FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra Black Forest Labs vs Vidu Q2 ShengShu Technology

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent photorealistic texture on the red book's leather and gold lettering.
• + Very clean glass materiality with realistic refraction and edge thickness.
• + Sophisticated soft lighting that feels natural for a window source.

• − The sphere is levitating unrealistically in the center of the cube.
• − The perspective of the table surface is slightly warped on the right side.

Vidu Q2

• + Natural placement of the blue sphere sitting on the bottom surface of the cube.
• + Dynamic shadow play from the fern-like plant across the table.
• + Strong adherence to the spatial requirements of the prompt.

• − The glass cube edges appear slightly distorted or doubled in some areas.
• − The red book looks a bit more generic or plastic-like compared to Model A.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent execution of long-exposure motion blur on passing vehicles.
• + Professional-grade cinematic composition and lighting.
• + High overall image clarity and realistic pavement reflections.

• − The subject appears to be just holding the bike rather than 'repairing' it.
• − Skin texture is slightly too smooth and clean for the prompt's 'natural' requirement.
• − The bicycle design is a bit generic and modern.

Vidu Q2

• + Perfectly captures the 'imperfect framing' and 'candid' street photography aesthetic.
• + Incredible detail in the hands, forearms, and bike mechanical parts.
• + Highly realistic weathered textures on both the red bicycle and the man's skin.

• − Failed to incorporate the requested motion blur from passing cars.
• − The rear of the bike features broken or floating chain segments.
• − The raining effect is very subtle, almost missing compared to Model A.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• − The image failed to load or is a solid black square, meaning it has zero prompt adherence or visual quality.

Vidu Q2

• + Excellent adherence to technical details like the hair braids with beads and the ornate engraving on the plate armor.
• + Beautiful lighting work with warm torchlight reflections and realistic bokeh sparks in the background.
• + High-quality texture work on the leather straps and the woven fabric of the underlayer.

• − The facial scars are a bit subtle given the 'battle-worn' description.
• − The skin appears slightly too clean for the requested 'dirt on the skin' prompt.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent professional layout that looks like a real marketing mockup.
• + Very clean typography and white space usage.
• + Food photos are high resolution and look appetizing and consistent.

• − Contains minor spelling errors like 'Pizzzans' and 'Appet Love'.
• − Section logic is slightly disjointed with text overlapping images.

Vidu Q2

• + Strong adherence to the grid layout requested in the prompt.
• + Includes all requested sections (Appetizers, Pizza, Mains) clearly labeled.
• + Vibrant accents were interpreted well through colorful underlining and borders.

• − Text is highly distorted and mostly illegible gibberish.
• − Image quality is lower with visible AI artifacts in the food photos.
• − The layout feels cluttered and less professional compared to the other model.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography and layout design suitable for a real advertisement.
• + Crisp, high-resolution food textures with realistic lighting on the bun and patties.
• + Great use of depth with floating embers and nuggets.

• − Missed the starburst element for the price.
• − The burger is more of a stack than an 'exploded' view where components are clearly separated by space.
• − Includes small hallucinatory text at the bottom corners.

Vidu Q2

• + Successfully included all requested elements including the starburst for the price.
• + Better interpretation of the 'exploded' motion with clear air gaps between all ingredients.
• + Dynamic fiery background fills the frame effectively.

• − Incorrect symbol for the price (used a hash/double bar instead of the Euro sign).
• − Lower overall image resolution and slightly soft textures compared to the competitor.
• − The text rendering is less polished with some artifacts around the edges of the letters.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + The handwriting style is very realistic and matches the 'chalk' texture requested.
• + The wooden frame and background bokeh enhance the 'cozy café' atmosphere.
• + Minimal spelling errors compared to the competitor, though some duplication occurs.

• − The text includes redundant lines and gibberish beneath the main items.
• − Failed to use 'elegant cursive' for the title as requested.
• − Spelling errors like 'Truffle mushroomm ris' and 'Ask's' are present.

Vidu Q2

• + Excellent chalk texture with realistic smudging and layered strokes.
• + Followed the instruction for the title to be in a more cursive/stylized script.
• + High visual appeal in terms of color variation and font 'weight'.

• − Severe spelling hallucinations throughout every single line (e.g., 'Octopd wpila', 'Browd Botter').
• − Changed the requested price for the first item from $24 to $34.
• − The text becomes almost entirely illegible at the bottom pf the board.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent photorealism and cinematic scale with a clear view of Earth's atmosphere
• + High detail in the astronaut's suit textures and the horse's anatomy
• + Superior lighting and composition that feels more 'cinematic' than 'digital art'

• − Failed the negative constraint entirely; the astronaut is riding the horse

Vidu Q2

• + Beautiful surreal color palette with nebula patterns on the horse's coat
• + Dynamic pose for both the horse and the astronaut
• + Detailed harness and space-suit design

• − Failed the negative constraint entirely; the astronaut is riding the horse
• − The anatomy where the astronaut's legs meet the horse is slightly messy

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent fur texture and lighting on the capybara.
• + Cinema-quality bokeh and atmosphere in the background.

• − Fundamental failure of spatial composition with the passenger appearing to sit in the front/middle next to the driver.
• − The passenger is also holding a steering wheel, which contradicts the prompt.

Vidu Q2

• + Perfect adherence to spatial instructions with the passenger clearly in the back seat.
• + Accurate depiction of the capybara's paws on the steering wheel.
• + Clear, high-quality rendered interior and city background.

• − The passenger's expression is slightly more vacant than 'bored.'
• − The capybara's paws look a bit like a mix between human hands and paws.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography rendering with almost perfect spelling
• + High-quality cinematic lighting with a professional digital illustration style
• + Sophisticated layout that uses the scroll and thorn border effectively

• − Missed the word 'Party' in the main title
• − Generated an extra line of redundant, garbled text below the banner

Vidu Q2

• + Strong 'vintage' texture on the parchment paper
• + Includes both webs and thorns as requested in the border

• − Significant spelling errors throughout all text elements
• − The date and time were hallucinated incorrectly (30.70.2025)
• − The composition feels less balanced and more cluttered

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography with a stylish, curved 'JAPAN' text
• + Superior lighting and refined textures that give a professional 3D render feel
• + Includes subtle details like steam and varied sushi types that enhance the scene

• − The text is a bit light in color, making it slightly less legible against the background
• − Includes an odd ladybug-like artifact on the wooden board

Vidu Q2

• + Bold, highly legible text that perfectly follows the prompt's layout
• + Clear interpretation of the 'raised diorama base' and flag icon
• + Vibrant colors that pop against the blue background

• − Texture quality is a bit generic and waxy compared to a realistic PBR look
• − Text rendering on the 'J' and 'N' has minor aliasing artifacts

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Exquisite rendering of soft backlight and golden rays.
• + Beautiful, consistent art style with very clean fur textures.
• + Captures the 'big expressive eyes' and 'wholesome vibe' perfectly.

• − The animals look very similar in style, almost like plush toys rather than distinct hyper-photorealistic species.
• − The animals are mostly sitting still rather than 'tumbling' as requested.

Vidu Q2

• + Captures the action and movement of 'tumbling' and 'chasing' much better.
• + Shows a more distinct variety of animal species and markings.
• + More accurate representation of a 'lush wildflower meadow' with a wider view.

• − Anatomy errors including a second golden retriever puppy that wasn't requested.
• − Noticeable artifacts around the butterflies and cluttered background elements.
• − The fox and kitten have slightly distorted facial features.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Strong composition with a balanced circular emblem
• + Excellent color palette and vintage texture
• + Clear and professional typography

• − Misspelled the name as 'Framilian' instead of 'Florian'

Vidu Q2

• + Matches the warm brown and cream tones well
• + Included the cloche dome design as requested

• − Severe text rendering issues with multiple misspellings and redundant text
• − The 'Esttt' typo is distracting
• − Low visual clarity and poor vector style execution compared to the other model

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

• + Excellent typography and layout for a professional poster.
• + Includes the requested 6 steps with clear, distinct icons.
• + Perfectly adheres to the NASA-inspired color palette and flat-vector style.

• − Nonsense filler text throughout the infographic.
• − The order of the steps on the visual timeline is confusing and non-linear.

Vidu Q2

• + Clean, simple vector icons for the lunar module.
• + Follows the light gray and white color palette well.

• − Severe spelling errors even on main titles (e.g., 'ALFONCH').
• − Poor layout with icons and text overlapping.
• − Missing several specific steps requested in the prompt.