FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs vs Wan 2.5 (Preview) Alibaba

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent refraction and reflection physics on the glass surfaces.
• + Highly realistic textures on the red book cover and the wooden table.
• + Clean, professional photographic composition with accurate lighting.

• − The blue sphere is levitating rather than sitting on a surface, which might look physically unnatural.
• − The plant is very close to the cube, making the 'behind' instruction feel a bit crowded.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strong adherence to the spatial relationship of the sphere sitting on the base.
• + Captures the 'soft window light' very effectively with beautiful shadows and dust motes.
• + Nice weathered texture on the edges of the book.

• − The sphere has multiple reflections that don't align perfectly with its position.
• − The glass edges appear slightly inconsistent in thickness compared to Model A.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on the passing vehicle
• + Very high resolution and clarity on the subject
• + Natural and realistic pavement reflections

• − The man appears to be standing over the bike rather than actively repairing it
• − Composition feels slightly staged compared to image B

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Stronger narrative adherence with the man actively crouching and using tools to repair the bike
• + Excellent natural skin texture and facial details
• + Better captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' feel requested

• − Failed to include the requested motion blur from passing cars
• − The rain texture looks a bit vertical and synthetic compared to the environment

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image is completely black and failed to render.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Excellent adherence to all prompt details including braided hair with beads, scars, and dirt.
• + Highly detailed textures on the ornate engraving, leather straps, and frayed cloth.
• + Strong cinematic atmosphere with realistic lighting and warm bokeh.

• − The 'bokeh sparks' requested look more like static blurred light orbs than dynamic sparks.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent presentation of the menu as a professional physical mockup
• + Very realistic and appetizing food photography for casual dining
• + Clean, high-quality typography and balanced white space

• − Several spelling errors like 'Pizzzans' and 'Appet Love'
• − The layout is a bit scattered and less organized than a standard grid

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Strict adherence to the requested grid layout
• + Clear logical separation of categories using colored lines
• + Good balance of text blocks alongside images

• − Text is highly garbled and includes many gibberish words
• − Food photography is slightly repetitive with similar basil garnishes on almost every dish
• − The flat design feel is less professional than Model A's mockup

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography with clean, legible font rendering
• + High-quality, appetizing burger textures and details
• + Good use of embers and fire to create a dark atmospheric background

• − Missed the 'starburst' request for the price tag
• − The burger is more of a 'tall stack' than a truly 'exploded' view where components are separated in all directions
• − Some small illegible AI-generated text artifacts at the very bottom

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfectly captures the 'exploded' concept with dynamic, floating ingredient placement
• + Correctly included the fiery starburst for the price as requested
• + Creative use of melting/dripping effects on the main title text

• − The 'LIMITED TIME ONLY' text is smaller and slightly harder to read due to spacing
• − Visual style is slightly more illustrative/CG than strictly photorealistic

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent realistic chalk texture with dusty smudges
• + Consistent thin handwriting style across the board
• + Accurate date and pricing formatting

• − Numerous spelling and repetition errors like 'mushroomm' and 'fresh fresh'
• − Illegible gibberish text in the second line of the first item
• − Failed to use elegant cursive for the title

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfect text rendering with no spelling errors
• + Beautiful slanted chalk handwriting that feels authentic
• + Stronger composition with realistic chalk dust and eraser marks

• − Omitted 'Herbs' from the second menu item
• − Line spacing is slightly crowded at the bottom

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent visual clarity and high-resolution details on the horse's mane and the planet below.
• + Cinematic composition with a very clear, wide-angle orbital perspective.
• + Clean rendering of the astronaut suit and background satellites.

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse, not the requested 'horse on top'.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Dynamic sense of movement with the gallop pose and nebula lighting.
• + Intricate detail on the astronaut's gloves and suit controls.
• + Vibrant color palette with the purple galaxy background.

• − Failed the negative constraint: the astronaut is riding the horse, not the requested 'horse on top'.
• − Lighting on the horse is slightly inconsistent with the space environment.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent texture on the capybara's fur.
• + Consistent lighting between the interior and the street lights.

• − Major logic failure placing the businesswoman in the front passenger seat instead of the back.
• − The capybara's body is awkwardly merged into the door frame.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfect adherence to the spatial requirements, placing the woman in the back seat.
• + Accurately depicts the capybara's paws on the steering wheel as requested.
• + Captures the 'bored' expression of the passenger very effectively.

• − The text on the taxi roof sign is nonsensical (gibberish).
• − The capybara's head shape is slightly narrower than a typical capybara, resembling a groundhog.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography style that matches the gothic theme
• + Very detailed frame made of thorns and branches
• + Clean layout and high resolution

• − Included redundant and misspelled text under the banner
• − Missed the word 'Party' in the main title
• − The jack-o-lantern is a bit small relative to the page

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfect text accuracy including all requested words and details
• + Highly detailed jack-o-lantern with realistic fire effects
• + Better use of the border elements like spiderwebs and thorns

• − The font choice for the main title is slightly more playful than vintage gothic
• − The composition feels a bit tight at the edges

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent adherence to the 'isometric' and 'diorama base' instructions
• + High level of detail in the miniature scene including varied sushi types and props
• + Clever integration of the text and flag into the background space

• − The text 'JAPAN' is slightly stylized which might not fit 'bold' as strictly as a sans-serif block
• − Includes a strange bug/insect detail on the board that wasn't requested

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Very clean and bold text rendering with a clear flag icon
• + High quality 3D rendering with soft, appealing textures
• + Good centering of the main object

• − Fails to create a 'diorama base', opting for a simple circular stand
• − Not a true 45° isometric perspective, feels more like a standard 3D character render
• − Lacks the 'miniature scene' complexity requested in the prompt

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent soft lighting and consistent artistic style
• + Deep, cohesive field of depth in the meadow
• + All four animals are clearly present and share a visually harmonious look

• − Stylized 'disney-fied' appearance rather than 'hyper-photorealistic'
• − The animals appear somewhat static and sitting rather than tumbling or chasing

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Captures the action of 'tumbling' and 'chasing' much more effectively
• + Includes specific lighting details like god rays and large dew sparkles
• + Realistic textures on the fox and kitten

• − The fox's eyes have unnatural, jagged pupils
• − The puppy's front paw is anatomically distorted
• − Floating water droplets look a bit like digital artifacts rather than natural dew

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent vector emblem style with balanced composition
• + High-quality professional typography
• + Great use of brown and cream tones

• − Spelling error in the main brand name ('Framlian' instead of 'Florian')
• − The 'Est. 1720' is not inside a banner as requested

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Perfect text rendering for both 'Caffè Florian' and 'Est. 1720'
• + Matches the 'minimalist' instruction better than the alternative
• + Successful implementation of the banner with correct text placement

• − The steam element is slightly less sophisticated in design
• − The cloche is a bit more generic than the detailed version in the other image

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent vector illustration style that feels modern and cohesive.
• + Follows the requested color palette perfectly with subtle gradients.
• + Successful layout of a curved horizon that provides a sense of scale.

• − The text is nonsensical gibberish instead of actual English.
• − The numbering and logical flow of the mission steps are confusing and incorrect.

Wan 2.5 (Preview)

• + Features actual legible text and correctly identifies the mission crew.
• + Logical flow of steps with clear visual connections between earth and moon.
• + Saturn V rocket illustration is very accurate and detailed for a flat style.

• − Iconography is slightly inconsistent, with the large moon at the top looking more realistic than vector.
• − The composition is a bit crowded, especially the labels for descent and landing.