field.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent photographic lighting and depth of field
  • + High resolution textures on the capybaras fur and the jacket
  • + Atmospheric background bokeh that captures the New York feel
  • The passenger is sitting in the front seat instead of the back seat as requested
  • The capybara only has one arm visible and it is not clearly on the steering wheel

Wan 2.7

  • + Successfully placed the passenger in the back seat
  • + Accurately depicted the capybara with both paws on the steering wheel
  • + Realistic taxi exterior details like the roof sign
  • The capybaras fur looks less realistic and more like brush strokes
  • The passenger is looking away from her phone rather than at it
  • Visible AI artifacts around the capybaras claws and the car door

Verdict: Wan 2.7 followed the complex spatial instructions much better, correctly placing the passenger in the back seat and the capybara's paws on the wheel. However, FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produced a significantly higher quality image with superior textures and lighting, even though it failed the specific positioning instructions by placing both characters in the front.

The Halloween Invitation

Text-to-Image

“Vintage gothic Halloween party invitation. Dark parchment poster, spooky border with webs and thorns, central glowing jack-o-lantern, bats, twisted trees, moody night sky. Add elegant gothic title text saying "Halloween Party Invitation", a small scroll banner saying "You are invited to a night of frights", and event details at the bottom: Date: 30.10.2026 Time: 7pm Location: The Arches, NYC Spooky but polished, cinematic lighting, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Strong composition with a central glow and high contrast.
  • + Atmospheric and moody lighting with cinematic twisted tree silhouettes.
  • + Legible event details and location.
  • Includes significant hallucinated text ('noickt or a night of frights') beneath the banner.
  • Text in the main title is missing the word 'Party' as requested in the prompt.

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfect text accuracy, including the full title and all details without typos.
  • + Beautifully detailed border with thorns, webs, and skulls.
  • + Cohesive vintage storybook illustration style.
  • Lighting is less 'cinematic' and more flat, reminiscent of a vector illustration.
  • The sky colors are a bit vibrant, leaning more whimsical than dark/gothic.

Verdict: Wan 2.7 is the clear winner for its superior ability to render complex text layout and prompt instructions without errors or hallucinations. While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra has more atmospheric lighting, its failure to include the word 'Party' in the header and the inclusion of messy gibberish text at the bottom makes it less functional as an invitation.

Isometric Miniature Diorama Scenes

Text-to-Image

“Create a clear, 45° top-down isometric miniature 3D cartoon scene of Japan's signature dish: sushi, with soft refined textures, realistic PBR materials, gentle lighting, on a small raised diorama base with minimal garnish and plate. Solid light blue background. At top-center: 'JAPAN' in large bold text, 'SUSHI' below it, small flag icon. Perfectly centered, ultra-clean, high-clarity, square format.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent typography integrated naturally into the composition
  • + Beautiful soft lighting and steam effects that enhance the miniature atmosphere
  • + High detail in the textures of the salmon and rice grains
  • The plant and some side items feel a bit cluttered relative to the 'minimal' request
  • Includes a strange bug-like artifact on the wooden base

Wan 2.7

  • + Perfectly follows the bold text and flag icon layout requested
  • + Very clean, minimal, and organized presentation of the sushi pieces
  • + Maintains a consistent 45-degree isometric perspective and smooth PBR materials
  • The text is a bit flat compared to the 3D aesthetic of the scene
  • The shrimp has a slightly odd facial feature rendering

Verdict: Both models followed the prompt exceptionally well, but Wan 2.7 is the likely winner for its superior clean layout and better adherence to the 'minimal garnish' and 'bold text' instructions. While FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra has more sophisticated lighting and texture, its composition feels slightly more cluttered and includes a small distracting artifact by the chopsticks.

Adorable Baby Animals in Sunny Meadow

Text-to-Image

“Hyper-photorealistic scene of fluffy baby animals—a golden retriever puppy, tabby kitten, baby bunny, and red fox kit—with big expressive eyes and ultra-detailed soft fur, playfully chasing butterflies and tumbling together in a lush wildflower meadow, warm golden sunrise light with god rays and dew sparkles, joyful wholesome vibe, 8K masterpiece.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent soft lighting and dreamy atmosphere.
  • + Extremely cute and stylized character designs that evoke a strong emotional response.
  • + Very soft and realistic fur texture.
  • Follows a more 'digital art' or 3D render style rather than hyper-photorealistic.
  • Creatures look slightly homogeneous in their facial structures.

Wan 2.7

  • + Captures the 'hyper-photorealistic' part of the prompt much better with realistic animal anatomy.
  • + Better dynamic action showing the animals actually 'tumbling' and 'chasing'.
  • + Stronger adherence to individual species characteristics, like the tabby patterns and the fox's features.
  • The cat's paw interaction with the rabbit's back looks slightly unnatural.
  • The butterflies feel a bit pasted-on compared to the rest of the scene.

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a beautiful, highly stylized image that leans into a 'cute' aesthetic, but fails to meet the 'photorealistic' requirement. Wan 2.7 provides a much more convincing photorealistic interpretation with realistic animal proportions and better movement, making it the more accurate response to the prompt.

Vintage Cafe Logo

Text-to-Image

“Vintage minimalist restaurant logo for "Caffè Florian", retro cloche dome with steam and "Est. 1720" banner, classic typography, warm brown and cream tones, subtle texture on light background, vector emblem style.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Excellent vector emblem style with professional shading
  • + Captures the vintage minimalist aesthetic perfectly
  • + High-quality linework and classic typography style
  • Spelling error in the main text, rendering 'Framilian' instead of 'Florian'

Wan 2.7

  • + Includes all specific elements like the cloche, steam, and banner
  • + Spelling is almost correct, though it ends in 'on' instead of 'an'
  • + Nice use of subtle texture on the background
  • Typography is a bit generic and the cloche looks slightly cartoonish
  • Composition is a bit busy with the extra stars and floral elements
  • Minor spelling error ('Florion' instead of 'Florian')

Verdict: FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra produces a much more sophisticated and aesthetically pleasing vector logo that perfectly matches the 'vintage minimalist' request, despite a significant spelling error. Wan 2.7 follows every detail of the prompt including the 'Est. 1720' banner and steam, but its visual execution feels more like clip-art than a professional logo. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is the likely winner for its superior composition and artistic quality, even though both models struggled with exact spelling.

Apollo 11: Journey to Tranquility

Text-to-Image

“Create a clean, modern vector infographic poster about the Apollo 11 mission. NASA-inspired palette (navy, white, muted red, light gray). Flat-vector style, crisp lines, consistent iconography, subtle gradients only. Steps (stop at landing): 1. Launch (Saturn Vicon) 2. Earth Orbit (Earth + orbit ring icon) 3. Translunar (trajectory arc icon) 4. Lunar Orbit (Moon + orbit ring icon) 5. Descent (lunar module descending icon) 6. Landing (lunar module on the surface icon) Small supporting elements (minimal text): • Crew strip: three silhouette icons with only last names: Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins. • Landing site marker: Moon pin labeled "Tranquility" only. Layout constraints: generous margins, large readable labels, clean background with subtle stars. Vector-only, print-poster look, high resolution.”

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Wan 2.7

AI Judge Analysis

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

  • + Clean vector illustration style
  • + Includes a large, well-designed moon surface graphic
  • + Modern and spacious layout
  • Text is largely nonsensical 'Lorem Ipsum' style gibberish
  • The workflow and numbering are illogical and chaotic
  • The iconography does not match the prompt's requested steps

Wan 2.7

  • + Follows the 6-step chronological sequence requested in the prompt
  • + Text is highly legible and contains accurate historical facts
  • + Iconography is relevant for each specific mission stage
  • Minor spelling errors like 'Descript' instead of 'Descent'
  • The composition is a bit crowded compared to Model A
  • The flat-vector style is slightly more basic

Verdict: Model B (Wan 2.7) is the clear winner because it actually functions as an infographic, following the requested 6-step mission sequence with legible and historically relevant text. While Model A (FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra) has a more polished 'premium' vector aesthetic, the text is gibberish and the infographic structure makes no logical sense.

Next steps

Explore each model